
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
The weakly interacting Bose gas and Bogoliubov's replacement
Alkali atoms a few hundred nanometres apart and colder than a microkelvin turn many-boson second quantisation from bookkeeping into a calculation. A contact interaction fixed by one measured length and a condensate operator made a number make that possible, and this topic keeps exactly the terms the next one diagonalises.
UAQM-15.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. Units 14 and 15 are the course’s optional extension into open systems and quantum gases. Unit 14 builds on radiation and decay; Unit 15 builds on second quantisation. Keep the fifteen-unit numbering and follow your institution’s required syllabus. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
One measured length replaces the potential; one macroscopic mode becomes a number.
The key idea
Bogoliubov's replacement treats the macroscopically occupied k = 0 mode of a dilute Bose gas as a number, a₀ → √N₀, after the interatomic potential has been replaced by a contact interaction g δ(r) whose strength g = 4πħ²aₛ/m is fixed by the measured scattering length.
Example. For ⁸⁷Rb, aₛ = 5.3 nm gives g = 5.13 × 10⁻⁵¹ J m³; at n = 1.0 × 10²⁰ m⁻³ the gas has n aₛ³ = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵, and the lowest-order energy per atom is gn/2 = 2.57 × 10⁻³¹ J, or kB × 18.6 nK.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A dilute gas of bosonic atoms is the simplest interacting many-boson system that second quantisation carries to closed form, and two moves set it up. The first trades a potential far too strong for perturbation theory for a contact term g δ(r) fixed by one measured number. At relative wavenumbers with kaₛ ≪ 1 every potential with the same scattering length aₛ scatters alike, so g is chosen to make first-order Born, with reduced mass m/2, reproduce aₛ: g = 4πħ²aₛ/m. The second move is Bogoliubov's. With almost every atom in k = 0, a₀ and a₀† act on the condensate as √N₀ up to corrections of relative order 1/N₀, so both are replaced by that number. Sorting the interaction by how many operators still act on excited modes leaves a constant gN²/(2V), which is gn/2 per atom, plus a Hamiltonian quadratic in the excited modes whose a†ₖa†₋ₖ terms are pairs of condensate atoms scattered to ±k. The model needs n aₛ³ ≪ 1, so that atoms meet only in pairs and few leave k = 0. It yields a quadratic form still to be diagonalised, not a spectrum; it gives up exact number conservation for a classical condensate amplitude; and it fails outright for liquid helium-4, whose atoms sit about one diameter apart.
1Fix g by the measured scattering length
Units are SI, with energies also quoted as temperatures E/kB; the gas is non-relativistic, so the course's metric signature (+, −, −, −) never enters. Quantum Mechanics II's first Born amplitude, quoted, is f = −(mᵣ/2πħ²)ṽ(q), with ṽ the Fourier transform of the potential and mᵣ the reduced mass. Take v(r) = g δ(r): its transform is the constant g, and two atoms of mass m have mᵣ = m/2, so f = −mg/(4πħ²) at every angle and energy. The scattering length is defined by f → −aₛ at low energy, hence aₛ = mg/(4πħ²) and g = 4πħ²aₛ/m, derived. Dimensions: ħ²aₛ/m carries J² s² m kg⁻¹ = J m³, an energy times a volume, as the coefficient of δ(r) must. For ⁸⁷Rb, m = 1.443 × 10⁻²⁵ kg and the measured aₛ = 5.3 nm, about 100 Bohr radii, give g = 5.13 × 10⁻⁵¹ J m³, repulsive. Match the unsymmetrised amplitude: the bosonic two-body operator generates the exchange amplitude itself, so symmetrising first would count it twice.
2Why a potential too deep for Born enters only through aₛ
The real Rb–Rb potential is anything but weak. Its well binds dozens of molecular vibrational states, and a potential that binds states is never perturbative: its exact aₛ swings through ±∞ each time the well deepens enough to hold one more, which no first-order formula can follow. What rescues the model is a separation of scales. Beyond the potential's range r₀, a few nanometres for alkali atoms, the zero-energy wavefunction is ψ ∝ 1 − aₛ/r whatever the potential (quoted), so when kr₀ ≪ 1 and kaₛ ≪ 1 every observable depends on aₛ alone. g δ(r) is not an approximation to the potential but a different potential with the same aₛ at first order. Pushed to second order it fails, the sum over intermediate states of 1/k² diverging at large k; the next-order Lee-Huang-Yang energy, named here, is finite only because that divergence cancels. In a gas the model also needs n aₛ³ ≪ 1, so the spacing far exceeds aₛ and three atoms rarely meet: ⁸⁷Rb at 1.0 × 10²⁰ m⁻³ gives 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ and a spacing of 215 nm, against 0.36 nm in liquid ⁴He.
3Bogoliubov's replacement: the condensate as a number
Without interactions the ground state at T = 0 is |N, 0, 0, …⟩, every atom in the k = 0 plane wave. A weak repulsion leaves most of them there: N₀ stays close to N, and the excited population N − N₀ = Σ′⟨a†ₖaₖ⟩ is a small fraction that the next topic computes. On the condensate, a₀|N₀⟩ = √N₀|N₀ − 1⟩ and a₀†|N₀⟩ = √(N₀ + 1)|N₀ + 1⟩. The two amplitudes differ by the factor √(1 + 1/N₀), and the commutator [a₀, a₀†] = 1 is smaller than a₀†a₀ = N₀ by 1/N₀, which is 10⁻⁵ for a hundred thousand atoms. Bogoliubov therefore treated a₀ and a₀† as commuting numbers, both equal to √N₀ once the condensate's phase is chosen real. Physically the condensate becomes a reservoir: taking an atom out or putting one in leaves its amplitude unchanged to order 1/N₀. The price shows in the one place it could matter, a₀†a₀†a₀a₀ = N₀(N₀ − 1), which the replacement turns into N₀², a relative error 1/N₀ that is negligible for every gas treated here.
4Sort the interaction by operators that leave k = 0
Quote Unit 10's Hamiltonian with v(p) = g: H = Σₖ εₖ a†ₖaₖ + (g/2V) Σ a†ₖ₊ₚ a†ₖ′₋ₚ aₖ′aₖ, with εₖ = ħ²k²/2m. Classify each interaction term by how many of its four operators carry nonzero momentum. None: (g/2V)N₀². One: impossible, since three zero momenta and one nonzero cannot balance. Two: six choices. Both creators give (gN₀/2V)a†ₖa†₋ₖ, both annihilators its adjoint, and the four mixed choices each give (gN₀/2V)a†ₖaₖ, two direct and two exchange, so 2gn₀ in all, with n₀ = N₀/V. Three or four: smaller by further powers of the excited fraction, and dropped. Now eliminate N₀ with N₀ = N − Σ′a†ₖaₖ, so (g/2V)N₀² ≈ gN²/(2V) − gn Σ′a†ₖaₖ, and set N₀ ≈ N in coefficients that already multiply excited operators. The result, derived, is H ≈ gN²/(2V) + Σ′[(εₖ + gn)a†ₖaₖ + ½gn(a†ₖa†₋ₖ + aₖa₋ₖ)]. An excited atom feels 2gn from the condensate and takes gn from the condensate's own energy.
5The energy per atom, and the checks it passes
In the bare condensate every excited occupation vanishes, so the leading energy is the constant: E₀ = gN²/(2V) and E₀/N = gn/2, derived. Differentiating gives μ = ∂E₀/∂N = gn, the scale beside εₖ in the quadratic terms, and P = −∂E₀/∂V = gn²/2, stable only for positive aₛ; with negative aₛ the uniform gas collapses, and trapped ⁷Li and ⁸⁵Rb condensates survive only below a critical number. Dimensions: gn is J m³ × m⁻³ = J. Free limit: g → 0 gives the ideal condensate's E₀ = 0. One-particle limit: the exact pair count gives gN(N − 1)/(2V), zero for one atom. For ⁸⁷Rb at 1.0 × 10²⁰ m⁻³, gn/2 = 2.57 × 10⁻³¹ J = kB × 18.6 nK and μ/h = 775 Hz. The sharpest measured check is the counting itself. Two atoms in one mode cost g/V, in different modes 2g/V, so a thermal gas has twice the condensate's interaction energy per atom; for three atoms the factor is 3! = 6, and JILA found three-body loss in ⁸⁷Rb condensates 7.4 ± 2.0 times slower than in thermal clouds of equal density.
6What the replacement gives up, and where it stops
With a₀ a number, H no longer commutes with N̂: the pair terms change the excited population by two with no condensate atoms to pay. The natural object is then K = H − μN̂ with μ = gn, and the atom number is right only on average. Number-conserving formulations restore exact conservation, from Girardeau and Arnowitt in 1959 to Gardiner and to Castin and Dum in the late 1990s, using operators such as a₀†aₖ/√N̂₀ that move an atom between mode k and the condensate at fixed N; they reproduce the same quadratic Hamiltonian at this order and are named, not derived. The approximation is a chain of smallness: N₀ ≫ 1 for the replacement, n aₛ³ ≪ 1 for the contact interaction and the dropped cubic and quartic terms, and T well below the condensation temperature. What it delivers is a quadratic form, not a spectrum. The pair coupling is nearly half the diagonal coefficient wherever εₖ ≪ gn, that is well below kc = √(8πnaₛ), 3.65 μm⁻¹ for ⁸⁷Rb at 10²⁰ m⁻³, and only the next topic's transformation can diagonalise it there.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Contact coupling from the scattering length
g = 4πħ²aₛ/m
One measured length replaces the whole potential. ⁸⁷Rb, aₛ = 5.3 nm: g = 5.13 × 10⁻⁵¹ J m³, or g/h = 7.7 × 10⁻¹⁸ Hz m³; a positive aₛ makes it repulsive.
g in J m³, aₛ the measured s-wave scattering length in m, m the atomic mass in kg; first Born with reduced mass m/2; derivedDiluteness
n aₛ³ ≪ 1
The spacing 1/∛n then dwarfs aₛ, 215 nm against 5.3 nm, so atoms meet in pairs at kaₛ ≪ 1, where aₛ is all of the potential they can see.
n = N/V in m⁻³ and aₛ in m, so n aₛ³ is a pure number; ⁸⁷Rb at 1.0 × 10²⁰ m⁻³ gives 1.5 × 10⁻⁵Hamiltonian with a contact interaction
H = Σₖ εₖ a†ₖaₖ + (g/2V) Σₖₖ′ₚ a†ₖ₊ₚ a†ₖ′₋ₚ aₖ′aₖ
A contact potential has a flat Fourier transform, so every transfer p costs g/V. Unlike jellium, no background cancels the p = 0 term: it carries the leading energy.
εₖ = ħ²k²/2m in J; V the periodic box volume in m³; [aₖ, a†ₖ′] = δₖₖ′; Unit 10's form with v(p) = g, quotedBogoliubov's replacement
a₀ → √N₀ and a₀† → √N₀
The condensate becomes a reservoir: adding or removing one atom changes its amplitude by a fraction 1/(2N₀), which is 5 × 10⁻⁶ for 10⁵ atoms.
N₀ the k = 0 occupation, a pure number; error of relative order 1/N₀, since [a₀, a₀†] = 1 while a₀†a₀ = N₀Quadratic Hamiltonian in the excited modes
H ≈ gN²/(2V) + Σ′ₖ [(εₖ + gn) a†ₖaₖ + ½gn (a†ₖa†₋ₖ + aₖa₋ₖ)]
Each a†ₖa†₋ₖ is a†ₖa†₋ₖa₀a₀ with the condensate operators made numbers: two condensate atoms scattered to ±k, momentum conserved.
Σ′ omits k = 0; n = N/V in m⁻³; every term in J; derived, dropping terms cubic and quartic in k ≠ 0 operatorsEnergy per atom at lowest order
E₀/N = gn/2 = 2πħ²aₛn/m
Differentiating gives μ = ∂E₀/∂N = gn. ⁸⁷Rb at 1.0 × 10²⁰ m⁻³: gn/2 = 2.57 × 10⁻³¹ J, or kB × 18.6 nK, and μ/h = 775 Hz.
E₀ = gN²/(2V) in J, n in m⁻³; derived; the exact pair count gN(N − 1)/(2V) vanishes for one atomInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Halve aₛ or n and kc shrinks by √2 while the flat lines stay put: in units of gn only the product naₛ moves the band, and the mass cancels from kc = √(8πnaₛ). Then slide the probe from 0.1 to 10 μm⁻¹ and watch pair ÷ diagonal fall from ½ towards zero.
Live results
- INTERACTION SCALE gn/kB
- 37.2 nK
- DILUTENESS n aₛ³
- 1.489 × 10⁻⁵
- CROSSOVER kc = √(8πnaₛ)
- 3.65 μm⁻¹
- PAIR ÷ DIAGONAL AT PROBE k
- 0.385
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Scattering length aₛ: 5.3 nm; Density n: 10 × 10¹⁹ m⁻³; Probe wavenumber k: 2.0 μm⁻¹
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The a†ₖa†₋ₖ terms look like a slip: they create two atoms from nothing, so it is tempting to drop them and keep only (εₖ + gn)a†ₖaₖ, on the grounds that number must be conserved or that their expectation value in the bare condensate is zero. They are not an artefact. Before the replacement each is a†ₖa†₋ₖa₀a₀, two condensate atoms colliding and leaving with momenta ±k, which conserves momentum and number alike; making a₀ a number only hid the a₀a₀. Drop them and every excitation costs εₖ + gn, which stays at gn as k → 0: a gap of kB × 37 nK for ⁸⁷Rb at 10²⁰ m⁻³, and a ground state with no atom outside k = 0. Keep them and the next topic finds a gapless phonon branch and a depleted condensate, both of which are measured. At low k the pair coupling ½gn is nearly half the diagonal coefficient, so this is where the interaction does its work.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A uniform ³⁹K condensate (m = 6.470 × 10⁻²⁶ kg) has its scattering length tuned by a Feshbach resonance to aₛ = 8.0 nm and has density n = 5.0 × 10¹⁸ m⁻³. Find the contact coupling g, test whether the gas is dilute, and give the lowest-order energy per atom in joules and as a temperature.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Coupling: g = 4πħ²aₛ/m = 4π × (1.0546 × 10⁻³⁴ J s)² × 8.0 × 10⁻⁹ m ÷ 6.470 × 10⁻²⁶ kg = 1.118 × 10⁻⁷⁵ J² s² m ÷ 6.470 × 10⁻²⁶ kg = 1.73 × 10⁻⁵⁰ J m³.
- Diluteness: n aₛ³ = 5.0 × 10¹⁸ m⁻³ × (8.0 × 10⁻⁹ m)³ = 5.0 × 10¹⁸ × 5.12 × 10⁻²⁵ = 2.6 × 10⁻⁶, far below 1. Equivalently the spacing 1/∛n = 585 nm is 73 times aₛ, so atoms meet only in pairs.
- Energy per atom: gn/2 = 1.728 × 10⁻⁵⁰ J m³ × 5.0 × 10¹⁸ m⁻³ ÷ 2 = 4.32 × 10⁻³² J. Dividing by kB = 1.381 × 10⁻²³ J K⁻¹ gives 3.13 × 10⁻⁹ K.
- Checks: J m³ × m⁻³ = J, an energy; aₛ → 0 gives zero, the ideal condensate; and the chemical potential μ = gn = 8.64 × 10⁻³² J is μ/h = 130 Hz.
Answer. g = 1.73 × 10⁻⁵⁰ J m³; n aₛ³ = 2.6 × 10⁻⁶, so the gas is dilute; E₀/N = gn/2 = 4.3 × 10⁻³² J, or kB × 3.1 nK.
MediumExample 2
A ⁸⁷Rb condensate (m = 1.443 × 10⁻²⁵ kg, aₛ = 5.3 nm) fills a periodic cubic box of side L = 50 μm at n = 4.0 × 10¹⁹ m⁻³. Find N and the relative error of Bogoliubov's replacement. For the lowest excited mode, compare the diagonal coefficient εₖ + gn with the pair coupling ½gn. Then find the wavenumber kc at which εₖ = gn and count the modes below it.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- N = nL³ = 4.0 × 10¹⁹ m⁻³ × (5.0 × 10⁻⁵ m)³ = 5.0 × 10⁶. Replacing a₀†a₀†a₀a₀ = N₀(N₀ − 1) by N₀² errs by 1/N₀ ≈ 2 × 10⁻⁷.
- g = 4πħ²aₛ/m = 5.133 × 10⁻⁵¹ J m³, so gn = 2.053 × 10⁻³¹ J, which is kB × 14.87 nK, and the pair coupling ½gn is kB × 7.44 nK.
- Lowest mode: k₁ = 2π/L = 1.257 × 10⁵ m⁻¹, so ε₁ = ħ²k₁²/2m = 6.085 × 10⁻³⁴ J, only kB × 0.044 nK. The diagonal coefficient is kB × 14.92 nK, and pair ÷ diagonal = ½/(1 + ε₁/gn) = ½/(1 + 0.044/14.87) = 0.4985, essentially its ceiling of ½.
- Crossover: εₖ = gn gives kc² = 2mgn/ħ² = 8πnaₛ, with the mass cancelling, so kc = √(8π × 4.0 × 10¹⁹ m⁻³ × 5.3 × 10⁻⁹ m) = 2.31 × 10⁶ m⁻¹, a wavelength 2π/kc = 2.72 μm. There pair ÷ diagonal has fallen to ¼.
- Modes with k below kc: (4π/3)kc³ × V/(2π)³ = (kcL)³/6π² = (115.4)³/59.22 = 2.6 × 10⁴, about 1.3 × 10⁴ pairs ±k that the pair terms couple strongly.
Answer. N = 5.0 × 10⁶, so the replacement errs by 2 × 10⁻⁷. For the lowest mode εₖ + gn = kB × 14.9 nK against ½gn = kB × 7.44 nK, a ratio of 0.4985. kc = 2.31 μm⁻¹, with about 2.6 × 10⁴ modes below it.
HardExample 3
A ⁸⁷Rb cloud (aₛ = 5.3 nm) is held at a uniform density n = 1.5 × 10²⁰ m⁻³ while it is cooled through condensation. Treat the non-condensed atoms as spread over many sparsely occupied plane-wave modes. Find the interaction energy per atom as a function of the condensate fraction f = N₀/N, evaluate it at f = 0, 0.60 and 1, and say what the same counting predicts for the ratio of three-body loss rates in thermal and condensed clouds.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Pair energies from (g/2V)Σ a†a†aa: two atoms in one mode, a†ₖa†ₖ|0⟩/√2, give g/V; two atoms in different modes, a†ₖa†ₖ′|0⟩, give a direct and an exchange contraction of g/V each, so 2g/V.
- Count pairs with N′ = N − N₀ and no two thermal atoms in one mode: N₀²/2 condensate pairs at g/V, N₀N′ condensate-thermal pairs at 2g/V and N′²/2 thermal pairs at 2g/V. The total is (g/2V)(N₀² + 4N₀N′ + 2N′²) = (g/2V)(2N² − N₀²).
- Per atom: Eᵢₙₜ/N = (gn/2)(2 − f²). With g = 5.13 × 10⁻⁵¹ J m³, gn/2 = 3.85 × 10⁻³¹ J, which is kB × 27.9 nK.
- f = 1 gives kB × 27.9 nK, Bogoliubov's constant gn/2; f = 0.60 gives 1.64 × 27.88 nK = kB × 45.7 nK; f = 0 gives kB × 55.8 nK, twice the condensate's value. Checks: g → 0 gives zero, and the gas stays dilute, n aₛ³ = 2.2 × 10⁻⁵.
- Three bodies: in one mode the three-atom operator gives N₀(N₀ − 1)(N₀ − 2) ≈ N₀³, while three atoms in distinct modes give one term per permutation, 3! = 6. A thermal cloud should therefore lose atoms to three-body recombination 6 times faster at equal density; JILA measured 7.4 ± 2.0 in ⁸⁷Rb in 1997.
Answer. Eᵢₙₜ/N = (gn/2)(2 − f²): kB × 55.8 nK at f = 0, 45.7 nK at f = 0.60 and 27.9 nK at f = 1. The same counting predicts thermal three-body loss 3! = 6 times the condensate's, against the measured 7.4 ± 2.0.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Bogoliubov's replacement treats the macroscopically occupied k = 0 mode of a dilute Bose gas as a number, a₀ → √N₀, after the interatomic potential has been replaced by a contact interaction g δ(r) whose strength g = 4πħ²aₛ/m is fixed by the measured scattering length.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.