Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

Energy conservation, Q values and thresholds

Two questions decide whether a reaction can happen at all, before anything is known about its rate. Where does energy conservation come from — a symmetry of H, holding at every vertex — and is there enough energy in the right frame? Q reads off a mass table; the threshold comes from the invariant s, computed in whichever frame is easiest.

UPV-19.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Energy conservation, Q values and thresholdsInvariant mass √s of a proton beam on a target of mass m_b at rest, against beam kinetic energy T, with c = 1. The dashed horizontal line is the threshold √s = Σm_f = m_p + m_b + ΔM; the dashed vertical ending on the open circle marks T_thr, where the curve crosses it. At T = 3.00 GeV, √s = 3.02 GeV against a threshold of 3.75 GeV.√s / GeV5beam T = 3.00 GeV → √s = 3.02 GeVthreshold Σmf = 3.75 GeV, met at Tₜₕᵣ = 5.63 GeV (dashed)bar: √s − Σmf = −0.73 GeV to spare in the CMthreshold √s = Σmf0beam kinetic energy T8 GeV
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

Energy is conserved by symmetry, and s decides whether there is enough of it.

The key idea

Energy is conserved whenever H has no explicit time dependence, because H generates time translation and trivially commutes with itself; the invariant s = (Σp)² then decides whether the conserved energy is enough, since a reaction needs √s ≥ Σmf c² in every frame.

Example. For p + p → p + p + p + p̄ the threshold is √s = 4mₚ c² = 3.75 GeV: a collider reaches it with 0.94 GeV of kinetic energy per beam, a fixed target needs T = 6mₚ c² = 5.63 GeV, because momentum conservation forces the products to keep moving.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Energy conservation is not a separate postulate; it is what time-translation symmetry looks like in Hilbert space. The Schrödinger equation is solved by U(t) = exp(−iHt/ħ), so H is the Hermitian generator of shifts in time, and the Heisenberg equation d⟨A⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨[H, A]⟩ + ⟨∂A/∂t⟩ with A = H gives d⟨H⟩/dt = ⟨∂H/∂t⟩: energy is conserved exactly when the Hamiltonian does not itself depend on the clock. In field theory the time integral at each interaction vertex becomes a delta function, so energy balances at every vertex, not merely on average. What the law cannot say is whether there is enough of it, and that is a question of frames. A decay at rest needs Q = (Σmᵢ − Σmf)c² > 0, read straight off a mass table. A collision needs the invariant s = (Σp)², a Lorentz scalar computed in the laboratory and interpreted in the centre of momentum, to satisfy √s ≥ Σmf c² — and a fixed target pays a heavy momentum-conservation tax, which is why colliders exist. The model costs two ideas that popular accounts get wrong: an internal line is off shell because q² ≠ m²c² in a propagator denominator, not because energy was borrowed; and ΔE Δt ~ ħ is the width–lifetime relation of a decaying state, not a Robertson uncertainty relation, because no time operator conjugate to H exists.

1Where energy conservation comes from

The Schrödinger equation iħ ∂|ψ⟩/∂t = H|ψ⟩ is solved by |ψ(t)⟩ = U(t)|ψ(0)⟩ with U(t) = exp(−iHt/ħ), so H is the Hermitian generator of the unitary family that shifts the system in time. Take the Heisenberg equation for any observable, d⟨A⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨[H, A]⟩ + ⟨∂A/∂t⟩, and set A = H. The commutator [H, H] vanishes identically, leaving d⟨H⟩/dt = ⟨∂H/∂t⟩. Energy is conserved precisely when the Hamiltonian does not depend explicitly on the clock — when the laws are the same on Tuesday as on Monday. An atom driven by a laser has H(t) = H₀ − 𝐝⋅𝐄₀ cos ωt and its energy is not conserved; the atom plus field has a time-independent H and its energy is. In quantum field theory the same symmetry appears vertex by vertex: the ∫dt at each interaction point produces δ(ΣE), so energy balances exactly at every vertex of a Feynman diagram, not only between the initial and final states.

2Reading Q from the mass table

Q = (Σmᵢₙᵢₜᵢₐₗ − Σmfinal)c² is the rest energy that turns into kinetic energy, and it is a Lorentz scalar, so a negative Q cannot be rescued by a change of frame. Use consistent masses. With nuclear masses the bookkeeping is literal; with the atomic masses tables actually list, the electrons cancel for α decay, β⁻ decay and most reactions, but β⁺ decay needs 2mₑ c² = 1.022 MeV subtracted. Rutherford's transmutation ¹⁴N + α → ¹⁷O + p: atomic masses 14.003074 + 4.002602 = 18.005676 u in, 16.999132 + 1.007825 = 18.006957 u out, so Q = −0.001281 u × 931.494 MeV/u = −1.193 MeV. Endothermic: the α particle must bring energy, and it will turn out to need more than 1.193 MeV of it. Neutron decay: 939.565 − 938.272 − 0.511 = 0.782 MeV, exothermic, and that 0.782 MeV is the total kinetic energy the proton, electron and antineutrino share.

3The invariant s: compute in the lab, judge in the CM

Add the four-momenta of everything on one side and square: s = (Σp)² = (ΣE)² − |Σ𝐩|² with c = 1. It is the same number in every inertial frame. In the centre-of-momentum frame Σ𝐩 = 0, so √s is the total CM energy, and the least it can be while still making the final state is when every product sits at rest there: √s = Σmf. That is the whole threshold condition. For beam a on target b at rest, s = mₐ² + mb² + 2Eₐ mb, which you evaluate in the laboratory and compare with (Σmf)². Antiproton production p + p → p + p + p + p̄ needs √s = 4mₚ = 3.753 GeV. A fixed target requires Eₐ = (16mₚ² − 2mₚ²)/(2mₚ) = 7mₚ, a kinetic energy of 6mₚ = 5.63 GeV — the Bevatron was built for 6.2 GeV precisely to clear it. A proton–proton collider reaches the same √s with 2mₚ per beam: 0.94 GeV of kinetic energy each.

4Why the threshold exceeds |Q|: the momentum tax

Expanding the fixed-target result gives Tₜₕᵣ = [(Σmf)² − (mₐ + mb)²]/(2mb) = −Q(Σmf + mₐ + mb)/(2mb), exact in relativity, and in the non-relativistic limit Tₜₕᵣ ≈ −Q(1 + mₐ/mb). The excess over |Q| is what momentum conservation charges: the beam's momentum must be carried away by the products, so they cannot all be at rest in the laboratory and part of the kinetic energy you supplied is locked into their centre-of-mass motion. For ¹⁴N(α, p)¹⁷O the factor is (18.006957 + 18.005676)/(2 × 14.003074) = 1.286, so Tₜₕᵣ = 1.193 × 1.286 = 1.53 MeV rather than 1.19 MeV. For p + p → p + p + π⁰ the factor is (2011.5 + 1876.5)/1876.5 = 2.07, so 135 MeV of pion costs 280 MeV of beam. The factor tends to 1 only as mb → ∞, a target too heavy to recoil — which is why the tax is smallest on a heavy nucleus and largest on a light one.

5Off shell is a propagator, not a loan

Because four-momentum is conserved exactly at each vertex, an internal line's momentum is fixed by the external legs: in electron–muon scattering the photon carries q = p₁ − p₃, and q² = (p₁ − p₃)² is negative, spacelike, nothing like the m² = 0 of a real photon. That line is off shell. The amplitude contains the propagator 1/(q² − m²c² + iε), and the mass-shell condition q² = m²c² is simply where that denominator has its pole — where an external, detectable particle would sit. Nothing is borrowed and nothing is paid back: the virtual particle is a term in a perturbation series, and its 'wrong' mass is a statement about a denominator. The same bookkeeping makes threshold a hard wall. Below √s = Σmf there is no final state with the right energy, so the transition amplitude is zero however short the interaction: a reaction 0.1 MeV short of threshold does not happen briefly, it does not happen.

6ΔE Δt ~ ħ is a lifetime–linewidth relation

The Robertson inequality σA σB ≥ |⟨[A, B]⟩|/2 needs two Hermitian operators, and time is not one. If some T satisfied [T, H] = iħ, then exp(−iaT/ħ) would shift energy by any real a, so the spectrum of H would be the whole real line and no ground state could exist — Pauli's argument. What survives is different in kind. A state whose survival amplitude is ⟨ψ(0)|ψ(t)⟩ = e(−iE₀t/ħ − t/2τ), so that |⟨ψ(0)|ψ(t)⟩|² = e(−t/τ), has an energy distribution whose Fourier transform is that amplitude: a Lorentzian of full width Γ = ħ/τ, since transforming the probability e(−t/τ) instead would give twice the width. The Z boson has Γ = 2.495 GeV, so τ = 6.582 × 10⁻²⁵ GeV s ÷ 2.495 GeV = 2.64 × 10⁻²⁵ s; the neutron's 878 s life gives Γ = 7.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ eV, unmeasurably narrow. The Mandelstam–Tamm form σA / |d⟨A⟩/dt| ≥ ħ/(2σH) is legitimate too, but its 'Δt' is a derived time scale, not the spread of an operator. Neither statement licenses energy non-conservation.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Time-translation generator

U(t) = e(−iHt/ħ), d⟨H⟩/dt = ⟨∂H/∂t⟩

Energy is conserved exactly when H carries no explicit time dependence — the physics tomorrow is the physics today.

H the Hamiltonian in J or eV, t in s, ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s; [H, H] = 0 removes the commutator term

Q value from the mass table

Q = (Σ mᵢₙᵢₜᵢₐₗ − Σ mfinal) c²

Q > 0: the process runs from rest and Q is the kinetic energy shared out. Q < 0: something must bring at least |Q|, and in a collision more.

rest masses in u or MeV/c², 1 u = 931.494 MeV/c²; Q is a Lorentz scalar, the same in every frame

Mandelstam invariant s

s = (Σ p)² = (ΣE)² − |Σ𝐩|², √s = ECM (c = 1)

Compute it in the laboratory where the numbers are, then apply the threshold in the centre of momentum where the products can all be at rest.

four-momenta summed over one side of the reaction; units GeV² with c = 1, and the same number in every inertial frame

Threshold condition

√s ≥ Σ mf c²

At threshold every product is at rest in the CM frame; any √s below this is forbidden outright, however briefly.

mf the rest masses of every final particle, including any that were already present before the collision

Fixed-target threshold

Tₜₕᵣ = [(Σmf)² − (mₐ + mb)²] / 2mb = −Q (Σmf + mₐ + mb) / 2mb

The factor beyond |Q| is the momentum-conservation tax: the products must carry the beam's momentum, so they cannot all be at rest in the lab.

beam a, target b at rest, c = 1; non-relativistic limit Tₜₕᵣ ≈ −Q (1 + mₐ/mb)

Width and lifetime, not a commutator

Γ τ = ħ, propagator 1 / (q² − m²c² + iε)

A state decaying as e(−t/τ) has an energy distribution of width ħ/τ — the sense in which ΔE Δt ~ ħ holds for an unstable state. Off shell means q² ≠ m²c² in that denominator, nothing borrowed.

Γ the full width of the Lorentzian line in eV, τ the mean life in s, ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s; q the internal four-momentum and m the mass of the exchanged particle
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

3.00 GeV
0 to 8 GeV; steps of 0.01.
0.938 GeV
0.938 to 3 GeV; steps of 0.001.
1.876 GeV
0.1 to 2 GeV; steps of 0.001.

Try this. Start with ΔM = 1.876 GeV, a p p̄ pair made on a proton, and drag T upward: the dot crosses the dashed line at 5.63 GeV, three times the 1.88 GeV the pair weighs. Then raise the target mass to 3 GeV and watch Tₜₕᵣ fall to 3.05 GeV, or set ΔM = 0.135 GeV for a π⁰ and read 0.28 GeV.

Live results

√s AT THIS T
3.02 GeV
THRESHOLD Tₜₕᵣ
5.63 GeV
Q VALUE
-1.88 GeV
Tₜₕᵣ ÷ |Q| (momentum tax)
3.00

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelInvariant mass √s of a proton beam on a target of mass m_b at rest, against beam kinetic energy T, with c = 1. The dashed horizontal line is the threshold √s = Σm_f = m_p + m_b + ΔM; the dashed vertical ending on the open circle marks T_thr, where the curve crosses it. At T = 3.00 GeV, √s = 3.02 GeV against a threshold of 3.75 GeV.√s / GeV5beam T = 3.00 GeV → √s = 3.02 GeVthreshold Σmf = 3.75 GeV, met at Tₜₕᵣ = 5.63 GeV (dashed)bar: √s − Σmf = −0.73 GeV to spare in the CMthreshold √s = Σmf0beam kinetic energy T8 GeV
Invariant mass √s of a proton beam on a target of mass mb at rest, against beam kinetic energy T, with c = 1. The dashed horizontal line is the threshold √s = Σmf = mₚ + mb + ΔM; the dashed vertical ending on the open circle marks Tₜₕᵣ, where the curve crosses it. At T = 3.00 GeV, √s = 3.02 GeV against a threshold of 3.75 GeV.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Beam kinetic energy T: 3.00 GeV; Target mass mb (at rest): 0.938 GeV; Mass created ΔM = Σmf − mₚ − mb: 1.876 GeV

Baseline 3.00; choose 0 to 8, in steps of 0.01.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The common error is to read ΔE Δt ~ ħ as permission: a virtual particle 'borrows' energy ΔE for a time ħ/ΔE, so a reaction just below threshold can happen briefly, or a W can be exchanged in beta decay because energy conservation is suspended for ħ/MW c² ≈ 10⁻²⁶ s. Every clause is wrong. Four-momentum is conserved exactly at every vertex, because the spacetime integral at each vertex produces a delta function. The W in n → p e⁻ ν̄ is off shell — q² is far from MW²c² — and that suppresses the amplitude through the propagator denominator 1/(q² − MW²c²) ≈ −1/MW²c²; it borrows nothing. And there is no time operator, so ΔE Δt is not a Robertson uncertainty relation at all: it is Γτ = ħ, a property of the energy distribution of a decaying state. Threshold is a hard inequality — below √s = Σmf the amplitude is zero.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Using mₙ c² = 939.565 MeV, mₚ c² = 938.272 MeV and mₑ c² = 0.511 MeV, decide from Q alone whether a free neutron can decay to p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ and whether a free proton can decay to n + e⁺ + νₑ. The neutrino masses are below 1 eV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Find the minimum kinetic energy of a proton beam striking a stationary proton target that produces a neutral pion, p + p → p + p + π⁰, given mₚ c² = 938.272 MeV and mπ c² = 134.977 MeV. Compare it with |Q| and with the kinetic energy per beam a proton–proton collider would need.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A cosmic-ray proton meets a cosmic microwave background photon head-on. The mean CMB photon energy is 2.70 kB T with T = 2.725 K. Find the proton energy at which p + γ → Δ⁺ (mΔ c² = 1232 MeV, mₚ c² = 938.272 MeV) becomes possible, and the photon energy seen in the proton's rest frame at that point.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A proton beam strikes a stationary proton target and the aim is p + p → p + p + p + p̄, with mₚ c² = 0.938 GeV. What is the minimum beam kinetic energy?
7

Review & continue

Energy is conserved whenever H has no explicit time dependence, because H generates time translation and trivially commutes with itself; the invariant s = (Σp)² then decides whether the conserved energy is enough, since a reaction needs √s ≥ Σmf c² in every frame.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.