
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Rest energy, kinetic energy & the energy-momentum invariant
This is where E = mc² stops being a slogan and becomes a line in an energy budget. Integrate the relativistic force law to see where work goes at high speed, draw energy as the hypotenuse of a triangle whose legs are momentum and mass, and use it to take decays and collisions apart without ever solving for a speed.
UPIII-08.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. This modern-physics material is an introductory survey, not a complete course in relativity, quantum, atomic, nuclear or particle physics. Your university determines the required depth and assessment. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
Energy is the hypotenuse, momentum one leg, and mass the leg no frame can change.
The key idea
The energy-momentum invariant is the statement that E² − (pc)² equals (mc²)² for any particle in any inertial frame, so total energy, pc and rest energy form a right triangle with E as the hypotenuse.
Example. A muon (mc² = 105.7 MeV) with pc = 200 MeV has E = √(200² + 105.7²) = 226.2 MeV, kinetic energy 120.5 MeV and speed β = 200/226.2 = 0.884, with no γ or √(1 − β²) computed along the way.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Kinetic energy is defined by what it has always been: the work a net force does bringing a body from rest to speed v. Keep that definition, replace Newton's momentum with p = γmv from the previous topic, and the integral ∫v dp evaluates to K = (γ − 1)mc². The result contains a term with no Newtonian counterpart, mc², present even at v = 0, and the natural reading is that the total energy is E = γmc² = K + mc², with mc² the energy a body has by virtue of its mass alone. Eliminating v between E = γmc² and p = γmv leaves E² − (pc)² = (mc²)², a combination every inertial frame computes identically from its own E and p, exactly as every frame computes the same interval from its own Δt and Δx. That single equation carries most of relativistic kinematics: β = pc/E gives the speed without a square root, E = pc holds for anything with m = 0, and applied to a whole system it defines an invariant mass M that includes the parts' kinetic energy and so is not the sum of their rest masses. The model holds for inertial frames in flat spacetime and says nothing about gravity. Its m is the invariant mass, the same number in every frame, which changes only when a body's internal energy changes; that is why no speed-dependent mass appears here.
1Integrate the force law and follow the work
Kinetic energy is the work a net force does from rest, K = ∫F dx = ∫(dp/dt) v dt = ∫v dp, and nothing in that definition is Newtonian except the momentum you put in. With p = γmv along the line of motion, dp = γ³m dv, because d(γv)/dv = γ³. So K = ∫₀v γ³mv dv, and the substitution c² dγ = γ³v dv turns it into mc² ∫₁γ dγ = (γ − 1)mc². Try it on an electron pushed through 1.00 MV: K = 1.00 MeV and mc² = 0.511 MeV, so γ = 1 + 1.00/0.511 = 2.96 and β = √(1 − 1/γ²) = 0.941. Newton's ½mv² would have given β = √(2 × 1.00/0.511) = 1.98, nearly twice c. Read the integral backwards and dK/dp = v: plotted against momentum, the energy's slope is the velocity. Newton's parabola p²/2m has slope p/m and steepens for ever; the relativistic curve bends over towards slope c, so past about 0.9c more work buys more energy and momentum but almost no more speed.
2Check the low-speed limit: Newton is the first term
Every relativistic result must return the classical one when v ≪ c, and this one does through the binomial series. With β = v/c, γ = 1/√(1 − β²) = 1 + ½β² + ⅜β⁴ + …, so K = (γ − 1)mc² = ½mv² + ⅜mv⁴/c² + … = ½mv²(1 + ¾β² + …). At β = 0.10 the correction is ¾ × 0.010 = 0.75%, invisible in most laboratory work; at β = 0.50 the exact factor γ − 1 = 0.1547 against ½β² = 0.125 makes K 24% larger than Newton's; at β = 0.90, γ − 1 = 1.294 against 0.405, a factor of 3.2. Dimensions check as well: γ is a pure number, so (γ − 1)mc² carries the units of mc², kg m² s⁻² = J. The series is the correspondence check in its sharpest form: not only does the relativistic formula tend to Newton's, it tells you the size of the first correction, ¾β², before you have measured anything.
3Rest energy is a real line in the budget
Write E = γmc² and split it as E = K + mc². The second term is there at v = 0, so a body at rest is not at zero energy: it holds mc², and 1.00 kg of anything holds (1.00)(2.998 × 10⁸)² = 8.99 × 10¹⁶ J, roughly the output of a 1 GW power station over three years. Chemistry never noticed because its energies are minute on that scale: burning 1.0 kg of petrol releases 4.6 × 10⁷ J, so the products are lighter than the reactants by 4.6 × 10⁷/(2.998 × 10⁸)² = 5.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ kg, and conservation of mass looked exact to every balance Lavoisier owned. Nuclear binding is where the term shows: a deuteron's mass is 2.224 MeV/c² below that of a free proton plus a free neutron, 0.12% of the total, and that deficit is the energy released when they bind. Particle physics works in the units this invites, quoting masses in MeV/c² so that mc² is read off directly: 0.511 MeV for the electron, 938.3 MeV for the proton, 931.5 MeV for one atomic mass unit.
4Eliminate the speed and find what every frame agrees on
Square E = γmc² and pc = γmvc and subtract: E² − (pc)² = γ²m²c⁴(1 − v²/c²) = (mc²)², because γ²(1 − β²) = 1. The speed has vanished, and with it every frame-dependent quantity. An observer moving along the particle's line at speed u measures E′ = γᵤ(E − up) and p′c = γᵤ(pc − uE/c), the same transformation that (ct, x) obeys, so E and p both change while E² − (pc)² does not, just as Δt and Δx change under a boost while c²Δt² − Δx² is fixed. Plot E against pc and every observer's (pc, E) for this particle lands on one hyperbola, vertex at mc² and asymptotes E = ±pc; a boost slides the point along it. Read as a right triangle, the same equation has legs pc and mc² and hypotenuse E, so β = pc/E is the cosine of the angle between E and the momentum leg and 1/γ = mc²/E is its sine. At p = 0 the triangle collapses to E = mc²; as m → 0 it flattens to E = pc with β = 1, and a photon needs nothing more.
5Work in MeV and let the triangle do the algebra
Accelerator units make the invariant an arithmetic identity: quote E and pc in MeV and m in MeV/c², and E² = (pc)² + (mc²)² uses the same numbers with no powers of ten. A proton spectrometer returns pc = 800 MeV. Then E = √(800² + 938.3²) = √(1 520 407) = 1233 MeV, K = E − mc² = 295 MeV, β = 800/1233 = 0.649 and γ = 1233/938.3 = 1.314: four results and not one square root of 1 − β². Now let a second observer ride along the beam at u = 0.500c, so γᵤ = 1.155: E′ = 1.155 × (1233 − 0.500 × 800) = 962 MeV and p′c = 1.155 × (800 − 0.500 × 1233) = 212 MeV. Different energy, different momentum, and √(962² − 212²) = 938 MeV, the proton mass again. Newton would have read K = p²/2m = 800²/(2 × 938.3) = 341 MeV from the same spectrometer, 16% too high; at pc = 2500 MeV his estimate would be nearly double the true value.
6Mass is not additive: the invariant mass of a system
Add the energies and momenta of several particles in one frame and form M²c⁴ = (ΣE)² − |Σp|²c². ΣE and Σp transform together exactly as E and p do, so M is the same in every frame, and since both sums are conserved in a reaction, M is conserved too. It is not the sum of the rest masses. Two 1.0 MeV photons flying apart back to back have m = 0 each, Σp = 0 and ΣE = 2.0 MeV, so the pair has M = 2.0 MeV/c²; the same two photons flying side by side have ΣE = |Σp|c and M = 0. A Σ⁺ hyperon (1189.4 MeV) at rest decays to a proton (938.3 MeV) and a π⁰ (135.0 MeV): the system's M stays 1189.4 MeV/c², while the products' rest masses sum to 1073.3 MeV/c². The missing Q = 116.1 MeV is their kinetic energy. The two-body formula gives Eₚ = (1189.4² + 938.3² − 135.0²)/(2 × 1189.4) = 957.1 MeV, so Kₚ = 18.8 MeV and the pion carries 97.3 MeV: at equal momentum the lighter particle always has the larger K. Nothing was destroyed: the system's M is unchanged, and 116.1 MeV of energy moved from the rest-energy column to the kinetic one.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Kinetic energy from the work integral
K = ∫₀ᵖ v dp = (γ − 1)mc²
Expands to ½mv² + ⅜mv⁴/c² + …, so Newton's kinetic energy is the first term of the series, not a rival formula.
m invariant mass in kg, v in m s⁻¹, c = 2.998 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹, γ = 1/√(1 − v²/c²); K in JTotal energy and rest energy
E = γmc² = K + mc²
Rest energy is a real entry in the budget: 1.00 kg at rest holds 8.99 × 10¹⁶ J, and 1 u has rest energy 931.5 MeV. γ = E/(mc²) reads straight off.
E, K and mc² in J, or in MeV with m quoted in MeV/c²; the rest energy mc² is E at v = 0The energy-momentum invariant
E² = (pc)² + (mc²)²
Links E and p without v or γ, so a momentum measured in a spectrometer becomes an energy in one line.
p in kg m s⁻¹ so pc is in J; E and p differ from frame to frame but E² − (pc)² does notSpeed from energy and momentum
β = v/c = pc/E
It is also the slope dE/d(pc) of the energy curve, since E dE = c²p dp: it tends to 1 once pc ≫ mc², and equals 1 exactly when m = 0.
dimensionless; with E and pc both in MeV the ratio needs no unit conversionInvariant mass of a system
M²c⁴ = (ΣE)² − |Σp|²c²
M counts the parts' kinetic energy as well as their rest masses, so two photons flying apart have M > 0, and a decay conserves M but not Σm.
sums over every particle in one frame; M in kg or MeV/c² is the same in every frame and equals ΣE/c² where Σp = 0Two-body decay from rest
E₁ = (M² + m₁² − m₂²)c²/(2M)
Fixes every product energy from masses alone; the shared kinetic energy is Q = (M − m₁ − m₂)c², and the lighter product takes most of it.
M parent mass, m₁ and m₂ product masses, all in kg or MeV/c²; E₁ is product 1's total energy; the momenta are equal and oppositeInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set pc to 0 and the dot sits at the vertex, E = mc². Raise pc: Newton's parabola climbs away above the curve while the tangent's slope β creeps towards 1 and never reaches it. Drag mc² to 0 and the curve folds onto E = pc. Move u and the open dot slides along the same curve.
Live results
- TOTAL ENERGY E
- 1233 MeV
- KINETIC ENERGY K = E − mc²
- 295 MeV
- SPEED β = pc/E
- 0.649
- √(E′² − (p′c)²) IN FRAME u
- 938 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Momentum pc: 800 MeV; Rest energy mc²: 938 MeV; Speed u of a second frame: 0.50 c
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Model boundary: m = p = 0 is the zero four-momentum, not a massless particle at rest. A massless particle with nonzero momentum has speed c; an undefined zero-energy velocity is not a valid prediction.
Catch the common trap
The first-year reflex is to bolt γ onto Newton's formula the way it was bolted onto p = mv, writing K = ½γmv². It looks right because it tends to ½mv² at low speed, but the work integral gives (γ − 1)mc², and the two disagree in the very next term: (γ − 1)mc² = ½mv² + ⅜mv⁴/c² + … while ½γmv² = ½mv² + ¼mv⁴/c² + …; at β = 0.90 the false formula gives 0.929mc² where the true kinetic energy is 1.294mc², 28% low, and as β → 1 it tends to ½γmc², half the true value. Kinetic energy in relativity is not half of momentum times velocity; it is E − mc², whatever E turns out to be. The same reflex produces relativistic mass: m is one invariant number, and γ belongs to the energy and the momentum, not to the particle.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
In a thought experiment, a 1.80 kg lump of putty moving at 0.800c meets a 3.20 kg lump moving the opposite way at 0.600c, and the two stick together. Find the mass and velocity of the merged lump and the energy that ends up heating it, and compare with Newton's answers.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Lump A: γ = 1/√(1 − 0.640) = 1/0.600 = 1.667, so E = γmc² = 1.667 × 1.80 kg × c² = 3.00 kg × c² and p = γmv = 1.667 × 1.80 kg × 0.800c = 2.40 kg × c. Lump B: γ = 1/√(1 − 0.360) = 1/0.800 = 1.250, so E = 1.250 × 3.20 kg × c² = 4.00 kg × c² and p = 1.250 × 3.20 kg × 0.600c = 2.40 kg × c, the opposite way.
- The relativistic momenta are equal and opposite, so Σp = 0: the merged lump is at rest in the lab. Its energy is all rest energy, ΣE = 7.00 kg × c² = 7.00 × (2.998 × 10⁸)² = 6.29 × 10¹⁷ J, so its mass is M = ΣE/c² = 7.00 kg.
- Rest masses before: 1.80 + 3.20 = 5.00 kg. After: 7.00 kg. The extra 2.00 kg is the kinetic energy the lumps brought in, (γA − 1)mA c² + (γB − 1)mB c² = (0.667 × 1.80 + 0.250 × 3.20) kg × c² = 2.00 kg × c² = 1.80 × 10¹⁷ J, now stored as internal (thermal) energy of the lump.
- Newton's momenta mv are 1.80 × 0.800c = 1.44 kg × c and 3.20 × 0.600c = 1.92 kg × c, which do not cancel, so he keeps the mass at 5.00 kg and sends it off at 0.48/5.00 = 0.0960c in B's direction. His heat is ½(1.80)(0.800c)² + ½(3.20)(0.600c)² − ½(5.00)(0.0960c)² = (0.576 + 0.576 − 0.023) kg × c² = 1.129 kg × c² = 1.01 × 10¹⁷ J, only 0.56 of the true figure.
- Check the limit: as both speeds fall, γ → 1, γmv → mv and (γ − 1)mc² → ½mv², so the two accounts converge term by term and M → Σm, the Newtonian answer.
Answer. M = 7.00 kg, at rest; 1.80 × 10¹⁷ J of heat, which is the extra 2.00 kg. Newton would give 5.00 kg moving at 0.0960c and 1.01 × 10¹⁷ J.
MediumExample 2
A calorimeter records two photons from a single decay with energies E₁ = 412 MeV and E₂ = 96.0 MeV, their directions 39.7° apart. Show that the pair has a non-zero invariant mass although each photon is massless, identify the parent particle, and find the parent's speed and Lorentz factor.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- For a photon E = pc, so |p₁|c = 412 MeV and |p₂|c = 96.0 MeV. Total energy ΣE = 508.0 MeV; the total momentum follows from the cosine rule, |Σp|²c² = E₁² + E₂² + 2E₁E₂ cos θ.
- Invariant mass: M²c⁴ = (ΣE)² − |Σp|²c² = (E₁ + E₂)² − (E₁² + E₂² + 2E₁E₂ cos θ) = 2E₁E₂(1 − cos θ).
- Numbers: 2 × 412 × 96.0 = 79 104 MeV², and 1 − cos 39.7° = 1 − 0.7694 = 0.2306, so M²c⁴ = 1.824 × 10⁴ MeV² and Mc² = 135.1 MeV. That matches the π⁰ (134.98 MeV/c²) to the precision of the energies.
- Two massless photons carry the pion's mass between them because they are not collinear: at θ = 0 the factor 1 − cos θ vanishes and so would the invariant.
- Parent speed from the system's β = |Σp|c/ΣE: |Σp|c = √(508.0² − 135.1²) = √(239 812) = 489.7 MeV, so β = 489.7/508.0 = 0.964 and γ = ΣE/(Mc²) = 508.0/135.1 = 3.76.
- Check: the narrowest opening angle a π⁰ with γ = 3.76 can give is 2 arcsin(1/γ) = 30.8°, when the photons share the energy equally. The measured 39.7° is wider, as it must be.
Answer. Mc² = 135.1 MeV, a neutral pion; it was moving at β = 0.964 with γ = 3.76, carrying E = 508 MeV and pc = 490 MeV.
HardExample 3
A proton beam with kinetic energy 2.00 GeV strikes protons at rest in a hydrogen target (mc² = 938.3 MeV). Find the invariant mass of a colliding pair, the energy available for making new particles, and the speed of the zero-momentum frame; confirm the invariant in that frame, and compare with two 1.00 GeV beams colliding head-on.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Beam proton: E₁ = K + mc² = 2938.3 MeV and p₁c = √(E₁² − (mc²)²) = √((2938.3 − 938.3)(2938.3 + 938.3)) = √(2000 × 3876.6) = 2784.5 MeV. The target has E₂ = 938.3 MeV and p₂ = 0.
- Lab totals: ΣE = 3876.6 MeV and |Σp|c = 2784.5 MeV, so M²c⁴ = 3876.6² − 2784.5² = 2mc²(E₁ + mc²) = 1876.6 × 3876.6 = 7.275 × 10⁶ MeV², and Mc² = 2697.2 MeV, already more than the 1876.6 MeV of the two rest masses.
- Baryon number is conserved, so two nucleons must come out, carrying at least 1876.6 MeV of rest energy between them, and only the part of Mc² beyond that can become new particles: 2697.2 − 1876.6 = 820.6 MeV, 41% of the beam's K, and all of it is on offer in the zero-momentum frame. Newton would give half of K, 1000 MeV. At 135.0 MeV per π⁰ that is at most 6 pions, not Newton's 7.
- Zero-momentum frame: βcm = |Σp|c/ΣE = 2784.5/3876.6 = 0.7183 and γcm = ΣE/(Mc²) = 1.4373. Transforming each proton, Ecm = γcm(E − βcm pc) gives 1348.6 MeV for both, with pcm c = γcm(pc − βcm E) = +968.7 and −968.7 MeV.
- In that frame ΣE = 2697.2 MeV and Σp = 0, so the invariant is 2697.2 MeV again: different energies and momenta, the same M. Two 1.00 GeV beams meeting head-on already have Σp = 0, so Mc² = 2 × 1938.3 = 3876.6 MeV and all 2000 MeV of kinetic energy is available.
Answer. Mc² = 2697 MeV; 821 MeV available (at most 6 π⁰, against Newton's 1000 MeV); zero-momentum frame at 0.718c, where each proton has E = 1349 MeV. Colliding 1.00 GeV beams make all 2000 MeV available.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The energy-momentum invariant is the statement that E² − (pc)² equals (mc²)² for any particle in any inertial frame, so total energy, pc and rest energy form a right triangle with E as the hypotenuse.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.