
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Opposite intrinsic parity and time reversal for spinors
Unit 5 gave you γ⁰ for parity and Unit 1 gave you −iσy K for time reversal. Here both act on the whole four-component spinor. The antifermion's parity comes out opposite to the fermion's, a sign visible in how para-positronium's photons are polarised, and T squares to −1, so no electrostatic field can leave an electron level unpaired.
UAQM-08.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
A relative sign no phase convention removes, and a square no phase can make +1.
The key idea
Intrinsic parity is the phase factor a particle's state acquires under spatial inversion beyond its orbital factor (−1)L; for a Dirac fermion only its product with the antifermion's is physical, and that product is −1.
Example. Ground-state positronium, 1¹S₀, has L = 0, so its parity is (−1)(0+1) = −1 and JP = 0⁻, which is why its two 511 keV photons leave with their linear polarisations at right angles.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Parity and time reversal were built for one particle; this topic turns them on the whole Dirac spectrum, negative energies included. Unit 5 showed that only SP = ηPγ⁰ keeps the Dirac equation covariant under x → −x, and left the phase ηP free. At rest γ⁰ is +1 on the upper components and −1 on the lower, so u(0, s) carries +ηP and the negative-energy v(0, s) carries −ηP. The positron is that state's absence: removing the factor −ηP from the filled sea leaves −ηP*, and ψc = iγ²ψ* gives the same. The free phase cancels in the product, −|ηP|² = −1, so a fermion-antifermion pair with orbital L has parity (−1)(L+1) and ground-state positronium is odd. Only making or destroying the pair can see that sign, and it is seen: para-positronium is 0⁻, Yang's argument crosses its photons' polarisations, and Compton polarimetry finds them crossed. Time reversal needs an antiunitary T = UK that leaves H = cα⋅p + βmc² + qφ alone, which forces Uα*U⁻¹ = −α and Uβ*U⁻¹ = β. The answer is U = iγ¹γ³, Unit 1's spin rule on each two-component block, with UU* = −1 in every representation: T² = −1, and every level of an electron in any electrostatic field is a Kramers pair. The one-particle theory stops at two doors. The charge-conjugation parity C = (−1)(L+S), which decides two photons or three, needs Unit 9's quantised field, and CPT is stated here, not proved.
1Conventions, and the sign γ⁰ leaves at rest
Units are SI with c and ħ kept, the metric is diag(1, −1, −1, −1), the Dirac representation is used throughout, and the electron's charge is −e. Quoted in one line from Unit 5: ψ′(t, x) = ηPγ⁰ψ(t, −x) is the only linear map that keeps the Dirac equation covariant under x → −x, and nothing fixes the phase ηP beyond |ηP| = 1. At rest the solutions are u(0, s)e(−imc²t/ħ), with only upper components, and v(0, s)e(+imc²t/ħ), with only lower ones. Since γ⁰ = diag(1, 1, −1, −1), γ⁰u = +u and γ⁰v = −v: a positive-energy electron at rest has parity +ηP, a negative-energy one −ηP. Derived, in one matrix product. Moving plane waves are not eigenstates, since P sends p to −p, but states of definite orbital angular momentum are. A bound state whose upper components have orbital l has parity ηP(−1)l, and its lower components, with l ± 1, agree because γ⁰ adds the missing −1. For a negative-energy state the lower components are the large ones, so its parity is −ηP(−1)l′, with l′ their orbital.
2The positron carries −ηP*, and the phase cancels
From topic 8.03, quoted: the vacuum is the filled sea, assigned parity +1, and a Slater determinant of parity eigenstates has the product of their eigenvalues. Empty a sea state at rest, eigenvalue −ηP, and that factor leaves the product: measured from the vacuum, the hole has (−ηP)⁻¹ = −ηP*, since |ηP| = 1. Topic 8.05's ψc = iγ²ψ* agrees by another route. If ψ′ = ηPγ⁰ψ(t, −x), then (ψ′)c = iγ²ηP*γ⁰ψ*(t, −x) = −ηP*γ⁰(iγ²ψ*)(t, −x), using γ⁰* = γ⁰ and γ²γ⁰ = −γ⁰γ²: the positron's wavefunction carries −ηP*. Choose ηP = 1 and the electron is even, the positron odd. Choose ηP = i, as some authors do so that P² = −1 on fermions, and both carry i. Either way η(e⁻)η(e⁺) = −|ηP|² = −1, derived, with no convention left in it. That product is the physics, and it holds for every particle the Dirac equation describes: muons, taus and quarks.
3A pair's parity, and when it can be seen
A fermion and its antifermion with orbital angular momentum L in their relative coordinate have parity η(e⁻)η(e⁺)(−1)L = (−1)(L+1), derived; the total spin S does not enter, since P acts on space only. In positronium 1¹S₀ is 0⁻, 1³S₁ is 1⁻, and 2³P₀, 2³P₁, 2³P₂ are 0⁺, 1⁺, 2⁺. Hydrogen's rule is (−1)L because the electron and proton numbers never change, so their phases are set by convention and cancel from every amplitude. In positronium the factor −1 is common to every state, so an E1 transition still links S to P exactly as in hydrogen and spectroscopy cannot see the sign. It shows only when the pair becomes something without that factor. Quarkonium follows the same rule, quoted: J/ψ at 3097 MeV, a ³S₁ cc̄ pair, is 1⁻, and the P-wave χc0, χc1, χc2 at 3415, 3511 and 3556 MeV are 0⁺, 1⁺, 2⁺. So ηc, a ¹S₀ pair of parity −1, cannot decay to two pions, whose J = 0 state has parity +1, and none is seen.
4Para-positronium's photons: Yang's argument and the test
Para-positronium annihilates into two photons in 125 ps, measured. In its rest frame they leave along ±k with polarisations ε₁, ε₂ transverse to k. A J = 0 amplitude is a rotational scalar linear in each ε, and transversality leaves two: ε₁⋅ε₂, even under parity, and k̂⋅(ε₁ × ε₂), odd because k reverses while ε₁ × ε₂ does not. This is Yang's 1950 argument, derived here in outline. A 0⁻ state decays with |M|² ∝ sin²χ, χ the angle between the linear polarisations: crossed. A 0⁺ state would give cos²χ: parallel. Compton scattering reads a 511 keV photon's polarisation, preferring planes perpendicular to ε. With the quoted Klein-Nishina cross-section, both photons scattered through θ in planes at angle Δ give N(Δ) ∝ (κ − sin²θ)² − sin⁴θ cos 2Δ for 0⁻, derived; N(90°)/N(0°) peaks at 2.84 near θ = 82° and tends to 1 as θ → 0. Wu and Shaknov (1950, quoted) measured 2.04 ± 0.08 where theory for their finite detectors gave 2.00. Para-positronium is odd, and the relative parity is measured.
5Building T for a four-component spinor
Quoted from Unit 1: time reversal is antiunitary, and for spin ½ it is Θ = −iσy K. For the Dirac equation try T = UK, U a constant unitary 4 × 4 matrix, and ask that ψT(t, x) = Uψ*(−t, x) solve the same equation. Conjugating iħ∂ₜψ = Hψ gives iħ∂ₜψT = (UH*U⁻¹)ψT, so we need UH*U⁻¹ = H for H = cα⋅p + βmc² + qφ(x). Conjugation sends p = −iħ∇ to −p and leaves the real φ alone, so the conditions are Uα*U⁻¹ = −α and Uβ*U⁻¹ = β. In the Dirac representation α₁, α₃ and β are real and α₂ is imaginary, so U must anticommute with α₁ and α₃ and commute with α₂ and β. The product α₁α₃ does exactly that, and iγ¹γ³ = −iα₁α₃ = −diag(σ₂, σ₂), derived. On each block −σ₂K = −i(−iσy K), Unit 1's rule times the phase −i, and in the non-relativistic limit, where only the upper block survives, T is Θ up to that phase. Check: UΣ*U⁻¹ = −Σ, so spin reverses with momentum and helicity is kept. A magnetic field breaks the symmetry unless A is reversed too.
6T² = −1, Kramers pairs, and what waits for Unit 9
Apply T twice: T² = UKUK = UU* = (−diag(σ₂, σ₂))(−diag(σ₂*, σ₂*)) = diag(σ₂σ₂*, σ₂σ₂*) = −1, since σ₂* = −σ₂. A phase on U cancels against its conjugate, and a change of representation S gives SUU*S⁻¹ = −1 again: T² = −1 belongs to spin ½, not to a convention. Kramers' theorem follows, derived. If Hψ = Eψ with real φ, then Tψ has energy E, and antiunitarity gives ⟨ψ|Tψ⟩ = ⟨T²ψ|Tψ⟩ = −⟨ψ|Tψ⟩, so ⟨ψ|Tψ⟩ = 0. Every level of one electron in any electrostatic field, however lopsided, is at least a doublet; for N electrons T² = (−1)N, so the guarantee holds for odd N. Only a magnetic field splits the pair, by gμB B: at g = 2.00 and B = 0.340 T that is 3.94 × 10⁻⁵ eV, or 9.52 GHz, the X-band where ESR spectrometers find such doublets. Two results are not derived here. C = (−1)(L+S), which sends para-positronium to two photons and ortho-positronium to three, needs Unit 9 and is quoted; CPT, which makes the e⁺ and e⁻ masses equal, measured to 8 parts in 10⁹, is stated.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Parity on a Dirac spinor
ψ′(t, x) = ηP γ⁰ ψ(t, −x), with γ⁰ = diag(1, 1, −1, −1)
Quoted from Unit 5. At rest u(0, s) has only upper components and v(0, s) only lower ones, so γ⁰u = +u and γ⁰v = −v: the sign this whole topic rests on.
ηP a phase, |ηP| = 1, the same for every solution; Dirac representation; x in m, t in s; γ⁰ and ηP dimensionlessIntrinsic parity of the antifermion
η(e⁺) = (−ηP)⁻¹ = −ηP*, so η(e⁻) η(e⁺) = −|ηP|² = −1
Derived twice. The unmeasurable phase cancels in the product, so the relative sign is physical, and it is the same for muons, taus and quarks.
η(e⁻) = ηP; the hole inverts the sea state's −ηP, and iγ²ψ* gives −ηP* again because γ²γ⁰ = −γ⁰γ²; all dimensionlessParity of a fermion-antifermion pair
P = η(e⁻) η(e⁺) (−1)L = (−1)(L+1)
Derived. Positronium 1¹S₀ and 1³S₁ are odd and the 2³PJ are even: the reverse of what hydrogen's rule, (−1)L alone, would assign.
L = 0, 1, 2 … the orbital angular momentum of the relative motion; the total spin S does not enter; dimensionlessCoincidence rate for para-positronium's photons
N(Δ) ∝ (κ − sin²θ)² − sin⁴θ cos 2Δ, with κ = 2 − cos θ + 1/(2 − cos θ)
Derived from Yang's 0⁻ amplitude and the quoted Klein-Nishina cross-section. N(90°)/N(0°) peaks at 2.84 near θ = 82°; a 0⁺ pair would flip the sign of the cos 2Δ term.
θ each photon's Compton angle; Δ the angle between the scattering planes; κ = k/k′ + k′/k at 511 keV, dimensionless; N in s⁻¹Time reversal for Dirac spinors
ψT(t, x) = iγ¹γ³ ψ*(−t, x), with iγ¹γ³ = −diag(σ₂, σ₂)
Derived from Uα*U⁻¹ = −α and Uβ*U⁻¹ = β. On each block −σ₂K = −i(−iσy K), Unit 1's spin rule times a phase, so spin and momentum both reverse.
Dirac representation; T = iγ¹γ³K is antiunitary; a symmetry with any real φ(x), and with a vector potential only if A → −AT squares to −1: Kramers' theorem
T² = (iγ¹γ³)(iγ¹γ³)* = −1, so ⟨ψ|Tψ⟩ = 0
Derived. ψ and Tψ are orthogonal and share an energy, so every level of one electron in an electrostatic field is at least doubly degenerate until a magnetic field acts.
a phase on U or a change of representation cancels in UU*; ψ any eigenstate of H with real φ(x); dimensionlessInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Keep the relative parity at −1 and sweep θ: the crossed-plane peak at Δ = 90° is tallest near 82°, a ratio of 2.84, and flattens towards 10° or 170°, where scattering stops seeing polarisation. Set it to +1, undoing Dirac's sign, and the peak jumps to Δ = 0.
Live results
- SCATTERED ENERGY k′
- 275 keV
- MODULATION DEPTH a
- 0.479
- RATIO N(90°)/N(0°)
- 2.84
- N(Δ)/N̄ AT THE MARKER
- 1.479
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Compton angle θ of each photon: 82 °; Relative parity η(e⁻)η(e⁺): −1; Angle Δ between scattering planes: 90 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting move is to give positronium hydrogen's parity rule, (−1)L, on the grounds that intrinsic parities are conventions, which makes the ground state 0⁺. The premise is half right: ηP is a convention, and in hydrogen the electron's and proton's phases can be chosen freely because neither particle number ever changes, so they cancel from every amplitude. The conclusion is wrong because the positron's phase is not chosen separately. The hole, or iγ²ψ*, fixes it at −ηP*, and the product η(e⁻)η(e⁺) = −1 contains no convention at all. A 0⁺ ground state would send out parallel-polarised photons and give a Compton ratio N(90°)/N(0°) below 1; Wu and Shaknov measured 2.04. The reverse slip is to expect the −1 in positronium's spectrum: it multiplies every state alike, so E1 selection rules are hydrogen's.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Take the electron's parity phase first as ηP = 1, then as ηP = i. In each case find the intrinsic parities of electron and positron, then the parities of positronium in 1¹S₀, 2³P₂ and 3³D₁, and say which of these numbers an experiment can test.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- At rest γ⁰u = +u and γ⁰v = −v, so an electron carries ηP and a negative-energy state at rest carries −ηP. The positron, that state's absence, carries (−ηP)⁻¹ = −ηP*.
- ηP = 1: electron +1, positron −1. ηP = i: electron i, positron −(i)* = −(−i) = i. The two conventions disagree about each particle, and even about whether the two differ.
- Products: (+1)(−1) = −1, and (i)(i) = i² = −1. The pair's intrinsic factor is −1 in both, with no trace of the convention: that product is what opposite intrinsic parity means.
- Pair parity (−1)(L+1), spin not entering: 1¹S₀ has L = 0, parity −1; 2³P₂ has L = 1, parity +1; 3³D₁ has L = 2, parity −1. So JP = 0⁻, 2⁺ and 1⁻.
- Testable: only the pair parities, and only where the pair is made or destroyed, as in 1¹S₀ → γγ, whose crossed polarisations Wu and Shaknov saw. The single-particle phases are not.
Answer. ηP = 1 gives e⁻ +1, e⁺ −1; ηP = i gives i for both. Either way η(e⁻)η(e⁺) = −1, and 1¹S₀, 2³P₂, 3³D₁ have parity −1, +1, −1 (JP = 0⁻, 2⁺, 1⁻).
MediumExample 2
An electron has momentum p = 4mc/3 along +z and spin up along z, so ψ = u e(i(pz − Et)/ħ) with u ∝ (1, 0, pc/(E + mc²), 0). Apply T = iγ¹γ³K in the Dirac representation, identify the state you get, check its helicity, and apply T a second time.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- E = √(p²c² + m²c⁴) = (5/3)mc² = 0.852 MeV and pc = 0.681 MeV, so pc/(E + mc²) = (4/3)/(8/3) = 0.500 and u ∝ (1, 0, 0.500, 0). The ratio is energy over energy, dimensionless, and tends to 0 as p → 0, the non-relativistic limit.
- K conjugates u (real here) and the plane wave: ψ*(−t, x) = u e(−i(pz + Et)/ħ) = u e(i(−pz − Et)/ħ), momentum −p and energy still +E. Reversing t and conjugating together keep the energy positive.
- iγ¹γ³ = −diag(σ₂, σ₂), and −σ₂ sends (a, b) to (ib, −ia). The upper block (1, 0) becomes (0, −i) and the lower block (0.500, 0) becomes (0, −0.500i), so ψT = −i(0, 1, 0, 0.500) e(i(−pz − Et)/ħ).
- Identify it: for momentum −p along z and spin down, cσ⋅p χ = −pcσz(0, 1) = (0, pc), so u(−pẑ, ↓) ∝ (0, 1, 0, 0.500). Hence ψT = −i u(−pẑ, ↓)e(i(−pz − Et)/ħ): momentum and spin both reversed, helicity +1 before and after.
- Again: conjugating −i(0, 1, 0, 0.500) gives (0, i, 0, 0.500i), and −diag(σ₂, σ₂) sends that to (−1, 0, −0.500, 0) = −u, while the plane wave returns to e(i(pz − Et)/ħ). So T²ψ = −ψ, as UU* = −1 requires.
Answer. Tψ = −i u(−pẑ, ↓) e(i(−pz − Et)/ħ): energy 0.852 MeV kept, momentum 0.681 MeV/c reversed, spin flipped, helicity +1 kept; and T²ψ = −ψ.
HardExample 3
Both 511 keV photons from para-positronium are Compton-scattered through θ, and coincidences are counted with the scattering planes parallel (Δ = 0) and crossed (Δ = 90°). With the quoted Klein-Nishina factor κ − 2sin²θ cos²φ, find the ideal N(90°)/N(0°) at θ = 82°. Wu and Shaknov's detectors were predicted to give 2.00; what would they have recorded for a 0⁺ pair, and how far is their 2.04 ± 0.08 from each?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Yang's 0⁻ amplitude k̂⋅(ε₁ × ε₂) makes the polarisation state ∝ |x⟩|y⟩ − |y⟩|x⟩: each photon alone is unpolarised, and the linear-polarisation correlation for analysers at relative angle Δ is −cos 2Δ. Each photon's factor is (κ − sin²θ) − sin²θ cos 2φ, so N(Δ) ∝ (κ − sin²θ)² − sin⁴θ cos 2Δ, every term dimensionless.
- At θ = 82°: cos θ = 0.13917, so k/k′ = 1.86083, k′ = 274.6 keV and κ = 1.86083 + 1/1.86083 = 2.39822, with sin²θ = 0.98063. Then (κ − sin²θ)² = 1.41759² = 2.00957 and sin⁴θ = 0.96164, a modulation depth a = 0.96164/2.00957 = 0.4785.
- Ideal ratio (1 + a)/(1 − a) = 1.4785/0.5215 = 2.84, close to the top of the curve, which peaks at 2.836 near θ = 81.7°. Limits: as θ → 0, a → 0 and the ratio → 1, since forward scattering cannot see polarisation; a 0⁺ pair gives 1/2.84 = 0.35.
- Finite detectors spread θ and Δ about their settings and dilute the depth. Write N = N̄(1 + aP cos 2Δ), P the pair's parity, −1 for 0⁻ and +1 for 0⁺; averaging over the same spread at Δ = 0 and at Δ = 90° keeps the form (1 + ā)/(1 − ā) for 0⁻, and setting it to 2.00 gives ā = 1/3, so the same apparatus would have recorded (1 − ā)/(1 + ā) = 0.50 for a 0⁺ pair.
- The measurement, 2.04 ± 0.08, lies (2.04 − 2.00)/0.08 = 0.5 standard errors from the 0⁻ prediction and (2.04 − 0.50)/0.08 = 19 from the 0⁺ one. Para-positronium is odd, so η(e⁻)η(e⁺) = −1 is measured, not assumed.
Answer. Ideal N(90°)/N(0°) = 2.84 at θ = 82° for 0⁻ (0.35 for 0⁺). The apparatus would have recorded 0.50 for 0⁺; 2.04 ± 0.08 is 0.5σ from 2.00 and 19σ from 0.50.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Intrinsic parity is the phase factor a particle's state acquires under spatial inversion beyond its orbital factor (−1)L; for a Dirac fermion only its product with the antifermion's is physical, and that product is −1.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.