
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Fall to the centre: Zα above l + ½
Bind a Klein-Gordon particle to a point nucleus with Z ≥ 69 and the exact 1s energy comes out complex. This lesson traces that to one term, the V² that squaring E − V brings in, follows it to Landau's fall to the centre, and shows why giving the nucleus a radius is the cure.
UAQM-03.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Square the Coulomb potential and you get an inverse-square pull with no length scale.
The key idea
Fall to the centre is the loss of a lowest level when an attractive inverse-square potential beats the centrifugal barrier plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds: near r = 0 the wavefunction oscillates as √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with infinitely many nodes and nothing in the equation to fix δ.
Example. In the Klein-Gordon Coulomb problem the inverse-square attraction is (Zα)²/r², so s states fall once Zα exceeds ½, at Z ≥ 69. At Z = 92, σ = 0.448 and each node sits 1110 times closer to the nucleus than the one outside it.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Squaring the Coulomb energy in (E − V)² does two things. The cross term −2EV is the familiar 1/r attraction; the square V² = (Zαħc)²/r² is new, an attractive inverse-square potential with exactly the shape of the centrifugal barrier. Near the origin nothing else matters, and because an inverse-square potential has no length of its own, the solutions there are pure powers, u ∝ rs with s = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²). While the root is real, s states still have two normalisable behaviours, and the equation does not choose between them: a nucleus of finite size does, and picks the larger. Once Zα passes l + ½ the root is imaginary. The solutions become √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with nodes crowding geometrically towards r = 0, both equally normalisable, and no length anywhere near the origin to fix δ. Scale invariance then forbids a lowest level, which is Landau's fall to the centre, and the exact energy formula turns complex: a point nucleus with Z ≥ 69 leaves s states without a ground state. What fails is the point nucleus, not relativity. Give the nucleus a radius R and matching to the regular interior fixes δ, restores real levels, and makes them depend on R: the first place in this course where an atomic level measures the nucleus.
1Near the origin only the r⁻² terms count
Units are SI with ħ and c kept, the metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1) of topic 3.01, and V = −Zαħc/r. Topic 3.06 derived the radial equation u″ + [(E² − m²c⁴)/(ħc)² + 2EZα/(ħc r) − (l(l + 1) − (Zα)²)/r²]u = 0, quoted here. As r → 0 the bracketed terms grow as r⁰, r⁻¹ and r⁻², so only the last can balance u″. Put u = rs: s(s − 1) = l(l + 1) − (Zα)², so s = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²), derived; these are l′ + 1 and −l′ in topic 3.06's notation. The (Zα)² comes from V² in (E − V)², an attraction with the centrifugal term's shape that Schrödinger's equation never had. Checks: s is a pure number, and Zα → 0 returns Schrödinger's l + 1 and −l. For hydrogen's 1s, s₊ = 1 − 5.3 × 10⁻⁵, so the radial function u/r grows as r(−5.3 × 10⁻⁵): the exact Klein-Gordon ground state diverges at the origin, yet the factor r(−5.3 × 10⁻⁵) is only 0.07% larger at r = 10⁻⁶ a₀ than at a₀. Harmless here, it is a warning of what large Zα will do.
2Two allowed roots for s states
Near r = 0, ∫|u|² dr converges only if 2 Re s + 1 > 0, that is Re s > −½. For l ≥ 1 the smaller root sits near −l and fails: at Z = 82, l = 1 gives s₋ = −0.875, and it passes only once (Zα)² exceeds 5/4, at Z ≥ 154. For s states below Zα = ½ both roots lie between 0 and 1: at Z = 30, s₊ = 0.950 and s₋ = 0.050, and u → 0 for each. The Klein-Gordon density carries an extra factor (E − V)/mc² ∝ 1/r near the nucleus, and even that integral converges, because 2s₋ > 0. Schrödinger's other argument fails too: there a constant u meant a radial function ∝ 1/r, whose Laplacian is a δ function, but r(s₋) with s₋ ≠ 0 produces none. So the point-Coulomb equation leaves a one-parameter family of s waves, and keeping r(s₊) is a boundary condition imposed from outside, stated rather than forced. The next section supplies the physics behind it.
3A nucleus of finite size chooses the larger root
Inside a nucleus of radius R the potential is finite, so the solution there is regular and reaches R with a logarithmic derivative λ = R u′/u. Once Zαħc/R dwarfs E and mc² the interior has no length but R, so λ is a pure number independent of R; for a charged shell, V is constant inside, the interior solution is sin(Zαr/R) and λ = Zα cot(Zα). Outside, u = a r(s₊) + b r(s₋), and matching at R gives b/a = R(s₊ − s₋)(s₊ − λ)/(λ − s₋), derived. Since s₊ − s₋ = 2√(¼ − (Zα)²) is positive, b/a → 0 as R → 0: the point-nucleus limit is r(s₊), and that is the reason for the choice. It converges slowly where the power is small. At Z = 10 it is 0.989, close to Schrödinger's 1; at Z = 68 it is 0.123, so a nucleus a million times smaller still leaves b at 0.18 of its value. Close to Zα = ½ the wavefunction remembers the nucleus.
4Past l + ½ the exponents turn complex
When (Zα)² exceeds (l + ½)² the roots are s = ½ ± iσ with σ = √((Zα)² − (l + ½)²). Since r(iσ) = cos(σ ln r) + i sin(σ ln r), the real solutions are u = A√r cos(σ ln(r/r₁) + δ), derived; the length r₁ is there because a logarithm needs a pure number, and changing it only shifts δ. Nodes sit where the cosine vanishes, at radii in the fixed ratio e(π/σ), so infinitely many lie between any radius and the origin. Both conjugate solutions give |u|² ∝ r, equally normalisable, and the near-origin equation holds no length that could fix δ. With the measured α the thresholds are Zc = 68.52 for s states, 205.55 for p and 342.59 for d, so only s states of real nuclei are in reach. At Z = 92, σ = 0.448: one node per factor 1110 in r, 0.33 per decade, so a point nucleus would add about one node between 0.3 fm and 300 fm and hide the rest at radii nothing can resolve.
5No ground state: an inverse-square potential has no scale
Near the origin the equation is u″ + [(Zα)² − l(l + 1)]u/r² = 0, Schrödinger's zero-energy equation in an attractive −γħ²/(2mr²) with γ = (Zα)² − l(l + 1). That potential has no length of its own: if u(r) is a bound state of a pure r⁻² well at energy E, then u(ηr) is one at η²E for every η > 0, so one bound state implies levels without a floor. Below γ = ¼ it binds nothing; above it the zero-energy solution has infinitely many nodes, and by the oscillation theorem each marks a deeper state. This is Landau's fall to the centre, derived. Classically the particle falls once the attraction beats L²/2mr²; quantum mechanics adds ¼ to the margin, which is why the threshold is (l + ½)², not l(l + 1). The energy formula records it: E₁ₛ = mc²√(½ + √(¼ − (Zα)²)), simplified here from topic 3.07, reaches mc²/√2 at Zα = ½ and is complex beyond. A complex E makes e(−iEt/ħ) grow or decay, so it labels no stationary state.
6A finite nucleus restores real levels
Give the nucleus a radius and the matching fixes δ: at fixed r the phase is σ ln(r/R) − φ, with tan φ = (λ − ½)/σ. The levels are then real but depend on R, and the point limit does not exist: each time R shrinks by e(π/σ) another node squeezes out of the nucleus. For real nuclei, R ≈ 1.2A¹⁄³ fm from electron scattering (7.1 fm for lead, quoted), and the window between R and the edge of the near-origin region, about ħ/(2mcZα), spans only a few e-folds: too few for one node, so the levels are finite, and they shift with R. The spinless pion is the test. In pionic lead, Z = 82 and Zα = 0.598 is above ½, so the point formula is complex, yet a 1s level bound by about 7 MeV has been measured, quoted, its energy set by the nuclear size and the pion's strong interaction. The same log-periodic tower is the Efimov effect of three-body physics: ratio 22.7 predicted, about 21 measured in caesium, quoted.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Exponents at the origin
s± = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²)
Zα → 0 returns Schrödinger's l + 1 and −l. The (Zα)² is V² at work, an attraction with the centrifugal term's r⁻² shape, so it moves both roots towards ½.
u, r times the radial function in m(−1/2), goes as rs as r → 0; s, l, Zα pure numbers; from s(s − 1) = l(l + 1) − (Zα)², derivedSquare-integrable at the origin
∫₀ |u|² dr converges ⟺ Re s > −½
For l ≥ 1 the root s₋ ≈ −l fails, for p states until Z ≥ 154 and for higher l beyond that. For s states nothing in the equation picks a root, so choosing one is a stated boundary condition.
u in m(−1/2), r in m; for l = 0 below Zα = ½, s₋ = ½ − √(¼ − (Zα)²) lies between 0 and ½, so both roots passA finite nucleus picks s₊
b/a = R(s₊ − s₋) (s₊ − λ)/(λ − s₋)
With s₊ − s₋ = 2√(¼ − (Zα)²) real and positive, b/a → 0 as R → 0. Slowly near threshold: at Z = 68 a millionfold smaller R leaves b at 0.18 of its value.
u = a r(s₊) + b r(s₋) outside a nucleus of radius R, in m; λ = R u′/u at R, a pure number set by the interior; derivedCritical coupling
Zc = (l + ½)/α
Above it the exponents are ½ ± iσ. Only s states lie within reach of real nuclei, and only for a nucleus taken as a point.
Zc is dimensionless: 68.52 for s, 205.55 for p and 342.59 for d states, with the measured α = 1/137.036; derivedAbove threshold: a wave in ln r
u ≈ A √r cos(σ ln(r/r₁) + δ), σ = √((Zα)² − (l + ½)²)
Nodes sit at radii in the ratio e(π/σ), crowding without end towards r = 0: a factor 1110 per node at Z = 92. Changing r₁ only shifts δ, and nothing near the origin fixes it.
A in m⁻¹; r₁ any fixed length in m, since ln needs a pure number; σ and δ dimensionless; derivedExact point-nucleus 1s energy
E₁ₛ = mc² √(½ + √(¼ − (Zα)²))
Expands to mc²[1 − (Zα)²/2 − 5(Zα)⁴/8]. At Zα = ½ it reaches mc²/√2, a binding of 149.7 keV for the electron's mass, with infinite slope, then turns complex.
E₁ₛ and mc² in J; topic 3.07's formula at n = 1, l = 0, simplified here; real only for Zα ≤ ½Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set Z = 60 and drag R smaller: solid and dashed merge, since the r(s₋) term dies as R(s₊ − s₋). Now set Z = 92 and repeat: each tenfold shrink of R slides the wave by σ ln 10 = 1.03 rad and the curves never agree. A point nucleus leaves the phase undefined.
Live results
- s₊ (REAL PART)
- 0.500
- σ = Im s₊
- 0.448
- NODES PER DECADE OF r
- 0.328
- |(R/r₁)(s₊ − s₋)|
- 1.0000
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Nuclear charge Z: 92; Nuclear radius, log₁₀(r₁/R): 6.00
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting reading of Z = 68.5 is that binding has grown so strong that the 1s level has fallen to zero energy, or into the negative-energy states, and pair creation takes over. The formula says otherwise: at Zα = ½ the 1s energy is mc²/√2 = 0.707mc², still well inside the gap; what diverges is the slope dE/dZ, not E. The failure is a short-distance one. V² supplies an attractive (Zα)²/r² which, once it beats the centrifugal term plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds, leaves the wavefunction oscillating in ln r with nothing to fix its phase. Nor is the 1/r singularity to blame: Schrödinger's hydrogen has the same 1/r at every Z and never falls, because at short distance 1/r loses to the kinetic energy while 1/r² ties with it. Diving towards −mc² is a separate, finite-nucleus phenomenon, met for the Dirac equation near Z = 170, quoted.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Lead has Z = 82. For a spinless particle bound to a point nucleus of that charge, find the exponents s at the origin for l = 0 and l = 1, say which near-origin solutions are acceptable, and give the power of r with which u/r starts for the 2p state.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Zα = 82/137.036 = 0.59838, so (Zα)² = 0.35806. The exponents are s = ½ ± √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²), derived in this lesson from s(s − 1) = l(l + 1) − (Zα)².
- l = 0: (l + ½)² − (Zα)² = 0.25 − 0.35806 = −0.10806, negative, so s = ½ ± iσ with σ = √0.10806 = 0.329. Both give |u|² ∝ r near the origin; the real solutions √r cos(0.329 ln(r/r₁) + δ) have nodes at radii in the ratio e(π/0.329) = 1.4 × 10⁴, and δ is left unfixed.
- l = 1: 2.25 − 0.35806 = 1.89194, whose root is 1.37548, so s₊ = 1.875 and s₋ = −0.875. Square-integrability needs Re s > −½, which s₋ fails, so only u ∝ r(1.875) is allowed and the 2p state is well defined.
- Then u/r ∝ r(0.875) near the origin, against Schrödinger's r¹: V² draws the p wave slightly in towards the nucleus. Check: as Zα → 0 the l = 1 exponents return to 2 and −1, Schrödinger's l + 1 and −l.
Answer. l = 0: s = ½ ± 0.329i, complex, so the point-nucleus 1s falls to the centre. l = 1: s₊ = 1.875 and s₋ = −0.875, only s₊ normalisable, so u/r ∝ r(0.875) for 2p.
MediumExample 2
Topic 3.07 derived E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(n − l − ½ + √((l + ½)² − (Zα)²))²](−1/2). Reduce it to a closed form for 1s. For a spinless particle with the electron's mass, mc² = 511.00 keV, find the 1s binding energy at Z = 50 and Z = 68 against the Bohr value (Zα)²mc²/2, the largest binding the formula allows, and what it returns at Z = 69.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Set n = 1, l = 0 and write S = √(¼ − (Zα)²). Then (Zα)² = ¼ − S² = (½ − S)(½ + S), so (Zα)²/(½ + S)² = (½ − S)/(½ + S), and adding 1 gives 1/(½ + S). Hence E₁ₛ = mc²√(½ + S), derived.
- Limit check: for small Zα, S ≈ ½ − (Zα)² − (Zα)⁴, so E₁ₛ ≈ mc²[1 − (Zα)²/2 − 5(Zα)⁴/8]: Bohr's term, then topic 3.07's (Zα)⁴ term with n/(l + ½) − ¾ = 5/4.
- Z = 50: Zα = 0.36487 and S = √(0.25 − 0.13313) = 0.34186, so E₁ₛ = √0.84186 mc² = 0.91753 mc². The binding is 0.08247 × 511.00 keV = 42.14 keV, against Bohr's 34.01 keV.
- Z = 68: Zα = 0.49622 and S = √0.0037657 = 0.06137, so E₁ₛ = √0.56137 mc² = 0.74924 mc² and the binding is 128.1 keV, more than twice Bohr's 62.9 keV, because S is now changing fast with Z.
- S is real only for Zα ≤ ½, that is Z ≤ 1/(2α) = 68.52. At that end point E₁ₛ = mc²/√2 = 0.70711 mc², a binding of 149.7 keV, and dE/dZ, proportional to 1/S, diverges.
- Z = 69: S = 0.05941i, so E₁ₛ = mc²√(½ + 0.05941i) = (0.70835 + 0.04194i)mc². A complex energy makes e(−iEt/ħ) grow or decay with no decay channel anywhere in the equation: the formula has stopped describing a state.
Answer. E₁ₛ = mc²√(½ + √(¼ − (Zα)²)). Binding 42.1 keV at Z = 50 (Bohr 34.0 keV) and 128 keV at Z = 68 (Bohr 62.9 keV); at most 149.7 keV, at Zα = ½; at Z = 69 the formula returns (0.708 + 0.042i)mc².
HardExample 3
Model a nucleus of radius R as a charged shell, so V = −Zαħc/R inside, with R small enough that E and mc² are negligible there. (a) Find λ = R u′/u at R for s states. (b) For Z = 60, find the ratio of the r(s₋) term to the r(s₊) term at r = 10R and r = 100R. (c) For Z = 80, find how far the phase of u at fixed r moves when R shrinks tenfold, and by what factor R must shrink to add a node.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- (a) Inside, the radial equation reduces to u″ + (Zα/R)²u = 0, whose regular solution is u = sin(Zαr/R). So λ = Zα cot(Zα), a pure number independent of R. Check: as Zα → 0, λ → 1 − (Zα)²/3 → 1, Schrödinger's l + 1.
- Outside, put u = √r g(t) with t = ln(r/R). The near-origin equation becomes g″ + ((Zα)² − ¼)g = 0, and matching at R gives g(0) = 1 and g′(0) = λ − ½, derived.
- (b) Z = 60: Zα = 0.43784, λ = 0.93527 and ν = √(¼ − (Zα)²) = 0.24144, so s± = 0.74144 and 0.25856. Then g = [(1 + κ)e(νt) + (1 − κ)e(−νt)]/2 with κ = (λ − ½)/ν = 1.8028, and the term ratio is ((1 − κ)/(1 + κ))e(−2νt) = −0.2864 e(−2νt).
- At r = 10R, e(−2νt) = 10(−0.4829) = 0.3289, so the ratio is −0.0942; at r = 100R it is −0.0310. Shrinking R tenfold at fixed r divides the admixture by only 10(2ν) = 3.04, against nearly 10 at small Z.
- (c) Z = 80: Zα = 0.58379, λ = 0.88373 and σ = √((Zα)² − ¼) = 0.30134. Then g = cos σt + ((λ − ½)/σ) sin σt = 1.619 cos(σt − φ) with φ = atan(1.2734) = 0.9051 rad. At fixed r the phase σ ln(r/R) − φ grows by σ ln 10 = 0.694 rad, 39.8°, for each tenfold shrink of R, without limit.
- A node is added each time σ ln(r/R) advances by π, a factor e(π/σ) = e(10.43) = 3.4 × 10⁴ in R. The first node outside R lies at t = (π/2 + φ)/σ = 8.22, r = 3700R, about 26 000 fm for R = 7.0 fm: far beyond the 330 fm or so where the near-origin form holds for an electron-mass particle, so a real nucleus has no such node.
Answer. λ = Zα cot(Zα). At Z = 60 the r(s₋) admixture is −0.094 at 10R and −0.031 at 100R, falling only 3.04-fold per decade of R. At Z = 80 the phase slips 0.694 rad per decade, and a node is added per factor 3.4 × 10⁴ in R.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Fall to the centre is the loss of a lowest level when an attractive inverse-square potential beats the centrifugal barrier plus the ¼ that quantum mechanics adds: near r = 0 the wavefunction oscillates as √r cos(σ ln r + δ), with infinitely many nodes and nothing in the equation to fix δ.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.