Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Relativistic Landau levels of a spinless particle

In a uniform magnetic field the Klein-Gordon equation becomes a problem you have already solved, and that is the point: the same oscillator, now giving an exact ladder in E². We use it to watch relativity squeeze Landau levels, recover the classical cyclotron frequency, and set the spinless baseline the Dirac equation will beat.

UAQM-03.05 · Lesson 5 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Relativistic Landau levels of a spinless particleKlein-Gordon Landau levels E/mc² against p_z/mc at B = 0.40 B_c. Solid: levels n = 0 to 3, and n = 0 and 1 at negative energy. Dashed: the free edge ±√(m²c⁴ + p_z²c²) and non-relativistic level 1. At p_z = 0.5 mc level 1 has E = 1.565 mc²; Mₙ = 1.483 m is its mass for motion along B, and 2E₀ is the gap between the n = 0 levels at p_z = 0.solid: exact levels, n = 0–3 above, n = 0–1 belowdashed: B = 0 edge, non-relativistic n = 1E/mc²pz/mcMₙ = 1.483 mgap 2E₀ = 2.366 mc²
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Same oscillator, new eigenvalue: the Landau ladder becomes a ladder in E².

The key idea

Relativistic Landau levels are the exact energies E = ±√(m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1)ħ|q|Bc²) of a spinless charge in a uniform magnetic field, with |q|B/h states per unit area in every level.

Example. At B = Bc = 4.41 × 10⁹ T and pz = 0, a spinless particle with the electron's mass and charge has its lowest level at √2 mc² = 723 keV, not the 766 keV that mc² + ½ħωc predicts.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A uniform magnetic field is the one place where the Klein-Gordon equation is solved by doing nothing new. In the Landau gauge A = (0, Bx, 0) the minimally coupled equation contains no t, y or z, so the energy, py and pz separate. What is left in x is Quantum Mechanics II's displaced oscillator with the rest mass m and ωc = |q|B/m unchanged. The only edit is to its eigenvalue: (E² − m²c⁴ − pz²c²)/2mc² now stands where the Schrödinger energy stood. The ladder therefore lives in E², not in E: E² = m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1)ħ|q|Bc², exact for either sign of E. Every level keeps QM-II's |q|B/h states per unit area, because nothing in the counting ever involved the energy. Two checks come for free. Expanding about mc² gives back QM-II's Landau energy less its square over 2mc², the expectation value of −π⁴/(8m³c²), topic 3.03's term minimally coupled. The gap between neighbours, 2ħ|q|Bc²/(Eₙ + Eₙ₊₁), tends at large n to ħ|q|B/(γm), ħ times a classical relativistic charge's cyclotron frequency. The model stops at what it leaves out. With no spin, no term ever splits a level or cancels the zero-point energy, so at pz = 0 the lowest level sits at mc²√(1 + B/Bc), while Unit 6's Dirac levels put the electron's lowest at exactly mc². Relativity reaches the lowest levels only near Bc = m²c²/(ħ|q|), 4.4 × 10⁹ T for the electron's mass; at lab fields it needs large n or pz. The negative-energy ladder waits for Unit 9.

1Separate the equation in the Landau gauge

Units are SI throughout and the metric is diag(1, −1, −1, −1), with pμ = iħ∂μ and, from topic 3.04, minimal coupling pμ → pμ − qAμ, Aμ = (φ/c, A). For a field B along z take φ = 0 and the Landau gauge A = (0, Bx, 0), so ∇ × A = B ẑ, and the equation reads −ħ²∂²ψ/∂t² = [c²(−iħ∇ − qA)² + m²c⁴]ψ. Nothing depends on t, y or z, so try ψ = f(x) e(i(ky y + kz z − Et/ħ)). With pz = ħkz and ħky − qBx = −qB(x − x₀), x₀ = ħky/(qB), dividing by 2mc² leaves [pₓ²/2m + ½mωc²(x − x₀)²] f = [(E² − m²c⁴ − pz²c²)/2mc²] f, with ωc = |q|B/m. That is QM-II's displaced oscillator line for line: the same rest mass m, the same ωc, the same centre x₀ and the same Hermite functions of (x − x₀)/ℓB, with ℓB = √(ħ/|q|B). Exactly one thing has changed. The number standing where the Schrödinger energy stood is now (E² − m²c⁴ − pz²c²)/2mc², still an energy, as the dimensions require.

2A ladder in E², with both signs of energy

QM-II's eigenvalue (n + ½)ħωc, quoted, now fixes E² rather than E: E² = m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1)ħ|q|Bc², exactly. Dimensions: ħ|q|B is (J s)(C)(kg s⁻¹ C⁻¹) = kg J, and times c² it is J², like m²c⁴. Read it as E² = Mₙ²c⁴ + pz²c² with Mₙ = m√(1 + (2n + 1)B/Bc) and Bc = m²c²/(ħ|q|). Each level moves along B as a free particle whose rest energy includes its gyration, so its inertia along B grows with n, which no non-relativistic level shows. Bc is 4.414 × 10⁹ T for the electron's mass and charge, the field that shrinks ℓB to the reduced Compton wavelength ħ/mc = 386 fm. Free-field limit: let B → 0 with (2n + 1)ħ|q|B = p⊥² held fixed, and E² = m²c⁴ + p²c² returns. Both signs of E solve the equation, so a ladder reaching down from −√(m²c⁴ + ħ|q|Bc²) mirrors the positive one. It carries topic 3.02's negative density and waits for Unit 9 to be read as antiparticles.

3Counting states: |q|B/h per unit area, untouched by relativity

Put the particle in an Lₓ × Ly rectangle, periodic in y, so ky = 2πj/Ly with j an integer. The energy never involves ky. It only places the orbit's centre at x₀ = ħky/(qB), which must lie inside the sample, a range Lₓ. The number of allowed j is therefore the ky range Lₓ|q|B/ħ divided by the spacing 2π/Ly, which is |q|BLₓLy/h. Each level holds |q|B/h states per unit area, derived: 2.418 × 10¹⁴ m⁻² per tesla for |q| = e, one state for each flux quantum h/|q| = 4.136 × 10⁻¹⁵ Wb threading the sample. Neither the x equation nor the range of x₀ knows E, so relativity moves every level and leaves each exactly as full as QM-II found it. The count is measured. A filled level of eB/h electrons per unit area carries Hall conductance e²/h, and quantum Hall plateaus sit at h/(νe²) for ν filled levels, with h/e² = 25 812.807 Ω, the same in every device to better than a part in 10⁹. Spin-split electron levels stand in there for our spinless ones.

4The non-relativistic limit and its first correction

Write ε = (n + ½)ħωc + pz²/2m, QM-II's Landau energy. The exact result is E = mc²√(1 + 2ε/mc²), and the binomial series gives E = mc² + ε − ε²/(2mc²) + ε³/(2m²c⁴) − …, derived: rest energy, then QM-II, then the first relativistic correction. Topic 3.03 found that correction as −p⁴/(8m³c²), and topic 3.04's minimal coupling makes it −π⁴/(8m³c²), with π = p − qA. Here π²/2m is exactly the non-relativistic Hamiltonian H₀ and ψ is its eigenstate, so ⟨−π⁴/(8m³c²)⟩ = −⟨(2mH₀)²⟩/(8m³c²) = −ε²/(2mc²). First-order perturbation theory returns the exact ε² term, and since the perturbation is a function of H₀ the ky degeneracy causes no trouble. The cross term in ε², −(n + ½)(B/Bc)pz²/2m, is the first sign of Mₙ. The series converges only while 2ε is below mc², the radius of convergence of √(1 + u). In a Penning trap at 5.36 T it converges fast: ħωc/mc² = 1.21 × 10⁻⁹, and the n → n + 1 line sits (n + 1) × 182 Hz below νc = 150.0 GHz, the size of shift the Harvard g-factor measurements correct for.

5Large n: ħ times the relativistic cyclotron frequency

Subtract neighbouring levels exactly: Eₙ₊₁² − Eₙ² = 2ħ|q|Bc², so Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ = 2ħ|q|Bc²/(Eₙ + Eₙ₊₁) = ħ|q|B/(γ̄m), with γ̄ the mean of the two levels' Lorentz factors γ = E/mc². That is derived, for every n. Classically, dp/dt = qv × B with p = γmv, and γ is constant because B does no work, so the charge circles at ω = |q|B/(γm), with γ counting the motion along B too. At large n neighbouring γs agree to order 1/n, and the quantum gap becomes ħω, as Bohr's correspondence demands: the ladder's squeeze is the slowing of a heavier orbit. The orbit matches too. Since p⊥² = (2n + 1)ħ|q|B, the radius p⊥/(|q|B) is √(2n + 1) ℓB, enclosing (n + ½)h/|q| of flux. A 7 TeV LHC proton in 8.33 T has γ = 7461 and n ≈ 5.0 × 10²². Its radius comes out at 2.80 km, the bending radius the dipoles are built for, and its level spacing is 7.0 × 10⁻¹¹ eV, ħ × 2π × 17.0 kHz, 7461 times below the non-relativistic ħωc.

6No spin term at any order: the baseline for g = 2

The Klein-Gordon levels depend on B only through (2n + 1)ħ|q|B. Nothing tells one orientation from another, no level splits, and the zero-point ½ħωc survives to all orders, so at pz = 0 the lowest level sits at mc²√(1 + B/Bc), above mc² in any field. Unit 6 derives, and we quote, the Dirac result E² = m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1 ± 1)ħ|q|Bc², the lower sign for a spin moment along B. The spinless rungs sit exactly midway, in E², between Dirac rungs; the lowest Dirac level stays at √(m²c⁴ + pz²c²) in every field; and at low energy the extra ±½ħωc is a spin energy with g = 2. Even the correction changes, from ((n + ½)ħωc)²/(2mc²) to ((n + ½ + mₛ)ħωc)²/(2mc²) in Penning-trap analyses. A measured contrast: graphene's electrons obey a massless Dirac equation with vF ≈ 1 × 10⁶ m s⁻¹ in place of c, and spectroscopy finds levels at ±vF√(2nħeB), one at zero energy and the next at 36 meV in 1 T. A massless Klein-Gordon ladder, vF√((2n + 1)ħeB), would start at 26 meV, with no zero level.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The Landau-gauge equation is QM-II's oscillator

[pₓ²/2m + ½mωc²(x − x₀)²] f = [(E² − m²c⁴ − pz²c²)/2mc²] f

Only the eigenvalue changes: (E² − m²c⁴ − pz²c²)/2mc² stands where the Schrödinger energy stood, so QM-II's Hermite functions solve it unchanged.

A = (0, Bx, 0); rest mass m in kg; ωc = |q|B/m in s⁻¹; x₀ = ħky/(qB) in m; E and pzc in J; derived

Exact relativistic Landau levels

E² = m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1)ħ|q|Bc², n = 0, 1, 2, …

Each level moves along B as a free particle of mass Mₙ = m√(1 + (2n + 1)B/Bc); B → 0 at fixed (2n + 1)ħ|q|B returns E² = m²c⁴ + p²c².

E in J, either sign; pz in kg m s⁻¹; q in C; B in T; derived from QM-II's (n + ½)ħωc, which is quoted

States per unit area in each level

N/(LₓLy) = |q|B/h

One state per flux quantum h/|q|. The count comes from where the orbit centre x₀ = ħky/(qB) can sit, which never involves E, so relativity moves every level and empties none.

N states per level in an Lₓ × Ly sample, so N/(LₓLy) in m⁻²; 2.418 × 10¹⁴ m⁻² per tesla for |q| = e; derived

Non-relativistic expansion

E = mc² + ε − ε²/(2mc²) + ε³/(2m²c⁴) − …, ε = (n + ½)ħωc + pz²/2m

The ε² term equals ⟨−π⁴/(8m³c²)⟩ exactly, because π²/2m is the Hamiltonian whose eigenstate this is: topic 3.03's correction with p → π, confirmed.

ε in J is QM-II's Landau energy; derived; the series converges only while 2ε is below mc²

Gap between neighbouring levels

Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ = 2ħ|q|Bc²/(Eₙ + Eₙ₊₁) = ħ|q|B/(γ̄m)

At large n neighbouring γs agree, and the gap is ħ times |q|B/(γm), the classical relativistic cyclotron frequency: correspondence, derived rather than assumed.

γ̄ = (Eₙ + Eₙ₊₁)/(2mc²), the mean Lorentz factor of the two levels; exact for every n; derived

Field at which relativity matters

Bc = m²c²/(ħ|q|)

At pz = 0, Eₙ = mc²√(1 + (2n + 1)B/Bc). At B = Bc the magnetic length √(ħ/|q|B) equals ħ/mc, the reduced Compton wavelength.

Bc in T; 4.414 × 10⁹ T for the electron's mass and charge, 3.29 × 10¹⁴ T for a charged pion; derived
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.40
0 to 0.6; steps of 0.02.
1
0 to 3; steps of 1.
0.5 mc
−1.2 to 1.2 mc; steps of 0.1.

Try this. Set B to 0 and every level collapses onto the free edge; raise it and the ladder opens, each rung closer to the last. Compare the gap readout with ħωc/γₙ, then slide pz outwards and watch the dashed non-relativistic parabola climb away from the exact level.

Live results

EXACT Eₙ
1.5652 mc²
NON-RELATIVISTIC mc² + ε
1.7250 mc²
EXACT GAP Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ
0.2375 mc²
CLASSICAL ħωc/γₙ
0.2556 mc²

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelKlein-Gordon Landau levels E/mc² against p_z/mc at B = 0.40 B_c. Solid: levels n = 0 to 3, and n = 0 and 1 at negative energy. Dashed: the free edge ±√(m²c⁴ + p_z²c²) and non-relativistic level 1. At p_z = 0.5 mc level 1 has E = 1.565 mc²; Mₙ = 1.483 m is its mass for motion along B, and 2E₀ is the gap between the n = 0 levels at p_z = 0.solid: exact levels, n = 0–3 above, n = 0–1 belowdashed: B = 0 edge, non-relativistic n = 1E/mc²pz/mcMₙ = 1.483 mgap 2E₀ = 2.366 mc²
Klein-Gordon Landau levels E/mc² against pz/mc at B = 0.40 Bc. Solid: levels n = 0 to 3, and n = 0 and 1 at negative energy. Dashed: the free edge ±√(m²c⁴ + pz²c²) and non-relativistic level 1. At pz = 0.5 mc level 1 has E = 1.565 mc²; Mₙ = 1.483 m is its mass for motion along B, and 2E₀ is the gap between the n = 0 levels at pz = 0.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Field strength B/Bc: 0.40; Highlighted level n: 1; Momentum along B, pz: 0.5 mc

Baseline 0.40; choose 0 to 0.6, in steps of 0.02.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting shortcut is to keep the non-relativistic ladder and replace m by γm, giving levels γmc² + (n + ½)ħ|q|B/(γm), evenly spaced by ħ|q|B/(γm). It cannot be right, because γ is not an input. Each level has its own energy and so its own γₙ = Eₙ/mc², and a ladder with one γ is not even defined. In the exact solution the oscillator's mass is the rest mass m, and all of relativity sits in the eigenvalue, which is quadratic in E. The classical frequency survives only as the spacing between neighbours, exactly ħ|q|B/(γ̄m) with γ̄ the mean of the two levels' factors, and it matches ħ|q|B/(γm) for either level alone only as n → ∞. At B = Bc and pz = 0 the exact levels are 1.414 mc² and 2.000 mc², 0.586 mc² apart, while ħωc/γ is 0.707 mc² for the lower level and 0.500 mc² for the upper.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A negative pion (spin 0, mc² = 139.570 MeV, charge −e) moves with pz = 0 in a 12.0 T solenoid. Find Bc for the pion, the energy of its n = 0 Landau level above mc², the fractional size of the relativistic correction to that energy, and how many states per square millimetre each level holds.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A spinless particle with the electron's mass and charge sits in a Penning trap's 5.36 T field, the scale of the Harvard one-electron experiments. Find νc. Then use the exact levels to find how far the n → n + 1 cyclotron line falls below νc for n = 0 and n = 1, and explain why evaluating the exact formula directly in double precision fails.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

In a field of 8.83 × 10⁹ T, twice Bc for the electron's mass and charge and of the order inferred at magnetar surfaces, take a spinless particle with that mass and charge and pz = 0. Find its three lowest levels and the gaps between them, test the non-relativistic series, compare the gaps with the classical ħ|q|B/(γm), and set the lowest level beside the quoted Dirac value.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A spinless particle of mass m and charge q has pz = 0 in a uniform field B = 0.60 Bc, where Bc = m²c²/(ħ|q|). What is the energy gap between its n = 1 and n = 2 Landau levels?
7

Review & continue

Relativistic Landau levels are the exact energies E = ±√(m²c⁴ + pz²c² + (2n + 1)ħ|q|Bc²) of a spinless charge in a uniform magnetic field, with |q|B/h states per unit area in every level.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.