
Physics III course sequence · Interactive lesson
Aperture Integrals, Fresnel Number & Combined Patterns
Once one slit has been integrated, any aperture can be. Shifting an opening only multiplies its far field by a phase, so two real slits give cos² fringes under a sinc² envelope and whole orders vanish where a fringe meets an envelope zero; one number, the Fresnel number, says whether the far-field integral was ever the right one to write.
UPIII-05.06 · Lesson 6 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
The far field is the aperture's Fourier transform; the Fresnel number says when it holds.
The key idea
The far-field amplitude of any aperture is the aperture integral ∫ A(x) e(ikx sin θ) dx, a Fourier transform of the transmission A(x), and the Fresnel number NF = a²/(λL) says whether that far-field form applies at a distance L.
Example. Two slits 40 μm wide with centres 120 μm apart have d/a = 3: the third-order fringe on each side lands exactly on the envelope's first zero and is missing, so the central lobe holds five bright fringes, orders 0, ±1 and ±2.
The complete physical model and assumptions
The last topic made a slit a continuum of sources; this one makes the aperture a function. Let A(x) be the amplitude an opening transmits at each point, and the far-field amplitude in direction θ is E(θ) ∝ ∫ A(x) e(ikx sin θ) dx: the Fourier transform of A at the spatial frequency k sin θ. Because the integral is linear, an aperture built from pieces has a pattern built from their transforms, and because shifting the aperture by x₀ only multiplies its transform by e(ikx₀ sin θ), two identical slits at ±d/2 give the single-slit field times 2 cos(πd sin θ/λ). Intensities therefore multiply, I = I₀ cos²α (sin β/β)², with the fringe spacing set by d and the envelope by a, and every interference order m for which ma/d is an integer falls on an envelope zero and is missing. All of it rests on the scalar, monochromatic, paraxial and far-field approximations. The last is quantified by the Fresnel number NF = a²/(λL), the quadratic phase the integral dropped at the aperture edge in units of π/4: below about 0.1 the Fraunhofer form is safe, near 1 the quadratic term must be kept and the integral becomes a Fresnel integral with no elementary closed form, and far above 1 the geometric shadow returns with ripples at its edges. Where no closed form exists the phasor sum is carried out numerically, and it must still return sinc² as NF → 0 and the shadow as NF → ∞.
1The far field is the Fourier transform of the aperture
Write A(x) for the amplitude an opening transmits at position x: 1 inside a clear slit, 0 outside, a smaller number where a filter dims the light, a complex number where a plate shifts its phase. Every element A(x) dx radiates a wavelet that, far away in direction θ, leads the centre by the phase kx sin θ, so E(θ) ∝ ∫ A(x) e(ikx sin θ) dx over the whole opening. That is the Fourier transform of A at the spatial frequency k sin θ, in rad m⁻¹, and the exponent is a length times an inverse length, as the argument of e must be. The rectangle of the last topic transforms to sin β/β. Change the function and the transform changes with it: a slit whose transmission falls linearly from 1 at the centre to 0 at the edges transforms to (sin(β/2)/(β/2))², because a triangle is a rectangle of width a/2 convolved with itself. Its intensity is the fourth power of a sinc: the first side lobe drops from 4.72% to 0.22% of the peak, but the central lobe doubles in width, since a sin θ = 2λ is now the first zero. That trade, side lobes against resolution, is apodisation, read straight off the integral.
2Shift an aperture and the integral only picks up a phase
Move the whole aperture sideways by x₀, so the transmission becomes A(x − x₀). Substitute x' = x − x₀: the limits move with it, and the factor e(ikx₀ sin θ) comes outside untouched. A shifted aperture therefore has exactly the same intensity pattern; only the phase of the far field records where it was. Now put two identical slits at x₀ = +d/2 and x₀ = −d/2. Linearity adds their fields: E = E₁(θ)[e(iα) + e(−iα)] = 2E₁(θ) cos α with α = πd sin θ/λ = ½kd sin θ, where E₁ is one slit's own field. Squaring gives I = 4I₁ cos²α, so with I₁ = Iₛ (sin β/β)² the whole pattern is I₀ cos²α (sin β/β)² and I₀ = 4Iₛ: the two-slit centre is four times as bright as one slit's, not twice, because amplitudes add before squaring. Try a = 25 μm, d = 75 μm and λ = 633 nm at sin θ = 0.010. Then α = 3.72 rad and β = 1.24 rad; cos²α = 0.699 and (sin β/β)² = 0.581, so I/I₀ = 0.406. The point sits near the m = 1 fringe (d sin θ = 1.18λ), and the envelope has already taken 42% of what that fringe would have had.
3Count the fringes and find the missing orders
Fringe maxima sit where d sin θ = mλ; envelope zeros where a sin θ = nλ with n ≠ 0. They coincide when m/n = d/a, and there the bright direction of the pair is a direction in which each slit alone sends nothing, so the order is missing. With d/a = 3 the orders ±3, ±6, ±9 vanish. Every other fringe is scaled by the envelope at its own angle, βₘ = mπa/d: for d = 3a the first order keeps (sin(π/3)/(π/3))² = 0.684 of the central intensity, the second 0.171, and the third is gone. Inside the central lobe |m| < d/a, so an integer ratio leaves 2(d/a) − 1 fringes, five for d = 3a and seven for d = 4a. A non-integer ratio hides no order until ma/d first reaches an integer: at d/a = 2.5 the third-order fringe survives at a dim 2.4%, the first casualty is m = 5, and the central lobe still holds five fringes. Two refinements a first course skips: the product's maxima lie a little inside mλ/d, pulled by the envelope's slope, and narrowing a with d fixed broadens the envelope and admits more orders without moving any of them.
4The Fresnel number decides which integral you may write
Every step so far took the phase across the aperture to be linear in x. From an element at x to a screen point y at distance L the exact path is √(L² + (y − x)²) ≈ L + (y − x)²/(2L), so k times it contains −kxy/L, the Fraunhofer term with sin θ ≈ y/L, and kx²/(2L), which the far-field integral throws away. At the edge x = a/2 the discarded phase is πa²/(4λL) = (π/4)NF with NF = a²/(λL). Read NF as (a/L)/(λ/a): the angle the aperture subtends over its own diffraction angle. For NF ≲ 0.1 the dropped phase is under 0.08 rad and the pattern is Fraunhofer; near NF = 1 it is 0.8 rad and neither the sinc² nor a shadow is right; for NF ≫ 1 the shadow returns, fringed at its edges. A 0.50 mm slit at 500 nm has a²/λ = 0.50 m, so 5.0 m gives NF = 0.10, 0.50 m gives 1.0 and 5.0 cm gives 10. For two slits the width that matters is the illuminated extent d + a, not a. A lens changes the rule: its own phase −kx²/(2f) cancels the dropped term exactly at L = f, so its focal plane shows the true far field on a short bench, with y = f tan θ.
5Keep the quadratic phase: the Fresnel integral
When NF is not small the integrand keeps the whole paraxial phase: E(y) ∝ ∫ A(x) e(iπ(x − y)²/(λL)) dx. Substitute t = (x − y)√(2/(λL)) and the exponent becomes iπt²/2, so the field is the difference of C(v) = ∫₀ᵛ cos(πt²/2) dt and S(v) = ∫₀ᵛ sin(πt²/2) dt between the two edges. These Fresnel integrals have no elementary antiderivative; they are tabulated, and plotted against each other they trace the Cornu spiral, a phasor arc whose curvature grows along its length instead of staying fixed. On the axis of a slit each edge sits at v = √(NF/2), and I/Iinc = 2[C(v)² + S(v)²], with Iinc the intensity of the unobstructed beam. Check the limits. As NF → 0, C ≈ v and S ≈ πv³/6, so I/Iinc → 2v² = NF: exactly the on-axis Fraunhofer prediction, an amplitude proportional to a. As NF → ∞, C and S → ½ and I/Iinc → 1, the geometric shadow, where the axis is as bright as the open beam. Between them the axis oscillates: NF = 1 gives 0.946, NF = 2 gives 1.60, brighter than with no slit at all, NF = 4 gives 1.58 and NF = 6 gives 0.74.
6No closed form: sum the phasors numerically
A Fresnel integral, a measured A(x) or an unsymmetrical aperture all end the same way: the phasor sum is done by machine. Cut the aperture into M strips of equal width, evaluate the phase at each midpoint and add the phasors, E ≈ (1/M) Σ A(uⱼ) e(iφⱼ), with uⱼ = −½ + (j − ½)/M the fractional position and, on axis, φⱼ = πNF uⱼ². For NF = 2 the edge phase is π/2, and M = 4 gives a mean phasor of squared modulus 0.854, so I/Iinc = NF × 0.854 = 1.71; M = 8 gives 1.63 and M = 16 gives 1.61, converging on the exact 1.60 from above with an error falling as 1/M². The choice of M is set where the phase varies fastest, at the edge: neighbouring strips should differ by less than about π/8, and since dφ/du = 2πNF u reaches 2π at u = ½, a strip width 1/M gives a step 2π/M and M ≥ 16. For a two-dimensional aperture the same sum on a grid is the fast Fourier transform. Numbers from a machine still owe the three checks: every phase must be dimensionless, NF → 0 must return the sinc² curve, and integrating I across the screen must return the power that entered the aperture.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
General aperture integral
E(θ) = C ∫ A(x) e(ikx sin θ) dx
It is the Fourier transform of the aperture at spatial frequency k sin θ, so every pattern in this section is one transform or a product of transforms.
A(x) is the dimensionless transmitted amplitude at position x (m); k = 2π/λ in rad m⁻¹; C sets the scaleShift theorem
A(x − x₀) → E(θ) e(ikx₀ sin θ)
Two identical apertures at ±d/2 add to 2 cos(πd sin θ/λ) times one aperture's field: fringes multiply the envelope, they never add to it.
x₀ in m is the sideways displacement of the aperture; |E|, and so the intensity, is unchangedTwo slits of finite width
I(θ) = I₀ cos²α (sin β/β)², α = πd sin θ/λ, β = πa sin θ/λ
d sets the fringe spacing and a the envelope width, so their ratio alone decides how the fringes fill the envelope.
d centre spacing and a slit width in m; α, β in rad; I₀ in W m⁻² is four times one slit's axial intensityMissing orders
order m is missing when m a/d = n, n = ±1, ±2, …
For d/a = 3 the orders ±3, ±6, … vanish and the central lobe keeps 2(d/a) − 1 = 5 fringes; for d/a = 2.5 the first casualty is m = 5.
m indexes the maxima d sin θ = mλ, n the envelope zeros a sin θ = nλ; both dimensionless integersFresnel number
NF = a²/(λL)
The quadratic phase the far-field integral dropped is πNF/4 at the edge: NF ≪ 1 is Fraunhofer, NF ≈ 1 Fresnel, NF ≫ 1 the geometric shadow.
a is the full aperture width, λ and L in m; dimensionless; for two slits use the overall extent d + aNear-field (Fresnel) integral
E(y) ∝ ∫ A(x) e(iπ(x − y)²/(λL)) dx
No elementary closed form exists, so C and S are tabulated or summed numerically; both tend to ½ as v → ∞, which is how the shadow returns.
y is the screen coordinate in m; t = (x − y)√(2/(λL)) turns it into C(v) = ∫₀ᵛ cos(πt²/2) dt and S(v)Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. At a = 25 μm, drag d from 75 to 100 μm: the envelope stays put, fringes crowd in, and the third order reappears once d/a leaves 3. Then set L = 2 cm with d = 150 μm: the curve holds, since a far-field pattern depends on angle alone, but the marker crosses NF = 1 and the curve stops being true.
Live results
- FRINGE SPACING λ/d
- 8.44 mrad
- ENVELOPE ZERO λ/a
- 25.3 mrad
- ENVELOPE ZERO AT ORDER d/a
- 3.00
- FRESNEL NUMBER (d+a)²/(λL)
- 0.032
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Slit width a: 25 μm; Centre-to-centre separation d: 75 μm; Screen distance L: 50 cm
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
First-year optics leaves two slits as two point sources, so the single-slit envelope arrives as a decoration and its algebra goes wrong in two ways: students add the envelope intensity to the cos² fringes, or read a missing order as a place where two dark fringes coincide. Both fail on the shift theorem. The field of the pair is the single-slit field times 2 cos α, so the intensities multiply and never add, and a missing order is a direction in which the two slits are perfectly in step but each slit on its own radiates nothing, because its own phasor arc has closed into a full circle; with nothing arriving there is nothing to reinforce. The count of fringes depends on d/a alone: widening the slits with d fixed pulls the envelope inwards and deletes orders, it does not brighten them, and narrowing them admits more orders while moving none.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Sodium light (λ = 589 nm) falls on two slits each 20.0 μm wide with centres 80.0 μm apart, and the pattern is caught on a screen 1.50 m away. Find the fringe spacing, the width of the envelope's central lobe, the missing orders and the number of fringes inside the central lobe, and confirm that the far-field form is justified.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Fringe spacing from the cos² factor: Δy = λL/d = (589 × 10⁻⁹ m)(1.50 m) ÷ (80.0 × 10⁻⁶ m) = 1.10 × 10⁻² m = 11.0 mm.
- Envelope zero from the sinc² factor: y₁ = λL/a = (589 × 10⁻⁹)(1.50) ÷ (20.0 × 10⁻⁶) = 44.2 mm, so the central lobe spans 2y₁ = 88.4 mm, exactly d/a = 4 fringe spacings on each side.
- Missing orders: ma/d = m/4 is an integer for m = ±4, ±8, ±12, …, so the fourth-order fringe falls on the envelope zero. Inside the central lobe |m| < 4, which leaves m = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3: seven fringes, 2(d/a) − 1.
- Far-field check with the full extent d + a = 100 μm: NF = (100 × 10⁻⁶)² ÷ (589 × 10⁻⁹ × 1.50) = 1.00 × 10⁻⁸ ÷ 8.84 × 10⁻⁷ = 0.0113 ≪ 1, and sin θ at the envelope zero is only λ/a = 0.0295, so the Fraunhofer and small-angle steps both hold.
Answer. Δy = 11.0 mm; central lobe 88.4 mm wide; orders ±4, ±8, … missing; 7 fringes in the central lobe; NF = 0.011, far field.
MediumExample 2
A helium-neon laser (632.8 nm) lights a pair of slits, and on a screen 2.00 m away the fringes are 5.06 mm apart with the fifth order on each side missing, the first to vanish. Find the slit separation and slit width, the second-, third- and fourth-order peak intensities relative to the centre, the number of fringes in the central lobe, and the next missing order.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- The fringe spacing fixes d: d = λL/Δy = (632.8 × 10⁻⁹ m)(2.00 m) ÷ (5.06 × 10⁻³ m) = 2.50 × 10⁻⁴ m = 0.250 mm.
- The first missing order is m = 5 with n = 1, so d/a = 5 and a = d/5 = 50.0 μm. Regime check with d + a = 0.300 mm: NF = (3.00 × 10⁻⁴)² ÷ (632.8 × 10⁻⁹ × 2.00) = 0.071, comfortably far field.
- At order m the envelope argument is βₘ = πa sin θₘ/λ = πma/d = mπ/5, independent of λ and L. For m = 2: β = 1.257 rad and (sin β/β)² = (0.9511/1.257)² = 0.573.
- For m = 3: β = 1.885 rad and (0.9511/1.885)² = 0.255. For m = 4: β = 2.513 rad and (0.5878/2.513)² = 0.0547, so the fourth order is only 5.5% as bright as the centre; the fifth, at β = π, is zero.
- The central lobe holds |m| < 5, that is m = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4: nine fringes. The next missing order needs n = 2, so m = 2 × 5 = 10, at sin θ = 10λ/d = 0.0253, still a small angle.
Answer. d = 0.250 mm and a = 50.0 μm; I₂/I₀ = 0.573, I₃/I₀ = 0.255, I₄/I₀ = 0.055; 9 fringes in the central lobe; orders ±10 vanish next.
HardExample 3
A single slit 0.400 mm wide is lit by a 500 nm plane wave of intensity Iinc, and a detector sits on the axis 0.160 m behind it. Find the Fresnel number; state what the Fraunhofer formula and geometric optics each predict for the axial intensity; evaluate the aperture integral numerically with 4 and then 8 equal strips; and compare with the exact Fresnel-integral value, given C(1) = 0.7799 and S(1) = 0.4383.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- NF = a²/(λL) = (4.00 × 10⁻⁴)² ÷ (500 × 10⁻⁹ × 0.160) = 1.60 × 10⁻⁷ ÷ 8.00 × 10⁻⁸ = 2.00. The quadratic phase the far-field integral drops is πNF/4 = π/2 at each edge, so neither limit can be trusted.
- Fraunhofer on axis: the amplitude is proportional to the aperture width, E/Einc = a/√(λL), so I/Iinc = a²/(λL) = NF = 2.00. Geometric optics: the axis lies inside the open aperture, so I/Iinc = 1.00. The two disagree by a factor of two.
- Keep the phase. With u = x/a the axial integrand is e(iπNF u²) = e(2πiu²), and I/Iinc = NF |(1/M) Σ e(iφⱼ)|² over the midpoints uⱼ = −½ + (j − ½)/M. For M = 4, u = ±0.125 and ±0.375 give φ = 0.0982 and 0.8836 rad; the mean phasor is ½(cos 0.0982 + cos 0.8836) + ½ i (sin 0.0982 + sin 0.8836) = 0.8148 + 0.4355 i, of squared modulus 0.8536, so I/Iinc = 2 × 0.8536 = 1.71.
- For M = 8, u = ±1/16, ±3/16, ±5/16 and ±7/16 give φ = 0.0245, 0.2209, 0.6136 and 1.2026 rad. The mean phasor is ¼(0.9997 + 0.9757 + 0.8176 + 0.3599) + ¼ i (0.0245 + 0.2191 + 0.5758 + 0.9330) = 0.7882 + 0.4381 i, of squared modulus 0.8132, so I/Iinc = 1.63. The phase step between neighbouring strips at the edge is 2π/M = π/4 here, twice the π/8 rule of thumb.
- Exact: with v = √(NF/2) = 1, I/Iinc = 2[C(1)² + S(1)²] = 2(0.6082 + 0.1921) = 1.60. The 8-strip sum is within 1.6% and 16 strips give 1.61, the error falling as 1/M². The axis is 60% brighter than the open beam: Fraunhofer overshoots by 25%, geometry undershoots by 37.5%.
Answer. NF = 2.00; Fraunhofer predicts 2.00 Iinc, geometry 1.00 Iinc; the phasor sum gives 1.71 Iinc (4 strips) and 1.63 Iinc (8 strips); exact 1.60 Iinc.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The far-field amplitude of any aperture is the aperture integral ∫ A(x) e(ikx sin θ) dx, a Fourier transform of the transmission A(x), and the Fresnel number NF = a²/(λL) says whether that far-field form applies at a distance L.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.