
Bounded modern-physics survey · Interactive lesson
Nuclear constituents, size, and density
Every nuclear size you will ever quote was inferred from a scattering experiment, and this topic teaches you to read one. Alphas obey Rutherford's law until they come close enough to feel something new; electrons diffract from the charge. Both say nuclei share one density, held by a force that reaches a femtometre or two.
UPIII-11.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Bounded modern-physics survey. This modern-physics material is an introductory survey, not a complete course in relativity, quantum, atomic, nuclear or particle physics. Your university determines the required depth and assessment.
Build the model
A nucleus has no visible edge: its size is where a scattering law stops working.
The key idea
A nucleus is a bound cluster of Z protons and N neutrons whose radius, measured by scattering, grows as R = R₀A¹⁄³ with R₀ ≈ 1.2 fm, so that its volume, not its radius, is proportional to the nucleon number A.
Example. Lead-208 has 13 times the nucleons of oxygen-16, yet its radius, 1.2 fm × 208¹⁄³ = 7.1 fm, is only 13¹⁄³ = 2.35 times oxygen's 3.0 fm, so both pack 0.14 nucleons into every cubic femtometre.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A nucleus is Z protons and N = A − Z neutrons, and nobody has seen one: its size is inferred from how other particles scatter off it. An alpha particle is repelled by the nuclear charge along a hyperbola, and one deflected through θ turns back at rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)[1 + 1/sin(θ/2)], where d is the head-on distance fixed by the beam energy. While Rutherford's point-charge cross-section fits the counts, the alphas have met nothing but the Coulomb field, so every fit is only an upper bound on the size. The bound becomes a measurement where the law fails, and it fails at a distance that is the same for every energy and angle and grows with A¹⁄³. Coulomb's law has no length of its own, so that distance belongs to a second force of short range. Electrons, blind to that force, diffract from the charge instead, and the angle of their first minimum gives R = R₀A¹⁄³ with R₀ ≈ 1.2 fm. Volume in proportion to A means every nucleus has the same density, 0.14 nucleons per fm³ or 2.3 × 10¹⁷ kg m⁻³, the signature of a force that binds each nucleon only to its neighbours. The model stops at the edge it pretends is sharp: real surfaces are about 2 fm thick, light and halo nuclei miss the A¹⁄³ law, and nothing here says what the force is, only where it switches on.
1Protons, neutrons, and why not electrons
A nucleus with nucleon number A holds Z protons and N = A − Z neutrons: ¹⁹⁷Au has Z = 79 and N = 118. Proton and neutron each have a mass close to 1 u and the electron only 1/1823 u, so a nuclear mass is close to A u, and A is the natural variable for size. Before the neutron was found, A protons plus A − Z electrons looked economical. Confinement rules it out. An electron held within R ≈ 7 fm needs momentum of order ħ/R, so pc ≈ 197.3 MeV fm ÷ 7.0 fm = 28 MeV, 55 times its rest energy. Its kinetic energy √((pc)² + (mc²)²) − mc² is then about 28 MeV, well above the 16 MeV of Coulomb attraction at gold's surface and far above the energies, typically around 1 MeV, of the electrons that beta decay actually emits. A nucleon with the same momentum has K = (pc)²/2mc² = 0.42 MeV: the classical limit applies because pc ≪ 939 MeV, and modest binding holds it. Spin agrees: 14 protons and 7 electrons would give ¹⁴N a half-integer spin, but it is measured as 1.
2Closest approach at any angle, from two conservation laws
Work in the centre-of-mass frame, where an alpha of charge ze approaches a nucleus of charge Ze with speed v₀, kinetic energy Kcm = KM/(M + m) and impact parameter b. At closest approach its velocity is perpendicular to r, so conservation of angular momentum gives vr = v₀b, and conservation of energy gives Kcm = Kcm b²/r² + zZe²/(4πε₀r). Dividing by Kcm and writing d = zZe²/(4πε₀Kcm) turns this into r² − dr − b² = 0, whose positive root is rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)[1 + √(1 + (2b/d)²)]. The hyperbolic orbit ties b to the deflection, b = (d/2)cot(θ/2), and because 1 + cot²x = 1/sin²x, rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)[1 + 1/sin(θ/2)]. Check the limits: θ = 180° needs b = 0 and returns rₘᵢₙ = d, the head-on result; θ → 0 needs b → ∞ and sends rₘᵢₙ to infinity. For 5.5 MeV alphas on gold, Kcm = 5.39 MeV and d = 42.2 fm, so even those counted at 150° turned back 43 fm from the centre, six times gold's 7.0 fm radius.
3Agreement is a bound; failure is a measurement
Rutherford's cross-section, dσ/dΩ = (d/4)²/sin⁴(θ/2), assumes two point charges and nothing else. Coulomb's law carries no length of its own, so the only length in the prediction is d, set by the beam energy. Agreement at angle θ therefore certifies only that nothing but the point-charge field acted outside rₘᵢₙ(θ): gold fitting at 5.5 MeV out to 150° places its charge within 43 fm, an upper bound and no more. Raise K and every rₘᵢₙ shrinks as 1/K until, at some energy and angle, the count falls below the prediction as alphas are drawn out of the elastic beam into reactions. Scans at different energies and angles put that onset at one value of rₘᵢₙ, and different targets put it at a distance that grows with A¹⁄³. A fixed distance, independent of the energy and angle that bring the alpha to it, is something pure Coulomb scattering cannot produce: it is the range of a second force. The law also fails at the opposite extreme, for another reason: a 5.5 MeV alpha passing gold with b beyond a₀/Z ≈ 670 fm, deflected by less than about 4°, meets a charge partly screened by the inner electrons.
4Electrons diffract from the charge
Electrons feel no strong force, so they report the charge distribution alone, but only when their wavelength is comparable to it. For λ = 3.0 fm they need pc = hc/λ = 1239.8 MeV fm ÷ 3.0 fm = 413 MeV, about 800 times the electron's rest energy, so E ≈ pc; the first-year λ = h/√(2mK) would give 60 fm at that energy and is simply wrong here. The scattered amplitude is the Fourier transform of the charge density, evaluated at the momentum transfer q = (2p/ħ)sin(θ/2), and dividing the measured cross-section by the point-charge (Mott) prediction leaves the squared form factor |F(q)|². A uniform sphere of radius R has F(q) = 3[sin(qR) − qR cos(qR)]/(qR)³, which first vanishes at qR = 4.493, the first root of tan x = x. So 400 MeV electrons on a 5.0 fm sphere show a minimum where sin(θ/2) = 4.493 × 197.3 MeV fm ÷ (2 × 400 MeV × 5.0 fm) = 0.222, at θ = 25.6°. Real minima are shallow dips, because the edge is diffuse; fits report an rms radius, and a uniform sphere with the same rms radius has R = √(5/3) rᵣₘₛ.
5One radius law means one density
Across nuclei from carbon to uranium the equivalent radii fall on R = R₀A¹⁄³ with R₀ ≈ 1.2 fm. Cube it and the volume, (4/3)πR₀³A, is proportional to A, so the number density n₀ = 3/(4πR₀³) = 0.138 fm⁻³ is the same for every nucleus; multiplying by the nucleon mass, 1.67 × 10⁻²⁷ kg, gives ρ ≈ 2.3 × 10¹⁷ kg m⁻³. The mean spacing n₀⁻¹⁄³ = 1.9 fm is little more than twice the proton's 0.84 fm charge radius, so the nucleons nearly touch. Atoms do the opposite: their radii stay between about 0.05 and 0.3 nm from hydrogen to uranium, because every electron is pulled by the whole nuclear charge through a long-range force, and added charge pulls the inner shells in. A nucleus instead grows like a drop of liquid, each added nucleon bringing its own volume. That is saturation: a nucleon is bound only to its near neighbours, so the range of the attraction is about the spacing, 1–2 fm, the same scale as the reach found where Rutherford's law fails.
6What the picture cannot tell you
R₀ is a fitted number, not a constant of nature. Electrons measure the charge and give about 1.2 fm; alphas and neutrons feel the strong force and report larger interaction radii, because the reach is included. Nor is the edge sharp: the density falls from 90% to 10% of its central value over about 2.3 fm, which is most of the radius of a light nucleus, so R₀A¹⁄³ is unreliable below A ≈ 12 and fails for halo nuclei such as ¹¹Li, whose two outermost neutrons spread far beyond it. Many heavy nuclei are not spheres at all. Above all, this is inference, not theory. The scattering data fix the distance at which a new force switches on and show that it is short-ranged; that 79 protons stay together in gold shows it is attractive and stronger than their mutual repulsion. None of it gives the force's shape, its repulsive core or its spin dependence, and none of it yields a binding energy: that takes the mass measurements of the next topic.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Head-on distance of closest approach
d = zZe²/(4πε₀Kcm)
The one length in Coulomb scattering, set by the beam: a 5.0 MeV (CM) alpha stops 45.5 fm from a Z = 79 nucleus. Double K and d halves.
z, Z charge numbers, 2 for an alpha; e²/4πε₀ = 1.44 MeV fm; Kcm = KM/(M + m) in MeV; d in fmClosest approach at scattering angle θ
rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)[1 + 1/sin(θ/2)]
Backward angles probe deepest: rₘᵢₙ = d at 180°, 1.21d at 90° and 1.5d at 60°, and it grows without limit as θ → 0.
θ the centre-of-mass scattering angle; rₘᵢₙ and d in fm; follows from energy and angular momentum with b = (d/2)cot(θ/2)Rutherford cross-section
dσ/dΩ = (d/4)² / sin⁴(θ/2)
Gold at 5.0 MeV (CM) and 90° gives 518 fm² sr⁻¹. Counts below the prediction at some (K, θ) mean the alpha met a force other than Coulomb's.
dσ/dΩ in fm² sr⁻¹ (1 fm² = 10 mb); d in fm; derived for two point charges and nothing elseInteraction radius where the law fails
Rᵢₙₜ ≈ R₀(A¹⁄³ + 4¹⁄³) + a
Rutherford's law holds while rₘᵢₙ > Rᵢₙₜ. For gold with a = 1.5 fm, Rᵢₙₜ = 10.4 fm, so failure begins head-on at 22 MeV (lab).
R₀ = 1.2 fm; the 4¹⁄³ is the alpha's; a ≈ 1–2 fm, the reach of the attraction beyond contact, fitted to onset dataFirst diffraction minimum of a uniform sphere
R = 4.493 ħc / [2pc sin(θ₁/2)]
Electrons feel no strong force, so this is the charge radius: 400 MeV electrons with a first minimum at 25.6° imply R = 5.0 fm.
θ₁ the angle of the first minimum; pc ≈ E for fast electrons, in MeV; ħc = 197.3 MeV fm; 4.493 solves tan x = xEmpirical radius law
R = R₀A¹⁄³, with R₀ ≈ 1.2 fm
Gold: 1.2 fm × 197¹⁄³ = 7.0 fm. Volume grows as A, so every nucleus has the same number density, 3/(4πR₀³) = 0.138 nucleons fm⁻³.
A the nucleon number, dimensionless; R the equivalent uniform-sphere radius in fm; reliable for A ≳ 12Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Start on gold at 5.5 MeV: the curve clears the band at every angle, so the law only bounds the size. Raise K past 22 MeV and failure starts at 180°, then creeps forward. For A = 27 it starts near 6 MeV. Set the reach to 0 and watch θ* move: that shift is what an onset measures.
Live results
- HEAD-ON DISTANCE d
- 42.2 fm
- INTERACTION RADIUS Rᵢₙₜ
- 10.4 fm
- LAW FAILS BEYOND θ*
- 180 °
- HEAD-ON ONSET ENERGY (LAB)
- 22.3 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Alpha kinetic energy K (lab): 5.5 MeV; Target nucleon number A: 197; Reach of the attraction a: 1.5 fm
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
Students carry the head-on formula over to every scattered alpha as if each came that close; d = zZe²/(4πε₀K) is the closest approach of only the one that bounces straight back. An alpha deflected through θ keeps its angular momentum about the nucleus and turns at rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)[1 + 1/sin(θ/2)], which is 1.21d at 90° and 1.5d at 60°. Read an onset measured at 60° with d and the radius comes out a third too small; use the lab energy in place of Kcm on an aluminium target and d is 13% too small again. Even the right rₘᵢₙ at onset is not the nuclear radius: it is where the alpha first feels the nucleus, the two radii plus the reach of the attraction. And an energy at which the law still holds measures no size at all; it only bounds one.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A beam of 12.0 MeV alpha particles (lab energy) strikes a thin ⁹⁰Zr target (Z = 40), and a detector counts alphas scattered through a centre-of-mass angle of 120°. Taking the interaction radius as 1.2 fm × (A¹⁄³ + 4¹⁄³) + 1.5 fm, decide whether those counts should follow Rutherford's law, and find the lab energy at which they would begin to depart from it.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Centre-of-mass energy: Kcm = KM/(M + m) = 12.0 MeV × 90/94 = 11.49 MeV.
- Head-on distance: d = zZe²/(4πε₀Kcm) = 2 × 40 × 1.44 MeV fm ÷ 11.49 MeV = 10.03 fm.
- At θ = 120°, sin 60° = 0.866, so rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)(1 + 1/0.866) = 5.013 fm × 2.155 = 10.80 fm.
- Interaction radius: 1.2 fm × (4.481 + 1.587) + 1.5 fm = 7.28 fm + 1.5 fm = 8.78 fm. These alphas turn back 2.0 fm outside it, so Rutherford's law should hold.
- At fixed angle every rₘᵢₙ scales as 1/K, and the M/(M + m) factor cancels in a ratio, so failure begins once K has risen by 10.80/8.78 = 1.230, at 12.0 MeV × 1.230 = 14.8 MeV.
Answer. rₘᵢₙ = 10.8 fm, outside the 8.8 fm interaction radius, so the counts follow Rutherford's law; at this angle they depart from it above about 14.8 MeV (lab).
MediumExample 2
Electrons of energy 380 MeV scatter from a medium-mass nucleus. Dividing the measured cross-section by the point-charge prediction shows the first deep minimum at θ₁ = 31.0°. Treating the nucleus as a uniform sphere, find its radius and its nucleon number, and show why the electron's momentum must be found relativistically.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Regime: 380 MeV is about 740 times the electron's rest energy of 0.511 MeV, so pc = √(E² − (mc²)²) = 380.0 MeV, and λ = hc/pc = 1239.8 MeV fm ÷ 380 MeV = 3.26 fm, comparable to a nuclear radius as a diffraction probe must be.
- Momentum transfer at the minimum: q₁ = (2pc/ħc) sin(θ₁/2) = (2 × 380 MeV ÷ 197.3 MeV fm) × sin 15.5° = 3.852 fm⁻¹ × 0.26724 = 1.0294 fm⁻¹.
- Uniform sphere: the first zero of F(q) is at q₁R = 4.493, so R = 4.493 ÷ 1.0294 fm⁻¹ = 4.36 fm.
- Nucleon number: A = (R/R₀)³ = (4.36 fm ÷ 1.2 fm)³ = 3.63³ ≈ 48, a nucleus such as ⁴⁸Ti. The angle fixes the size; it cannot tell protons from neutrons.
- Correspondence check: the classical momentum √(2mK) would give pc = √(2 × 0.511 MeV × 380 MeV) = 19.7 MeV, a wavelength of 63 fm, and from the same minimum R = 84 fm, or A ≈ 3.4 × 10⁵. The classical p²/2m is the pc ≪ mc² limit of E² = (pc)² + (mc²)², and here pc is 740 times mc².
Answer. R ≈ 4.36 fm, so A ≈ 48. The classical momentum would have inferred R ≈ 84 fm, a size no nucleus has.
HardExample 3
Suppose scans of alpha scattering with a detector fixed at a centre-of-mass angle of 90° find the counts first falling 2% below Rutherford's prediction at lab energies of 12.9 MeV on ⁵⁸Ni (Z = 28) and 27.6 MeV on ²⁰⁸Pb (Z = 82). Find the closest approach at each onset, compare it with the contact distance 1.2 fm × (A¹⁄³ + 4¹⁄³), say what the comparison implies, and predict the onset energy for ¹²⁰Sn (Z = 50) at the same angle.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Centre-of-mass energies: for ⁵⁸Ni, 12.9 MeV × 58/62 = 12.07 MeV; for ²⁰⁸Pb, 27.6 MeV × 208/212 = 27.08 MeV.
- Head-on distances d = 2Z × 1.44 MeV fm ÷ Kcm: nickel 80.64 ÷ 12.07 = 6.682 fm, lead 236.2 ÷ 27.08 = 8.721 fm. At 90°, rₘᵢₙ = (d/2)(1 + √2) = 1.2071d, giving 8.066 fm for nickel and 10.527 fm for lead.
- Contact distances: nickel 1.2 fm × (3.8709 + 1.5874) = 6.550 fm, lead 1.2 fm × (5.9250 + 1.5874) = 9.015 fm. The onsets lie 1.516 fm and 1.512 fm beyond contact: the same to within the precision of the data.
- What does not match: at onset the Coulomb potential energy zZe²/(4πε₀rₘᵢₙ) is 10.0 MeV for nickel and 22.4 MeV for lead, and the Coulomb force 1.24 against 2.13 MeV fm⁻¹. The onset is set by neither an energy nor a force but by one distance beyond contact, unchanged for a nucleus with three times the charge.
- Interpretation: a second force, which must be attractive for nuclei to hold together at all, reaches about 1.5 fm beyond the charge surfaces, comparable to the 1.9 fm spacing of nucleons. Coulomb physics contains no such length.
- Prediction for ¹²⁰Sn, taking the reach as 1.5 fm: contact 1.2 fm × (4.932 + 1.587) = 7.82 fm, so Rᵢₙₜ = 9.32 fm; d = 9.32 fm ÷ 1.2071 = 7.72 fm; Kcm = 144.0 MeV fm ÷ 7.72 fm = 18.65 MeV; lab K = 18.65 MeV × 124/120 = 19.3 MeV.
Answer. Onsets at rₘᵢₙ = 8.07 fm (Ni) and 10.5 fm (Pb), each about 1.5 fm beyond contact: the mark of a short-range attraction, not a Coulomb threshold. Predicted onset for ¹²⁰Sn at 90°: about 19.3 MeV (lab).
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
A nucleus is a bound cluster of Z protons and N neutrons whose radius, measured by scattering, grows as R = R₀A¹⁄³ with R₀ ≈ 1.2 fm, so that its volume, not its radius, is proportional to the nucleon number A.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics III completion tasks.