
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Spin from the equation: J = L + (ħ/2)Σ is conserved
Nobody wrote spin into Dirac's equation, and this is the topic where you catch the equation supplying it. Two commutators with the free Hamiltonian show orbital angular momentum leaking, a matrix built from the alphas leaking back along the same operator, and a conserved sum that fixes the spin at one-half.
UAQM-04.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
The free Dirac Hamiltonian conserves neither L nor Σ, only their sum with ħ/2.
The key idea
For a free Dirac particle neither the orbital angular momentum L nor the matrix spin (ħ/2)Σ commutes with the Hamiltonian, but J = L + (ħ/2)Σ does, and (ħ/2)Σ has eigenvalues ±ħ/2 on every axis: the equation itself describes spin one-half.
Example. An electron of total energy 5mc² (kinetic energy 2.04 MeV) in a state of sharp Jz = +ħ/2 whose momenta lie on a 30° cone about z has ⟨Sz⟩ = 0.40ħ and ⟨Lz⟩ = 0.10ħ: the parts depend on E and the cone, the sum 5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s does not.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Dirac built his equation to be first order with a positive density; nothing in his requirements mentions spin. Yet commute the free Hamiltonian H = cα⋅p + βmc² with the orbital angular momentum and L is not conserved: dL/dt = cα × p, because the velocity operator cα is not parallel to p, although no torque acts. The cure is already inside the algebra. The matrix Σₖ = −(i/2)εₖᵢⱼαᵢαⱼ, built from the same anticommuting alphas and equal to diag(σ, σ) in the Dirac representation, leaks along the same operator α × p with the opposite sign, so J = L + (ħ/2)Σ commutes with H, and ħ/2 is the only coefficient that does. Because (ħ/2)Σ obeys the angular-momentum algebra with S² = (3/4)ħ², the equation has assigned spin one-half without being asked. What brings it is linearisation, a first-order square root of p², not relativity: the relativistic Klein-Gordon equation is spinless, and a Galilean first-order equation has spin. The model stops at three borders. The argument is for the free particle, though a central potential leaves J conserved; that J generates rotations of ψ is assumed until Unit 5; and for positive-energy states the leak shows only as unsharp Sz and Lz, while the oscillating cross terms between +E and −E wait for Unit 8.
1Orbital angular momentum leaks without a torque
SI units throughout, with the metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1) wherever a four-vector appears. Take H = cα⋅p + βmc² and Lᵢ = εᵢⱼₖxⱼpₖ. The mass term commutes with L, because β acts on the four components and L acts on position. In the kinetic term only [pₗ, xⱼ] = −iħδₗⱼ survives, so [H, Lᵢ] = −iħc εᵢⱼₖαⱼpₖ, which is [H, L] = −iħc α × p, derived. Dimensions: ħc α × p is J s × m s⁻¹ × kg m s⁻¹ = J × J s, as [H, L] must be. The Heisenberg equation turns it into dL/dt = cα × p, and since dr/dt = (i/ħ)[H, r] = cα this is just velocity × momentum. No torque acts; the velocity operator is simply not parallel to p, for each component of cα has eigenvalues ±c. Contrast the Schrödinger particle, whose velocity p/m is parallel to p, and the Klein-Gordon one, which meets p only through p²: both conserve L. The leak belongs to the first-order equation.
2A spin matrix hidden in Dirac's algebra
Dirac's requirements fixed only αᵢαⱼ + αⱼαᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ, αᵢβ + βαᵢ = 0 and β² = 1. From these alone, (αₓαy)² = −αₓαₓαyαy = −1, so Σz = −iαₓαy squares to 1. It is Hermitian, since (−iαₓαy)† = iαyαₓ = −iαₓαy, and traceless, since Tr(αₓαy) = Tr(αyαₓ) = −Tr(αₓαy). Cycling gives Σₓ = −iαyαz and Σy = −iαzαₓ, compactly Σₖ = −(i/2)εₖᵢⱼαᵢαⱼ, and moving αz through two factors gives [Σₓ, Σy] = 2iΣz. In the Dirac representation αₓαy = diag(iσz, iσz), so Σ = diag(σ, σ), the Pauli matrices in both diagonal blocks; in the Weyl representation, where α = diag(−σ, σ), the same product gives the same Σ. Nothing here used relativity or a representation: any set of matrices obeying Dirac's algebra carries this Σ with it, derived.
3The second leak cancels the first
The commutators of Σz follow from the algebra too. β and αz each anticommute with both factors of αₓαy, so they commute with Σz. αₓ commutes with its own factor and anticommutes with αy, which gives αₓΣz − Σzαₓ = −2iαy, and likewise αyΣz − Σzαy = 2iαₓ. Hence [H, Σz] = 2ic(αₓpy − αypₓ) = 2ic(α × p)z, and cycling gives [H, Σ] = 2ic α × p, derived. It is the operator of the L leak with the opposite sign, so [H, L + λΣ] = ic(2λ − ħ) α × p, which vanishes for every momentum only at λ = ħ/2: J = L + (ħ/2)Σ commutes with H. Checks: (ħ/2)Σ carries J s, like r × p; at p = 0 both leaks vanish; for a plane wave along z, (α × p)z = 0, so Lz and Σz each commute with H there. In general the one spin component that survives alone is Σ⋅p, since (α × p)⋅p = 0, and topic 4.08 builds its label on it. That J generates rotations of ψ is assumed here and proved in Unit 5.
4Spin one-half is an output of linearisation
Set S = (ħ/2)Σ. The algebra of Σ gives [Sᵢ, Sⱼ] = iħεᵢⱼₖSₖ and S² = (ħ²/4)(Σₓ² + Σy² + Σz²) = (3/4)ħ² = s(s + 1)ħ² with s = 1/2. Distinct Σₖ anticommute, since ΣₓΣy = αₓαy = −ΣyΣₓ; hence for any unit vector n̂, (n̂⋅Σ)² = 1 with zero trace, so the spin along every axis is ±ħ/2 = ±5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s, each value twice among the four components. In Quantum Mechanics I spin was attached by hand: a two-component factor multiplied the Schrödinger wave function, S and L were separately conserved for a free particle, and J = L + S added two conserved things. Here neither part is conserved and the coefficient ħ/2 is forced. Relativity is not the source, for the Klein-Gordon equation is relativistic and spinless. Lévy-Leblond's Galilean first-order equation of 1967, named and quoted here, needs σ matrices too and even gives g = 2. The source is the first-order square root of p², which needs anticommuting matrices, as (σ⋅p)² = p² shows. Measured: Stern and Gerlach's silver beam splits in two, and the sodium D lines at 589.0 and 589.6 nm form a doublet: both count two spin states, as s = 1/2 requires.
5What the leak looks like at positive energy
Non-conservation does not make a free electron's spin precess as it flies. Take the 4.06 spinors u = N(ξ, cσ⋅p ξ/(E + mc²)) and a second spinor u′ at the same momentum with upper part ξ′. The cross terms give u′†αᵢu = N²c ξ′†(σᵢσ⋅p + σ⋅p σᵢ)ξ/(E + mc²) = 2N²cpᵢ ξ′†ξ/(E + mc²), while u′†u = 2N²E ξ′†ξ/(E + mc²). So at one momentum and positive energy, α acts as pc/E, the group velocity over c, and ⟨α × p⟩ = 0 in any packet built only from positive-energy spinors: ⟨L⟩ and ⟨Σ⟩ are each constant, derived. The operator statement [H, L] ≠ 0 lives in the matrix elements that join +E to −E; those oscillate at 2E/ħ, never slower than 2mc²/ħ = 1.55 × 10²¹ rad s⁻¹, the zitterbewegung that Unit 8 interprets. At positive energy alone the leak shows as unsharpness: a state of sharp E and sharp Jz generally has neither Sz nor Lz sharp.
6How the conserved ħ/2 is shared
Superpose u(p, ↑) over a cone of half-angle θ about z, with equal weight at every azimuth φ and one energy E. The lower components are κσ⋅p̂↑ = κ(cos θ ↑ + sin θ e(iφ) ↓), with κ = pc/(E + mc²) and κ² = (E − mc²)/(E + mc²). Summed over φ, the e(iφ)↓ piece carries mₗ = 1 with mₛ = −1/2 and everything else mₗ = 0 with mₛ = +1/2, so Jz = +ħ/2 and E are both sharp. The weights, normalised by 1 + κ², give ⟨Sz⟩ = (ħ/2)(1 + κ² cos 2θ)/(1 + κ²) = (ħ/2)[1 − (1 − mc²/E)sin²θ], derived, and ⟨Lz⟩ = ħ/2 − ⟨Sz⟩. At E = 2mc², where v = 0.866c, and θ = 30°, that is 0.4375ħ of spin and 0.0625ħ of orbit. The fraction is dimensionless, as it must be. Limits: E → mc² returns all of ħ/2 to spin, the Pauli result; θ → 0 does too, since p then lies along z; E ≫ mc² leaves (ħ/2)cos²θ, the massless form in which spin points only along ±p̂.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Orbital angular momentum leaks
[H, L] = −iħc α × p
Derived. With dr/dt = cα it gives dL/dt = cα × p: no torque acts, but the velocity operator cα is not parallel to the momentum.
H = cα⋅p + βmc² in J; L = r × p in J s; p in kg m s⁻¹; c in m s⁻¹; α and β dimensionless 4 × 4 matricesA spin matrix built from the alphas
Σₖ = −(i/2) εₖᵢⱼ αᵢ αⱼ, for example Σz = −i αₓ αy
Derived from αᵢαⱼ + αⱼαᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ alone, so every representation carries it: Σₖ² = 1, Tr Σₖ = 0 and [Σₓ, Σy] = 2iΣz.
Dimensionless 4 × 4; equals diag(σ, σ), σ in both diagonal blocks, in the Dirac and the Weyl representationsSpin leaks back
[H, Σ] = 2ic α × p
Derived. The same operator α × p as in the L commutator with the opposite sign: the two leaks are built to cancel.
c in m s⁻¹, p in kg m s⁻¹, Σ dimensionless; β and the parallel alpha commute with each Σₖ, so two terms surviveConserved total angular momentum
J = L + (ħ/2)Σ, with [H, J] = 0
Derived for the free H, and kept when a central V(r) is added, since V(r) commutes with L and with Σ. At p = 0 L and Σ are conserved separately; for p ≠ 0 only Σ⋅p survives alone.
J in J s; ħ/2 = 5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s is the only λ that makes [H, L + λΣ] = ic(2λ − ħ) α × p vanishSpin one-half from the algebra
S = (ħ/2)Σ obeys [Sᵢ, Sⱼ] = iħ εᵢⱼₖ Sₖ
Derived: the equation fixes the spin, nothing is attached by hand. Measured: Stern and Gerlach split silver in two, and alkali lines come as doublets.
S in J s; S² = (3/4)ħ² = s(s + 1)ħ² gives s = 1/2; Sz = ±ħ/2, each value twice among four componentsSpin and orbital shares of a sharp Jz = +ħ/2
⟨Sz⟩ = (ħ/2)[1 − (1 − mc²/E) sin²θ]
Derived from the 4.06 spinors. E → mc² gives all spin, the Pauli limit, and so does θ → 0, where p lies along z; E ≫ mc² leaves (ħ/2)cos²θ.
E total energy, mc² = 0.511 MeV; θ the cone half-angle of the momenta about z; ⟨Lz⟩ = ħ/2 − ⟨Sz⟩Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set θ = 90° and raise E from mc² to 5mc²: the spin share falls as mc²/E, down to 0.2, while the bar keeps its height ħ/2. Then slide θ to 0°: the dot moves to the left edge, where every curve meets the Pauli value 1 and the bar is all spin, because with p along z the operator (α × p)z vanishes.
Live results
- SPIN ⟨Sz⟩
- 0.313 ħ
- ORBITAL ⟨Lz⟩
- 0.187 ħ
- SPEED v/c
- 0.866
- KINETIC ENERGY
- 0.51 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Total energy E / mc²: 2.0; Cone half-angle θ: 60 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting reasoning is that a free particle feels no torque, so L and S must be conserved separately, as they are for a Schrödinger–Pauli particle, and that J = L + S becomes necessary only when a potential adds spin-orbit coupling. The free Dirac Hamiltonian already couples them: cα⋅p puts σ⋅p into the off-diagonal blocks, so an upper spin-up component drags in lower components in which part of the spin is flipped and the orbital angular momentum raised by ħ to compensate. The opposite over-correction is just as wrong: [H, L] ≠ 0 does not mean a moving electron's spin precesses or trades with its orbit as it flies. In any positive-energy state ⟨L⟩ and ⟨Σ⟩ stay constant. What the commutator removes is the guarantee that Sz and Lz are sharp: a state of sharp E and sharp Jz = ħ/2 generally divides ħ/2 between spin and orbit by an amount fixed by E and the directions of the momenta, and both parts are sharp only in the limits the cone formula names, at rest or with every momentum along the z axis.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Suppose you did not know the electron's spin and tried J = L + λΣ as the conserved angular momentum of the free Dirac Hamiltonian. Using [H, L] = −iħc α × p and [H, Σ] = 2ic α × p, find λ in J s and the eigenvalues of λΣz.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Add the two commutators: [H, L + λΣ] = −iħc α × p + 2iλc α × p = ic(2λ − ħ) α × p.
- α × p is not the zero operator: on a plane wave with p = p x̂ its z component is −pαy, and αy² = 1 gives it eigenvalues ±p. So the bracket must vanish, and λ = ħ/2.
- Numerically λ = (1.0546 × 10⁻³⁴ J s)/2 = 5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s. Dimensions: Σ is a pure matrix and λΣ is added to r × p, whose unit is m × kg m s⁻¹ = J s, so λ must be in J s.
- Σz² = 1 and Tr Σz = 0 in four dimensions, so its eigenvalues are +1, +1, −1, −1 and λΣz = ±5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s, each twice. Limit check: at p = 0 every λ commutes with H, so only moving states fix the coefficient.
Answer. λ = ħ/2 = 5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s, so Sz = ±5.27 × 10⁻³⁵ J s, each value twice among the four components: spin one-half, fixed by the equation.
MediumExample 2
An electron with kinetic energy 1.00 MeV moves along +x in the spinor u(p, ↑) of topic 4.06, whose upper components are ↑ along z. Find ⟨Σz⟩ and ⟨cαₓ⟩, and show that the expectation of dLz/dt = c(α × p)z vanishes although [H, Lz] does not. Take mc² = 0.511 MeV.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- E = 1.000 + 0.511 = 1.511 MeV and pc = √(1.511² − 0.511²) MeV = 1.422 MeV.
- Lower components: cσ⋅p ↑/(E + mc²) = κσₓ↑ = κ↓ with κ = 1.422/2.022 = 0.7033. Check: κ² = 0.4946 equals (E − mc²)/(E + mc²) = 1.000/2.022.
- Σz is +1 on the upper ↑ and −1 on the lower ↓, so ⟨Σz⟩ = (1 − κ²)/(1 + κ²) = 0.5054/1.4946 = 0.338, which is mc²/E = 0.511/1.511. So u(p, ↑) is not an eigenvector of Σz: the label ↑ names the rest-frame spin, not a conserved one.
- u†αₓu/u†u = 2κ/(1 + κ²) = 1.4066/1.4946 = 0.941 = pc/E, so ⟨cαₓ⟩ = 0.941c, the group velocity. For αy the cross terms give κ ξ†(σyσₓ + σₓσy)ξ = 0, so ⟨αy⟩ = 0.
- Here (α × p)z = αₓpy − αypₓ = −pαy, so ⟨dLz/dt⟩ = −cp⟨αy⟩ = 0. On this stationary state the commutator shows up as the unsharp ⟨Σz⟩ = 0.338, not as a drift.
Answer. ⟨Σz⟩ = mc²/E = 0.338, so ⟨Sz⟩ = 0.169ħ = 1.78 × 10⁻³⁵ J s; ⟨cαₓ⟩ = 0.941c; ⟨αy⟩ = 0, so ⟨dLz/dt⟩ = 0.
HardExample 3
A 300 keV electron microscope forms a beam of sharp Jz = +ħ/2 from u(p, ↑) plane waves on a cone of half-angle θ about z. (a) Find ⟨Lz⟩ and ⟨Sz⟩ at θ = 10.0 mrad. (b) What θ would put 1.00% of Jz into orbital form? (c) Could a faster beam reach 1.00% at θ = 10.0 mrad? Take mc² = 0.511 MeV.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Use the cone result derived above: the orbital fraction of Jz is Δ = (1 − mc²/E)sin²θ, with ⟨Lz⟩ = (ħ/2)Δ and ⟨Sz⟩ = (ħ/2)(1 − Δ). Here E = 0.300 + 0.511 = 0.811 MeV, so 1 − mc²/E = 0.300/0.811 = 0.3699, with γ = 1.587 and v = 0.777c.
- (a) sin²(0.0100) = 1.000 × 10⁻⁴, so Δ = 3.70 × 10⁻⁵. Then ⟨Lz⟩ = 1.85 × 10⁻⁵ ħ = 1.95 × 10⁻³⁹ J s and ⟨Sz⟩ = (ħ/2)(1 − 3.70 × 10⁻⁵) = 0.49998ħ. The Pauli description of microscope electrons, spin and orbit separately conserved, is good to about four parts in 10⁵.
- (b) Δ = 0.0100 needs sin²θ = 0.0100/0.3699 = 0.02703, so sin θ = 0.1644 and θ = 0.165 rad = 9.46°, far outside the paraxial cones of an electron microscope.
- (c) As E → ∞, 1 − mc²/E → 1, so Δ never exceeds sin²θ = 1.00 × 10⁻⁴ at θ = 10.0 mrad: no beam energy reaches 1%. The split is set by how much of p is transverse to z; relativity only scales it.
- Checks: ⟨Lz⟩ + ⟨Sz⟩ = ħ/2 for every θ; Δ is dimensionless; Δ → 0 both as E → mc² and as θ → 0, where p lies along z and (α × p)z = 0.
Answer. (a) ⟨Lz⟩ = 1.85 × 10⁻⁵ ħ = 1.95 × 10⁻³⁹ J s and ⟨Sz⟩ = 0.49998ħ; (b) θ = 0.165 rad, or 9.46°; (c) no: Δ ≤ sin²θ = 1.00 × 10⁻⁴ at any energy.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
For a free Dirac particle neither the orbital angular momentum L nor the matrix spin (ħ/2)Σ commutes with the Hamiltonian, but J = L + (ħ/2)Σ does, and (ħ/2)Σ has eigenvalues ±ħ/2 on every axis: the equation itself describes spin one-half.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.