Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Midterm consolidation: symmetry, scattering, Dirac theory

This week's paper rewards rebuilding results, not reciting them. Here the eight units become one argument: what symmetry forbids before any force is named, what Dirac's equation forces, and what hole theory only renames. Then the six derivations the paper samples are rehearsed against dimensions, limits and data.

UAQM-08.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Midterm consolidation: symmetry, scattering, Dirac theoryEach cross-section divided by its Rutherford value, against scattering angle θ. Solid: Mott's 1929 factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) for one electron of speed β = 0.94 on a heavy spinless nucleus, 0.116 at 180°. Dashed: Mott's 1930 ratio for two identical particles of spin 0.5 with η = 2.0, against |f|² + |f′|²; at 90° it is 0.50 for any η.cross-section ÷ Rutherford, against θsolid: Mott 1929, one electron, β = 0.94dashed: Mott 1930, pair of spin 0.5, η = 2.02100°90°180°scattering angle θ
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Six re-derivations carry the first half of the course, each ending at a measured number.

The key idea

Relativistic one-particle theory is the quantum mechanics of a single particle obeying a Lorentz-covariant wave equation, Klein-Gordon or Dirac, in a prescribed external field: exact for its free and Coulomb solutions, but unable to change the number of particles.

Example. For hydrogen-like uranium, Zα = 0.67136, it gives the 1s binding energy mc²(1 − √(1 − (Zα)²)) = 132.28 keV. The measured binding is 0.46 keV smaller: nuclear size, which a point nucleus omits, and radiative effects, which no one-particle theory contains.

The complete physical model and assumptions

The first eight units are one argument, and the midterm asks you to run it, not recite where it ends. It opens with symmetry: Wigner's theorem leaves only unitary and antiunitary operators, time reversal must be antiunitary, Θ² = (−1)(2j) makes every odd-electron level Kramers-degenerate, and with exchange symmetry these constraints fix the form of every spin-dependent and identical-particle amplitude before a potential is named. Relativity then demands a wave equation. For the electron, Klein-Gordon's indefinite density, wrong hydrogen fine structure and s-state collapse at Zα = ½ force Dirac's, although read as a field theory Klein-Gordon still describes spin-0 particles correctly. Dirac's algebra makes ψ four-component and spin ½ unasked; the equation is covariant through an S(Λ) that is not unitary for boosts; its non-relativistic limit with minimal coupling yields g = 2, the Thomas half and the Darwin term with nothing inserted; and its Coulomb series terminates on energies that depend on n and j alone. The equation keeps its negative energies, and hole theory reads them as positrons, with ψc = iγ²ψ* their wavefunction and Klein's step a source of pairs. There the model stops. It describes one particle in a prescribed field, so the 1057.8 MHz Lamb shift, the anomaly a = 1.16 × 10⁻³, spontaneous emission and any change in particle number lie outside it, and its sea, an infinite charge subtracted by hand with no counterpart for bosons, is a rereading, not a theory. Six re-derivations sample the chain; each answer must name the link it rests on.

1One set of conventions, three checks and a ledger

Units are SI with x⁰ = ct, the metric is (+, −, −, −), the γ matrices are in the Dirac representation with γ⁰ = β = diag(1, 1, −1, −1), and spinors carry Unit 4's u†u = 2E/c. Every answer then gets three checks and one tag. Dimensions: a cross-section in m² sr⁻¹, a spinor in √(kg m s⁻¹), every energy a multiple of mc² = 0.511 MeV. A limit: β → 0 must return Rutherford, the leading order in Zα Bohr's Z² × 13.6 eV, and v/c → 0 the Pauli equation of Quantum Mechanics II. A measured number. The tag says where the result lives: derived in the one-particle theory (Θ² = −1, both Mott formulas, g = 2, the Foldy-Wouthuysen operators, the n- and j-only energies, ψc); read off the filled sea (the positron's charge +e, energy +E, momentum and spin); or quoted (Bargmann's proof, Pauli's theorem, Mott's exact solution, Schwinger's α/2π, the Z ≈ 172 finite-nucleus limit, every measured value). A quoted result presented as derived is wrong even when its number is right.

2Symmetry fixes the amplitudes before any potential does

Units 1 and 2 reach their results without solving a wave equation. Wigner's theorem allows only unitary and antiunitary symmetries; time reversal must be antiunitary, and for spin ½ Θ = −iσyK gives Θ² = −1, a value no phase choice alters, so an odd-electron level in zero magnetic field is at least doubly degenerate. Rotation and parity then cut a spin-½ amplitude on a spinless target down to g(θ) + ih(θ)σ⋅n; an unpolarised beam leaves with P = 2 Im(gh*)/(|g|² + |h|²) along n, and time reversal makes the analysing power equal to it. Exchange fixes the identical-particle weights, ¼|f + f′|² + ¾|f − f′|² for spin-½ fermions and |f + f′|² for spin-0 bosons. With the exact Coulomb phase the cross term at 90° does not depend on η, so the rate there is half the classical sum for protons and twice it for α particles, wherever the nuclear force can be neglected. The limit check: make the particles distinguishable and the cross term goes, leaving Rutherford.

3One trace: the relativistic Mott factor

Unit 5 puts spin into the dynamics. In the first Born approximation a static Coulomb field couples through γ⁰, so the amplitude is proportional to ū(p′)γ⁰u(p). Summing final and averaging initial spins with Σu ū = p̸ + mc turns |M|² into ½Tr[(p̸′ + mc)γ⁰(p̸ + mc)γ⁰], and only Tr(γμγν) = 4gμν and the vanishing of odd traces are needed: the trace is 4(E²/c² + p⋅p′ + m²c²), and with p⋅p′ = p² cos θ it is 8(E/c)²(1 − β² sin²(θ/2)). Dividing by the spinless 4(E/c)² leaves the factor. Checks: (Zαħc)²/(pc)² is an area; as β → 0 the factor goes to 1 and pv to 2T, giving Rutherford. At 180° the factor is 1 − β², 0.114 for a 1.00 MeV electron, and it vanishes as β → 1: a vector coupling conserves helicity, and reversing the momentum with Jz fixed along the axis would flip it. This is a property of one Dirac particle's current, not of exchange.

4One boosted spinor, then one Foldy-Wouthuysen step

The spinor at momentum p is the rest spinor √(2mc)(χ ; 0) boosted by S = cosh(ζ/2) + α⋅p̂ sinh(ζ/2), with cosh ζ = E/mc². Its lower pair is tanh(ζ/2) = pc/(E + mc²) of the upper, about v/2c when slow: roughly α/2 = 0.0036 in hydrogen's ground state. S is Hermitian, not unitary, so u†u rises from 2mc to 2E/c while ū u stays 2mc. That small ratio is Unit 6's expansion parameter. Write H = βmc² + O + V with the odd operator O = cα⋅π, where π = p − qA is the minimal-coupling momentum. The unitary e(βO/(2mc²)), its exponent anti-Hermitian because β and O anticommute, removes O at first order, and the even term it leaves, βO²/(2mc²) = β(σ⋅π)²/(2m), already holds −(qħ/2m)βΣ⋅B: g = 2 with nothing added. Carried to order (v/c)², it leaves −βp⁴/(8m³c²) and −[O, [O, V]]/(8m²c⁴), whose two parts are the spin-orbit term with the Thomas half built in and the Darwin term (ħ²/(8m²c²))∇²V. In hydrogen's 2S level the Darwin term alone is mc²α⁴/16 = 9.06 × 10⁻⁵ eV, or 21.9 GHz.

5One radial termination, and a ranking of what it omits

Unit 7 turns two first-order radial equations into a series with exponent √(κ² − (Zα)²); making it end leaves n − |κ| = 0, 1, 2, … (0 only for negative κ) and E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(n − |κ| + √(κ² − (Zα)²))²](−1/2). Three checks follow. Expanded, it is mc² − mc²(Zα)²/(2n²) − (mc²(Zα)⁴/(2n⁴))(n/(j + ½) − ¾), exactly the Foldy-Wouthuysen answer. It knows only |κ| = j + ½, so 2S₁/₂ (κ = −1) and 2P₁/₂ (κ = +1) coincide at every order, and the measured 1057.8 MHz between them, the Lamb shift, lies outside this theory. And it ends: the 1s energy mc²√(1 − (Zα)²) reaches zero at Zα = 1, where Klein-Gordon s states had already failed at Zα = ½. Against data, hydrogen's 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ comes out 10.944 GHz with the reduced mass, and 10.969 GHz is measured: the 25 MHz left over is radiative. In U⁹¹⁺ the point-nucleus 1s binding, 132.28 keV, exceeds the measured value by 0.46 keV, nuclear size plus radiative effects.

6One charge-conjugate spinor, and hole theory as a rereading

Unit 8 changes no equation; it rereads one. In the Dirac representation ψc = iγ²ψ* = (ψ₄*, −ψ₃*, −ψ₂*, ψ₁*) solves the Dirac equation with q → −q and carries a sea wave of energy −E, momentum −p and spin −s into a positive-energy wave with +E, +p and +s: the quantum numbers derived for the hole by subtracting one state from the filled sea, with helicity unchanged. The same reading turns Klein's anomalous step current into pair creation, at the scale Ec = m²c³/(eħ) = 1.32 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹ with suppression exp(−πEc/E). SP = γ⁰ gives fermion and antifermion opposite intrinsic parity, so positronium has P = (−1)(L+1): parapositronium is 0⁻, and its two annihilation photons are measured polarised at right angles. On the paper, hole theory is examinable as this bookkeeping and its failures: an infinite, unobservable sea charge, no sea at all for bosons, and no description of particle number changing in time, which is what Unit 9's quantised fields supply.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Mott 1930: identical spin-½ fermions, Coulomb

dσ/dΩ = (η/2k)² [sin⁻⁴(θ/2) + cos⁻⁴(θ/2) − cos(η ln tan²(θ/2)) sin⁻²(θ/2) cos⁻²(θ/2)]

Derived in Unit 2 from ¼|f + f′|² + ¾|f − f′|² with the exact Coulomb phase. At θ = 90° the cross term is fixed whatever η is, halving the classical sum; without exchange it is Rutherford.

θ in the centre-of-mass frame; k in m⁻¹ from the reduced mass; η = Z²e²/(4πε₀ħv), v the relative speed; dσ/dΩ in m² sr⁻¹

Mott 1929: one Dirac electron, static Coulomb field

dσ/dΩ = (Zαħc)² (1 − β² sin²(θ/2)) / (4p²c²β² sin⁴(θ/2))

Derived in Unit 5: the factor is ½Tr[(p̸′ + mc)γ⁰(p̸ + mc)γ⁰] ÷ 4(E/c)². β → 0 returns Rutherford; at 180° it is 1 − β², zero as β → 1. Mott's exact solution is quoted.

Zαħc = Ze²/(4πε₀) in J m; p in kg m s⁻¹; β = v/c = pc/E; nucleus static and spinless; first Born approximation

A boosted spinor

u(p, s) = [cosh(ζ/2) + α⋅p̂ sinh(ζ/2)] √(2mc) (χₛ0), with cosh ζ = E/mc²

Derived in Unit 5. tanh(ζ/2) = pc/(E + mc²) returns Unit 4's lower pair; the matrix is Hermitian, not unitary, so u†u grows from 2mc to 2E/c while ū u stays 2mc.

ζ: rapidity, dimensionless (η in Unit 5); p̂: unit vector along p; χₛ: two-spinor with χₛ†χₛ = 1; u in √(kg m s⁻¹)

One Foldy-Wouthuysen step: the Darwin term

HD = (ħ²/(8m²c²)) ∇²V, the spin-free part of −[O, [O, V]]/(8m²c⁴), with O = cα⋅p

Derived in Unit 6 with nothing inserted by hand; the commutator's other part is spin-orbit with the Thomas half. In nS it shifts (Zα)⁴mc²/(2n³): 21.9 GHz for hydrogen 2S.

V = qφ in J; m in kg; ħ in J s; for a hydrogen-like ion ∇²V = (Ze²/ε₀)δ³(r), so only S states feel it

Radial termination: exact Dirac-Coulomb levels

E = mc² [1 + (Zα)² / (n − |κ| + √(κ² − (Zα)²))²](−1/2)

Derived in Unit 7 by ending the series. It depends on n and j only, so 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide at all orders; to (Zα)⁴ it equals the Foldy-Wouthuysen result; for 1s it is mc²√(1 − (Zα)²).

n − |κ| = 0, 1, 2, … is the radial quantum number, 0 only for negative κ; κ = ∓(j + ½) for j = l ± ½; Zα dimensionless; E in J, rest energy included

Charge conjugation of a Dirac spinor

ψc = iγ²ψ* = (ψ₄*, −ψ₃*, −ψ₂*, ψ₁*) in the Dirac representation

Derived in topic 8.05: ψc obeys the equation with q → −q and sends a sea wave of −E, −p, spin −s to one of +E, +p, +s, the hole's numbers; helicity is kept, and twice returns ψ.

ψ and ψc in the same units, m(−3/2) for a normalised packet; γ² has σ₂ above the diagonal and −σ₂ below
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.94
0 to 0.98; steps of 0.02.
2.0
0 to 6; steps of 0.5.
0.5
0 to 1; steps of 0.5.

Try this. Drop β to zero and the solid curve flattens onto 1 at every angle while the dashed one does not move; raise η and the dashed ripples crowd towards 0° and 180° yet still pass the same value at 90°. Step the spin from ½ to 0 to turn the fermion dip into the boson peak.

Live results

1929 FACTOR AT 180°
0.116
1929 FACTOR AT 90°
0.558
1930 RATIO AT 90°
0.500
ELECTRON KINETIC ENERGY
0.987 MeV

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelEach cross-section divided by its Rutherford value, against scattering angle θ. Solid: Mott's 1929 factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) for one electron of speed β = 0.94 on a heavy spinless nucleus, 0.116 at 180°. Dashed: Mott's 1930 ratio for two identical particles of spin 0.5 with η = 2.0, against |f|² + |f′|²; at 90° it is 0.50 for any η.cross-section ÷ Rutherford, against θsolid: Mott 1929, one electron, β = 0.94dashed: Mott 1930, pair of spin 0.5, η = 2.02100°90°180°scattering angle θ
Each cross-section divided by its Rutherford value, against scattering angle θ. Solid: Mott's 1929 factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) for one electron of speed β = 0.94 on a heavy spinless nucleus, 0.116 at 180°. Dashed: Mott's 1930 ratio for two identical particles of spin 0.5 with η = 2.0, against |f|² + |f′|²; at 90° it is 0.50 for any η.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Electron speed β = v/c: 0.94; Sommerfeld parameter η: 2.0; Spin s of each identical particle: 0.5

Baseline 0.94; choose 0 to 0.98, in steps of 0.02.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Calling every departure from Rutherford “the Mott factor” and using it in the wrong experiment. Mott derived two results with different causes. The 1929 factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) belongs to one Dirac particle in a static field: it comes from the spinor current through the trace, tends to 1 as β → 0, and is fully present for an electron on a spinless ¹²C nucleus, where nothing can be exchanged. The 1930 cross term −cos(η ln tan²(θ/2))/(sin²(θ/2) cos²(θ/2)) belongs to two identical particles: it comes from antisymmetrising the amplitude, survives at any speed, and disappears the moment the particles can be told apart. Weighting electron-carbon data by ¼|f + f′|² + ¾|f − f′|², or slow α-α data by 1 − β² sin²(θ/2), answers the wrong question. Electron-electron scattering needs both at once, and its relativistic form, Møller's, waits for quantised fields.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A Dirac-sea state ψ = N(0, −0.5, 0, 1) e(i(Et − pz)/ħ), with N = √((E + mc²)/c) and E and p those of an electron moving at 0.80c, is emptied. Read off its energy, momentum and spin, build ψc = iγ²ψ*, and give the charge, energy, momentum, spin and helicity of the positron it describes.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

An electron of kinetic energy 1.00 MeV scatters elastically from a ¹²C nucleus (spin 0, Z = 6) through 120°. Using the spin-averaged trace, find the Mott factor and dσ/dΩ in the first Born approximation, then test the result by dimensions, by the β → 0 limit, by the nucleus's measured size and by the quoted second-order correction.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Find the 1s binding energy of hydrogen (Z = 1) and of hydrogen-like uranium (Z = 92) by two routes: terminating the Dirac radial series exactly, and one Foldy-Wouthuysen reduction to order (v/c)² with Quantum Mechanics II's 1s expectation values. Judge each route against hydrogen's measured ionisation energy, 13.598 434 6 eV, and the measured U⁹¹⁺ binding, 0.46 keV below the point-nucleus Dirac value.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

On the midterm you are asked why hydrogen's 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ levels coincide in Dirac's theory yet are measured 1057.8 MHz apart. Which answer is both correct and correctly labelled as derived or quoted?
7

Review & continue

Relativistic one-particle theory is the quantum mechanics of a single particle obeying a Lorentz-covariant wave equation, Klein-Gordon or Dirac, in a prescribed external field: exact for its free and Coulomb solutions, but unable to change the number of particles.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.