
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
The Hartree-Fock spectrum and its singularity at kF
Hartree-Fock gets the energy of the electron gas roughly right and then misdescribes every electron at the Fermi surface. Here we derive its single-particle spectrum, find the logarithm hiding at kF, let sodium's specific heat and bandwidth reject it, and trace the fault to the bare 1/q², which screening repairs.
UAQM-15.05 · Lesson 5 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. Units 14 and 15 are the course’s optional extension into open systems and quantum gases. Unit 14 builds on radiation and decay; Unit 15 builds on second quantisation. Keep the fifteen-unit numbering and follow your institution’s required syllabus. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
Exchange widens the band, and the bare 1/q² puts a logarithm at the Fermi surface.
The key idea
The Hartree-Fock spectrum of the electron gas is the energy εₖ = ħ²k²/2m + Σₓ(k) of a plane-wave orbital in the self-consistent field of the filled Fermi sea, the exchange term Σₓ(k) being the electron's attraction to its own exchange hole.
Example. In sodium, rₛ = 3.93, exchange lowers the k = 0 state by 8.46 eV and the k = kF state by 4.23 eV, so the occupied band widens from the free 3.24 eV to 7.47 eV; photoemission measures 2.65 eV.
The complete physical model and assumptions
In jellium the Hartree-Fock orbitals are plane waves, so the Fock operator's only work is to price each one: the kinetic energy ħ²k²/2m plus an exchange term Σₓ(k), the attraction of an electron to the hole that the Pauli principle digs around it among electrons of its own spin. Summing the bare Coulomb transform e²/(ε₀q²) over the occupied same-spin states gives Σₓ(k) in closed form. Exchange binds the bottom of the band twice as hard as its top, so the band widens; and because 1/q² weights small momentum transfers without limit, the sharp edge of the sea reappears as a logarithm in the slope, and dεₖ/dk diverges at kF. That one logarithm makes the density of states at the Fermi surface vanish, and with it the linear specific heat every metal shows; the same exchange stretches sodium's occupied band to 7.47 eV where photoemission sees 2.65 eV. The fault is not exchange as such but the range of the interaction. Real electrons move to screen any charge, which no single determinant can describe; replace 1/q² by 1/(q² + kₛ²) and the logarithm is cut off at |k − kF| of order kₛ, the slope stays finite and the density of states returns. Hartree-Fock energies, which integrate over the whole sea, survive this; its Fermi-surface properties do not.
1Plane waves already solve the Fock equation
Work in SI units, with energies also in rydbergs (1 Ry = 13.606 eV) and lengths in Bohr radii (a₀ = 52.92 pm); everything here is non-relativistic, so no metric signature enters. Built from occupied plane waves, the Fock operator commutes with every translation, so its eigenfunctions are plane waves again: they are self-consistent from the start and nothing needs iterating. The Hartree potential of the uniform electron density is the q = 0 term that topic 15.01 cancelled against the background, so what is left is exchange. Momentum conservation makes the exchange operator diagonal in k, and the Fock operator returns e(ik⋅r) multiplied by εₖ = ħ²k²/2m + Σₓ(k), with Σₓ(k) = −(1/V) Σ e²/(ε₀|k − k′|²) summed over the occupied k′ of the same spin. By Koopmans' theorem, quoted from Unit 10, −εₖ is the frozen-orbital cost of removing the electron in state k, the quantity photoemission measures.
2Doing the exchange sum, and checking it three ways
Replace (1/V)Σ by ∫d³k′/(2π)³ over the sphere k′ ≤ kF. The angular integral is elementary: ∫dΩ′/(k² + k′² − 2kk′ cos θ) = (2π/(kk′)) ln|(k + k′)/(k − k′)|. The radial one, from 0 to kF, is ∫k′ ln|(k + k′)/(k − k′)| dk′ = kkF + ((kF² − k²)/2) ln|(k + kF)/(k − kF)|, and together they give Σₓ(k) = −(2e²kF/(4π²ε₀)) F(k/kF). Dimensions: e²/ε₀ is J m and kF is m⁻¹, so the prefactor is an energy, (4/π)(kF a₀) Ry = 2.444/rₛ Ry, or 8.46 eV for sodium. Limit: as x → ∞, F → 1/(3x²) and Σₓ → −nσe²/(ε₀k²): a fast electron finds every same-spin electron nearly at rest, each exchange transfers its whole momentum k, and each contributes −e²/(ε₀k²V). Topic 15.03: F averages 3/4 over the sea, and half the average Σₓ, half because summing εₖ counts every pair twice, is −0.916/rₛ Ry.
3Why the slope diverges at kF
Differentiate: dF/dx = 1/(2x) − ((1 + x²)/(4x²)) ln|(1 + x)/(1 − x)|, which runs to −∞ as x → 1. Near the Fermi surface the group velocity v = (1/ħ) dεₖ/dk is therefore v/vF = 1 + 0.166 rₛ [ln(2kF/|k − kF|) − 1], in units of the free vF = ħkF/m. For sodium the coefficient is 0.652: v = 3.82 vF at 0.99 kF, 5.31 vF at 0.999 kF, and 1.50 more for each further decade. The origin is geometric. ∂Σₓ/∂k weights each occupied k′ by the gradient of 1/q², which falls as 1/q³. Deep inside the sea the occupied neighbourhood of k is a whole ball, and the small-q contributions cancel in opposite pairs; on the Fermi surface half that ball is empty, and the uncancelled half gives ∫q² dq/q³ = ∫dq/q, a logarithm. An interaction that stays finite at q = 0 makes the same integral converge.
4Two measurements that reject the spectrum
Define m* by dεₖ/dk = ħ²k/m*. The density of states per unit energy is g(ε) = Vk²/(π² dεₖ/dk) for both spins, so g/gfree = m*/m at the same k, and an infinite slope makes g(εF) = 0, vanishing as 1/ln. Thermal excitations sample states within kBT of εF, which lie at |k − kF| ≈ kBT/(ħv), so the effective density of states falls as 1/ln(T₀/T), with T₀ of order εF/kB, and the electronic specific heat goes as T/ln(T₀/T). Every simple metal shows instead C = γT with γ constant at low temperature; sodium's γ is 1.38 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻², quoted, while Hartree-Fock predicts about a tenth of the free 1.09 near 1 K. The band fares no better. The exchange widening Σₓ(kF) − Σₓ(0) = 1.222/rₛ Ry is derived, so sodium's band is 3.24 + 4.23 = 7.47 eV wide; angle-resolved photoemission (Jensen and Plummer, 1985) measures 2.65 eV, quoted: narrower than free, not 2.3 times wider.
5Screening the interaction removes the logarithm
Replace the bare interaction by e²/(ε₀(q² + kₛ²)). The angular integral becomes (π/(kk′)) ln[((k + k′)² + kₛ²)/((k − k′)² + kₛ²)], finite at k′ = k, and the radial integral closes again: Σₓ = −(2e²kF/(4π²ε₀)) G(x, y), with y = kₛ/kF and G = 1/2 + ((1 − x² + y²)/(8x)) ln[((1 + x)² + y²)/((1 − x)² + y²)] − (y/2)[arctan((1 + x)/y) + arctan((1 − x)/y)], which is F at y = 0. Its slope at kF is finite: v/vF = 1 + 0.332 rₛ [((2 + y²)/8) ln(1 + 4/y²) − 1/2]. For small y it reduces to the bare formula with |k − kF| replaced by kₛ, so screening does not remove the logarithm's growth, it stops it at the screening wavenumber. Weak screening cures slowly: with kₛ = 0.05 kF, sodium's m*/m at kF is still only 0.36.
6Screening as correlation's first lesson
Why should the interaction be screened? In the exchange term two electrons interact through the bare e²/(ε₀q²), as though the rest of the gas stayed frozen while they exchanged. Real electrons of both spins move in response, so any slowly varying charge is surrounded, within a distance of order 1/kₛ, by a compensating cloud, and for q ≪ kₛ the interaction is cut off. That rearrangement is correlation, a mixing of many determinants, so one determinant cannot express it and the cure lies outside Hartree-Fock. Thomas-Fermi screening, the static long-wavelength response of the gas, is quoted here: kₛ² = 4kF/(πa₀), or kₛ = 1.61 kF for sodium. With it, sodium's m*/m at kF is 0.956, independent of temperature, so the linear specific heat returns, and the bandwidth falls from 7.47 eV to 3.43 eV. That is still above the measured 2.65 eV: the narrowing below free electrons is a further correlation effect, quoted and not derived. Total energies were never in danger, because ln|k − kF| is integrable, so the −0.916/rₛ Ry of topic 15.03 stands.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Hartree-Fock energy of a plane wave (derived)
εₖ = ħ²k²/2m − (2e²kF/(4π²ε₀)) F(k/kF)
The whole Fock eigenvalue: the Hartree term has cancelled the background, so kinetic energy plus exchange is all there is, and −εₖ is Koopmans' removal energy.
εₖ in J; k, kF in m⁻¹; e in C; ε₀ in F m⁻¹; the prefactor is (4/π)(kF a₀) Ry = 2.444/rₛ RyThe exchange function (derived)
F(x) = 1/2 + ((1 − x²)/(4x)) ln|(1 + x)/(1 − x)|
Holds all the k-dependence. Exchange binds k = 0 twice as hard as kF, and half the sea average of Σₓ, −0.916/rₛ Ry, is topic 15.03's exchange energy per electron.
x = k/kF, dimensionless; F(0) = 1, F(1) = 1/2, F → 1/(3x²) as x → ∞; its average over the sea is 3/4Slope near the Fermi surface (derived)
dεₖ/dk ≈ ħ²kF/m + (e²/(4π²ε₀)) [ln(2kF/|k − kF|) − 1]
In units of ħkF/m: v/vF = 1 + 0.166 rₛ [ln(2kF/|k − kF|) − 1]. Each factor of 10 closer to kF adds 0.382 rₛ, without limit.
dεₖ/dk in J m; ħ in J s; m the electron mass in kg; valid for |k − kF| ≪ kFOccupied bandwidth (derived)
WHF = ε(kF) − ε(0) = (3.683/rₛ² + 1.222/rₛ) Ry
Sodium, rₛ = 3.93: the free 3.24 eV becomes 7.47 eV, against 2.65 eV measured by photoemission. Exchange multiplies the bandwidth by 1 + 0.332 rₛ.
WHF in Ry, 1 Ry = 13.606 eV; rₛ in units of a₀ = 52.92 pm; the first term is the free bandwidthScreened exchange: the slope at kF (derived)
v(kF)/vF = 1 + 0.332 rₛ [((2 + y²)/8) ln(1 + 4/y²) − 1/2], with y = kₛ/kF
As y → 0 it becomes the bare logarithm with |k − kF| replaced by kₛ: screening cuts the divergence off at the screening wavenumber.
From e²/(ε₀(q² + kₛ²)); kₛ in m⁻¹; vF = ħkF/m in m s⁻¹; finite for every y above zeroThomas-Fermi screening wavenumber (quoted)
kTF² = 4kF/(πa₀), so kTF/kF = 0.815 √rₛ
Named here as correlation's first lesson, not derived. Used as kₛ, it turns sodium's m*/m at kF from zero into 0.956.
kTF in m⁻¹; a₀ = 4πε₀ħ²/(me²) = 52.92 pm; for sodium kTF = 1.61 kF = 1.49 × 10¹⁰ m⁻¹Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. At sodium's rₛ = 3.93 the bare band is 7.47 eV wide against 3.24 eV free. Drag kₛ down to 0.05 kF: the screened dip at kF still only reaches 0.36, because the cure fades as slowly as the logarithm grew. Raise rₛ and the exchange terms grow in proportion.
Live results
- BARE HF BANDWIDTH
- 7.47 eV
- SCREENED BANDWIDTH
- 3.43 eV
- SCREENED m*/m AT kF
- 0.956
- THOMAS-FERMI kₛ/kF
- 1.61
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Density parameter rₛ: 3.93; Screening wavenumber kₛ/kF: 1.615
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
Because the ratio of exchange to kinetic energy grows as rₛ, it is tempting to treat Hartree-Fock as exact at high density, so that its Fermi-surface predictions should at least hold for a dense metal such as aluminium. They do not. The singular part of the slope is 0.166 rₛ ln(2kF/|k − kF|): a small rₛ shrinks the coefficient but cannot bound the logarithm. At rₛ = 1 the Hartree-Fock velocity still doubles within 1.8 × 10⁻³ kF of the Fermi surface and grows without limit closer in, so at low enough temperature the predicted specific heat fails at every density. The fault lies in the range of the bare 1/q², not in the size of e². Integrated quantities escape because ln|k − kF| is integrable, which is why the exchange energy of topic 15.03 is sound while vF and g(εF) are not.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Treat sodium as jellium with rₛ = 3.93. Find the exchange self-energy Σₓ of an electron at k = 0, at k = kF and at k = 3kF, and check the last against the fast-electron limit −nσe²/(ε₀k²).
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- The prefactor is 2e²kF/(4π²ε₀) = (4/π)(kF a₀) Ry = 2.444/rₛ Ry = 0.6218 Ry = 8.46 eV, so Σₓ(k) = −8.46 eV × F(k/kF).
- F(0) = 1 and F(1) = 1/2, so Σₓ(0) = −8.46 eV and Σₓ(kF) = −4.23 eV: the bottom of the band is bound twice as hard as the top.
- At x = 3: F(3) = 1/2 + ((1 − 9)/12) ln 2 = 0.5000 − 0.4621 = 0.0379, so Σₓ(3kF) = −0.321 eV.
- For the limit, in SI: n = 3/(4π(rₛa₀)³) = 2.654 × 10²⁸ m⁻³, so nσ = 1.327 × 10²⁸ m⁻³; kF = 1.919/(rₛa₀) = 9.228 × 10⁹ m⁻¹, so k = 2.768 × 10¹⁰ m⁻¹ and k² = 7.664 × 10²⁰ m⁻².
- nσe²/(ε₀k²) = (1.327 × 10²⁸ m⁻³)(2.899 × 10⁻²⁷ J m)/(7.664 × 10²⁰ m⁻²) = 5.02 × 10⁻²⁰ J = 0.313 eV, the units reducing to m⁻³ × J m × m² = J. The exact value is 2.3 per cent larger, because F(3) = 0.0379 still exceeds 1/(3x²) = 0.0370.
Answer. Σₓ = −8.46 eV at k = 0, −4.23 eV at kF and −0.321 eV at 3kF; the fast-electron limit gives −0.313 eV, 2.3 per cent smaller in size.
MediumExample 2
For sodium, rₛ = 3.93, find the Hartree-Fock group velocity v = (1/ħ) dεₖ/dk, in units of vF = ħkF/m, at k = 0.99 kF and 0.999 kF. Then estimate how close to kF an electron must be for v to reach 10 vF, and the energy width of that shell.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Exactly, v/vF = x − 0.3317 rₛ F′(x), with x = k/kF and F′(x) = 1/(2x) − ((1 + x²)/(4x²)) ln|(1 + x)/(1 − x)|; for sodium 0.3317 rₛ = 1.304.
- At x = 0.99: ln(1.99/0.01) = 5.293 and F′ = 0.5051 − 0.5051 × 5.293 = −2.168, so v/vF = 0.99 + 1.304 × 2.168 = 3.82.
- At x = 0.999: ln(1.999/0.001) = 7.600 and F′ = 0.5005 − 0.5005 × 7.600 = −3.303, so v/vF = 0.999 + 1.304 × 3.303 = 5.31. The decade added 1.49, as the near-kF form v/vF ≈ 1 + 0.652 [ln(2kF/|k − kF|) − 1] predicts: 0.652 ln 10 = 1.50 per decade.
- For v = 10 vF that form needs ln(2kF/|k − kF|) = 1 + 9/0.6518 = 14.81, so |k − kF| = 2e(−14.81) kF = 7.4 × 10⁻⁷ kF.
- Because v keeps rising towards kF, the shell's energy width is the slope integrated across it, not its edge value times the width. With δ′ = |k − kF|/kF running from 0 to δ = 7.4 × 10⁻⁷: 2εF ∫[1 + 0.652 (ln(2/δ′) − 1)] dδ′ = 2εF δ [1 + 0.652 ln(2/δ)] = 2εF δ (10 + 0.652) = 6.49 eV × 7.4 × 10⁻⁷ × 10.65 = 5.1 × 10⁻⁵ eV, with εF = 3.24 eV, which is kB × 0.6 K. The edge estimate ħv|k − kF| = 10 × 2εF δ = 4.8 × 10⁻⁵ eV falls 6 per cent short.
Answer. v = 3.82 vF at 0.99 kF and 5.31 vF at 0.999 kF, rising 1.50 per decade; v = 10 vF needs |k − kF| ≈ 7.4 × 10⁻⁷ kF, a shell 5.1 × 10⁻⁵ eV wide, about kB × 0.6 K.
HardExample 3
Estimate Hartree-Fock's Sommerfeld coefficient γ for sodium (rₛ = 3.93, εF = 3.24 eV) at 1 K and at 10 K, and compare it with the free-electron value and the measured, temperature-independent 1.38 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻². Then evaluate m*/m at kF with exchange screened at the Thomas-Fermi wavenumber, and the γ that follows.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Free electrons, one per sodium atom: γ₀ = (π²/2)R/TF with TF = εF/kB = 3.765 × 10⁴ K, so γ₀ = 4.935 × 8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹/37650 K = 1.09 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻².
- To logarithmic accuracy the heat is carried by states within kBT of εF, at δ = |k − kF|/kF where kBT = ħv δ kF = 2εF (v/vF) δ, and their density of states is g₀ vF/v. So γ/γ₀ ≈ vF/v at that δ, with v/vF = 1 + 0.652 [ln(2/δ) − 1].
- At 1 K, kBT = 8.62 × 10⁻⁵ eV. Iterate from v = 8 vF: δ = 1.66 × 10⁻⁶ gives v = 9.47 vF; then δ = 1.40 × 10⁻⁶ gives 9.59 vF, and a further pass leaves it there. So γ ≈ 1.09/9.59 = 0.11 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻².
- At 10 K the same iteration settles at v = 7.97 vF, so γ ≈ 0.14 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻²: Hartree-Fock's γ drifts by 20 per cent over a decade of temperature, the 1/ln(T₀/T) law, and sits ten to twelve times below the constant measured 1.38.
- Screened: y = kTF/kF = 0.8145 √3.93 = 1.615, y² = 2.607 and ln(1 + 4/y²) = 0.9299, so v/vF = 1 + 1.304 × (4.607/8 × 0.9299 − 0.5) = 1 + 1.304 × 0.0355 = 1.046 and m*/m = 0.956, the same at every temperature.
- Then γ ≈ 0.956 × 1.09 = 1.04 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻² at all low temperatures: the linear law is back. The remaining factor of 1.3 up to the measured 1.38 is quoted, not derived, as the electron-phonon interaction and correlation beyond screened exchange.
Answer. Hartree-Fock: γ ≈ 0.11 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻² at 1 K and 0.14 at 10 K, drifting as 1/ln(T₀/T) and ten to twelve times below the measured 1.38; screened at kTF = 1.61 kF, m*/m = 0.956 and γ ≈ 1.04 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻², constant.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Hartree-Fock spectrum of the electron gas is the energy εₖ = ħ²k²/2m + Σₓ(k) of a plane-wave orbital in the self-consistent field of the filled Fermi sea, the exchange term Σₓ(k) being the electron's attraction to its own exchange hole.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.