Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Reading the spectrum: n, j and hydrogen-like uranium

The exact Dirac–Coulomb energy is one line, and this topic teaches you to read it: which states it forces together, why Unit 6's three corrections had to add up to a function of j alone, and what it predicts at Zα = 0.671, where the order-α⁴ formula misses uranium's 1s binding by 4 keV.

UAQM-07.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Reading the spectrum: n, j and hydrogen-like uraniumEach bar shows how much more tightly a level of a hydrogen-like ion is bound than Bohr's (Zα)²mc²/2n², as a percentage of that Bohr binding, hanging down because more binding means lower energy. Filled: the exact Dirac–Coulomb value. Open: the (Zα)² series of that excess cut after 1 term(s), the first being Unit 6's order-α⁴ correction. The middle pair of bars is two states, 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂. Now Z = 92 and Zα = 0.671.Bohr20%40%Z = 92, Zα = 0.671% beyond Bohr bindingopen: series to (Zα)⁴, filled: exact1s₁/₂2S₁/₂ = 2P₁/₂2P₃/₂
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

κ enters only as κ²: levels pair up exactly, and uranium shows how far α⁴ falls short.

The key idea

In the Dirac–Coulomb spectrum a level is fixed by n and j alone: the two states of one shell with the same j, whose orbital labels are l = j ± ½ and whose parities are opposite, have exactly the same energy, and only the top level j = n − ½ is unpaired.

Example. In hydrogen-like uranium, Zα = 0.671, 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ are both bound by 34.22 keV and 2P₃/₂ by 29.65 keV: a 4.57 keV doublet where Unit 6's order-α⁴ formula predicts 3.24 keV.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Topic 7.06 ended with E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(nᵣ + γ)²](−1/2), γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²), and the spectrum can be read straight off it. κ appears only squared, inside γ, and the radial count nᵣ = n − |κ| needs only its size, so the two states κ and −κ of one shell share an energy exactly, at every Z the point-nucleus theory allows: 2S₁/₂ with 2P₁/₂, 3P₃/₂ with 3D₃/₂. Only the top level j = n − ½, which needs nᵣ = 0 and so exists only for negative κ, stands alone. The partners are not one state written twice: they have opposite parity, swapped orbital labels and different radial functions, so neither J nor parity forces the coincidence; it belongs to the 1/r potential. Unit 6's kinetic, spin–orbit and Darwin corrections each depend on l, yet had to sum to a function of j alone, because together they are the (Zα)⁴ term of this one formula. Hydrogen cannot tell the exact formula from that first term. Hydrogen-like uranium can: its exact 1s binding is 132.3 keV, against 128.1 keV through order α⁴ and 115.2 keV from Bohr, and its 2P doublet is 4.57 keV against 3.24 keV. The model stops where the potential stops being a point charge's 1/r and the electron stops being alone with it: nuclear size and the radiative corrections leave U⁹¹⁺'s ground state, measured, about 0.46 keV less bound, and the same physics splits every κ, −κ pair, hydrogen's Lamb shift among them.

1κ enters only as κ²: the pairs, exactly

Work in SI units, with α = e²/4πε₀ħc = 1/137.036 and mc² = 510.999 keV; where four-vectors appear the metric is (+, −, −, −), though nothing in this topic needs one. Topic 7.06's termination condition gave E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(nᵣ + γ)²](−1/2) with γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²). Look at where κ enters: inside γ as κ², and in n = nᵣ + |κ| through its size. Reverse the sign of κ at fixed nᵣ and nothing in the formula changes, so the states κ and −κ of one shell are degenerate, and since nothing was expanded the statement holds to all orders in Zα. With this course's convention the pair is l = j − ½, negative κ, and l = j + ½, positive κ: 2S₁/₂ with 2P₁/₂, 3S₁/₂ with 3P₁/₂, 3P₃/₂ with 3D₃/₂. The exception is the top level j = n − ½, which needs nᵣ = 0, and nᵣ = 0 terminates only for negative κ, so 1s₁/₂, 2P₃/₂ and 3D₅/₂ stand alone. Bohr's degeneracy is lifted only part of the way: the 18 states of n = 3 fall into three levels holding 4, 8 and 6 states, not five.

2Same energy, different spinors

The partners are not one state written twice. 2S₁/₂ has an s-wave upper component and a p-wave lower one, 2P₁/₂ the reverse; they have opposite parity and opposite eigenvalues of K, and topic 7.04's radial equations differ between them through the ∓κ/r terms. Near the origin both G and F go as rγ. Put that into dG/dr = −(κ/r)G + (E + mc² − V)F/ħc, where −V = Zαħc/r dominates, and γ = −κ + Zα F/G, so F/G = (κ + γ)/(Zα). For κ = −1 that is −(1 − γ)/(Zα) = −0.0036 in hydrogen; for κ = +1 it is (1 + γ)/(Zα) = 274. Close to the nucleus a 2P₁/₂ electron is almost all ‘small’ component, an s-wave. In uranium the two ratios are −0.386 and 2.59. So no rotation or reflection forces the coincidence: it is dynamical, a property of 1/r like Bohr's l-degeneracy, and an operator found by Johnson and Lippmann in 1950, a Dirac cousin of the Runge–Lenz vector, commutes with H and carries κ into −κ (quoted). Any departure from a point charge's 1/r splits the pair.

3Unit 6's three terms are the first term of this

Expand the exact energy in (Zα)² and it gives Bohr's −mc²(Zα)²/2n² and then −mc²(Zα)⁴(n/(j + ½) − ¾)/2n⁴, the order-α⁴ formula Quantum Mechanics II quoted and Unit 6 assembled from three Foldy–Wouthuysen terms. Each of those terms depends on l; their sum cannot, because the exact answer does not. Check it for n = 2 in units of mc²(Zα)⁴. For 2S₁/₂ the kinetic term gives −13/128 and the Darwin term +8/128, and spin–orbit is zero at l = 0. For 2P₁/₂ the kinetic term gives −7/384 and spin–orbit −8/384, and the Darwin term, a contact term, is zero. Both sum to −5/128: the Darwin term supplies at l = 0 exactly what spin–orbit cannot. For 2P₃/₂, −7/384 + 4/384 = −1/128, so the doublet is mc²(Zα)⁴/32, which in hydrogen is 4.53 × 10⁻⁵ eV or 10.95 GHz, against 10.969 GHz measured. The 0.2% left over is mostly the electron's anomalous magnetic moment, quoted, which the Dirac equation does not contain.

4Uranium's ground state: where α⁴ runs out

Hydrogen cannot tell the exact formula from its first correction: the next term, mc²α⁶/16, is 4.8 × 10⁻⁹ eV. Hydrogen-like uranium can. With Z = 92, Zα = 0.6714, (Zα)² = 0.4507 and γ₁ = √(1 − (Zα)²) = 0.7411, the exact 1s energy is mc²γ₁, a binding of mc²(1 − γ₁) = 132.28 keV. Bohr's (Zα)²mc²/2 gives 115.16 keV, and adding Unit 6's (Zα)⁴mc²/8 = 12.98 keV gives 128.13 keV, still 4.15 keV short. The (Zα)⁶ term supplies 2.92 keV of that and the (Zα)⁸ term 0.82 keV: the series converges, but slowly, and Unit 6's term carries only 76% of the 17.12 keV relativistic correction. The checks hold. The binding is mc² times a pure number, so the dimensions are right; as Z → 0, mc²(1 − √(1 − (Zα)²)) → (Zα)²mc²/2, Bohr's value; and only at Zα = 1 does the binding reach mc², where topic 7.09 takes over.

5Uranium's n = 2 shell: a doublet 41% wider

For n = 2 the formula collapses into closed forms. The j = ½ pair has nᵣ = 1 and γ₁, and (1 + γ₁)² + (Zα)² = 2(1 + γ₁), so E = mc²√((1 + γ₁)/2) for both 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂, a binding of 34.22 keV in uranium. 2P₃/₂ has nᵣ = 0 and γ₂ = √(4 − (Zα)²) = 1.8840, so E = mc²γ₂/2 = mc²√(1 − (Zα)²/4), a binding of 29.65 keV. Bohr puts all eight n = 2 states at 28.79 keV. The doublet is 4.57 keV, against Unit 6's mc²(Zα)⁴/32 = 3.24 keV. Expanding both closed forms one order further gives the splitting as mc²[(Zα)⁴/32 + 5(Zα)⁶/256 + …], so the exact splitting exceeds the α⁴ value by about (5/8)(Zα)² at first, and by more as Zα grows: 2% in iron, 10% by Z = 53, and 41% in uranium, where (5/8)(Zα)² alone gives 28%. The quantum defect δ = (Zα)²/(|κ| + γ) shows why the shift is lopsided. It is 0.259 for j = ½ and 0.116 for j = 3/2, so the j = ½ pair, whose spinors reach the nucleus as r(γ₁ − 1), is pulled 18.8% beyond Bohr while 2P₃/₂ moves only 3.0%.

6What the measurement says, and what it leaves out

X-ray measurements on U⁹¹⁺ in the ESR storage ring at GSI found the ground state 460 ± 5 eV less bound than the point-nucleus Dirac value (Gumberidze and co-workers, 2005, quoted). Theory accounts for it in two comparable pieces, both quoted. The nucleus's finite size, with a 5.86 fm rms charge radius, takes about 0.20 keV, because a 1s density that grows toward the nucleus as r(2γ₁ − 2) feels the flattened potential inside it. The radiative corrections take about 0.27 keV: the self-energy raises the level by about 0.36 keV and vacuum polarisation lowers it by about 0.09 keV. So the measured binding is about 131.82 keV. The exact point-nucleus value is right to 0.35%, while the α⁴ formula is 2.8% short and Bohr 12.6%. Both pieces lie outside the Dirac–Coulomb Hamiltonian: the finite nucleus and vacuum polarisation change the point charge's 1/r potential, and the self-energy couples the electron to the quantised radiation field. So they also split every κ, −κ pair. In hydrogen the same physics separates 2S₁/₂ from 2P₁/₂ by the measured 1057.8 MHz Lamb shift, which Unit 13 computes; the Dirac formula predicts zero there at every order.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Exact energy, read through κ²

E(n, κ) = mc² [1 + (Zα)²/(n − |κ| + √(κ² − (Zα)²))²](−1/2)

κ enters only as κ² and |κ|, so κ and −κ at one n give the same E with nothing expanded: the all-orders degeneracy in one line. As Z → 0, E − mc² → −(Zα)²mc²/2n², Bohr's level.

E in J, mc² = 510.999 keV; Zα dimensionless; n = nᵣ + |κ| with |κ| = j + ½; derived in topic 7.06 and used here

Relativistic quantum defect

E = mc² [1 + (Zα)²/(n − δ)²](−1/2), with δ = |κ| − γ = (Zα)²/(|κ| + γ)

Derived here. δ shrinks as j grows, so within a shell larger j lies higher: in uranium the n = 2, j = ½ pair is bound 18.8% beyond Bohr, 2P₃/₂ only 3.0%.

δ dimensionless; γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²); hydrogen: δ ≈ α²/(2j + 1); uranium: δ = 0.259 for j = ½, 0.116 for j = 3/2

Top level of a shell, κ = −n

E = mc² √(1 − (Zα/n)²)

Derived here from γ² + (Zα)² = n². Uranium: 1s bound by 132.28 keV, 2P₃/₂ by 29.65 keV. Real only for Zα < n, so of these levels 1s fails first, at Zα = 1.

j = n − ½ and nᵣ = 0; n = 1 gives 1s₁/₂, n = 2 gives 2P₃/₂, n = 3 gives 3D₅/₂; E in J

The n = 2, j = ½ pair

E(2S₁/₂) = E(2P₁/₂) = mc² √((1 + γ₁)/2), with γ₁ = √(1 − (Zα)²)

Derived here. Uranium: γ₁ = 0.7411, so both states are bound by 34.22 keV. One expression for two states of opposite parity is the degeneracy made explicit.

nᵣ = 1 with κ = −1 or +1; (1 + γ₁)² + (Zα)² = 2(1 + γ₁) collapses the bracket; E in J

1s binding as a series in (Zα)²

B(1s) = mc² [(Zα)²/2 + (Zα)⁴/8 + (Zα)⁶/16 + 5(Zα)⁸/128 + …]

Derived by expanding mc²(1 − γ₁). In uranium Unit 6's term recovers only 76% of the 17.12 keV relativistic correction; in hydrogen the (Zα)⁶ term is 4.8 × 10⁻⁹ eV.

B = mc² − E in J; Bohr's term, then Unit 6's, then higher orders; uranium: 115.16, 12.98, 2.92 and 0.82 keV

2P doublet as a series in (Zα)²

E(2P₃/₂) − E(2P₁/₂) = mc² [(Zα)⁴/32 + 5(Zα)⁶/256 + 53(Zα)⁸/4096 + …]

Derived by expanding the two closed forms above. In uranium the exact 4.57 keV is 1.41 times the first term's 3.24 keV, and from Z = 53 upward the exact splitting exceeds the α⁴ value by 10% or more.

in J; the first term is Unit 6's splitting, 4.53 × 10⁻⁵ eV or 10.95 GHz in hydrogen; exact ÷ first term = 1 + (5/8)(Zα)² + …
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

92
1 to 118; steps of 1.
1
1 to 4; steps of 1.

Try this. Set Z = 92 with one term: the open bars are Unit 6's order-α⁴ values, and the 1s bar stops at 11.3% against the exact 14.9%. Add terms and it climbs to 14.7%. The doublet is the height gap between the two filled n = 2 bars, 15.9% of Bohr's n = 2 binding at Z = 92. Drop to Z = 20 and one term already matches.

Live results

1s BINDING, EXACT
132.28 keV
1s BINDING, SERIES
128.13 keV
2P DOUBLET, EXACT
4.566 keV
2P DOUBLET, SERIES
3.244 keV

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelEach bar shows how much more tightly a level of a hydrogen-like ion is bound than Bohr's (Zα)²mc²/2n², as a percentage of that Bohr binding, hanging down because more binding means lower energy. Filled: the exact Dirac–Coulomb value. Open: the (Zα)² series of that excess cut after 1 term(s), the first being Unit 6's order-α⁴ correction. The middle pair of bars is two states, 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂. Now Z = 92 and Zα = 0.671.Bohr20%40%Z = 92, Zα = 0.671% beyond Bohr bindingopen: series to (Zα)⁴, filled: exact1s₁/₂2S₁/₂ = 2P₁/₂2P₃/₂
Each bar shows how much more tightly a level of a hydrogen-like ion is bound than Bohr's (Zα)²mc²/2n², as a percentage of that Bohr binding, hanging down because more binding means lower energy. Filled: the exact Dirac–Coulomb value. Open: the (Zα)² series of that excess cut after 1 term(s), the first being Unit 6's order-α⁴ correction. The middle pair of bars is two states, 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂. Now Z = 92 and Zα = 0.671.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Nuclear charge Z: 92; Series terms kept: 1

Baseline 92; choose 1 to 118, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting reading is that 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide only because Unit 6 stopped at (Zα)⁴, so that a better relativistic calculation, or an ion heavy enough to need one, would split them, and that this splitting is the Lamb shift. The exact formula rules it out. E depends on κ only through κ², so the pair is level at Zα = 0.671 just as at Zα = 0.0073: in uranium the full 4.57 keV doublet opens while 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ stay together. The opposite error is as common. Because the two states share j, the degeneracy is credited to rotational symmetry and expected in any central potential. It is not: the states differ in parity and in κ, and a finite nucleus or a screened potential splits them at once. The degeneracy is exact for 1/r and only for 1/r, so the Lamb shift measures physics outside the Dirac–Coulomb Hamiltonian, not higher orders inside it.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

List the n = 3 states of a hydrogen-like ion with their κ, nᵣ, the orbital labels (l, l′) of the upper and lower components, and parity. Group them into distinct Dirac–Coulomb energies with the number of states in each, and evaluate the binding of the one level with no partner for uranium, Z = 92.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Hydrogen-like gold, Au⁷⁸⁺ with Z = 79, emits a Lyman-α doublet: Ly-α₁ from 2P₃/₂ → 1s₁/₂ and Ly-α₂ from 2P₁/₂ → 1s₁/₂. Use the exact point-nucleus Dirac energies to find both photon energies and their splitting, and compare the splitting with Unit 6's order-α⁴ value.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Unit 6's order-α⁴ formula gives the 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ splitting as mc²(Zα)⁴/32. Expand the exact n = 2 energies one order further, use the result to estimate the lowest Z at which the exact splitting exceeds the α⁴ value by 10%, and test the estimate against the exact energies.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

In the point-nucleus Dirac–Coulomb model of hydrogen-like uranium, Zα = 0.671, where the (Zα)² series converges slowly, how do the energies of 3P₃/₂ (κ = −2) and 3D₃/₂ (κ = +2) compare?
7

Review & continue

In the Dirac–Coulomb spectrum a level is fixed by n and j alone: the two states of one shell with the same j, whose orbital labels are l = j ± ½ and whose parities are opposite, have exactly the same energy, and only the top level j = n − ½ is unpaired.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.