Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

Auditing neutron beta decay

Run the whole audit on one decay you can check against the tables. Take n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ through the mass, charge, baryon-number, lepton-number and spin ledgers and through three-body kinematics, then stop where the audit stops and name what a lifetime needs that no ledger can supply.

UPV-19.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Auditing neutron beta decayElectron spectrum of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, dN/dT_e ∝ p_e E_e (Q − T_e)², Q = 782.3 keV; marker at T_e = 300 keV, height 0.98 of peak. Right: momentum triangle p_e + p_ν̄ + p_p = 0 at e–ν̄ angle 90°, proton recoil 0.34 keV.n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, Q = 782.3 keVdN/dTₑ ∝ pₑ Eₑ (Q − Tₑ)²pₑ + pν̄ + pₚ = 0Tₑ = 300 keV · Eν̄ ≈ 482 keVendpointTₑ / keV782θ = 90°Tₚ = 0.34 keVpₑ solid · pν̄ dashed · pₚ faint
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

One decay, every ledger closed, and the number the ledgers cannot give.

The key idea

A conservation audit of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ checks that every additive quantum number and the total angular momentum are the same before and after, and that the parent mass exceeds the summed product masses so that Q > 0.

Example. Q = 939.565 − 938.272 − 0.511 = +0.782 MeV; charge 0 = +1 − 1 + 0; B: 1 = 1; Lₑ: 0 = +1 − 1. Every ledger closes, so the decay is allowed — and it happens, with τ = 878 s.

The complete physical model and assumptions

An audit is a set of Hermitian generators that commute with H, and neutron decay is the cleanest place to run one because every input is tabulated and the answer is a measured lifetime. Each continuous symmetry supplies a generator G with [H, G] = 0 — H itself for energy, P̂ for momentum, Ĵ for angular momentum, the charge operators for electric charge, B and Lₑ — and because H, Ĵ², Ĵz and the charges commute with one another (the components of Ĵ do not) the neutron at rest can be an eigenstate of all of them at once. The audit then reads: write the eigenvalues of n on one side and of p, e⁻, ν̄ₑ on the other, and demand equality term by term, using direct sums where the label is angular momentum and a subtraction of masses where it is energy. Every ledger closes, and the closing tells you real things: that Q is +782 keV, that an antineutrino rather than a neutrino must accompany the electron, that the three spin-½ products, leaving in the s-wave, must couple to S = ½, and that the electron spectrum is a continuous band whose endpoint sits 0.75 keV below Q. What the audit costs is honesty about its limit. The same ledgers close for a decay that takes 10⁻²³ s and for one that takes 10¹⁰ years, so they contain no rate at all. The 878 s lifetime comes only from the matrix element — GF, Vud, gA — and from the integrated phase space, none of which a conservation law can see.

1Open the energy ledger: masses first, then Q

Energy is conserved because H generates time translation, U(t) = exp(−iHt/ħ), and the weak Hamiltonian carries no explicit time dependence. For a decay at rest that statement collapses to a subtraction of tabulated rest masses. With mₙ = 939.565 MeV, mₚ = 938.272 MeV and mₑ = 0.511 MeV, Q = mₙ − mₚ − mₑ = 0.782 MeV — 782.3 keV with the full-precision masses, since mₙ − mₚ = 1293.3 keV. The antineutrino mass, below 1 eV, changes nothing at this level. Q > 0 is the verdict: a free neutron can decay. Run the same subtraction for the mirror process p → n + e⁺ + νₑ and Q = −1.293 − 0.511 = −1.804 MeV, so a free proton cannot; electron capture, p + e⁻ → n + νₑ, is closed too, with Q = −0.782 MeV, which is why hydrogen is stable while free neutrons are not. Inside a nucleus the binding-energy difference between parent and daughter joins the ledger and can flip the sign either way — that is how β⁺ emitters exist — but for the bare particles the masses alone decide.

2Sum the additive charges on both sides

Each additive quantum number is the eigenvalue of a Hermitian generator that commutes with H: electric charge from the gauged U(1), baryon number and lepton-family number from accidental global U(1) phases, the last only approximately, since neutrino oscillation breaks Lₑ in flight though never at a decay vertex. Because the generators commute with each other a state carries all of them at once, and because they commute with H each sum is fixed. Assign them particle by particle. Charge: n 0, p +1, e⁻ −1, ν̄ₑ 0, so 0 → +1 − 1 + 0 = 0. Baryon number: n 1 (udd), p 1 (uud), leptons 0, so 1 → 1. Electron-family number: e⁻ +1, ν̄ₑ −1, hadrons 0, so 0 → +1 − 1 = 0, while Lμ and Lτ are zero on both sides. Strangeness is 0 → 0, consistent with a ΔS = 0 charged-current vertex. The ledger is also what fixes the antineutrino: n → p + e⁻ + νₑ would give Lₑ = 0 → +2 and is forbidden, though charge, B and Q are untouched. The audit does not care that ν̄ₑ is invisible in a detector — it demands the particle by bookkeeping, which is exactly how Pauli argued for it in 1930.

3Couple three spin-½ particles and demand J = ½

Rotational invariance gives [H, Jᵢ] = 0, so total J is a ledger too, with the twist that angular momenta combine as a direct sum, not a number. The neutron has j = ½. The final spins live in C² ⊗ C² ⊗ C², dimension 8, and Clebsch–Gordan reduces it: ½ ⊗ ½ = 0 ⊕ 1, then (0 ⊕ 1) ⊗ ½ = ½ ⊕ ½ ⊕ 3/2, with dimensions 2 + 2 + 4 = 8. For an allowed transition the leptons leave in the L = 0 s-wave, so Jfinal = S and only the two S = ½ multiplets can match the neutron; S = 3/2 is shut. The two open multiplets are physically distinct. In one the e⁻ν̄ₑ pair is in the spin singlet (Fermi, coupling gV), in the other the spin triplet (Gamow–Teller, coupling gA), and with λ = gA/gV = −1.275 the rate splits as 1 : 3λ², about 17 % Fermi to 83 % Gamow–Teller. The same ledger kills the two-body candidate n → p + e⁻: two spin-½ particles plus an integer orbital L can only reach integer J, never the neutron's ½ — a half-integer total needs an odd number of fermions on each side.

4Let momentum share Q three ways: the spectrum and its endpoint

P̂ = −iħ∇ commutes with H, so in the neutron's rest frame pₚ + pₑ + pν̄ = 0. With three bodies that leaves two continuous parameters — the electron energy and the electron–antineutrino angle — instead of the single fixed momentum a two-body decay would give. Weighting every configuration equally, the density of final states for an electron of kinetic energy Tₑ is dN/dTₑ ∝ F(Z, Eₑ) pₑ Eₑ (Q − Tₑ)², where pₑ and Eₑ are the electron momentum and total energy, (Q − Tₑ)² is the antineutrino's phase space with the proton's sub-keV recoil neglected, and the Fermi function F is within a few per cent of 1 for Z = 1 except at the lowest electron energies. The curve rises from zero, peaks near 250 keV and falls to zero at the endpoint. The endpoint is where the antineutrino leaves with no momentum, so the proton must recoil with pₚ = −pₑ. The electron there is relativistic, γ = 2.53, so pₑ²c² = Tₑ² + 2mₑc²Tₑ = 1.41 MeV², and Tₚ = pₑ²/(2mₚ) = 0.75 keV. The endpoint is therefore Q − 0.75 keV = 781.6 keV, and a Kurie plot of √(N/(pₑ Eₑ F)) against Tₑ is a straight line through it.

5Name the vertex: only a W changes flavour

A closed ledger says the decay may happen; the interaction says how. At quark level n(udd) → p(uud) turns one d into a u, and a flavour change is something neither the gluon nor the photon can do — both couple diagonally in flavour. Only the charged-current weak vertex d → u + W⁻, followed by W⁻ → e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, does it, with ΔS = 0 and a Cabibbo factor Vud = 0.974 at the hadronic end. That single fact sets the scale of the lifetime: a strong decay of a 940 MeV hadron takes about 10⁻²³ s and an electromagnetic one 10⁻¹⁶ to 10⁻²⁰ s, while the neutron survives 878 s because the amplitude carries GF ≈ 1.17 × 10⁻⁵ GeV⁻² and the phase space is squeezed by mₑ⁵. It also explains why gA ≠ gV: the vector current is protected by CVC, so gV = 1, but the axial current is renormalised by the strong interaction inside the nucleon to λ = gA/gV = −1.275 — a number measured through decay asymmetries and derivable from no ledger.

6Stop where the audit stops: the lifetime is not in the ledger

Fermi's golden rule, Γ = (2π/ħ)|M|²ρ(E), separates what the audit gave from what it did not. The audit gave the kinematics, Q and the shape of the spectrum in the previous section, but not the number ρ: integrating that shape with the Coulomb-dependent Fermi function gives f = 1.689 in units of mₑ⁵, which no ledger computes. Everything else is the matrix element: GF from muon decay, |Vud| = 0.974 from the CKM matrix, the factor (1 + 3λ²) from summing the Fermi and Gamow–Teller channels, and a 3.9 % radiative correction. Assembled, 1/τ = GF²|Vud|²(1 + 3λ²) mₑ⁵ f (1 + ΔR)/(2π³ħ) gives 880 s against the measured 878.4 ± 0.5 s. Turn it round and the neutron becomes an instrument: with τ and λ measured, the formula returns |Vud| and tests CKM unitarity. What is still open is experimental — bottle experiments that count surviving neutrons give 878 s, beam experiments that count emitted protons give about 888 s, and the 9 s gap is roughly four standard deviations. Nothing in the conservation audit even knows there is a lifetime to disagree about.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Q value from tabulated masses

Q = (mₙ − mₚ − mₑ)c² = 1293.3 keV − 511.0 keV = 782.3 keV

Q > 0 is the energy ledger's verdict that a free neutron can decay; Q is also the total kinetic energy the three products share.

mₙ − mₚ = 1.2933 MeV, mₑ = 0.5110 MeV; the antineutrino mass, below 1 eV, is invisible at this precision

Additive ledgers

q: 0 → +1 − 1 + 0 · B: 1 → 1 + 0 + 0 · Lₑ: 0 → 0 + 1 − 1

Each sum is the eigenvalue of a generator with [H, G] = 0, so it must match term by term; a νₑ in place of ν̄ₑ fails Lₑ (0 → 2).

q: charge in units of e; B = 1 for n and p, 0 for leptons; Lₑ = +1 for e⁻ and νₑ, −1 for e⁺ and ν̄ₑ

Three spin-½ products

½ ⊗ ½ ⊗ ½ = ½ ⊕ ½ ⊕ 3/2, and Jfinal = S when L = 0

[H, J] = 0 demands Jfinal = ½: both S = ½ multiplets (Fermi and Gamow–Teller) are open in the s-wave, and S = 3/2 is shut.

S is the total spin of p, e⁻ and ν̄ₑ; L the orbital angular momentum of the products; dimensions 2 + 2 + 4 = 8

Electron endpoint and proton recoil

Tₑ,ₘₐₓ = Q − Tₚ, with Tₚ = pₑ²/(2mₚ) = (Tₑ² + 2mₑc²Tₑ)/(2mₚc²) = 0.75 keV

The endpoint is two-body kinematics inside a three-body decay: the antineutrino at rest, the proton taking 0.1 % of Q, the electron the rest.

at the endpoint pν̄ = 0 and pₚ = −pₑ; mₚc² = 938.27 MeV; the result is Tₑ,ₘₐₓ = 781.6 keV

Three-body spectrum shape

dN/dTₑ ∝ F(Z, Eₑ) pₑ Eₑ (Q − Tₑ)²

Phase space alone gives the continuous band that peaks near 250 keV; √(N/(pₑ Eₑ F)) against Tₑ is a straight line ending at the endpoint.

pₑ, Eₑ: electron momentum and total energy; (Q − Tₑ) ≈ Eν̄ with the sub-keV proton recoil neglected; F is the Fermi function, within a few % of 1 for Z = 1 except at the lowest electron energies

What the ledger cannot give: the rate

1/τ = GF² |Vud|² (1 + 3λ²) mₑ⁵ f (1 + ΔR) / (2π³ħ)

Returns 880 s against the measured 878.4 s, built from GF, Vud, gA and integrated phase space — none of them visible to any conservation law.

λ = gA/gV = −1.275, f = 1.689 (integrated Fermi function), ΔR ≈ 0.039; ħ = c = 1 except the final ħ
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

300 keV
20 to 780 keV; steps of 5.
90 °
0 to 180 °; steps of 5.

Try this. Push Tₑ to 780 keV: the dashed antineutrino arrow vanishes, the faint proton arrow becomes the exact reverse of the electron's and Tₚ reads 0.75 keV — the endpoint. Then set Tₑ = 300 keV and swing θ from 0° to 180°: Tₚ runs from 0.66 to 0.01 keV while the marker on the spectrum never moves.

Live results

ELECTRON pₑ c
630 keV
ELECTRON γ = Eₑ/mₑc²
1.59
PROTON RECOIL Tₚ
0.34 keV
dN/dTₑ ÷ PEAK
0.98

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelElectron spectrum of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, dN/dT_e ∝ p_e E_e (Q − T_e)², Q = 782.3 keV; marker at T_e = 300 keV, height 0.98 of peak. Right: momentum triangle p_e + p_ν̄ + p_p = 0 at e–ν̄ angle 90°, proton recoil 0.34 keV.n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, Q = 782.3 keVdN/dTₑ ∝ pₑ Eₑ (Q − Tₑ)²pₑ + pν̄ + pₚ = 0Tₑ = 300 keV · Eν̄ ≈ 482 keVendpointTₑ / keV782θ = 90°Tₚ = 0.34 keVpₑ solid · pν̄ dashed · pₚ faint
Electron spectrum of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, dN/dTₑ ∝ pₑ Eₑ (Q − Tₑ)², Q = 782.3 keV; marker at Tₑ = 300 keV, height 0.98 of peak. Right: momentum triangle pₑ + pν̄ + pₚ = 0 at e–ν̄ angle 90°, proton recoil 0.34 keV.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Electron kinetic energy Tₑ: 300 keV; Angle between e⁻ and ν̄ₑ: 90 °

Baseline 300; choose 20 to 780, in steps of 5.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The endpoint is not Q, and the electron there is not slow. Students set Tₑ,ₘₐₓ = Q, or subtract a proton recoil computed from p² = 2mₑTₑ, which gives 0.43 keV. But an electron with Tₑ = 782 keV has Eₑ = 1.293 MeV = 2.53 mₑc²: its momentum is pₑc = √(Tₑ² + 2mₑc²Tₑ) = 1.188 MeV, not √(2mₑc²Tₑ) = 0.894 MeV, and the proton recoil at the endpoint is pₑ²/(2mₚ) = 0.75 keV, putting the endpoint at 781.6 keV. The proton, with Tₚ/mₚc² ≈ 10⁻⁶, is the particle you may treat non-relativistically; the electron never is. The 0.3 keV slip changes no ledger and no verdict, but recoil corrections of this kind are what endpoint experiments must get right before they can hunt the neutrino mass: a Kurie fit anchored to Q instead of Q − Tₚ misplaces the endpoint by more than seven hundred times the whole effect a sub-eV neutrino mass would produce.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Audit n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ on the energy, charge, baryon-number and electron-family ledgers, using mₙ = 939.565 MeV, mₚ = 938.272 MeV and mₑ = 0.511 MeV. Then test the variant n → p + e⁻ + νₑ.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Find the maximum electron kinetic energy in neutron decay and the proton recoil energy at that point. Use mₙ − mₚ = 1293.33 keV, mₑc² = 511.00 keV and mₚc² = 938 272 keV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

The audit says nothing about the rate. Using 1/τ = GF²|Vud|²(1 + 3λ²) mₑ⁵ f (1 + ΔR)/(2π³ħ) with GF = 1.1664 × 10⁻⁵ GeV⁻² (ħ = c = 1), |Vud| = 0.9737, λ = gA/gV = −1.2754, f = 1.6887 and ΔR = 0.039, find τₙ and compare it with the measured 878.4 s. Take ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻²² MeV s.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

In the audit of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ, which statement is one that the conservation laws and kinematics actually establish?
7

Review & continue

A conservation audit of n → p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ checks that every additive quantum number and the total angular momentum are the same before and after, and that the parent mass exceeds the summed product masses so that Q > 0.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.