Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Fall to the centre: Zα above l + ½

Bind a Klein-Gordon particle to a point nucleus with Z ≥ 69 and the exact 1s energy comes out complex. This lesson traces that to one term, the V² that squaring E − V brings in, follows it to Landau's fall to the centre, and shows why giving the nucleus a radius is the cure.

UAQM-03.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Fall to the centre: Zα above l + ½u/√r for an s state against log₁₀(r/r₁) at Z = 92, Zα = 0.671, r⁻² terms only. Shaded: a charged-shell nucleus with log₁₀(r₁/R) = 6.00, regular solution inside; solid: the matched solution outside; dashed: a nucleus ten times smaller. Scaled to 1 at r₁ below Zα = ½, to unit amplitude above. The last readout, (R/r₁)^(s₊ − s₋), is how far the nucleus damps the r^(s₋) term at r₁.u/√r near the origin: s states, Zα = 0.671solid: log₁₀(r₁/R) = 6.00; dashed: R/10(Zα)² − ¼ = 0.201shaded: nucleus−10−50log₁₀(r/r₁)+1−1
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Square the Coulomb potential and you get an inverse-square pull with no length scale.

The key idea

Fall to the centre is the loss of a lowest level when an attractive inverse-square potential beats the centrifugal barrier plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds: near r = 0 the wavefunction oscillates as √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with infinitely many nodes and nothing in the equation to fix δ.

Example. In the Klein-Gordon Coulomb problem the inverse-square attraction is (Zα)²/r², so s states fall once Zα exceeds ½, at Z ≥ 69. At Z = 92, σ = 0.448 and each node sits 1110 times closer to the nucleus than the one outside it.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Squaring the Coulomb energy in (E − V)² does two things. The cross term −2EV is the familiar 1/r attraction; the square V² = (Zαħc)²/r² is new, an attractive inverse-square potential with exactly the shape of the centrifugal barrier. Near the origin nothing else matters, and because an inverse-square potential has no length of its own, the solutions there are pure powers, u ∝ rs with s = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²). While the root is real, s states still have two normalisable behaviours, and the equation does not choose between them: a nucleus of finite size does, and picks the larger. Once Zα passes l + ½ the root is imaginary. The solutions become √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with nodes crowding geometrically towards r = 0, both equally normalisable, and no length anywhere near the origin to fix δ. Scale invariance then forbids a lowest level, which is Landau's fall to the centre, and the exact energy formula turns complex: a point nucleus with Z ≥ 69 leaves s states without a ground state. What fails is the point nucleus, not relativity. Give the nucleus a radius R and matching to the regular interior fixes δ, restores real levels, and makes them depend on R: the first place in this course where an atomic level measures the nucleus.

1Near the origin only the r⁻² terms count

Units are SI with ħ and c kept, the metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1) of topic 3.01, and V = −Zαħc/r. Topic 3.06 derived the radial equation u″ + [(E² − m²c⁴)/(ħc)² + 2EZα/(ħc r) − (l(l + 1) − (Zα)²)/r²]u = 0, quoted here. As r → 0 the bracketed terms grow as r⁰, r⁻¹ and r⁻², so only the last can balance u″. Put u = rs: s(s − 1) = l(l + 1) − (Zα)², so s = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²), derived; these are l′ + 1 and −l′ in topic 3.06's notation. The (Zα)² comes from V² in (E − V)², an attraction with the centrifugal term's shape that Schrödinger's equation never had. Checks: s is a pure number, and Zα → 0 returns Schrödinger's l + 1 and −l. For hydrogen's 1s, s₊ = 1 − 5.3 × 10⁻⁵, so the radial function u/r grows as r(−5.3 × 10⁻⁵): the exact Klein-Gordon ground state diverges at the origin, yet the factor r(−5.3 × 10⁻⁵) is only 0.07% larger at r = 10⁻⁶ a₀ than at a₀. Harmless here, it is a warning of what large Zα will do.

2Two allowed roots for s states

Near r = 0, ∫|u|² dr converges only if 2 Re s + 1 > 0, that is Re s > −½. For l ≥ 1 the smaller root sits near −l and fails: at Z = 82, l = 1 gives s₋ = −0.875, and it passes only once (Zα)² exceeds 5/4, at Z ≥ 154. For s states below Zα = ½ both roots lie between 0 and 1: at Z = 30, s₊ = 0.950 and s₋ = 0.050, and u → 0 for each. The Klein-Gordon density carries an extra factor (E − V)/mc² ∝ 1/r near the nucleus, and even that integral converges, because 2s₋ > 0. Schrödinger's other argument fails too: there a constant u meant a radial function ∝ 1/r, whose Laplacian is a δ function, but r(s₋) with s₋ ≠ 0 produces none. So the point-Coulomb equation leaves a one-parameter family of s waves, and keeping r(s₊) is a boundary condition imposed from outside, stated rather than forced. The next section supplies the physics behind it.

3A nucleus of finite size chooses the larger root

Inside a nucleus of radius R the potential is finite, so the solution there is regular and reaches R with a logarithmic derivative λ = R u′/u. Once Zαħc/R dwarfs E and mc² the interior has no length but R, so λ is a pure number independent of R; for a charged shell, V is constant inside, the interior solution is sin(Zαr/R) and λ = Zα cot(Zα). Outside, u = a r(s₊) + b r(s₋), and matching at R gives b/a = R(s₊ − s₋)(s₊ − λ)/(λ − s₋), derived. Since s₊ − s₋ = 2√(¼ − (Zα)²) is positive, b/a → 0 as R → 0: the point-nucleus limit is r(s₊), and that is the reason for the choice. It converges slowly where the power is small. At Z = 10 it is 0.989, close to Schrödinger's 1; at Z = 68 it is 0.123, so a nucleus a million times smaller still leaves b at 0.18 of its value. Close to Zα = ½ the wavefunction remembers the nucleus.

4Past l + ½ the exponents turn complex

When (Zα)² exceeds (l + ½)² the roots are s = ½ ± iσ with σ = √((Zα)² − (l + ½)²). Since r(iσ) = cos(σ ln r) + i sin(σ ln r), the real solutions are u = A√r cos(σ ln(r/r₁) + δ), derived; the length r₁ is there because a logarithm needs a pure number, and changing it only shifts δ. Nodes sit where the cosine vanishes, at radii in the fixed ratio e(π/σ), so infinitely many lie between any radius and the origin. Both conjugate solutions give |u|² ∝ r, equally normalisable, and the near-origin equation holds no length that could fix δ. With the measured α the thresholds are Zc = 68.52 for s states, 205.55 for p and 342.59 for d, so only s states of real nuclei are in reach. At Z = 92, σ = 0.448: one node per factor 1110 in r, 0.33 per decade, so a point nucleus would add about one node between 0.3 fm and 300 fm and hide the rest at radii nothing can resolve.

5No ground state: an inverse-square potential has no scale

Near the origin the equation is u″ + [(Zα)² − l(l + 1)]u/r² = 0, Schrödinger's zero-energy equation in an attractive −γħ²/(2mr²) with γ = (Zα)² − l(l + 1). That potential has no length of its own: if u(r) is a bound state of a pure r⁻² well at energy E, then u(ηr) is one at η²E for every η > 0, so one bound state implies levels without a floor. Below γ = ¼ it binds nothing; above it the zero-energy solution has infinitely many nodes, and by the oscillation theorem each marks a deeper state. This is Landau's fall to the centre, derived. Classically the particle falls once the attraction beats L²/2mr²; quantum mechanics adds ¼ to the margin, which is why the threshold is (l + ½)², not l(l + 1). The energy formula records it: E₁ₛ = mc²√(½ + √(¼ − (Zα)²)), simplified here from topic 3.07, reaches mc²/√2 at Zα = ½ and is complex beyond. A complex E makes e(−iEt/ħ) grow or decay, so it labels no stationary state.

6A finite nucleus restores real levels

Give the nucleus a radius and the matching fixes δ: at fixed r the phase is σ ln(r/R) − φ, with tan φ = (λ − ½)/σ. The levels are then real but depend on R, and the point limit does not exist: each time R shrinks by e(π/σ) another node squeezes out of the nucleus. For real nuclei, R ≈ 1.2A¹⁄³ fm from electron scattering (7.1 fm for lead, quoted), and the window between R and the edge of the near-origin region, about ħ/(2mcZα), spans only a few e-folds: too few for one node, so the levels are finite, and they shift with R. The spinless pion is the test. In pionic lead, Z = 82 and Zα = 0.598 is above ½, so the point formula is complex, yet a 1s level bound by about 7 MeV has been measured, quoted, its energy set by the nuclear size and the pion's strong interaction. The same log-periodic tower is the Efimov effect of three-body physics: ratio 22.7 predicted, about 21 measured in caesium, quoted.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Exponents at the origin

s± = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²)

Zα → 0 returns Schrödinger's l + 1 and −l. The (Zα)² is V² at work, an attraction with the centrifugal term's r⁻² shape, so it moves both roots towards ½.

u, r times the radial function in m(−1/2), goes as rs as r → 0; s, l, Zα pure numbers; from s(s − 1) = l(l + 1) − (Zα)², derived

Square-integrable at the origin

∫₀ |u|² dr converges ⟺ Re s > −½

For l ≥ 1 the root s₋ ≈ −l fails, for p states until Z ≥ 154 and for higher l beyond that. For s states nothing in the equation picks a root, so choosing one is a stated boundary condition.

u in m(−1/2), r in m; for l = 0 below Zα = ½, s₋ = ½ − √(¼ − (Zα)²) lies between 0 and ½, so both roots pass

A finite nucleus picks s₊

b/a = R(s₊ − s₋) (s₊ − λ)/(λ − s₋)

With s₊ − s₋ = 2√(¼ − (Zα)²) real and positive, b/a → 0 as R → 0. Slowly near threshold: at Z = 68 a millionfold smaller R leaves b at 0.18 of its value.

u = a r(s₊) + b r(s₋) outside a nucleus of radius R, in m; λ = R u′/u at R, a pure number set by the interior; derived

Critical coupling

Zc = (l + ½)/α

Above it the exponents are ½ ± iσ. Only s states lie within reach of real nuclei, and only for a nucleus taken as a point.

Zc is dimensionless: 68.52 for s, 205.55 for p and 342.59 for d states, with the measured α = 1/137.036; derived

Above threshold: a wave in ln r

u ≈ A √r cos(σ ln(r/r₁) + δ), σ = √((Zα)² − (l + ½)²)

Nodes sit at radii in the ratio e(π/σ), crowding without end towards r = 0: a factor 1110 per node at Z = 92. Changing r₁ only shifts δ, and nothing near the origin fixes it.

A in m⁻¹; r₁ any fixed length in m, since ln needs a pure number; σ and δ dimensionless; derived

Exact point-nucleus 1s energy

E₁ₛ = mc² √(½ + √(¼ − (Zα)²))

Expands to mc²[1 − (Zα)²/2 − 5(Zα)⁴/8]. At Zα = ½ it reaches mc²/√2, a binding of 149.7 keV for the electron's mass, with infinite slope, then turns complex.

E₁ₛ and mc² in J; topic 3.07's formula at n = 1, l = 0, simplified here; real only for Zα ≤ ½
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

92
10 to 137; steps of 1.
6.00
1 to 9; steps of 0.25.

Try this. Set Z = 60 and drag R smaller: solid and dashed merge, since the r(s₋) term dies as R(s₊ − s₋). Now set Z = 92 and repeat: each tenfold shrink of R slides the wave by σ ln 10 = 1.03 rad and the curves never agree. A point nucleus leaves the phase undefined.

Live results

s₊ (REAL PART)
0.500
σ = Im s₊
0.448
NODES PER DECADE OF r
0.328
|(R/r₁)(s₊ − s₋)|
1.0000

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelu/√r for an s state against log₁₀(r/r₁) at Z = 92, Zα = 0.671, r⁻² terms only. Shaded: a charged-shell nucleus with log₁₀(r₁/R) = 6.00, regular solution inside; solid: the matched solution outside; dashed: a nucleus ten times smaller. Scaled to 1 at r₁ below Zα = ½, to unit amplitude above. The last readout, (R/r₁)^(s₊ − s₋), is how far the nucleus damps the r^(s₋) term at r₁.u/√r near the origin: s states, Zα = 0.671solid: log₁₀(r₁/R) = 6.00; dashed: R/10(Zα)² − ¼ = 0.201shaded: nucleus−10−50log₁₀(r/r₁)+1−1
u/√r for an s state against log₁₀(r/r₁) at Z = 92, Zα = 0.671, r⁻² terms only. Shaded: a charged-shell nucleus with log₁₀(r₁/R) = 6.00, regular solution inside; solid: the matched solution outside; dashed: a nucleus ten times smaller. Scaled to 1 at r₁ below Zα = ½, to unit amplitude above. The last readout, (R/r₁)(s₊ − s₋), is how far the nucleus damps the r(s₋) term at r₁.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Nuclear charge Z: 92; Nuclear radius, log₁₀(r₁/R): 6.00

Baseline 92; choose 10 to 137, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting reading of Z = 68.5 is that binding has grown so strong that the 1s level has fallen to zero energy, or into the negative-energy states, and pair creation takes over. The formula says otherwise: at Zα = ½ the 1s energy is mc²/√2 = 0.707mc², still well inside the gap; what diverges is the slope dE/dZ, not E. The failure is a short-distance one. V² supplies an attractive (Zα)²/r² which, once it beats the centrifugal term plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds, leaves the wavefunction oscillating in ln r with nothing to fix its phase. Nor is the 1/r singularity to blame: Schrödinger's hydrogen has the same 1/r at every Z and never falls, because at short distance 1/r loses to the kinetic energy while 1/r² ties with it. Diving towards −mc² is a separate, finite-nucleus phenomenon, met for the Dirac equation near Z = 170, quoted.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Lead has Z = 82. For a spinless particle bound to a point nucleus of that charge, find the exponents s at the origin for l = 0 and l = 1, say which near-origin solutions are acceptable, and give the power of r with which u/r starts for the 2p state.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Topic 3.07 derived E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(n − l − ½ + √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²))²](−1/2). Reduce it to a closed form for 1s. For a spinless particle with the electron's mass, mc² = 511.00 keV, find the 1s binding energy at Z = 50 and Z = 68 against the Bohr value (Zα)²mc²/2, the largest binding the formula allows, and what it returns at Z = 69.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Model a nucleus of radius R as a charged shell, so V = −Zαħc/R inside, with R small enough that E and mc² are negligible there. (a) Find λ = R u′/u at R for s states. (b) For Z = 60, find the ratio of the r(s₋) term to the r(s₊) term at r = 10R and r = 100R. (c) For Z = 80, find how far the phase of u at fixed r moves when R shrinks tenfold, and by what factor R must shrink to add a node.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A spinless particle is bound to a point nucleus with Z = 40, so Zα = 0.292. Which statement about the l = 0 solutions near r = 0 is correct?
7

Review & continue

Fall to the centre is the loss of a lowest level when an attractive inverse-square potential beats the centrifugal barrier plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds: near r = 0 the wavefunction oscillates as √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with infinitely many nodes and nothing in the equation to fix δ.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.