
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Galilean relativity and the invariance problem
Before relativity can repair anything you have to see exactly what breaks. Take the boost x′ = x − vt, show why every Newtonian experiment is blind to it, then push the same substitution through Maxwell's wave equation and watch the form fall apart. That failure is the problem the rest of this section exists to solve.
UPIII-08.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. This modern-physics material is an introductory survey, not a complete course in relativity, quantum, atomic, nuclear or particle physics. Your university determines the required depth and assessment. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
Newton's laws survive a change of inertial frame. Maxwell's wave equation does not.
The key idea
Galilean relativity says the laws of mechanics take the same form in every inertial frame, the frames being related by x′ = x − vt and t′ = t, so that velocities subtract while accelerations, forces and Newton's laws are identical in all of them.
Example. A passenger on a train at 40 m s⁻¹ throws a ball forward at 15 m s⁻¹ relative to the carriage; the platform assigns it u = 15 + 40 = 55 m s⁻¹, yet both frames record the same 9.81 m s⁻² downward acceleration for it, and so the same F = ma.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Galilean relativity is the claim that uniform motion is undetectable from inside: any frame moving at constant velocity relative to an inertial frame is itself inertial, and the laws of mechanics take the same form in all of them. The transformation that encodes the claim is x′ = x − vt with t′ = t. Differentiate once and velocities subtract, u′ = u − v; differentiate twice and the vt term dies, a′ = a, so F = ma reads identically in both frames and no collision, pendulum or projectile can reveal v. The transformation looks like bookkeeping, but it carries a physical assumption in its quietest line: t′ = t asserts one universal clock, so that events simultaneous in one frame are simultaneous in every frame and every observer measures the same time interval between two ticks. Nothing available in 1687 could test that. Maxwell's equations broke the peace. They predict electromagnetic waves at c = 1/√(μ₀ε₀), built from two constants measured with capacitors and coils in a laboratory that names no frame, and the same substitution that leaves F = ma untouched turns the vacuum wave equation into something with a cross term proportional to v. Either Maxwell's equations hold in one privileged frame, or the boost and its hidden clock are wrong. That is the invariance problem, and everything in this section follows from taking the second option seriously.
1An inertial frame is defined by the first law, not by rest
An inertial frame is one in which a body free of forces keeps a constant velocity. Once you have one you have infinitely many: any frame moving at constant velocity relative to it is inertial too, and any frame accelerating relative to it is not. No experiment picks one of them out as at rest; rest is a choice of origin. The Earth's surface fails the test only slightly. The equatorial spin gives a centripetal acceleration ω²R = (7.29 × 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹)² × 6.38 × 10⁶ m = 0.034 m s⁻², and the orbit adds 5.9 × 10⁻³ m s⁻², so for an experiment lasting seconds the laboratory is inertial to better than half a percent of g. Galileo's version of the principle was a ship: below decks with the ports shut, no dropped weight, dripping bottle or flying insect tells you whether the ship is moored or under way. This section is about how far that principle can be pushed once the experiment involves light.
2The boost, and the assumption written into t′ = t
Take two inertial frames whose origins coincide at t = 0, with S′ moving along +x at speed v as seen from S. An event — a flash, a collision, a tick — has coordinates (x, t) in S and (x′, t′) in S′, and the Galilean boost relates them: x′ = x − vt, y′ = y, z′ = z, t′ = t. The inverse is the same map with v replaced by −v, x = x′ + vt′, as the symmetry of the two frames demands. A flare fired at x = 1200 m and t = 4.0 s in the ground frame sits at x′ = 1200 − 25 × 4.0 = 1100 m in the frame of a train doing 25 m s⁻¹, and at t′ = 4.0 s. That last equation is the one to stare at. It says a clock in S′ reads exactly what a clock in S reads, that the time interval between two events is the same in every frame, and that two events with the same t are simultaneous for everyone. None of that was measured. It was assumed, because no clock of the era could have detected the alternative and because it makes the boost look like a mere change of origin.
3Differentiate once for velocities, twice for the invariance
Because t′ = t, differentiating x′ = x − vt with respect to the shared time is legal and gives u′ = u − v: velocities subtract, and a ball thrown forward at 15 m s⁻¹ inside a train at 40 m s⁻¹ has u = 55 m s⁻¹ on the platform. Differentiate again and, because v is constant, a′ = a. Newton's second law keeps its form provided the forces depend only on relative positions and relative velocities, which gravity, springs, contact forces and drag through a medium all do, since the medium's own velocity transforms along with everything else. Conservation laws inherit the invariance. If Σmᵢuᵢ is conserved in S then Σmᵢ(uᵢ − v) = Σmᵢuᵢ − vΣmᵢ is conserved in S′ whenever total mass is, and for the whole system K′ = K − vp + ½Mv², so the kinetic energy lost in a collision, though the energies themselves differ between frames, comes out the same because Δp = 0. Mechanics offers no handle on v at all.
4A wave on a medium picks out the medium's frame
Sound obeys ∂²p/∂x² − (1/cₛ²) ∂²p/∂t² = 0 with cₛ = 343 m s⁻¹ in the frame of still air. Push that equation through the boost with the chain rule. Since x = x′ + vt′ and t = t′, ∂/∂x = ∂/∂x′ and ∂/∂t = ∂/∂t′ − v ∂/∂x′: the space derivative is untouched but the time derivative, squared, brings in cross terms, and in S′ the equation reads (1 − v²/cₛ²) ∂²p/∂x′² + (2v/cₛ²) ∂²p/∂x′∂t′ − (1/cₛ²) ∂²p/∂t′² = 0. That is not a wave equation of the standard form, and its plane-wave solutions have phase speeds cₛ − v forward and cₛ + v backward, exactly u′ = u − v applied to the wave. For a car at 30 m s⁻¹ the two sound speeds are 313 and 373 m s⁻¹, and nobody is troubled, because the air is a real thing and its rest frame is a real frame. Waves do not break the Galilean boost; they merely report which frame their medium is at rest in.
5Maxwell's equations fix a speed and name no frame
In vacuum Maxwell's equations combine into ∂²E/∂x² − μ₀ε₀ ∂²E/∂t² = 0, a wave equation with speed c = 1/√(μ₀ε₀). Evaluate it: μ₀ = 4π × 10⁻⁷ H m⁻¹ and ε₀ = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹ give μ₀ε₀ = 1.113 × 10⁻¹⁷ s² m⁻², whose inverse square root is 2.998 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹, the measured speed of light. Both constants come from bench measurements — a capacitor's charge per volt, the force between steady currents — that involve no motion relative to anything. So the equations assert one speed c with no medium in sight, and the calculation of the previous section applies with cₛ replaced by c: in any frame moving at v relative to the one where Maxwell's equations hold, the wave equation acquires the (2v/c²) ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ cross term and light would travel at c − v one way and c + v the other. Two options remain. Either there is a preferred frame, the luminiferous ether, in which Maxwell's equations are exact and every other frame is detectably moving; or the boost itself is wrong and Maxwell's equations hold in every inertial frame.
6The prediction is second order in v/c, and it was tested
If an ether exists the Earth moves through it at something like its orbital speed, v ≈ 3.0 × 10⁴ m s⁻¹, so β = v/c ≈ 1.0 × 10⁻⁴. One-way effects of order β cannot be measured directly, because two separated clocks would have to agree to 10⁻⁴ of a light transit time. Round trips remove the first-order term: light sent along the motion and back takes L/(c − v) + L/(c + v) = (2L/c)/(1 − β²) ≈ (2L/c)(1 + β²), so the ether's signature survives only as a fraction β² ≈ 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ of the transit time. That is small, but it is a definite prediction of the Galilean boost at 30 km s⁻¹, nowhere near c. Michelson and Morley built an interferometer sensitive enough to see it and in 1887 found no ether wind; how their two-arm comparison works, and what its null result forces, is where the next topic begins. This topic can already say where to look. Newton's laws are exactly invariant under the boost, so no mechanical experiment could have flagged a problem, and the line of the boost that nothing had ever tested is the universal clock, t′ = t.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Galilean boost between inertial frames
x′ = x − vt, y′ = y, z′ = z, t′ = t
Maps every event's coordinates from S to S′. The last equation asserts one universal clock, and it is the line that will not survive the section.
x, x′ in m; t, t′ in s; v in m s⁻¹ is the constant velocity of S′ along +x as seen from SGalilean velocity addition
u′ = u − v
Turns every velocity in S into one in S′ by subtraction, so a light pulse at c in S would be seen at c − v by a frame chasing it.
u = dx/dt and u′ = dx′/dt′, both in m s⁻¹; follows from differentiating x′ = x − vt because t′ = tInvariance of acceleration and of F = ma
a′ = d²x′/dt² = d²x/dt² − dv/dt = a
The second derivative kills the vt term, so Newton's laws read identically in both frames and no mechanical experiment can measure v.
a, a′ in m s⁻²; dv/dt = 0 because the boost speed is constant; m is taken frame-independentSpeed of light from Maxwell's equations
c = 1/√(μ₀ε₀) = 2.998 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹
Fixes a wave speed from constants that name no frame — the one quantity a Galilean boost cannot leave alone.
μ₀ = 4π × 10⁻⁷ H m⁻¹ and ε₀ = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹, both from static bench measurementsVacuum wave equation after a Galilean boost
(1 − v²/c²) ∂²E/∂x′² + (2v/c²) ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ − (1/c²) ∂²E/∂t′² = 0
The boost changes the equation's form: its solutions travel at c − v and c + v, so Maxwell's equations could hold in one frame only.
E in V m⁻¹; from ∂/∂x = ∂/∂x′ and ∂/∂t = ∂/∂t′ − v ∂/∂x′ applied to ∂²E/∂x² − (1/c²) ∂²E/∂t² = 0Galilean round trip along the motion
t∥ = L/(c − v) + L/(c + v) = (2L/c)/(1 − v²/c²)
The first-order terms cancel and only v²/c² survives, which is why the ether was hunted with an interferometer rather than a clock.
L the one-way path in m, v the frame's speed through the supposed ether in m s⁻¹, t∥ in sInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set v to 0 and the two fronts coincide: no boost, no disagreement. Raise v and the solid front slides backwards off the emitter while the dashed one stays put — a Galilean world gives light the speed c − v ahead and c + v behind, and only one frame can see Maxwell's single c.
Live results
- FORWARD REACH (c − v)t′
- 0.420 m
- BACKWARD REACH (c + v)t′
- 0.779 m
- CENTRE OFFSET vt′
- 0.180 m
- MAXWELL RADIUS ct′
- 0.600 m
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Frame speed v: 0.30 c; Time since emission t′: 2.0 ns
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
First-year students treat the Galilean transformation as a low-speed approximation that starts to fail near c, and t′ = t as an observed fact. Both are wrong in a specific way. The cross term (2v/c²) ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ that a boost injects into the wave equation is linear in v: the transformation is incompatible with Maxwell's equations at every speed, not only near c, and what is small at low speed is merely the size of the measurable consequences, of order v²/c² ≈ 10⁻⁸ for the Earth's orbital motion. And t′ = t was never measured. No clock of the era could have resolved a discrepancy of one part in 10⁸, so the universal clock was an assumption that hid inside the algebra for two centuries. Small effects protected the boost; they did not justify it.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A test track runs along x. In the track frame S a maglev sled moves at v = 120 m s⁻¹ in +x, and the sled frame S′ has its origin on the sled, coinciding with the track origin at t = 0. At track time t = 12.0 s a signalling flash occurs at x = 1850 m. (a) Find the flash's coordinates in S′. (b) A drone flies along the track at 35 m s⁻¹ in −x as seen from S; find its velocity in S′. (c) Check the v → 0 limit.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Boost with the given v: x′ = x − vt = 1850 m − (120 m s⁻¹)(12.0 s) = 1850 − 1440 = 410 m. The Galilean rule t′ = t gives t′ = 12.0 s: one shared clock, one reading.
- Read the result physically: at t = 12.0 s the sled is at x = 1440 m in S, so the flash is 410 m ahead of it, which is exactly the position an observer riding the sled assigns to it.
- Velocities subtract: u′ = u − v = (−35 m s⁻¹) − (120 m s⁻¹) = −155 m s⁻¹. The drone recedes toward −x′ at 155 m s⁻¹ in the sled frame; its 35 m s⁻¹ is a track-frame number and the sled never measures it.
- Limiting case: with v = 0 the boost returns x′ = 1850 m and u′ = −35 m s⁻¹, the S values, as it must. The inverse boost also closes: x = x′ + vt′ = 410 + 1440 = 1850 m.
Answer. (a) x′ = 410 m, t′ = 12.0 s; (b) u′ = −155 m s⁻¹, toward −x′; (c) v = 0 restores the track-frame values.
MediumExample 2
A sonic anemometer has two transducers 0.150 m apart along the wind. A pulse sent downwind arrives after t₁ = 431.0 μs; one sent upwind arrives after t₂ = 443.8 μs. (a) Use Galilean velocity addition for sound in moving air to find the wind speed and the still-air speed of sound. (b) If light in an ether behaved the same way and the lab moved through it at 3.0 × 10⁴ m s⁻¹, what one-way asymmetry would 0.150 m give, and why is that the wrong experiment?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- In the frame of the air, sound moves at cₛ in every direction. The instrument is at rest in the ground frame, relative to which the air moves at the wind speed w, so Galilean addition gives cₛ + w for a pulse travelling downwind and cₛ − w for one travelling upwind: t₁ = d/(cₛ + w) and t₂ = d/(cₛ − w).
- Invert each: cₛ + w = d/t₁ = 0.150/(4.310 × 10⁻⁴) = 348.0 m s⁻¹ and cₛ − w = d/t₂ = 0.150/(4.438 × 10⁻⁴) = 338.0 m s⁻¹.
- Add and subtract: cₛ = ½(348.0 + 338.0) = 343.0 m s⁻¹ and w = ½(348.0 − 338.0) = 5.0 m s⁻¹. The medium's rest frame is detectable from inside the moving frame: the asymmetry between the two one-way times is the drift.
- For light in an ether: Δt = d/(c − v) − d/(c + v) = 2dv/(c² − v²) ≈ 2dv/c² = 2(0.150)(3.0 × 10⁴)/(2.998 × 10⁸)² = 1.0 × 10⁻¹³ s.
- A one-way time needs two clocks 0.150 m apart that agree to better than 10⁻¹³ s, and any signal used to synchronise them travels at the very speed under test. That circularity is why one-way tests could never be decisive and why the light experiments used round trips, where the first-order asymmetry cancels and only v²/c² remains.
Answer. cₛ = 343 m s⁻¹ and w = 5.0 m s⁻¹ (from d/t₁ = 348.0 and d/t₂ = 338.0 m s⁻¹); for light, Δt ≈ 1.0 × 10⁻¹³ s one way, which needs synchronised clocks and so tests the boost with the boost's own assumption.
HardExample 3
Frame S is the one in which the vacuum wave equation ∂²E/∂x² − (1/c²) ∂²E/∂t² = 0 holds. Frame S′ moves at v along +x under the Galilean boost. (a) Use the chain rule to rewrite the equation in S′. (b) Substitute E = E₀ cos(kx′ − ω′t′) and find the allowed phase speeds ω′/k. (c) For a laboratory moving at v = 3.00 × 10⁴ m s⁻¹ and a 4.00 m path along v, find the excess of the round-trip time over 2L/c and compare it with the period of 633 nm light.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Invert the boost, x = x′ + vt′ and t = t′, and apply the chain rule: ∂/∂x′ = ∂/∂x and ∂/∂t′ = ∂/∂t + v ∂/∂x, so ∂/∂x = ∂/∂x′ and ∂/∂t = ∂/∂t′ − v ∂/∂x′. The space derivative is unchanged; the time derivative picks up a piece of the space derivative.
- Square the time operator: (∂/∂t′ − v ∂/∂x′)² = ∂²/∂t′² − 2v ∂²/∂x′∂t′ + v² ∂²/∂x′². Substituting gives (1 − v²/c²) ∂²E/∂x′² + (2v/c²) ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ − (1/c²) ∂²E/∂t′² = 0, which is not the wave-equation form: the cross term is first order in v.
- For E = E₀ cos(kx′ − ω′t′): ∂²E/∂x′² = −k²E, ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ = kω′E and ∂²E/∂t′² = −ω′²E. The equation becomes ω′² + 2vk ω′ − (c² − v²)k² = 0, so ω′ = −vk ± ck, that is ω′/k = c − v or −(c + v).
- In S′ light therefore runs at c − v toward +x′ and at c + v toward −x′, which is u′ = u − v applied to ±c: a Galilean world has no frame-independent light speed. A round trip along the motion takes t = L/(c − v) + L/(c + v) = (2L/c)/(1 − β²) with β = v/c.
- Numbers: β = 3.00 × 10⁴/(2.998 × 10⁸) = 1.001 × 10⁻⁴, so β² = 1.001 × 10⁻⁸, and 2L/c = 8.00/(2.998 × 10⁸) = 2.668 × 10⁻⁸ s. Excess = (2L/c)(1/(1 − β²) − 1) ≈ (2L/c)β² = 2.67 × 10⁻¹⁶ s.
- The period of 633 nm light is λ/c = 2.111 × 10⁻¹⁵ s, so the excess is 0.127 of a period, about an eighth of a cycle. No clock resolves 10⁻¹⁶ s directly, but an interferometer compares phase, which is why that instrument and not a clock settled the question. Check: v → 0 removes the cross term and the excess, and S′ becomes S.
Answer. (a) The boosted equation gains a (2v/c²) ∂²E/∂x′∂t′ cross term and a (1 − v²/c²) factor; (b) ω′/k = c − v or −(c + v); (c) excess ≈ 2.67 × 10⁻¹⁶ s, about 0.13 of a 633 nm period.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Galilean relativity says the laws of mechanics take the same form in every inertial frame, the frames being related by x′ = x − vt and t′ = t, so that velocities subtract while accelerations, forces and Newton's laws are identical in all of them.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics III completion tasks.