Skip to main content

Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson

Damped cavity mode: coherent states survive, cats do not

This is where decoherence stops being a word and becomes a rate you can compute. One leaky mode and one jump operator give two exact solutions: a coherent state that loses photons but never its purity, and a superposition of two such states whose interference dies 2|α|² times faster than its energy.

UAQM-14.05 · Lesson 5 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Damped cavity mode: coherent states survive, cats do notLeft, in the frame turning at ω: the components |α₀e^(±iδ)⟩ as circles of radius ½, shrinking toward the vacuum, and the Wigner function's interference fringes along the real axis, drawn at height |c|. Right, against κt: the fraction of photons left (dashed) and |c| (solid). At κt = 0.25, |c| = 0.170 while each component keeps 3.12 of its 4.0 photons.fringes ∝ |c| = 0.17solid: coherence |c|dashed: photons e(−κt)1κt from 0 to 1.5Re αIm α
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Optional unit · institution-dependent. Units 14 and 15 are the course’s optional extension into open systems and quantum gases. Unit 14 builds on radiation and decay; Unit 15 builds on second quantisation. Keep the fifteen-unit numbering and follow your institution’s required syllabus. Optional work is not a required completion gate.

1

Build the model

Loss shrinks a coherent state; it erases a superposition 2|α|² times faster.

The key idea

A damped cavity mode is a single field oscillator that loses photons through its mirrors at rate κ into an empty outside world; its master equation has the one jump operator √κ a and can be solved exactly.

Example. At 51.1 GHz with a photon lifetime of 160 μs, κ = 6.25 × 10³ s⁻¹ and Q = ω/κ = 5.1 × 10⁷. A superposition |α⟩ + |−α⟩ with |α|² = 4 loses its interference at 2κ|α|² = 5.0 × 10⁴ s⁻¹, within about 20 μs.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Take one cavity mode of angular frequency ω, leaking through its mirrors into an outside world that holds no photons. Topics 14.03 and 14.04 turn that coupling into a Lindblad master equation with the single jump operator L = √κ a, κ being the photon loss rate, and everything here is solved from it exactly. Its moments close order by order: ⟨a⟩ turns at ω and decays at κ/2, the photon number decays at κ, together the classical ring-down of a cavity with Q = ω/κ. Its solutions say more. A coherent state stays an exact, pure coherent state of shrinking amplitude, because it is an eigenstate of the jump operator: a photon leaving it tells the outside world nothing, so mode and outside stay in a product state. The superposition |α⟩ + |−α⟩ fares differently. Each component shrinks in the same way, but each writes a different coherent state into the outside world, and the overlap of the two records multiplies the interference terms by exp[−2|α|²(1 − e(−κt))]. Early on that is a rate 2κ|α|²: a few-photon superposition decoheres several times faster than it loses energy, a 10⁶-photon one two million times faster. All of this is derived; the 1996 experiment that saw it is quoted. The model needs a memoryless reservoir at zero temperature: heat it and coherent states stop being exact solutions, and couple an atom to the mode faster than κ and the mode no longer decays on its own.

1One leaky mode, one jump operator

SI units throughout; nothing here moves relativistically, so the metric (+, −, −, −) never enters. The mode is an oscillator, H = ħωa†a with the zero-point term dropped, coupled through a partly transmitting mirror to a continuum of outside modes bₖ by ħΣ(gₖa†bₖ + gₖ*bₖ†a), with the outside at zero temperature. Topic 14.03's steps go through with σ replaced by a: the Born step keeps the outside in its vacuum, the Markov step needs its spectrum flat over a band much wider than κ around ω, and the secular step was taken in writing the coupling without the terms abₖ and a†bₖ†, which oscillate near 2ω. What survives is the master equation of the first card, with κ = 2π|g(ω)|² times the density of outside modes at ω, the golden-rule rate through the mirror, and a small frequency shift absorbed into ω. Every term of dρ/dt is in s⁻¹. The approximations are very good: a superconducting cavity at 51.1 GHz with photon lifetime Tc = 160 μs has κ = 6.25 × 10³ s⁻¹ and Q = ω/κ = 5.1 × 10⁷, so κ/ω = 2 × 10⁻⁸.

2The moments close, and the field rings down classically

For any operator A the master equation gives d⟨A⟩/dt = iω⟨[a†a, A]⟩ + κ⟨a†Aa − ½a†aA − ½Aa†a⟩. For A = a the commutator is −a, and with aa† = a†a + 1 the dissipator is a†aa − ½a†aa − ½(a†a + 1)a = −½a, so d⟨a⟩/dt = −(iω + κ/2)⟨a⟩. For A = a†a it is a†a†aa − (a†a)² = −a†a, so d⟨n⟩/dt = −κ⟨n⟩. In general d⟨a†ᵐaⁿ⟩/dt = [i(m − n)ω − (m + n)κ/2]⟨a†ᵐaⁿ⟩: each normally ordered moment obeys its own closed equation. The amplitude decays at κ/2 and the energy at κ, as for a classical cavity of quality factor Q = ω/κ, and κ → 0 returns the free mode. For a single photon, ⟨n⟩ = e(−κt) is the probability that it is still there. In 2007 the ENS group, in a 51.1 GHz cavity whose ring-down time was measured as Tc = 0.130 s, watched single photons appear and vanish in sudden jumps, the single-shot face of that probability, quoted.

3A coherent state stays coherent, exactly

Try ρ(t) = |β⟩⟨β| with β(t) = α₀e(−iωt − κt/2). Writing |β⟩ = e(−|β|²/2)e(βa†)|0⟩ and differentiating gives d|β⟩/dt = [κ|β|²/2 − (iω + κ/2)βa†]|β⟩, and βa†|β⟩ = a†a|β⟩. So d(|β⟩⟨β|)/dt = κ|β|²ρ − iω[a†a, ρ] − (κ/2)(a†aρ + ρa†a), which is the master equation's right side term for term, because its jump term is aρa† = |β|²ρ. The ansatz is exact. The state stays pure, its photon statistics stay Poissonian with mean |α₀|²e(−κt), and no noise is added. The reason is that |β⟩ is an eigenstate of the jump operator, so losing a photon leaves it unchanged. Seen from outside, a reduced state that stays pure means a product: |α₀⟩|vac⟩ becomes |β⟩|E⟩, and since the coupling is linear in the mode operators, |E⟩ is a multimode coherent state carrying |α₀|²(1 − e(−κt)) photons, exactly those the mode lost. That is why laser light sent through any passive loss is still laser light.

4The cat: components shrink, interference dies

Start from N(|α₀⟩ + |−α₀⟩), with N² = 1/[2(1 + e(−2|α₀|²))]. Of its four dyads the two diagonal ones are solved already. The equation is linear, so try c(t)X with X = |β⟩⟨−β|. The derivative of X again supplies −iω[a†a, X] − (κ/2)(a†aX + Xa†a) + κ|β|²X, but the jump term is now aXa† = β(−β)*X = −|β|²X, with the opposite sign. Matching leaves dc/dt = −2κ|β|²c = −2κ|α₀|²e(−κt)c, so c = exp[−2|α₀|²(1 − e(−κt))]; the exponent is a photon number times a pure number. With |α₀|² = 4, by κt = 0.125 each component has lost 12% of its photons and is still pure while c has fallen to 0.39, and by κt = 0.25 the loss is 22% and c = 0.17. For general components α₁ and α₂, |c| = exp[−½|α₁ − α₂|²(1 − e(−κt))], with a phase Im(α₁α₂*)(1 − e(−κt)). In the Wigner function, quoted, each component is a Gaussian hill and c sets the height of the fringes between them. Late on c → e(−2|α₀|²): both hills have shrunk into one vacuum.

5Why the bigger superposition dies faster

The rate 2κ|α₀|² is twice the rate κ|α₀|² at which photons leave, and two pictures say why. First, the records: each component writes its own coherent state into the outside world, |±γ⟩ with |γ|² = |α₀|²(1 − e(−κt)), and tracing out the outside multiplies the interference by their overlap, ⟨−γ|γ⟩ = e(−2|γ|²), the factor the master equation gave. Decoherence is over once the two records can be told apart, long before the energy has gone. Second, the photons themselves: a(|α⟩ + |−α⟩) = α(|α⟩ − |−α⟩), so every escaping photon flips the relative sign. The number k that has escaped is Poisson-distributed with mean μ = |α₀|²(1 − e(−κt)), and averaging the sign over it gives ⟨(−1)ᵏ⟩ = e(−2μ), the same factor again. The one-photon limit is the opposite extreme: in |0⟩ + |1⟩ the coherence is ⟨a⟩ itself and decays at κ/2, half the energy rate, the T₂ = 2T₁ of amplitude damping in 14.02. Scaled up, an optical superposition with 10⁶ photons per component and Tc = 1 μs keeps its coherence for 0.5 ps, which is why superpositions of classical fields are never seen.

6The 1996 experiment, and where the model stops

In 1996 Brune, Haroche and colleagues at the École Normale Supérieure watched this happen, quoted here. A coherent field of mean photon number 3.3 sat in a superconducting cavity near 51 GHz with a photon lifetime of about 160 μs. A rubidium atom in a superposition of two circular Rydberg states crossed it off resonance and shifted the field's phase one way or the other, leaving components |α₀e(±iδ)⟩ at distance D = 2|α₀| sin δ, entangled with the atom. A second atom, sent a delay τ later, tested whether they could still interfere. The signal decayed well within the photon lifetime, faster for larger D, in agreement with the D²/2 rate derived here. The model has limits. A reservoir at temperature T raises the loss term by a factor nₜₕ + 1 and adds 14.04's gain term κnₜₕ(a†ρa − ½aa†ρ − ½ρaa†), so coherent states stop being exact solutions and the early rate becomes (2nₜₕ + 1)κD²/2, quoted; at 51.1 GHz and 0.8 K, nₜₕ = 0.05, a 10% increase. And once an atom couples to the mode faster than κ, the mode no longer decays on its own: that is Jaynes-Cummings dynamics, beyond this equation.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Master equation of the leaky mode at T = 0

dρ/dt = −iω[a†a, ρ] + κ(aρa† − ½a†aρ − ½ρa†a)

One jump operator, L = √κ a, with κ = ω/Q. Every result in this topic is solved from this line with no further approximation.

ω: mode angular frequency, rad s⁻¹; κ: photon loss rate, s⁻¹; ρ dimensionless. Derived in 14.03 and 14.04, with σ replaced by a.

The mean field rings down at κ/2

d⟨a⟩/dt = −(iω + κ/2)⟨a⟩, so |⟨a⟩(t)| = |α₀| e(−κt/2)

Re⟨a⟩ = |α₀| e(−κt/2) cos(ωt − θ₀), a classical cavity's ring-down, with θ₀ the phase of α₀. Set κ = 0 and the free mode oscillates for ever.

⟨a⟩ is dimensionless, a field amplitude in units of one photon's; κ/2 in s⁻¹ is the amplitude decay rate. Derived.

The photon number decays at the full rate κ

d⟨n⟩/dt = −κ⟨n⟩, so ⟨n⟩(t) = ⟨n⟩₀ e(−κt)

The same for a coherent state, a Fock state or a cat. The 51.1 GHz ENS cavity reported in 2007 had a measured Tc = 0.130 s, so κ = 7.7 s⁻¹.

n = a†a, dimensionless; photon lifetime Tc = 1/κ, in s. Derived, for any initial state of the mode.

A coherent state stays a pure coherent state

ρ(t) = |α(t)⟩⟨α(t)|, with α(t) = α₀ e(−iωt − κt/2)

a|α⟩ = α|α⟩, so losing a photon leaves the state as it was: the outside world learns nothing about it and no entanglement forms.

Exact at zero temperature; derived. α is dimensionless and |α(t)|² is the mean photon number.

Coherence factor of the cat |α₀⟩ + |−α₀⟩

c(t) = exp[−2|α₀|²(1 − e(−κt))]

The components shrink as a lone coherent state does and only the interference is multiplied by c. Late on c → e(−2|α₀|²), as both components merge into the vacuum.

Multiplies |α(t)⟩⟨−α(t)| and its conjugate; |α₀|² and κt are dimensionless. Derived.

Early decoherence rate for any two components

Γd = κ|α₁ − α₂|²/2, which is 2κ|α₀|² when α₁ = −α₂ = α₀

The decoherence time is Tc divided by D²/2. Components one unit apart, D = 1, decohere at κ/2, more slowly than their energy decays, however many photons each holds.

D = |α₁ − α₂| is the phase-space distance between the components, dimensionless; Γd in s⁻¹. Derived, for κt ≪ 1.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

4.0
0.5 to 9; steps of 0.5.
90 °
10 to 90 °; steps of 5.
0.25
0 to 1.5; steps of 0.05.

Try this. Step κt from 0 to 0.3: the circles barely move while the fringes flatten. Raise |α₀|² and the solid curve drops faster; close δ toward 10° and it slows, because the rate follows D², the squared distance between the circles, not the photon number.

Live results

SEPARATION D AT t = 0
4.00
COHERENCE |c|
0.170
PHOTONS LEFT |α(t)|²
3.12
EARLY RATE Γd/κ
8.00

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelLeft, in the frame turning at ω: the components |α₀e^(±iδ)⟩ as circles of radius ½, shrinking toward the vacuum, and the Wigner function's interference fringes along the real axis, drawn at height |c|. Right, against κt: the fraction of photons left (dashed) and |c| (solid). At κt = 0.25, |c| = 0.170 while each component keeps 3.12 of its 4.0 photons.fringes ∝ |c| = 0.17solid: coherence |c|dashed: photons e(−κt)1κt from 0 to 1.5Re αIm α
Left, in the frame turning at ω: the components |α₀e(±iδ)⟩ as circles of radius ½, shrinking toward the vacuum, and the Wigner function's interference fringes along the real axis, drawn at height |c|. Right, against κt: the fraction of photons left (dashed) and |c| (solid). At κt = 0.25, |c| = 0.170 while each component keeps 3.12 of its 4.0 photons.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Photons per component |α₀|²: 4.0; Phase split δ: 90 °; Time κt: 0.25

Baseline 4.0; choose 0.5 to 9, in steps of 0.5.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting picture is that a superposition decoheres because its energy leaks away, so it should last about one photon lifetime, Tc = 1/κ. Both halves are wrong. Loss alone does not decohere a coherent state: |α⟩ loses photons at rate κ|α|² and stays exactly pure, because a lost photon tells the outside world nothing it did not already know. And the interference between |α⟩ and |−α⟩ dies at 2κ|α|², not κ: with |α|² = 4 the coherence is down to 0.17 while each component still holds 78% of its photons. What destroys coherence is information, not energy. Each component leaves a different record outside, and the interference survives only while those records overlap. The rate is set by how different they are, |α₁ − α₂|², which is why two nearly equal fields stay coherent far longer than two opposite fields of the same energy.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A 51.1 GHz superconducting cavity at zero temperature has a measured photon lifetime Tc = 0.130 s and holds the coherent state |α₀⟩ with |α₀|² = 4.0. Find κ and Q, then |⟨a⟩|, ⟨n⟩, the photon-number variance and the probability of finding the cavity empty 65 ms later.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A cat |α₀⟩ + |−α₀⟩ with |α₀|² = 3.0 is prepared in a zero-temperature cavity with photon lifetime 160 μs. Find the early decoherence time, the coherence factor and the photons left per component after 20 μs, and the time at which the coherence has fallen to 1/e. How much of the energy is gone by then?

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A dispersive probe splits a coherent field with |α₀|² = 6.0 into |α₀e(iδ)⟩ + |α₀e(−iδ)⟩ with δ = 0.50 rad, in a zero-temperature cavity with Tc = 160 μs. Find D and the early decoherence time, then the modulus and phase of c after τ = 30 μs. Compare with |α₀⟩ + |−α₀⟩ of the same energy, and find the largest |α₀|² for which an opposite-phase cat keeps |c| ≥ 0.5 over the same τ.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

The cat |α⟩ + |−α⟩ with |α|² = 5.0 is stored at zero temperature in a cavity whose photon lifetime is Tc = 1.0 ms. What is the state 50 μs later?
7

Review & continue

A damped cavity mode is a single field oscillator that loses photons through its mirrors at rate κ into an empty outside world; its master equation has the one jump operator √κ a and can be solved exactly.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.