
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Wave model of light and coherence
Before any fringe spacing can be calculated, you need to know what is oscillating, what a detector actually records, and why two torches aimed at one wall never make fringes. This is the topic that decides whether an interference pattern exists at all.
UPII-14.01 · Lesson 1 of 8 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. Your university may teach this optics or introductory modern-physics material separately. Follow your institution’s required sequence. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
A pattern appears only where the phase difference holds still.
The key idea
Two light fields are coherent when the phase difference between them stays constant for at least as long as the detector averages, which is the condition for their cross term, and so for any visible interference pattern, to survive.
Example. A helium-neon laser of bandwidth Δν = 1.5 GHz keeps its phase memory for τc = 1/Δν = 0.67 ns, a coherence length of 0.20 m: split the beam, recombine it with arms differing by 5 cm and the fringes stay crisp; at 2 m they are gone.
The complete physical model and assumptions
The wave model treats light as a transverse electromagnetic field oscillating as E = E₀ cos(kx − ωt + φ₀), and it earns its keep because fields superpose: where two beams overlap the total field is the sum, so the intensity — which is what any detector reports, being proportional to the time average of E² — carries a cross term 2√(I₁I₂) cos δ that neither beam has alone. Every result in physical optics is that cross term. But at 5 × 10¹⁴ Hz nothing follows the oscillation; every instrument averages over millions of cycles, so the cross term survives only if δ holds still across the averaging time. Real sources do not oblige. A thermal source restarts with a random phase roughly every 10⁻¹³ s, so its light carries a finite bandwidth Δν and its phase memory lasts only τc ≈ 1/Δν, the coherence time. Ask the same question about two points across the beam instead of two instants and it returns as spatial coherence, limited by the angular size of the source. The model stops predicting fringes not because light stops being a wave, but because the phase difference you were relying on stops being constant: past a path difference of Lc = c τc, or a transverse separation of λ₀/θₛ, the cross term averages away and the intensities simply add.
1What oscillates, and what a detector can follow
Light is a transverse electromagnetic wave, and it is the electric field that drives every detector you will use — an eye, a photodiode, a photographic grain. Along one direction the field of a single plane wave is E(x, t) = E₀ cos(kx − ωt + φ₀), with k = 2π/λ counting radians per metre and ω = 2πf radians per second. At λ₀ = 550 nm the frequency is c/λ₀ = 5.45 × 10¹⁴ Hz and one period lasts 1.83 fs. Nothing follows that. The fastest photodiode integrates for nanoseconds and the eye for tens of milliseconds, so every instrument reports the time average of the energy flux: I = ⟨ε₀cE²⟩ = ½ε₀cE₀², the ½ being the average of cos² over a cycle. That consequence sets up the rest of the topic. The observable is a squared amplitude, the oscillation itself is invisible, and any claim about phase has to be cashed out as a claim about a time-averaged intensity. For scale, a 1.0 mW laser filling 1.0 mm² gives I = 1.0 × 10³ W m⁻², so E₀ = √(2I/ε₀c) = 8.7 × 10² V m⁻¹.
2Fields add, intensities do not
Superposition is a statement about fields: where two beams overlap, E = E₁ + E₂ at every instant. Take E₁ = E₀₁ cos(ωt) and E₂ = E₀₂ cos(ωt + δ) at one point. Squaring and time-averaging gives ⟨E²⟩ = ⟨E₁²⟩ + ⟨E₂²⟩ + 2⟨E₁E₂⟩, and the product averages to ⟨E₀₁E₀₂ cos(ωt) cos(ωt + δ)⟩ = ½E₀₁E₀₂ cos δ. Multiply through by ε₀c and the result is I = I₁ + I₂ + 2√(I₁I₂) cos δ. The first two terms are what you would get by adding brightnesses like sand; the third is the interference, and it is the only term that knows the beams are related. For equal beams, I₁ = I₂ = I₀, it collapses to I = 2I₀(1 + cos δ) = 4I₀ cos²(δ/2), which runs from 4I₀ at δ = 0 down to exactly zero at δ = π. Nothing is created or destroyed: cos δ averages to zero across a full pattern, so the mean intensity is still I₁ + I₂. Interference moves energy out of the dark fringes and into the bright ones.
3Phase difference is bookkeeping on optical path
Everything now rests on δ, and δ has exactly three sources. The beams may cover different geometric distances; they may pass through media of different refractive index; and they may have left their sources with different phases. Inside a medium the frequency is unchanged but the wavelength shrinks to λ = λ₀/n, so a distance r holds nr/λ₀ cycles rather than r/λ₀. Counting cycles and multiplying by 2π, δ = (2π/λ₀)(n₂r₂ − n₁r₁) + (φ₂ − φ₁). The quantity nr is the optical path length, and Δ = n₂r₂ − n₁r₁ is the optical path difference, so δ = 2πΔ/λ₀ whenever the two sources start in phase. Worth a number: sliding a 12.0 μm sheet of glass of n = 1.52 into one beam, in place of the same thickness of air, adds (1.52 − 1.00)(12.0 μm) = 6.24 μm of optical path — 10.6 wavelengths at λ₀ = 589 nm, so the pattern shifts by 10.6 fringes for a sheet thinner than a hair.
4Coherence is whether the cross term survives averaging
Write the observed intensity honestly, with the average taken over the detector's integration time T: I = I₁ + I₂ + 2√(I₁I₂)⟨cos δ⟩. Two limits follow. If δ is genuinely fixed over T then ⟨cos δ⟩ = cos δ, the full cross term appears, and the beams are coherent. If δ wanders across the whole range 0 to 2π during T then ⟨cos δ⟩ = 0, the beams add like sand, and they are incoherent. The general case is written 2√(I₁I₂)|γ| cos δ, where |γ| between 0 and 1 is the degree of coherence, and what a meter actually returns is the fringe visibility V = (Iₘₐₓ − Iₘᵢₙ)/(Iₘₐₓ + Iₘᵢₙ) = 2√(I₁I₂)|γ|/(I₁ + I₂). Two independent LEDs are hopeless: their relative phase is redrawn roughly every 10⁻¹³ s, so a 1/60 s exposure averages about 1.7 × 10¹¹ independent draws and ⟨cos δ⟩ sinks to some 2 × 10⁻⁶. The practical response is never to use two sources. Split one beam — by wavefront at a pair of slits, or by amplitude at a half-silvered mirror — so that both arms inherit the same phase accidents.
5Temporal coherence: finite bandwidth, finite wave trains
A perfectly monochromatic wave would be one frequency extending over all time. Real light is emitted in bursts, and a burst lasting τc cannot be a single frequency: Fourier analysis spreads it over a bandwidth Δν ≈ 1/τc. Read backwards, a measured spectral width fixes how long the phase is remembered, and multiplying by c turns that memory into a distance, the coherence length Lc = cτc ≈ λ₀²/Δλ. This is the tolerance on path difference. Recombine two arms differing by Δ and the visibility stays high while Δ ≪ Lc, collapses near Δ ≈ Lc, and is gone past it; the number of usable fringes is Lc/λ₀ ≈ λ₀/Δλ. The spread across sources is enormous. White light at λ₀ = 550 nm with Δλ ≈ 300 nm gives Lc ≈ 1.0 μm, about two fringes, which is why a soap film shows colour only where it is submicron thin. A sodium line filtered to Δλ = 0.60 nm gives Lc = 0.58 mm. A helium-neon laser of Δν = 1.5 GHz gives Lc = 0.20 m, and a stabilised laser reaches kilometres.
6Spatial coherence: the source has to look small
Temporal coherence compares one beam with itself at a later time. Spatial coherence compares two points across the same wavefront at the same time, which is the question that matters when two slits or pinholes have to be illuminated. A point source is perfect: one emitter drives both points, so their phase difference is fixed by geometry alone. Widen the source to a width a at distance R and every element of it drives its own pattern, shifted slightly from its neighbours because it sees a slightly different path difference to the two points. Summing over the source washes the fringes out once that shift reaches one fringe, which happens when the point separation d reaches the transverse coherence width wₜ ≈ λ₀R/a = λ₀/θₛ, with θₛ = a/R the angular width of the source. Numbers make the rule vivid: the Sun subtends θₛ = 9.3 mrad, so sunlight at 550 nm is coherent across only 59 μm, while a 0.20 mm filament at 1.0 m manages 2.8 mm. That is why Young set a single narrow slit ahead of his double slit, and why a laser, spatially coherent across its whole beam, needs no such trick.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Harmonic light wave
E(x, t) = E₀ cos(kx − ωt + φ₀)
The entire state of the beam at one point is a single number, the phase kx − ωt + φ₀. Interference only ever compares two of them.
E₀ the peak field in V m⁻¹, k = 2π/λ in rad m⁻¹, ω = 2πf in rad s⁻¹, φ₀ the source phase in radIntensity of a light wave
I = ½ ε₀ c E₀²
The ½ is the time average of cos². A detector reports I and never E, so amplitudes must be squared before anything is read off.
I in W m⁻², ε₀ = 8.85 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹, c = 3.00 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹, E₀ in V m⁻¹Two-beam interference
I = I₁ + I₂ + 2√(I₁I₂) cos δ
The cross term is the interference. It swings 2√(I₁I₂) either side of the plain sum, and it disappears the moment ⟨cos δ⟩ hits zero.
I₁ and I₂ are the intensities each beam gives on its own in W m⁻²; δ is the phase difference between the fields in radPhase from optical path difference
δ = (2π/λ₀)(n₂r₂ − n₁r₁) + (φ₂ − φ₁)
Light slows in a medium, so it is nr and not r that counts: 12.0 μm of glass with n = 1.52 adds 6.24 μm of optical path.
λ₀ the vacuum wavelength in m, nr the optical path length in m, φ the emitted phase in radVisibility of two-beam fringes
V = 2√(I₁I₂) |γ| / (I₁ + I₂)
Measured as (Iₘₐₓ − Iₘᵢₙ)/(Iₘₐₓ + Iₘᵢₙ), so V separates the two ways a pattern fades: mismatched intensities, or lost coherence.
|γ| is the degree of coherence, 0 for independent fields and 1 for locked ones; I₁ and I₂ in W m⁻²Coherence length of a source
Lc = c τc ≈ λ₀²/Δλ
The path difference at which fringes fade. About λ₀/Δλ fringes survive, so a red line 10 nm wide gives roughly 63 of them.
τc ≈ 1/Δν is the coherence time in s, Δν the bandwidth in Hz, Δλ the spectral width in m, Lc in mInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Hold λ₀ at 0.60 μm and push Δλ from 35 to 130 nm: Lc collapses from 10.29 to 2.77 μm and the fringes die within a few μm of zero path difference. Then restore Δλ = 35 nm and drop I₂/I₁ to 0.20 — the spacing never moves, but the minima lift off the axis and the visibility caps at 0.745.
Live results
- COHERENCE LENGTH Lc
- 6.00 μm
- COHERENCE TIME τc
- 20.0 fs
- BANDWIDTH Δν
- 50.0 THz
- PEAK VISIBILITY V(0)
- 1.000
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Wavelength λ₀: 0.60 μm; Spectral width Δλ: 60 nm; Intensity ratio I₂/I₁: 1.00
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
Two sources of the same wavelength are not automatically coherent, and coherence is not a label a beam wears once and for all. What matters is whether δ holds still for as long as the detector integrates. Two independent lamps filtered to the same colour emit wave trains whose phases reset at random every 10⁻¹³ s or so, ⟨cos δ⟩ goes to zero, and the intensities simply add. One laser beam split and recombined is coherent at a path difference of 1 μm and incoherent at 1 km, because coherence is always coherence at a stated Δ. The partner slip is adding intensities instead of fields: two coherent beams of I₀ each give 4I₀ at a maximum, not 2I₀, because it is the amplitudes that superpose and the square comes afterwards.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Two coherent beams of equal intensity I₀ meet at a point in air, having left their sources in phase, with a path difference of 1.35 μm. The vacuum wavelength is 540 nm. Find the phase difference, the intensity at that point, and the two nearest path differences that would instead give a maximum.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- In air n ≈ 1.00, so the optical path difference is just the geometric one: Δ = 1.35 μm. In wavelengths, Δ/λ₀ = 1.35 μm ÷ 0.540 μm = 2.50.
- Each whole wavelength of path is 2π of phase, so δ = 2π × 2.50 = 5π rad = 15.7 rad. Subtracting two full turns leaves π rad: the fields arrive exactly out of step.
- Equal beams give I = 4I₀ cos²(δ/2) = 4I₀ cos²(2.50π) = 0. The point is dark, and its energy has gone into the neighbouring maxima.
- A maximum needs Δ/λ₀ to be a whole number, so the nearest are Δ = 2λ₀ = 1.08 μm and Δ = 3λ₀ = 1.62 μm — a move of only 0.27 μm either way.
Answer. δ = 5π rad, which is π rad once full turns are removed, so I = 0. The nearest maxima sit at Δ = 1.08 μm and Δ = 1.62 μm.
MediumExample 2
A sodium lamp filtered to λ₀ = 589.0 nm with Δλ = 0.60 nm feeds two equal beams that start in phase and are recombined. A glass sheet 9.60 μm thick with n = 1.52 is slid into one beam, displacing an equal thickness of air. Find the extra optical path, the phase difference it creates, the intensity as a multiple of the single-beam intensity I₀, and check that fringes survive at all.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- The sheet displaces air rather than vacuum, so only the excess optical path counts: Δ = (n − 1)t = (1.52 − 1.00)(9.60 μm) = 4.992 μm.
- In vacuum wavelengths that is 4.992 μm ÷ 0.5890 μm = 8.475, so the whole pattern slides by 8.48 fringes.
- Phase: δ = 2πΔ/λ₀ = 2π × 8.475 = 53.25 rad. Only the fractional part decides the intensity, and 0.475 of a turn is 2.99 rad, just short of π.
- Equal beams: I = 4I₀ cos²(δ/2) = 4I₀ cos²(26.63 rad) = 0.024 I₀. The point has gone almost, but not quite, dark.
- Coherence check: Lc ≈ λ₀²/Δλ = (589.0 nm)²/(0.60 nm) = 5.8 × 10⁵ nm = 0.58 mm, more than a hundred times the 4.99 μm added, so the visibility is untouched.
Answer. Δ = 4.992 μm = 8.475 wavelengths, δ = 53.25 rad and I = 0.024 I₀; with Lc = 0.58 mm ≫ 4.99 μm the fringes stay sharp.
HardExample 3
A white LED is filtered to λ₀ = 632 nm with spectral width Δλ = 12 nm. Its emitting face is a = 0.45 mm across and it sits R = 1.60 m from a pair of pinholes separated by d. Find the coherence length and coherence time, the transverse coherence width at the pinholes, a sensible choice of d, and how many fringes the source can support.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Temporal reach: Lc ≈ λ₀²/Δλ = (632 nm)² ÷ (12 nm) = 3.33 × 10⁴ nm = 33.3 μm, and τc = Lc/c = 33.3 × 10⁻⁶ m ÷ 3.00 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ = 1.11 × 10⁻¹³ s = 111 fs.
- Spatial reach: the face subtends θₛ = a/R = 0.45 mm ÷ 1.60 m = 2.81 × 10⁻⁴ rad, so wₜ ≈ λ₀/θₛ = 632 × 10⁻⁹ m ÷ 2.81 × 10⁻⁴ = 2.25 × 10⁻³ m = 2.25 mm.
- Contrast is already zero at d = wₜ, so stay well inside it. For a uniformly bright face the visibility follows |sin(πd/wₜ)/(πd/wₜ)|, which is 0.64 at d = wₜ/2 = 1.12 mm but 0.92 at d = 0.50 mm.
- Fringe budget: the usable path difference is capped by Lc, so the count either side of the centre is Lc/λ₀ = λ₀/Δλ = 632 ÷ 12 = 53.
- The two limits do different jobs. The spatial one restricts the geometry, fixing how far apart the pinholes may sit; the temporal one restricts how far out into the pattern you may look before the fringes smear — 53 orders here, which is generous.
Answer. Lc = 33.3 μm and τc = 111 fs; wₜ = 2.25 mm, so d ≈ 0.50 mm gives a visibility near 0.92, with about 53 usable fringes.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Two light fields are coherent when the phase difference between them stays constant for at least as long as the detector averages, which is the condition for their cross term, and so for any visible interference pattern, to survive.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics II completion tasks.