
Physics III course sequence · Interactive lesson
Superposition & Linear Media
Everything later in this section — fringe patterns, beats, Doppler analysis — is cashed against one licence: overlapping waves add displacement by displacement and then walk away unchanged. Linearity grants that licence, and linearity is an approximation with a measurable edge.
UPIII-03.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Superposition is granted by an equation, not by the waves.
The key idea
The superposition principle says that where two or more waves overlap in a linear medium, the displacement of the medium at each point and instant is the algebraic sum of the displacements each wave would produce there on its own.
Example. If one pulse would lift a rope element by 9.0 mm while another pulls the same element down by 4.0 mm at the same instant, the element sits at +5.0 mm — and a moment later each pulse has its full height back.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A wave equation earns superposition by being linear. Write the one-dimensional equation as ∂²y/∂x² = (1/v²) ∂²y/∂t²: every term is first degree in y or in a derivative of y, so the operator distributes over sums and a y₁ + b y₂ solves it whenever y₁ and y₂ do. The physical content is a bookkeeping rule — at every point and every instant the medium's displacement is the algebraic sum of what each wave would produce alone — and with it comes a strong corollary: the waves do not act on each other, so they leave an overlap with their shapes, speeds and amplitudes intact. That linearity is not a law of nature but the leading term of an expansion. A string obeys it while the slope ∂y/∂x stays small enough that sin θ may be replaced by tan θ and the tension treated as constant; air obeys it while the condensation δρ/ρ₀ stays small enough that the adiabatic law P ∝ ργ may be cut after its first term. Push past those conditions and the speed itself begins to depend on the local amplitude: crests overtake troughs, the waveform steepens, harmonics that were never launched appear, and two overlapping waves start generating frequencies neither of them carried. Superposition then fails — and it fails measurably, which is what makes the linear model a testable claim rather than a convenience.
1Linearity is a property of the equation
Superposition is not a separate physical postulate; it is the algebraic shape of the wave equation. Collect the equation into an operator, L[y] ≡ ∂²y/∂x² − (1/v²) ∂²y/∂t², so that a wave is anything with L[y] = 0. Every term in L is first degree in y or in one of its derivatives, and differentiation is itself linear, so L[a y₁ + b y₂] = a L[y₁] + b L[y₂] for any constants a and b. If both waves solve the equation the right-hand side is zero, and the combination solves it too. Change one term and the property evaporates: add even a modest λy² and the combination picks up a cross term 2λ y₁ y₂ belonging to neither wave, so the sum is no longer a solution. Notice also what linearity does not demand. It says nothing about the shapes, frequencies or directions involved — a 40 Hz pulse and a 4 kHz sinusoid superpose exactly as readily as two identical crests — and it does not require the waves to be small, only that the equation governing them stay linear across the range they actually use.
2Where the linear equation comes from: one segment of string
Take a short segment of a taut string, of length Δx along x, carrying tension F and mass per unit length μ. The tension pulls along the string at each end, so the net transverse force is F(sin θ₂ − sin θ₁), with θ the local angle to the x axis. Exactly, sin θ = (∂y/∂x)/√(1 + (∂y/∂x)²); exactly, the segment's mass is μ√(1 + (∂y/∂x)²) Δx, because a displaced segment is longer than Δx; and exactly, that extra length raises F. Three separate nonlinearities, all three governed by the same dimensionless number, the slope ∂y/∂x. Impose (∂y/∂x)² ≪ 1 and all three corrections vanish together: the force becomes F (∂²y/∂x²) Δx, the mass becomes μ Δx, and Newton's second law gives F ∂²y/∂x² = μ ∂²y/∂t², with v = √(F/μ). The condition has a size. A wave whose steepest slope is 0.05 makes sin θ differ from ∂y/∂x by 0.12%; at a slope of 0.10 the error is 0.50%. Linearity on a string is not a yes-or-no property — it is an accuracy, and it degrades as the square of the slope.
3What superposition licenses, and what it does not
Operationally the rule is narrow and precise: at a chosen point and a chosen instant, add the displacements the individual waves would produce there, carrying their signs. If one pulse would put a rope element at +12 mm and another at −4 mm, the element is at +8 mm. Every quantity depending linearly on y inherits the rule, because a linear operation applied to a sum returns the sum of the results: transverse velocity ∂y/∂t, slope ∂y/∂x, transverse force, and — for sound and light — acoustic pressure and electric field. Quantities built from squares inherit nothing. Kinetic energy per unit length is ½μ(∂y/∂t)², potential energy per unit length is ½F(∂y/∂x)², and intensity goes as amplitude squared, so none of them is the sum of the separate values. The same linearity licenses decomposition as well as addition. Because any solution can be written as a sum of sinusoids and each sinusoid then propagates independently at v, one column of air carries an orchestra without the cello smearing the piccolo, and a bounded medium can be analysed one normal mode at a time.
4Two pulses meet, and neither is changed
Send a pulse f(x − vt) rightward and an inverted copy −f(x + vt) leftward, timed to coincide at t = 0. Then y = f(x) − f(x) = 0 everywhere: the string is flat. It is not at rest. The wave equation is second order in time, so the state of the string is its displacement together with its transverse velocity, and ∂y/∂t = −v f′(x − vt) − v f′(x + vt) equals −2v f′(x) at that instant — largest exactly where the pulse was steepest. The whole energy is kinetic, and the flat string immediately rebuilds both pulses. Run the experiment with two identical upright pulses and the complement appears: at coincidence y = 2f(x) and ∂y/∂t = 0, a doubled crest momentarily at rest with all its energy potential. The accounting closes exactly. A travelling pulse splits its energy equally between kinetic and potential, so each carries 2U with U = ∫ ½F f′² dx. At full overlap the doubled crest holds ∫ ½F (2f′)² dx = 4U, and the flat moving string holds ∫ ½μ (2v f′)² dx = 4U as well, because μv² = F. Two pulses in, 4U throughout, two pulses out.
5The small-amplitude condition for sound, in numbers
Sound compresses air far too fast for heat to flow, so the state follows P = P₀(1 + s)γ, where s = δρ/ρ₀ is the condensation and γ = 1.40 for air. Expanding, P = P₀[1 + γs + ½γ(γ − 1)s² + …]. Keeping only the term linear in s gives the acoustic pressure p = γP₀ s and, with the continuity and momentum relations, a linear wave equation whose speed is c = √(γP₀/ρ₀). That deserves a correspondence check: √(1.40 × 1.013 × 10⁵ Pa ÷ 1.20 kg m⁻³) = 344 m s⁻¹, which is the measured speed of sound. Now size the discarded term. Ordinary speech at 60 dB carries an intensity of 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ W m⁻², a pressure amplitude of 0.029 Pa and a condensation of only 2.0 × 10⁻⁷. Even at 120 dB, the threshold of pain, the pressure amplitude is 28.7 Pa and s ≈ 2.0 × 10⁻⁴. The first discarded term is down on the linear one by ½(γ − 1)s ≈ 4 × 10⁻⁵, so linear acoustics holds to a few parts in a hundred thousand across the whole range of ordinary hearing.
6Where the licence is withdrawn
Push the amplitude up and the speed itself begins to depend on the wave. For sound of finite amplitude the local propagation speed is c + βu, with u the signed particle velocity and β = (γ + 1)/2 = 1.20 in air. Compressions, which carry u forward, outrun rarefactions; the waveform leans forward and steepens, and the steepening breeds harmonics at 2f, 3f, … that were never launched. The distance over which a sinusoid steepens into a shock is x ≈ c²/(βωu₀). At 1.0 kHz and 120 dB, u₀ = 0.070 m s⁻¹ and x ≈ 2.2 × 10² m — far longer than any concert hall, which is why room acoustics is linear, and far shorter than the path of a sonic boom, which is why that is not. The test is sharp. A linear, time-independent medium can change a wave amplitude and its phase, but it can never place energy at a frequency absent from the input. Drive two tones f₁ and f₂ through a nonlinear element and new spectral lines at f₁ + f₂ and 2f₁ − f₂ appear, frequencies neither source carried. Measure one of those and you have measured the failure of superposition.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
The one-dimensional wave equation
∂²y/∂x² = (1/v²) ∂²y/∂t²
Second order in both variables but first degree in y: no y², no y ∂y/∂x. That degree is the entire licence for superposition.
y displacement in m, x in m, t in s, v the wave speed in m s⁻¹Linearity of the wave operator
L[y] ≡ ∂²y/∂x² − (1/v²) ∂²y/∂t², L[a y₁ + b y₂] = a L[y₁] + b L[y₂]
If L[y₁] = 0 and L[y₂] = 0, then L[a y₁ + b y₂] = 0, so every combination of solutions is itself a solution.
a and b are dimensionless constants; L[y] carries the unit m⁻¹Superposition of displacements
y(x, t) = y₁(x, t) + y₂(x, t) + …
Fixes the medium point by point and instant by instant; everything linear in y — velocity, slope, pressure, field — adds the same way.
an algebraic sum with signs, each term in m at the same x and the same tSmall-slope approximation on a string
sin θ = (∂y/∂x) / √(1 + (∂y/∂x)²) ≈ ∂y/∂x
Dropping the root is what makes the string equation linear. At a slope of 0.10 the error is 0.50%; it reaches 5% only at a slope of 0.33.
θ is the angle the string makes with the x axis; the slope ∂y/∂x is dimensionlessLinear-acoustics condition
p = γ P₀ s, valid while s ≪ 1
Cutting the adiabatic law after the term linear in s is what linearises sound; at 120 dB s ≈ 2 × 10⁻⁴, so the first dropped term is smaller than the one kept by ½(γ − 1)s ≈ 4 × 10⁻⁵.
p acoustic pressure in Pa, P₀ = 1.013 × 10⁵ Pa, γ = 1.40 for air, s = δρ/ρ₀ dimensionlessLocal speed of a finite-amplitude sound wave
vlocal = c + ((γ + 1)/2) u
Crests travel faster than troughs, so the waveform steepens, breeds harmonics and finally shocks — and superposition is gone.
u the signed particle velocity in m s⁻¹; c = 343 m s⁻¹ in air at 20 °CInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set the second pulse to −15 mm and drag t to 40: the string goes flat although both dashed pulses are plainly still there. With ε at 0, carry t on to 60 and both pulses emerge unchanged; raise ε at t = 40 and a dent appears that no linear medium could produce.
Live results
- PULSE 1 AT MEETING POINT
- 12.5 mm
- PULSE 2 AT MEETING POINT
- -8.4 mm
- LINEAR SUM THERE
- 4.2 mm
- NONLINEAR MIXING TERM
- 0.0 mm
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Time t: 36 ms; Second pulse height A₂: −10 mm; Nonlinear mixing ε: 0.0
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The words interference and collision invite the picture that overlapping waves act on each other — push, deflect or annihilate — and that where they cancel their energy is destroyed. Linearity says the opposite: each wave keeps solving the equation as though the other were absent, so the sum is a statement about the medium's displacement, never an interaction between waves. Two consequences are routinely missed. Displacements add with their signs, not as heights, so +6 mm meeting −6 mm gives 0 rather than 12 mm. And a flat string is not an empty string: the state includes ∂y/∂t, and at the instant of total cancellation the transverse velocity is at its maximum, holding every joule the two pulses brought. Nothing is stored and nothing is destroyed; the pulses reappear because the equation is linear.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
At one instant the string element at x = 0.60 m would be displaced +8.0 mm by pulse P alone and −5.0 mm by pulse Q alone, and at that same instant P alone would give it a transverse velocity of +1.4 m s⁻¹ and Q alone +0.9 m s⁻¹. The string has μ = 0.020 kg m⁻¹. Find the net displacement and the net transverse velocity, then test whether the kinetic energy per unit length adds the same way.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Superposition adds signed displacements, not heights: y = yP + yQ = +8.0 mm + (−5.0 mm) = +3.0 mm.
- Transverse velocity is ∂y/∂t, and differentiation is a linear operation, so it acts on the sum term by term: v = +1.4 m s⁻¹ + 0.9 m s⁻¹ = +2.3 m s⁻¹. Slope and transverse force follow the same rule, for the same reason.
- Kinetic energy per unit length is ½μv², which is quadratic in y. Separately: ½(0.020)(1.4)² = 0.0196 J m⁻¹ and ½(0.020)(0.9)² = 0.0081 J m⁻¹, a total of 0.0277 J m⁻¹.
- Together: ½(0.020)(2.3)² = 0.0529 J m⁻¹, nearly twice that total. Linearity in y licenses nothing about quantities built from y².
Answer. y = +3.0 mm and v = +2.3 m s⁻¹. The kinetic energy density is 0.053 J m⁻¹ where the separate pulses would give 0.028 J m⁻¹ — displacements superpose, energy densities do not.
MediumExample 2
A sinusoidal wave y = A sin(kx − ωt) runs along a taut string with A = 4.0 mm and λ = 0.25 m. (a) Find the steepest slope anywhere on the string. (b) The exact transverse force uses sin θ = (∂y/∂x)/√(1 + (∂y/∂x)²); find the fractional error made there by replacing sin θ with ∂y/∂x. (c) At the same wavelength, what amplitude drives that error to 5%?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- k = 2π/λ = 2π ÷ 0.25 m = 25.13 rad m⁻¹.
- ∂y/∂x = Ak cos(kx − ωt), so the steepest slope is Ak = (4.0 × 10⁻³ m)(25.13 rad m⁻¹) = 0.1005 — dimensionless, as a slope must be.
- Fractional error = 1 − 1/√(1 + 0.1005²) = 1 − 1/√1.01010 = 1 − 0.99499 = 5.0 × 10⁻³, that is 0.50%. The leading discarded term goes as half the square of the slope, which is why a tenth of a radian costs only half a percent.
- For 5%: 1/√(1 + s²) = 0.95 gives 1 + s² = 1.1080, so s = 0.3287.
- A = s/k = 0.3287 ÷ 25.13 rad m⁻¹ = 1.31 × 10⁻² m = 13 mm, some 3.3 times the original amplitude at the same wavelength.
Answer. Steepest slope 0.10; the linear approximation is in error by 0.50% there; the error reaches 5% at A ≈ 13 mm. Superposition on a string is an accuracy, not a yes-or-no property.
HardExample 3
A 1.0 kHz plane sound wave in air has a level of 120 dB, referred to 1.0 × 10⁻¹² W m⁻². Take ρ₀ = 1.20 kg m⁻³, c = 343 m s⁻¹, γ = 1.40 and P₀ = 1.013 × 10⁵ Pa. Find the pressure amplitude, the condensation, the fraction of c by which the local wave speed rises and falls either side of c over a cycle, and the distance over which the waveform would steepen into a shock.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Level to intensity: I = I₀ 10(L/10) = 1.0 × 10⁻¹² W m⁻² × 10¹² = 1.00 W m⁻².
- For a plane wave I = pᵣₘₛ²/(ρ₀c), so pᵣₘₛ = √(1.00 × 1.20 × 343) = √411.6 = 20.3 Pa, and the amplitude is p₀ = √2 × 20.3 Pa = 28.7 Pa.
- Condensation: s = p₀/(γP₀) = 28.7 Pa ÷ (1.418 × 10⁵ Pa) = 2.0 × 10⁻⁴. The first discarded term of the adiabatic law is smaller than the one kept by ½(γ − 1)s = 4.0 × 10⁻⁵.
- Particle velocity amplitude: u₀ = p₀/(ρ₀c) = 28.7 ÷ 411.6 = 0.0697 m s⁻¹. With β = (γ + 1)/2 = 1.20 the local speed swings by ±βu₀ = ±0.0836 m s⁻¹, a fraction βu₀/c = 2.4 × 10⁻⁴ either side of c.
- Shock distance: with ω = 2π × 1.0 × 10³ = 6.28 × 10³ rad s⁻¹, x ≈ c²/(βωu₀) = 343² ÷ (1.20 × 6.28 × 10³ × 0.0697) = 1.176 × 10⁵ ÷ 525 = 2.2 × 10² m.
Answer. p₀ = 28.7 Pa, s = 2.0 × 10⁻⁴, the local speed rises and falls by 2.4 × 10⁻⁴ of c either side, and the shock distance is 2.2 × 10² m. A 30 m hall is only 13% of that distance, so even painfully loud sound superposes there.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The superposition principle says that where two or more waves overlap in a linear medium, the displacement of the medium at each point and instant is the algebraic sum of the displacements each wave would produce there on its own.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.