Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

What hole theory cannot do: the case for quantised fields

Seven topics have pushed Dirac's equation and its sea as far as they go; this one audits what they cannot do. Take each assumption hole theory makes, find the symmetry or measurement it runs into, and turn the failure into a requirement. The five requirements you leave with are the specification Unit 9's quantised fields must meet.

UAQM-08.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: What hole theory cannot do: the case for quantised fieldsReflection coefficient R against step height V₀ at a sharp step, for total energy E = 1.5 mc², on a vertical scale of R/(1 + R) that puts R = 1 halfway up. Solid: spin ½ (Dirac, quoted from topic 8.02). Dashed: spin 0 (Klein-Gordon, derived here). Both use group-velocity momenta. The shaded Klein window opens at V₀ = 2.5 mc²; the spin-0 pole is at V₀ = 2E = 3.0 mc².Reflection at a sharp stepsolid spin ½, dashed spin 0R → ∞R = 3R = 108Klein windowstep height V₀ / mc²
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Four failures of the filled sea, each turned into a requirement on quantised fields.

The key idea

Hole theory's limits are the assumptions it cannot justify: it subtracts the infinite charge and energy of a sea of real electrons by hand, breaks the symmetry charge conjugation demands, has no sea for bosons, and treats number-changing processes with a fixed-number equation.

Example. π⁺ and π⁻ are particle and antiparticle with one mass, 139.570 MeV, yet a sea of negative-energy pions could stabilise nothing: a boson mode already holding one quantum doubles, rather than blocks, the rate at which a second falls into it.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Hole theory is a state of infinitely many electrons described by a one-electron equation. Topics 8.03 to 8.07 showed what that buys: a filled sea that blocks the radiative fall, holes that are positrons of charge +e and mass m, and a pair threshold of 2mc² = 1.022 MeV, all measured. Each success rests on an assumption it cannot justify from inside. Its sea is made of real electrons whose charge and energy, growing with the momentum cutoff as Λ³ and Λ⁴, are subtracted by hand. Electrons are occupied states and positrons vacancies, although charge conjugation maps either description onto the other. Only exclusion makes a sea a floor, so Klein-Gordon particles get none, yet K⁰ and its antiparticle have masses equal to 6 parts in 10¹⁹. And it treats pair creation with a wave equation for a fixed number of particles, which it manages only by making that number infinite. Turned into demands, the failures write Unit 9's specification: states of any particle number; an empty vacuum whose infinite constants are ordering terms; particles and antiparticles on equal terms; energy bounded below with no sea; and a rule deciding which particles obey exclusion. Hole theory's numbers survive, because the quantised Dirac field reproduces them pair for pair. Its account does not: it stops wherever bosons, changing particle number or the vacuum itself are involved.

1The audit: a sea of real electrons, subtracted by hand

Units are SI with c and ħ kept, the metric is diag(1, −1, −1, −1), and the electron's charge is −e. Quoted in one line from topics 8.03 to 8.07: filling every negative-energy state blocks the radiative fall, a hole is a positron of charge +e and mass m, and a pair costs 2mc² = 1.022 MeV. The price is a sea of real electrons, two per momentum state, of density Λ³/(3π²ħ³) below a momentum cutoff Λ. At Λ = mc one cubic micrometre of vacuum holds 5.87 × 10¹⁷ of them, a charge of −0.094 C whose Coulomb field at 1 m would be 8.4 × 10⁸ V m⁻¹. Hole theory declares that this charge makes no field, that the sea's energy makes no gravity, and that sea electrons exert no forces on one another: three subtractions made by hand, none produced by any rule inside the theory. Nor are the subtracted numbers properties of anything. Raise the cutoff to 10mc and the charge grows a thousandfold and the energy 6.0 × 10³-fold. A quantity that scales with an arbitrary cutoff as Λ³ is not being measured; it is being removed.

2Requirement: an empty vacuum, infinities as ordering terms

Unit 9 expands the Dirac field over Unit 4's spinors, ψ = Σ [b u e(−ip⋅x/ħ) + d† v e(ip⋅x/ħ)], with b destroying an electron and d a positron (stated; built in topic 9.05). Before any algebra is chosen its energy is H = Σ Eₚ (b†b − d d†), over momenta and both spins. With the anticommutator d d† + d†d = 1 of topic 9.07, H = Σ Eₚ (b†b + d†d) − Σ Eₚ. The constant −Σ Eₚ is hole theory's sea energy term for term, but it is now a number times the identity. It commutes with every operator, so it cancels from every energy difference and every transition amplitude: a pair at rest costs 2mc² = 1.022 MeV whatever the cutoff, the measured threshold. Discarding it, normal ordering, chooses an origin of energy and removes no electrons, because the vacuum, b|0⟩ = d|0⟩ = 0, contains none. One-mode check: H = E(b†b + d†d − 1) has levels −E, 0, 0 and +E, so a particle costs E and a pair 2E above the vacuum. The same algebra turns the sea's charge into the c-number −e Σ 1.

3Charge conjugation forbids a preferred sea

In hole theory an electron is an occupied positive-energy state and a positron a missing negative-energy one. Topic 8.05's ψc = iγ²ψ* maps every negative-energy solution of charge −e onto a positive-energy solution of charge +e, so the same algebra describes a sea of positrons whose holes are electrons. Both accounts predict the same physics, nothing in the theory selects one, and their unsubtracted vacuum charges are −eN and +eN. Heisenberg's 1934 remedy can be derived. Write Q = −e(Σ nₖ − 2cN), with nₖ = 0 or 1 over all 2N states, N in each band. Conjugation sends nₖ to 1 − nₖ′ for the conjugate state k′, and Q must become −Q; that forces c = ½, so Q = −e Σ(nₖ − ½): zero for the filled sea, −e for an electron, +e for a hole, at any cutoff. The symmetry it restores is measured: positron and electron g-factors differ by a fraction (−0.5 ± 2.1) × 10⁻¹² (quoted). Requirement: particles and antiparticles on equal terms, as b and d† enter ψ, with Q = −e Σ(b†b − d†d) after ordering (stated; topic 9.07).

4Spin zero: antiparticles with no sea to make them

Unit 3's Klein-Gordon particles also have negative energies with no floor (topic 3.09). A sea stops a fall only through exclusion, and the occupation factor shows what bosons do instead. Quantum Mechanics I's ladder algebra gives |⟨n + 1|a†|n⟩|² = n + 1, so the golden-rule rate into a mode already holding n bosons is (1 + n) times the rate into an empty one; for fermions c†c† = 0 makes it 1 − n, zero for a full state. Derived. Limit: n = 0 returns the bare rate, and 1 + n is the stimulated emission measured in every laser. A mode holding one negative-energy pion doubles the rate at which a second falls in, and each addition lowers the energy further: a boson sea is a drain, not a floor. Yet spin-0 particles have antiparticles: π⁺ and π⁻ share the mass 139.570 MeV, K⁰ and K̄⁰ have masses equal to 6 parts in 10¹⁹, and e⁺e⁻ collisions make π⁺π⁻ pairs above 279.14 MeV (all quoted). Requirement: energy bounded below without a sea. Quantised with commutators, the complex scalar field has H = Σ ħωₚ(a†a + b†b) plus a positive constant, with b† creating the antiparticle (stated; topic 9.03).

5The Klein step counts particles

For spin 0 the equation is second order, so ψ and ∂ψ/∂z are continuous at a sharp step. With incident momentum p, momentum q beyond it and c²q² = (E − V₀)² − m²c⁴, matching gives RB = ((p − q)/(p + q))² and TB = 4pq/(p + q)², summing to 1 since the spin-0 flux is proportional to momentum. Derived. Above V₀ = E + mc² a packet leaves the step only if the group velocity c²q/(E − V₀) is positive, so q is negative: RB = ((p + |q|)/(p − |q|))² exceeds 1, TB is negative, and a pole sits at V₀ = 2E, where |q| = p. For E = 2mc² and V₀ = 5.5mc², RB = 9.83. Beyond the step the density (E − V₀)|φ|²/mc² is negative: the transmitted wave is antiparticles leaving. Spin ½ under the same rule gives RF = 0.159 (topic 8.02, quoted), never above 1, and for m = 0 zero at every step: the normal-incidence Klein tunnelling measured in graphene in 2009 (quoted). Checks: RB is a ratio of momenta, and returns to 1 where the window opens and as V₀ → ∞. Quoted field reading (Hansen and Ravndal, 1981): RB − 1 counts pairs the incident boson stimulates; exclusion denies a spin-½ step that stimulation.

6Particle number changes: the specification for Unit 9

Hole theory describes γ → e⁻e⁺ beside a nucleus with a one-particle equation by keeping the number of electrons, sea included, fixed and infinite: a pair is one sea electron lifted, an annihilation one dropped back. What is observed does change. Q = −e(N₋ − N₊) is conserved, and the electron's lifetime exceeds 6.6 × 10²⁸ years (quoted), but N₋ + N₊ changes by 2 with every pair, and the photon number, which never had a sea, changes with every emission. An amplitude between states of different particle number needs a state space containing them all. So the audit ends in five requirements. A Fock space, the sum of the N-particle spaces for N = 0, 1, 2, …, with operators that change N (topic 9.02). An empty vacuum whose infinite constants are ordering terms (9.02, 9.07). Particles and antiparticles on equal terms (9.03, 9.07). Energy bounded below without a sea: commutators leave the Dirac energy Σ Eₚ(b†b − d†d) unbounded below (9.06), anticommutators repair it (9.07). And a rule fixing which particles obey exclusion: the spin-statistics connection (9.09).

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The sea as an ordering constant

−Σ Eₚ d d† = Σ Eₚ d†d − Σ Eₚ, using d d† + d†d = 1

Anticommutator stated here, derived in topic 9.07. The c-number −Σ Eₚ is hole theory's sea energy term for term, but it multiplies the identity and cancels from every energy difference.

Eₚ = √(p²c² + m²c⁴) in J; d, d† the dimensionless positron mode operators; sums over momentum p and both spins

Charge counted symmetrically in the two bands

Q = −e Σₖ (nₖ − ½), summed over all states of both energy bands

Derived: conjugation sends nₖ to 1 − nₖ′, and demanding Q → −Q fixes the ½. The filled sea has Q = 0, one electron −e, one hole +e, at any cutoff.

nₖ = 0 or 1, dimensionless; e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C; the cutoff keeps equal numbers of states in the two bands

Occupation factor for a transition into a mode

Γ(n) = (1 ± n) Γ₀, upper sign for bosons, lower for fermions

Derived from |⟨n + 1|a†|n⟩|² = n + 1 and c†c† = 0. A full fermion state blocks the fall; a boson mode holding n quanta speeds it n + 1 times, so no boson sea is a floor.

Γ₀ the golden-rule rate into the empty mode, in s⁻¹; n the mode's occupation: 0, 1, 2, … for bosons, 0 or 1 for fermions

Spin-0 reflection at a sharp step

RB = ((p − q)/(p + q))², TB = 1 − RB, with c²q² = (E − V₀)² − m²c⁴

Derived from continuity of ψ and ∂ψ/∂z. In the Klein window RB = ((p + |q|)/(p − |q|))² exceeds 1 and TB is negative, with a pole at V₀ = 2E.

p, q the momenta before and beyond the step in kg m s⁻¹; E, V₀ in J; q negative above V₀ = E + mc², set by group velocity

What a pair process conserves

ΔN₋ = ΔN₊, so Q = −e(N₋ − N₊) is fixed while N₋ + N₊ changes by 2ΔN₋

Derived from hole bookkeeping: a pair lifts one sea electron, an annihilation drops one back. A theory of these processes needs states of every N₋ + N₊, which is Fock space.

N₋, N₊ the numbers of electrons and positrons, dimensionless; Q in C
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.5 mc²
1.1 to 3 mc²; steps of 0.1.
4.5 mc²
0.1 to 7.9 mc²; steps of 0.2.

Try this. At E = 1.5 mc², slide V₀ across the shaded window: the solid spin-½ curve never rises above R = 1, while the dashed spin-0 curve climbs above it at the window edge, reaches R → ∞ at V₀ = 2E and sinks back toward 1 for high steps. Then raise E and watch the window and the pole move right.

Live results

R, SPIN ½
0.270
T, SPIN ½
0.730
R, SPIN 0
5.32
T, SPIN 0
-4.32

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelReflection coefficient R against step height V₀ at a sharp step, for total energy E = 1.5 mc², on a vertical scale of R/(1 + R) that puts R = 1 halfway up. Solid: spin ½ (Dirac, quoted from topic 8.02). Dashed: spin 0 (Klein-Gordon, derived here). Both use group-velocity momenta. The shaded Klein window opens at V₀ = 2.5 mc²; the spin-0 pole is at V₀ = 2E = 3.0 mc².Reflection at a sharp stepsolid spin ½, dashed spin 0R → ∞R = 3R = 108Klein windowstep height V₀ / mc²
Reflection coefficient R against step height V₀ at a sharp step, for total energy E = 1.5 mc², on a vertical scale of R/(1 + R) that puts R = 1 halfway up. Solid: spin ½ (Dirac, quoted from topic 8.02). Dashed: spin 0 (Klein-Gordon, derived here). Both use group-velocity momenta. The shaded Klein window opens at V₀ = 2.5 mc²; the spin-0 pole is at V₀ = 2E = 3.0 mc².

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Total energy E: 1.5 mc²; Step height V₀: 4.5 mc²

Baseline 1.5; choose 1.1 to 3, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting story is that hole theory was abandoned because experiment proved it wrong. It was not, and believing so hides what the quantised field changes. Wherever hole theory could compute, its numbers stand: Dirac's 1930 annihilation cross section, applied to para-positronium in 1946, gives the decay rate α⁵mc²/(2ħ) = 8.03 × 10⁹ s⁻¹, 0.5% above the measured 7.99 × 10⁹ s⁻¹, an excess the radiative corrections remove (all quoted). The quantised Dirac field reproduces every such number, because its states with a few electrons and positrons are hole theory's excitations term for term. What changes is the account: no real electrons in the vacuum, both charges on equal terms, the same construction for bosons, and states with any number of particles. Hole theory failed on consistency and scope, not on the numbers it produced.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A 3.000 MeV photon converts into an electron-positron pair beside a lead nucleus; the positron stops in the material and annihilates with an atomic electron at rest. Counting only the particles taking part, track Q, the electron and positron numbers N₋ and N₊, and the photon number through the three stages, and find what hole theory's fixed electron count really conserves. Take mc² = 0.511 MeV; neglect recoil and binding.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A spin-0 particle and a spin-½ particle, each of mass m and total energy E = 1.25mc², meet sharp electrostatic steps of height V₀ = 3.25mc². Identify the regime, choose the momentum beyond the step by group velocity, and find R and T for each. Read the spin-0 result as particles leaving the step, and find the step height for a charged pion, mπc² = 139.57 MeV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Put the free Dirac field in a periodic cube of side L = 1.00 nm, keeping momenta |p| ≤ mc. Count the (p, s) modes and give hole theory's vacuum charge and energy. Split H = Σ Eₚ(b†b − d d†) with d d† = 1 − d†d, find the energy of an electron and a positron at rest above the vacuum and the symmetrised vacuum charge, and compare the constant's density with the measured cosmological vacuum energy, 5.2 × 10⁻¹⁰ J m⁻³.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

One spin-0 particle and one spin-½ particle, each of mass m and total energy 2mc², meet the same sharp electrostatic step of height 5mc². With the momentum beyond the step chosen so that the wave there moves away from the step, the spin-0 reflection coefficient is 17.3 and the spin-½ one is 0.18. What does the spin-0 value mean?
7

Review & continue

Hole theory's limits are the assumptions it cannot justify: it subtracts the infinite charge and energy of a sea of real electrons by hand, breaks the symmetry charge conjugation demands, has no sea for bosons, and treats number-changing processes with a fixed-number equation.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.