Skip to main content

Kinetic energy, potential energy and the Hamiltonian

Differentiate twice for kinetic, multiply by V for potential.

Energy is where operator algebra earns its keep. Build T̂ by letting p̂ act twice, add V(x) as a plain multiplication, and learn the two conditions the construction quietly needs: a potential that depends on x alone, so the translation is unambiguous, and a real one, so the sum is Hermitian.

Build the model

Energy as an instruction: differentiate twice for kinetic, multiply by V for potential.

1The big idea

Classically the energy of a particle on a line is H = p²/2m + V(x), and the quantum rule replaces p by p̂ = −iħ d/dx. For this H the replacement leaves nothing to choose. Kinetic energy is p̂ applied twice and divided by 2m, and because (−i)² = −1 the i's cancel: T̂ = −(ħ²/2m) d²/dx², a real second-derivative operator that responds to the curvature of ψ. Potential energy involves x alone, so V̂ is simply multiplication by V(x) at each point. Their sum Ĥ is linear, and the time-independent Schrödinger equation becomes Ĥψ = Eψ: acting with Ĥ returns the same function scaled by one constant. Two facts make Ĥ more than plausible. Moving T̂ from one function to the other inside an integral takes two integrations by parts; the two sign flips cancel, and each step leaves a boundary term that vanishes only for functions in the right domain. The potential term moves across only if V* = V. Together these make Ĥ Hermitian, which is what conserves probability and what will force real energies and orthogonal stationary states. The construction stops where its hidden assumptions fail. A classical term mixing x and p, as with a position-dependent mass or a magnetic force, has several inequivalent operator orderings and physics must pick one. A complex V, used on purpose to model absorption, breaks Hermiticity and drains probability. Spin and relativity are not in this Ĥ at all.

2In one sentence

The Hamiltonian operator Ĥ = −(ħ²/2m) d²/dx² + V(x) is the energy written as an instruction on ψ: differentiate twice and scale by −ħ²/2m for the kinetic part, multiply by V(x) for the potential part, and add the two results.

Example. For an electron ħ²/2m = 0.0381 eV nm². On ψ = sin(kx) with k = 2.0 nm⁻¹, where V = 0.50 eV, T̂ψ = (0.0381 eV nm²)(2.0 nm⁻¹)² ψ = 0.15 eV × ψ and V̂ψ = 0.50 eV × ψ, so Ĥψ = 0.65 eV × ψ.

3Squaring p̂ means applying it twice

p²/2m becomes an operator by replacing p with p̂ = −iħ d/dx, and p̂²ψ means p̂ acting on the function p̂ψ, not the square of that function. The first p̂ gives −iħψ′; the second gives (−iħ)²ψ″ = −ħ²ψ″, because (−i)² = −1. So T̂ψ = −(ħ²/2m)ψ″: the i's are gone and the minus sign is what they leave behind. Squaring the output instead, (p̂ψ)²/2m = −ħ²(ψ′)²/2m, grows fourfold when ψ doubles, so it is not linear and cannot be an operator on wavefunctions. Check the dimensions: ħ²/2m is in J² s² kg⁻¹ = J m², and d²/dx² supplies m⁻², so T̂ψ carries joules times the units of ψ. For an electron ħ²/2m = 6.10 × 10⁻³⁹ J m², or 0.0381 eV nm². T̂ also asks more of ψ than p̂ does: it needs a second derivative, so its natural domain is functions smooth enough for ψ″ to exist and be square-integrable.

4V̂ multiplies, so each classical term has one translation

V̂ does no differentiating: it multiplies ψ by V(x) point by point, V̂ψ(x) = V(x)ψ(x), exactly as x̂ multiplies by x. That is why H = p²/2m + V(x) becomes an operator with nothing left to choose. Each term is a function of p alone or of x alone, and a function of one operator is unambiguous: p̂² means p̂p̂, and V(x̂) acts by multiplication. A term that mixes x and p is different. Classically xp = px, but x̂(p̂ψ) = −iħxψ′ while p̂(x̂ψ) = −iħ(ψ + xψ′), and the two differ by iħψ; the commutator topic makes this general. Such terms arise when the mass depends on position, as in a graded semiconductor, or when a magnetic force depends on velocity, and each then needs an ordering chosen by physics rather than algebra. A force that dissipates energy, like friction, cannot be written as any V(x), so no Ĥ of this form can describe it.

5Ĥψ = Eψ is a claim about a whole function

Ĥ turns ψ into a new function, Ĥψ = T̂ψ + V(x)ψ, and the time-independent Schrödinger equation says that new function is E times the old one at every x. Dividing by ψ makes this a test: Ĥψ/ψ must be the same constant everywhere. Try a Gaussian, ψ = e(−x²/2b²), in the spring potential V = ½mω²x². Then T̂ψ/ψ = (ħ²/(2mb²))(1 − x²/b²), which falls as x² grows while V rises as x², so Ĥψ/ψ = ħ²/(2mb²) + ½x²(mω² − ħ²/(mb⁴)). The x² term cancels only when b² = ħ/(mω), and then Ĥψ = ½ħω ψ. For an electron with ħω = 1.0 eV that width is 0.276 nm and E = 0.50 eV. Any other width leaves Ĥψ/ψ varying with x, so that Gaussian is not an energy eigenfunction. How to solve such equations in general is the next topic; the oscillator itself is Unit 9.

6Two integrations by parts make T̂ Hermitian, on a domain

To test T̂, move d²/dx² from ψ to φ* inside ∫φ*ψ″ dx. One integration by parts gives [φ*ψ′] − ∫φ*′ψ′ dx; a second gives [φ*ψ′ − φ*′ψ] + ∫φ*″ψ dx. Each step flips the sign and two flips restore it, so ∫φ*(T̂ψ)dx = ∫(T̂φ)*ψ dx provided the bracket vanishes at both ends; the factor −ħ²/2m is real, so conjugating it changes nothing. On the whole line the bracket dies because normalisable states and their slopes fall to zero. At hard walls it dies because φ and ψ are both zero there, whatever their slopes. Leave the domain and the result fails: in a box 0 ≤ x ≤ a, take φ = sin(πx/a) and the constant ψ = 1, which is not zero at the walls. Then ∫φ(T̂ψ)dx = 0, because ψ″ = 0, but ∫(T̂φ)ψ dx = (ħ²/2m)(2π/a). One derivative alone, d/dx, flips the sign once and is anti-Hermitian, which is why p̂ needs its i and T̂ does not.

7The potential moves across only if it is real

The potential term needs no calculus. ∫φ*(Vψ)dx equals ∫(V*φ)*ψ dx for any V, so it equals ∫(Vφ)*ψ dx for every pair of functions only when V* = V. Nothing else about V matters: it may be negative, discontinuous, or infinite outside a box, and Ĥ stays Hermitian as long as V is real. The condition is not decoration. The rate of change of the norm is dN/dt = (1/iħ)[∫Ψ*(ĤΨ)dx − ∫(ĤΨ)*Ψ dx], which is the Hermiticity test with φ = ψ = Ψ, so a Hermitian Ĥ conserves probability, the result Unit 2 reached through the continuity equation. Give V an imaginary part and the bracket survives: V = V₀ − iW makes N fall as e(−2Wt/ħ). Nuclear and atomic physics use exactly such an optical potential on purpose, to model particles removed from a beam. There Hermiticity fails because probability is meant to leave.

8One integration by parts: kinetic energy is never negative

Integrate ∫ψ*(T̂ψ)dx by parts only once and the boundary term ψ*ψ′ vanishes for a normalisable state, leaving ⟨T⟩ = (ħ²/2m)∫|ψ′|² dx. That is a sum of squares, so ⟨T⟩ ≥ 0, with equality only if ψ′ = 0 everywhere, which on the whole line means ψ = 0. Every normalisable state therefore has positive kinetic energy, and ⟨H⟩ = ⟨T⟩ + ⟨V⟩ lies strictly above the minimum of V: no state can sit motionless at the bottom of a well. The same form prices confinement. Squeeze a normalised ψ to 1/s of its width, ψ(x) → √s ψ(sx), and ∫|ψ′|² dx grows by s², so halving a state's width quadruples ⟨T⟩. The pointwise ratio T̂ψ/ψ can be negative where ψ curves away from the axis; only the mean is bound to be positive.

9

Key equations

What each relation says, and the units it is written in.

Kinetic-energy operator

T̂ = p̂²/2m = −(ħ²/2m) d²/dx²

p̂ acts twice and (−i)² = −1 fixes the sign, so T̂ is a real operator that responds to curvature. Squaring the function p̂ψ instead is not even linear.

ħ = 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s, m in kg; ħ²/2m in J m², 6.10 × 10⁻³⁹ J m² = 0.0381 eV nm² for an electron

Potential-energy operator

V̂ψ(x) = V(x) ψ(x)

A multiplication, well defined because V depends on x alone. A classical term that mixes x and p has more than one operator ordering.

V(x) in J, evaluated at the same x as ψ; no derivative acts

The Schrödinger equation as Ĥψ = Eψ

Ĥψ = −(ħ²/2m) d²ψ/dx² + V(x) ψ = E ψ

Ĥψ/ψ must equal one constant everywhere. A trial ψ for which that ratio varies with x is not an energy eigenfunction.

E in J and the same at every x; ψ in m(−1/2) for a normalised state on a line

Hermiticity of Ĥ

∫ φ* (Ĥψ) dx = ∫ (Ĥφ)* ψ dx

Two integrations by parts move T̂ across, each flipping a sign; the potential moves across only because it is real.

needs [φ*ψ′ − φ*′ψ] = 0 at both ends and V(x)* = V(x); each side in J for normalised φ and ψ

Kinetic energy as a sum of squares

⟨T⟩ = ∫ ψ* (T̂ψ) dx = (ħ²/2m) ∫ |dψ/dx|² dx

Never negative, so ⟨H⟩ ≥ min V. Safe on a kinked ψ, where ψ″ hides a delta function that the first form misses.

one integration by parts with ψ*ψ′ → 0 at the ends; ∫|dψ/dx|² dx in m⁻², so ⟨T⟩ in J

Norm under a complex potential

dN/dt = (2/ħ) ∫ Im V(x) |Ψ|² dx

Zero for every Ψ only if Im V = 0. An absorbing V = V₀ − iW gives N(t) = e(−2Wt/ħ).

N = ∫|Ψ|² dx is dimensionless; Im V in J and ħ in J s, so dN/dt in s⁻¹

10

Interactive lab

Change one variable. Predict first, then read the result.

Controls

Try this. At ω = 1.00 ω₀, drag b to 1.00 ℓ₀: the dashed curvature term falls exactly as fast as V(x) rises, the solid line lies flat on ⟨H⟩ = 0.50 ħω₀, and Ĥψ = Eψ holds. Then raise ω to 1.50 ω₀ and the same ψ fails until b shrinks to about 0.82 ℓ₀.

Live results

Ĥψ/ψ AT x = 0
0.30 ħω₀
Ĥψ/ψ AT x = ±b
0.85 ħω₀
MEAN ⟨H⟩ = ⟨T⟩ + ⟨V⟩
0.57 ħω₀
EIGENVALUE ½ħω
0.50 ħω₀
Interactive modelLocal energy of the Gaussian ψ = e^(−x²/2b²) in the spring potential V = ½mω²x², with x in ℓ₀ = √(ħ/mω₀) and energy in ħω₀. Dashed: T̂ψ/ψ. Faint: V(x). Solid: their sum Ĥψ/ψ, from 0.30 at the centre to 0.85 at x = ±b. Its |ψ|²-weighted mean is ⟨H⟩ = 0.57 ħω₀; the sum is flat only at b = 1.00 ℓ₀.solid: Ĥψ/ψ = T̂ψ/ψ + V(x)dashed: T̂ψ/ψ, faint: V(x)energy / ħω₀⟨H⟩ = 0.5712−2+2x / ℓ₀
Local energy of the Gaussian ψ = e(−x²/2b²) in the spring potential V = ½mω²x², with x in ℓ₀ = √(ħ/mω₀) and energy in ħω₀. Dashed: T̂ψ/ψ. Faint: V(x). Solid: their sum Ĥψ/ψ, from 0.30 at the centre to 0.85 at x = ±b. Its |ψ|²-weighted mean is ⟨H⟩ = 0.57 ħω₀; the sum is flat only at b = 1.00 ℓ₀.
11

Catch the common trap

The mistake this lesson is built to prevent.

A stretch where ψ is a straight line has ψ″ = 0, so it is tempting to say it carries no kinetic energy, and that a wavefunction built from straight segments has ⟨T⟩ = 0. Both halves are wrong. T̂ψ/ψ at a point is not the kinetic energy of anything; only the integral ⟨T⟩ is. And where two segments meet at a kink, ψ′ jumps, so ψ″ contains a delta function holding all the curvature the straight parts lack. Take the normalised tent ψ = √(3/(2a³)) (a − |x|) on |x| ≤ a. Its ψ″ vanishes everywhere except x = 0 and x = ±a, yet ⟨T⟩ = (ħ²/2m)∫|ψ′|² dx = 3ħ²/(2ma²), which is 0.11 eV for an electron with a = 1.0 nm. Compute kinetic energy from ∫|ψ′|² dx, which needs only first derivatives, and the kinks take care of themselves.

Test it: what changes?

Widen Gaussian trial width b · fixed ω
  • Centre value ħ²/(2mb²) of Ĥψ/ψ falls
  • Value at x = ±b, ½mω²b², rises
  • ⟨T⟩ = ħ²/(4mb²) falls
  • Ĥψ/ψ is flat only at b² = ħ/(mω)
Raise spring frequency ω · fixed b
  • V(x) = ½mω²x² steepens
  • Centre value ħ²/(2mb²) unchanged
  • Matching width √(ħ/(mω)) shrinks
  • Eigenvalue ½ħω rises
12

Practice & worked examples

Three tiers. Try each before opening the solution.

EasyExample 1

An electron has ψ(x) = A e(−x²/2b²) with b = 0.20 nm, in a region where V = 0. Build T̂ψ by letting p̂ act twice, find the value of T̂ψ/ψ at the centre and where it changes sign, and find ⟨T⟩.

View solution →
  1. First p̂: p̂ψ = −iħ dψ/dx = −iħ(−x/b²)ψ = (iħx/b²)ψ.
  2. The second p̂ acts on that whole function, product rule included: d(xψ)/dx = ψ + xψ′ = (1 − x²/b²)ψ, so p̂(iħxψ/b²) = −iħ × (iħ/b²)(1 − x²/b²)ψ = (ħ²/b²)(1 − x²/b²)ψ.
  3. Divide by 2m: T̂ψ = (ħ²/(2mb²))(1 − x²/b²)ψ. Dimensions: ħ²/2m in J m² over b² in m² gives J, times ψ.
  4. Numbers: ħ²/(2mb²) = 0.0381 eV nm² ÷ 0.040 nm² = 0.95 eV. So T̂ψ/ψ is 0.95 eV at x = 0, zero at x = ±b = ±0.20 nm (the inflection points of ψ), and negative beyond, where ψ curves away from the axis.
  5. For the mean, integrate by parts once: ⟨T⟩ = (ħ²/2m)∫|dψ/dx|² dx = (ħ²/2m)⟨x²⟩/b⁴, and |ψ|² ∝ e(−x²/b²) has ⟨x²⟩ = b²/2, so ⟨T⟩ = ħ²/(4mb²) = 0.48 eV.
  6. Checks: ⟨T⟩ is positive although T̂ψ/ψ is negative in the tails. As b → ∞ the Gaussian flattens and ⟨T⟩ → 0, the particle at rest; halving b would quadruple it.

Answer. T̂ψ = (ħ²/(2mb²))(1 − x²/b²)ψ: T̂ψ/ψ = 0.95 eV at the centre, zero at x = ±0.20 nm and negative beyond; ⟨T⟩ = ħ²/(4mb²) = 0.48 eV.

MediumExample 2

An absorbing region is modelled by adding a constant imaginary part to an otherwise real potential, V(x) = V₀(x) − iW with W = 5.0 meV. Show that Ĥ is no longer Hermitian, find how the norm N(t) = ∫|Ψ|² dx evolves, and find the time for N to fall from 1 to 0.50.

View solution →
  1. T̂ and the real part V₀(x) pass the Hermiticity test as before, so only the new term matters: ∫φ*(−iWψ)dx − ∫(−iWφ)*ψ dx = −iW∫φ*ψ dx − iW∫φ*ψ dx = −2iW∫φ*ψ dx. Conjugating −iW flips its sign, so the two sides no longer match.
  2. Differentiate the norm and use the Schrödinger equation, ∂Ψ/∂t = ĤΨ/(iħ), with its conjugate: dN/dt = (1/iħ)[∫Ψ*(ĤΨ)dx − ∫(ĤΨ)*Ψ dx]. The bracket is the Hermiticity test with φ = ψ = Ψ.
  3. Substitute step 1: dN/dt = (1/iħ)(−2iW N) = −(2W/ħ)N, so N(t) = e(−2Wt/ħ). Dimensions: W in J over ħ in J s gives s⁻¹, as a rate must.
  4. Numbers: ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s, so ħ/(2W) = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s ÷ 1.0 × 10⁻² eV = 6.6 × 10⁻¹⁴ s. N = 0.50 when t = (ħ/2W) ln 2 = 4.6 × 10⁻¹⁴ s.
  5. Checks: W → 0 gives an infinite decay time and Hermiticity returns. With W positive, probability leaves, as an absorber should; the opposite sign would create probability from nothing.

Answer. ∫φ*(Ĥψ)dx − ∫(Ĥφ)*ψ dx = −2iW∫φ*ψ dx ≠ 0; N(t) = e(−2Wt/ħ) with ħ/2W = 66 fs, so N halves after 46 fs.

HardExample 3

In a graded semiconductor layer an electron's effective mass varies near x = 0 as 1/m(x) = (1/m₀)(1 + αx/b), with m₀ = 0.067 mₑ, α = 0.20 and b = 5.0 nm. Two candidate kinetic operators are T̂₁ = −(ħ²/2m(x)) d²/dx² and T̂₂ = p̂ (1/2m(x)) p̂. Test each for Hermiticity with the normalised pair φ ∝ e(−x²/2b²) and ψ ∝ (x/b) e(−x²/2b²).

View solution →
  1. Expand the second: T̂₂ψ = −(ħ²/2) d/dx[(1/m) dψ/dx] = T̂₁ψ − (ħ²/2)(d(1/m)/dx)(dψ/dx). The extra term is nonzero wherever the mass varies and ψ has a slope, so p²/2m(x) names no single operator: the order of p̂ and m(x) is a physical choice.
  2. Use u = x/b and ε = ħ²/(2m₀b²) = (0.0381 eV nm² ÷ 0.067) ÷ (5.0 nm)² = 22.7 meV. Normalised, φ = (b√π)(−1/2) e(−u²/2) and ψ = (b√π/2)(−1/2) u e(−u²/2), so that b²φ″ = (u² − 1)φ and b²ψ″ = (u² − 3)ψ.
  3. One way: ∫φ(T̂₁ψ)dx = −(√2/√π)αε∫(u⁴ − 3u²)e(−u²)du, since the terms without α are odd and vanish. With ∫u²e(−u²)du = √π/2 and ∫u⁴e(−u²)du = 3√π/4, this is +(3√2/4)αε = 4.8 meV.
  4. The other way: ∫(T̂₁φ)ψ dx = −(√2/√π)αε∫(u⁴ − u²)e(−u²)du = −(√2/4)αε = −1.6 meV. The two differ by √2 αε = 6.4 meV, so T̂₁ is not Hermitian: moving its derivatives across 1/m(x) creates terms in d(1/m)/dx that T̂₁ does not contain.
  5. For T̂₂ integrate by parts once; the Gaussian tails kill the boundary term: ∫φ(T̂₂ψ)dx = (ħ²/2)∫(1/m)(dφ/dx)(dψ/dx)dx. That is symmetric in φ and ψ, so it equals ∫(T̂₂φ)ψ dx for every pair; here it is (√2/√π)αε∫(u⁴ − u²)e(−u²)du = (√2/4)αε = 1.6 meV.
  6. Checks: at α = 0 both operators reduce to −(ħ²/2m₀) d²/dx² and all three numbers vanish, because φ is even and ψ odd. Every result is ε times a pure number, so each is an energy.

Answer. T̂₁ gives 4.8 meV one way and −1.6 meV the other, so it is not Hermitian; T̂₂ = p̂(1/2m(x))p̂ gives 1.6 meV both ways and is the ordering to use.

13

Quick check

Choose an answer, then check it. Explain to yourself why the others fail.

To prove ∫φ*(Ĥψ) dx = ∫(Ĥφ)*ψ dx for Ĥ = −(ħ²/2m) d²/dx² + V(x), which conditions does the proof actually use?
14

Key takeaway

Kinetic energy is p̂ applied twice; potential energy just multiplies.

Build T̂ by applying p̂ twice, not by squaring p̂ψ, and multiply by V(x) for the potential. Ĥ is Hermitian only if V is real and the boundary term [φ*ψ′ − φ*′ψ] vanishes. Compute ⟨T⟩ as (ħ²/2m)∫|dψ/dx|² dx, which is never negative.

Next: Eigenvalue equations: solving Âψ = aψ →

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.