Skip to main content

Physics II course sequence · Interactive lesson

Cylindrical & Spherical Capacitors

Between nested conductors the field is not uniform, so ΔV is an integral rather than E d. Do it once for cylinders and once for spheres, and the capacitance falls out as pure geometry — a logarithm, and a difference of reciprocals.

UPII-05.07 · Lesson 7 of 8 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Cylindrical & Spherical CapacitorsElectric field between coaxial conductors, plotted from the inner surface out to the shield, with 1.00 nC per metre of charge on the inner conductor. The inner radius is a = 1.2 mm, the shield radius b = 6.0 mm, and the gap is filled with a dielectric of κ = 1.00. The field falls as 1/r from 14.98 kV m⁻¹ at the inner surface to 3.00 kV m⁻¹ at the shield. The dashed line is the mean field ΔV/(b−a), the area under the curve is ΔV = 28.94 V, and dividing the charge by that voltage gives C/L = 34.6 pF m⁻¹.E(r) = λ/(2πκε₀r)kV m⁻¹, with λ = 1.00 nC m⁻¹E at r = a: 14.98 kV m⁻¹ΔV = ∫ E dr = 28.94 Va = 1.2 mmb = 6.0 mmΔV ÷ (b−a)ΔV is the area under this curve, not E × gapradius r
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Curved conductors, non-uniform field, one integral

The key idea

A cylindrical or spherical capacitor is two nested conductors separated by a gap. Its capacitance comes from integrating the non-uniform field between them: C = 2πε₀L/ln(b/a) for coaxial cylinders, C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a) for concentric spheres.

Example. A metre of RG-58 coaxial cable — inner radius 0.405 mm, shield radius 1.475 mm, polyethylene κ ≈ 2.26 — holds about 97 pF. With the same geometry empty, it would hold 43 pF.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Parallel plates hide the general method behind a uniform field. Curve the conductors and ΔV is no longer E d but ∫ₐᵇ E dr. The procedure never changes: put +Q on the inner conductor, use symmetry and Gauss's law to get E(r), integrate radially across to the other conductor, then divide, C = Q/ΔV. Q cancels every time, which is the point — capacitance is geometry and permittivity, nothing else. For coaxial cylinders E falls as 1/r, the integral is a logarithm, and C/L = 2πε₀/ln(b/a): only the ratio of radii matters, and it matters weakly. For concentric spheres E falls as 1/r², the integral gives 1/a − 1/b, and C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a) depends on both radii rather than on the gap alone. Squeeze either gap and both collapse to ε₀A/d; open the sphere's outer shell to infinity and C = 4πε₀a remains, the capacitance of a single conductor.

1The recipe: Gauss's law, then a radial integral

Every capacitance calculation is the same four steps, and the parallel-plate case only makes them look easy. Put charge +Q on the inner conductor; the outer one carries −Q on its inner surface, so the field lives entirely in the gap and vanishes outside. Use the symmetry to choose a Gaussian surface on which E is constant and radial, and read off E(r). Integrate along a radial path from the inner conductor to the outer, ΔV = ∫ₐᵇ E dr — the path is free, so pick the radial one and the dot product becomes a plain product. Divide: C = Q/ΔV. Because E is proportional to Q, the charge cancels at that last step, which is why capacitance never depends on how much charge you put on. What survives is geometry and ε₀. For plates the field is uniform and the integral is E d; for nested cylinders and spheres it is not, and skipping the integral is the single most common way to get these two results wrong.

2Coaxial cylinders: the integral is a logarithm

Take two long coaxial conductors of length L, inner radius a and outer radius b, with +Q spread along the inner one. A coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius r and length ℓ encloses λℓ, with λ = Q/L, and E is radial and constant on its curved side, so E(2πrℓ) = λℓ/ε₀ and E = λ/(2πε₀r). Integrating outward, ΔV = (λ/2πε₀)∫ₐᵇ dr/r = (λ/2πε₀) ln(b/a). Then C = Q/ΔV = 2πε₀L/ln(b/a), or per unit length C/L = 2πε₀/ln(b/a), with 2πε₀ = 55.6 pF m⁻¹. Only the ratio b/a appears, so scaling both radii by the same factor leaves the capacitance per metre untouched. RG-58 cable has a ≈ 0.405 mm and b ≈ 1.475 mm, giving ln(b/a) = 1.293 and 43.0 pF m⁻¹ if the gap were empty; the polyethylene filling, κ ≈ 2.26, lifts that to 97 pF m⁻¹, near the 100 pF m⁻¹ on the datasheet.

3Concentric spheres: a difference of reciprocals

Now nest two spheres, radii a and b, with +Q on the inner. A spherical Gaussian surface of radius r inside the gap encloses Q, so E(4πr²) = Q/ε₀ and E = Q/(4πε₀r²) — the field a point charge would make, because the shell outside contributes nothing within itself. Integrating, ΔV = (Q/4πε₀)∫ₐᵇ dr/r² = (Q/4πε₀)(1/a − 1/b), and dividing out Q leaves C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a). Unlike the coaxial result this is not a function of b/a alone: a length is built in through the product ab. Take a = 20.0 mm and b = 25.0 mm. Then ab/(b−a) = (5.00 × 10⁻⁴ m²)/(5.00 × 10⁻³ m) = 0.100 m, so C = 0.100/(8.99 × 10⁹) = 11.1 pF. Note how small that is: nested spheres of laboratory size store picofarads, which is why practical capacitors buy their capacitance with large areas at tiny separations instead.

4Two limits worth checking: thin gaps and lone conductors

Test every derived formula where you already know the answer. Let the gap d = b − a become small next to the radii. For the sphere, C = 4πε₀ab/d = ε₀(4πab)/d, and 4πab is exactly the surface area of a sphere of radius √(ab), the geometric mean of the two radii — so the spherical capacitor is a parallel-plate capacitor of that area, with no approximation at all. For the coax, write C = ε₀(2πr*L)/d with r* = (b−a)/ln(b/a), the logarithmic mean radius; the RG-58 numbers give r* = 0.828 mm, between a and b as it must be. In both cases the mean radius tends to the common radius as d shrinks, and C → ε₀A/d. Push the other way instead: send b → ∞ in the spherical result and C = 4πε₀a survives. A single isolated conductor has capacitance. A 20 mm sphere alone holds 2.2 pF against 11.1 pF with a shell at 25 mm, and the Earth, radius 6371 km, has 4πε₀a = 709 μF.

5The field is strongest at the inner conductor

Because E falls as 1/r or 1/r², the largest field in either device sits on the inner conductor's surface, and that is where the insulation fails first. For the coax, E(a) = λ/(2πε₀a), and eliminating λ using ΔV gives E(a) = ΔV/(a ln(b/a)) — worth reading slowly, because a appears twice with opposite effects. Thinning the inner wire shrinks a but grows ln(b/a), so at fixed ΔV and fixed b the peak field is smallest where d[a ln(b/a)]/da = ln(b/a) − 1 = 0, that is b/a = e = 2.718, giving E(a) = e ΔV/b. The maximum is flat, though: RG-58's b/a = 3.64 sits well off that optimum, yet its peak field is only 3.7% above the best available, 1.91 kV m⁻¹ per applied volt against 1.84. Spheres behave the same way, with E(a) = ΔV b/(a(b − a)), minimised at a = b/2 where E(a) = 4ΔV/b. Converting those peak fields into a voltage rating is the next lesson's business.

6What the derivation assumed

Four assumptions carry these results. Symmetry: the inner conductor must be concentric, and a wire pushed off centre raises the field where the gap is narrowest while barely changing C, so eccentricity costs breakdown margin rather than capacitance. Infinite length: the coaxial answer ignores the ends, where field lines bulge outward, so quote it per metre and trust it for L ≫ b. A complete outer conductor: the induced −Q on the shell is what confines the field to the gap, and breaking or removing the shell drops the capacitance towards the isolated-conductor value. And a uniform linear dielectric filling the whole gap, so ε₀ → κε₀ everywhere; a partly filled gap needs series reasoning, and κ drifts with frequency and temperature. One dividend of the same logarithm: a coaxial line's characteristic impedance is (60 Ω/√κ) ln(b/a), which for RG-58 gives 52 Ω — the reason nominal 50 Ω cable has b/a near 3.5.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Field integration recipe

C = Q/ΔV, with ΔV = ∫ₐᵇ E⋅dr

Gauss's law supplies E(r), the radial integral supplies ΔV, and Q cancels to leave pure geometry.

ΔV in V, Q in C, C in F; integrate radially from the positive conductor outward

Coaxial cylinders

E = λ/(2πε₀r), C/L = 2πε₀/ln(b/a)

A 1/r field integrates to a logarithm, so only the ratio b/a survives — and it enters weakly.

λ = Q/L in C m⁻¹; 2πε₀ = 55.6 pF m⁻¹; holds for a < r < b, far from the ends

Concentric spheres

E = Q/(4πε₀r²), C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a)

A 1/r² field integrates to 1/a − 1/b, so both radii matter, not the gap b − a alone.

1/(4πε₀) = 8.99 × 10⁹ N m² C⁻²; a and b in m give C in F

Isolated conductor limit

C = 4πε₀a as b → ∞

Take the outer shell away and a lone conductor still has capacitance, fixed by its radius.

a = 20 mm gives 2.2 pF; the Earth, a = 6371 km, gives 709 μF

Thin-gap limit

C = ε₀A/d, with A = 4πab (spheres) or 2πr*L, r* = (b−a)/ln(b/a)

Both curved geometries collapse to the parallel-plate result when the gap is thin.

d = b − a; exact as written, and A → the conductor area once d ≪ a

Dielectric filling

C(κ) = κ C(vacuum)

Polyethylene, κ ≈ 2.26, lifts a 43.0 pF m⁻¹ coaxial line to 97 pF m⁻¹.

Uniform linear dielectric filling the gap; at fixed Q the field in the gap drops by κ
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.2 mm
1 to 2 mm; steps of 0.1.
6.0 mm
5 to 9 mm; steps of 0.2.
1.00
1 to 3; steps of 0.02.

Try this. Hold a at 1.2 mm and drag the shield out from 5.0 to 9.0 mm. The gap more than doubles, from 3.8 mm to 7.8 mm, but ΔV climbs only from 25.7 V to 36.2 V and C/L falls from 39.0 to 27.6 pF m⁻¹ — b enters only inside the logarithm.

Live results

ln(b/a)
1.609
CAPACITANCE C/L
34.6 pF m⁻¹
PEAK FIELD ÷ MEAN FIELD
2.49 ×
GAP VOLTAGE ΔV
28.94 V

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics II modelElectric field between coaxial conductors, plotted from the inner surface out to the shield, with 1.00 nC per metre of charge on the inner conductor. The inner radius is a = 1.2 mm, the shield radius b = 6.0 mm, and the gap is filled with a dielectric of κ = 1.00. The field falls as 1/r from 14.98 kV m⁻¹ at the inner surface to 3.00 kV m⁻¹ at the shield. The dashed line is the mean field ΔV/(b−a), the area under the curve is ΔV = 28.94 V, and dividing the charge by that voltage gives C/L = 34.6 pF m⁻¹.E(r) = λ/(2πκε₀r)kV m⁻¹, with λ = 1.00 nC m⁻¹E at r = a: 14.98 kV m⁻¹ΔV = ∫ E dr = 28.94 Va = 1.2 mmb = 6.0 mmΔV ÷ (b−a)ΔV is the area under this curve, not E × gapradius r
Electric field between coaxial conductors, plotted from the inner surface out to the shield, with 1.00 nC per metre of charge on the inner conductor. The inner radius is a = 1.2 mm, the shield radius b = 6.0 mm, and the gap is filled with a dielectric of κ = 1.00. The field falls as 1/r from 14.98 kV m⁻¹ at the inner surface to 3.00 kV m⁻¹ at the shield. The dashed line is the mean field ΔV/(b−a), the area under the curve is ΔV = 28.94 V, and dividing the charge by that voltage gives C/L = 34.6 pF m⁻¹.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Inner conductor radius a: 1.2 mm; Shield inner radius b: 6.0 mm; Dielectric constant κ: 1.00

Baseline 1.2; choose 1 to 2, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest error is carrying ΔV = E d across from parallel plates. Between nested conductors E is not uniform: for the RG-58 geometry, using the inner-surface field over the gap overstates ΔV by a factor 2.04, and using the outer-surface field understates it by 0.56. Only the integral is right. The second error is reading C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a) as though the gap were what mattered: a 20 mm sphere with a shell at 25 mm gives 11.1 pF, and the same sphere with no shell gives 2.2 pF.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A coaxial line has an inner conductor of radius a = 0.50 mm inside a shield of inner radius b = 3.50 mm. Find the capacitance per metre with the gap empty, the capacitance of a 25 m drum of it, and the per-metre figure once the gap is filled with polyethylene, κ = 2.26.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Concentric spheres have inner radius a = 30.0 mm and outer radius b = 50.0 mm with vacuum between them. Find the capacitance. Then show that ε₀A/d reproduces it exactly when A = 4πab, find what a naive A = 4πa² would have given, and find the capacitance the inner sphere keeps once the shell is taken away.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A coaxial line has a fixed shield inner radius b = 3.00 mm and runs at ΔV = 5.00 kV. Find the peak field at the inner conductor when a = 1.00 mm; find the inner radius that minimises that peak field and the field it achieves; and compare the capacitance per metre of the two designs.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

An air-filled coaxial cable has inner radius a = 0.50 mm and outer radius b = 2.00 mm, giving 40.1 pF m⁻¹. The shield is rebuilt at b = 4.00 mm with a unchanged. What is the new capacitance per metre?
7

Review & continue

A cylindrical or spherical capacitor is two nested conductors separated by a gap. Its capacitance comes from integrating the non-uniform field between them: C = 2πε₀L/ln(b/a) for coaxial cylinders, C = 4πε₀ab/(b−a) for concentric spheres.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.