
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
The Klein paradox as pair production, and the critical field
Klein's step looked like a failure of the Dirac equation. Read with a filled sea, it is the first calculation of the vacuum breaking into electron-positron pairs. This topic does that reading, then asks the practical question: how strong must a field be before it happens, and has anything on Earth come close?
UAQM-08.06 · Lesson 6 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Read with a filled sea, Klein's impossible fluxes are pairs, priced by 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹.
The key idea
Klein pair production is the vacuum beside a steep potential releasing electron-positron pairs at no energy cost, possible only where empty electron states lie level with the filled negative-energy sea, and suppressed in a uniform field E by exp(−πEc/E).
Example. A field of 1.32 × 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹, one tenth of Ec, needs 20 ħ/mc = 7.7 pm to raise an electron's potential energy by 2mc², and its Sauter factor is e(−10π) = 2.3 × 10⁻¹⁴.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Topic 8.02 left the Klein step with a reflected flux above the incident one and a transmitted electron current running back toward the step. Hole theory turns both into a process. Inside the Klein window, mc² ≤ E ≤ V₀ − mc², the near side's empty electron states lie level with the far side's filled sea, so sea electrons striking the step pass into empty states and leave as ordinary electrons, while the vacancies they leave are positrons driven the other way by the same field. R − 1 = −T then counts pairs, each made at zero energy cost; and since sea electrons arrive whether or not anything is incident, the step makes pairs from the vacuum itself, at a rate no one-particle wavefunction gives. A real potential rises over a distance, and a sea electron must then tunnel across a forbidden stretch 2mc²/(eE) long. WKB, derived here, gives the suppression exp(−πEc/E), where Ec = m²c³/(eħ) = 1.32 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹ is the field that gains mc² across ħ/mc; Schwinger's rate, quoted, carries this exponent, and the strongest laser focus yet made falls short of Ec by a factor of 1500. The picture stops in two places. Hole theory cannot make its infinitely many particles consistent, which is Unit 9's work. And a nucleus, whose field passes Ec within about ħ/mc, makes no pairs unless its 1s level sinks below −mc², near Z = 172 by topic 7.09's quoted estimate, an emission never observed.
1Line the two continua up across the step
SI units throughout; where a four-vector appears the metric is (+, −, −, −). In a region of constant potential energy V a free Dirac solution has E = V ± √(p²c² + m²c⁴), so the near side of a step offers electron states with E ≥ mc² and a sea with E ≤ −mc², while the far side, lifted by V₀, offers E ≥ V₀ + mc² and a sea with E ≤ V₀ − mc². Between mc² and V₀ − mc² the near side's positive continuum overlaps the far side's negative one: the Klein window, open only when V₀ exceeds 2mc² = 1.022 MeV. Topic 8.02's matching, quoted in one line, gives R = ((1 − r)/(1 + r))² and T = 4r/(1 + r)² with r = (q/p)(E + mc²)/(E − V₀ + mc²); for E = 2mc² and V₀ = 6mc², a positive transmitted momentum q gives r = −√5 = −2.24, R = 6.85 and T = −5.85. A Schrödinger step has no negative branch, hence no window. What is new here is not the algebra but the occupation: in Dirac's vacuum every far-side state in the window is filled and every near-side one is empty.
2Read R above 1 and T below 0 with the sea filled
With q positive, the far-side wave has group velocity dE/dq = −qc²/|E − V₀|, pointing at the step: a sea electron arriving from the right. In the one-particle theory nothing could be arriving; in hole theory the far sea is full and its electrons strike the step all the time. In the window they find empty states beyond it and pass through, each leaving to the left as an ordinary electron and leaving a vacancy that topic 8.04 identifies as a positron, charge +e, rest plus kinetic energy V₀ − E, carried right by the same field that drives the electron left. The flux identity R + T = 1, charge conservation for the Dirac current, reads R − 1 = −T: the excess electrons on the incident side match the positrons beyond the step pair for pair, since an electron current running left is a positron current running right. Each pair costs E + (−E) = 0. And the sea electrons come whether or not anything is incident, so the step emits pairs from the vacuum: a rate the one-particle solution, which fixes only ratios of fluxes, cannot give.
3Counting the pairs needs the filled sea
To get a rate, count occupied states instead of solving for one wavefunction. In one dimension a filled band delivers 1/(2πħ) particles per second per unit energy per spin to the step, so sea electrons arriving from the right, each passing with the group-velocity transmission Tg = 4|r|/(1 + |r|)², between 0 and 1, give (1/2πħ)∫Tg dE pairs per second, the integral running over the window. The count needs every sea state occupied at once, a statement about infinitely many particles that no single Dirac wavefunction can make; Unit 9's quantised field reproduces it, quoted. Its size: mc²/(2πħ) = 1.24 × 10²⁰ s⁻¹, so a sharp step with a window a few mc² wide would release of order 10²⁰ pairs a second. An incident electron does not drive the process. By exclusion it can only occupy, and so block, the outgoing state a pair electron would have used. Klein's 1929 result was never really a paradox of reflection: it was the first sign that a one-particle wave equation was describing a many-particle vacuum, the case topic 8.08 makes in full.
4The critical field: mc² gained across ħ/mc
No electrode is sharper than an atom, so ask what a real slope must do. Spread V₀ over a width w and the field is E = V₀/(ew); the window still needs V₀ ≥ 2mc², but the field now sets how far apart the two continua lie at fixed energy. The natural scale is the field that raises an electron's potential energy by mc² across its reduced Compton wavelength, ħ/mc = 0.386 pm: eEc(ħ/mc) = mc², so Ec = m²c³/(eħ) = 1.32 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹. Units: kg² m³ s⁻³ over C J s is N C⁻¹, a field. Limits: as ħ → 0 it diverges, so a classical field never makes pairs, and it grows as m², so the muon's is 4.3 × 10⁴ times larger, 5.7 × 10²² V m⁻¹. Against it, hydrogen's field at the Bohr radius, 5.14 × 10¹¹ V m⁻¹, is α³Ec; the strongest static fields, at field-emission tips, are about 10¹⁰ V m⁻¹; and the most intense laser focus measured, about 10²³ W cm⁻², peaks near 9 × 10¹⁴ V m⁻¹, some 1500 times short.
5Tunnelling through the tilted gap: Sauter's exponent
Let a uniform field E raise the electron's potential energy as V(x) = eEx. At energy ε the squared Dirac equation fixes the local momentum by (ε − V)² = p²c² + m²c⁴, spin entering only at the next order in ħ. Where |ε − V| is below mc², p is imaginary: a forbidden stretch d = 2mc²/(eE) = 2(Ec/E)ħ/mc separates the near side's positive continuum from the far side's sea. Quantum Mechanics II's WKB exponent gives P ≈ exp(−(2/ħ)∫|p|dx); with u = ε − eEx the integral is (1/ceE)∫√(m²c⁴ − u²)du from −mc² to mc², a half-disc of area πm²c⁴/2, so P ≈ exp(−πm²c³/(eħE)) = exp(−πEc/E), derived. Sauter's 1931 exact solution, quoted, agrees. Checks: the exponent is dimensionless, equals (π/2)d/(ħ/mc), and gives e(−π) = 0.043 at E = Ec. A transverse momentum p⊥ adds p⊥²c² to m²c⁴; summing over p⊥ and spin with the quantised field, Schwinger in 1951 obtained a rate Γ ≈ (eE)² exp(−πEc/E)/(4π³ħ²c) pairs per unit volume per unit time, quoted, whose exponent is this one.
6A nucleus: far above Ec, yet no pairs
Coulomb's law divided by Ec gives E(r)/Ec = Zα(ħ/mcr)², derived, so a nucleus exceeds Ec inside r = √(Zα)ħ/mc: 33 fm for hydrogen, 299 fm for lead, and about 1800Ec at lead's surface. Yet a lone nucleus emits no positrons, and energy says why. A static field can only release a pair that costs nothing; the cheapest puts the electron in the lowest empty level, E(1s), and the positron at rest far away, at mc², so emission needs E(1s) + mc² ≤ 0, derived. The strong-field region is smaller than ħ/mc, and confining an electron inside it costs more kinetic energy than the potential returns: Unit 7's point-nucleus level, mc²√(1 − Z²α²), stays positive, and for lead the cheapest pair costs 1.80mc² = 920 keV. Topic 7.09's finite-nucleus 1s, quoted, reaches −mc² near Z = 172; beyond it an empty 1s would fill from the sea and release a positron, the Klein window in Coulomb form. Uranium-uranium collisions, a combined Z = 184 for about 10⁻²¹ s, gave no confirmed signal, quoted.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
The Klein window
mc² ≤ E ≤ V₀ − mc²
The energies at which the near side's empty electron states lie level with the far side's filled sea: the only energies at which a static step can make pairs.
E: the electron's total energy; V₀: the step's potential energy, both in J; mc² = 0.511 MeV. Empty unless V₀ ≥ 2mc².Critical field
Ec = m²c³/(eħ) = 1.32 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹
The field that gains an electron mc² across its reduced Compton wavelength: the scale against which any field is judged for pair creation.
m in kg, c in m s⁻¹, e in C, ħ in J s. Defined by eEc(ħ/mc) = mc², with ħ/mc = 0.386 pm.Sauter's suppression, WKB through the gap
P ≈ exp(−πEc/E)
Equal to exp(−(π/2)d/(ħ/mc)) for the forbidden stretch d = 2mc²/(eE). It vanishes faster than any power of E, so no finite order of perturbation theory in the field makes pairs.
P: dimensionless; E: uniform field in V m⁻¹. Derived here. A transverse momentum p⊥ multiplies the exponent by 1 + p⊥²/m²c².Schwinger's pair rate, quoted
Γ ≈ (eE)² exp(−πEc/E) / (4π³ħ²c)
Turns the derived exponent into a count: 4.7 × 10⁵⁴ pairs m⁻³ s⁻¹ at Ec, while at 10²³ W cm⁻², the most intense laser focus yet made, the exponential alone is near 10⁻²⁰⁸⁰.
Γ in pairs m⁻³ s⁻¹; e in C, E in V m⁻¹, ħ in J s, c in m s⁻¹. Leading term for spin ½, from Schwinger (1951).A nucleus's field in units of Ec
E(r)/Ec = Zα (ħ/mcr)²
Above 1 inside r = √(Zα) ħ/mc, 299 fm for lead, and about 1800 at its surface: nuclei are not short of field strength.
Z: proton number; α = 1/137.036; r: distance from the nucleus in m, outside its charge; ħ/mc = 386 fm. Derived from Coulomb's law.Spontaneous pairs from a static field
E(1s) + mc² ≤ 0
Unit 7's point nucleus has E(1s) = mc²√(1 − Z²α²), positive, so it never qualifies; topic 7.09's finite nucleus does near Z = 172, quoted.
E(1s): lowest empty electron level, potential energy included, in J; mc²: a free positron's least energy. Derived.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Start at V₀ = 4 mc², w = 4 ħ/mc, where E = Ec and the factor is e(−π) = 0.043. Shrink w to 0.5 for a near-sharp Klein step, then stretch it to 20: the window stays 2 mc² wide but the factor falls to 1.5 × 10⁻⁷. Then lower V₀ below 2 mc² at w = 0.5: the field still tops Ec, yet the window shuts.
Live results
- FIELD E
- 1.323 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹
- KLEIN WINDOW
- 2.00 mc²
- 2mc² RISE LENGTH
- 0.772 pm
- log₁₀ SAUTER FACTOR
- -1.36
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Step height V₀: 4.00 mc²; Ramp width w: 4.0 ħ/mc
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
A step higher than 2mc² is not enough. It is natural to read Klein's condition as a voltage threshold, so that any drop above 1.022 MV, the column of a 5 MV electrostatic accelerator for instance, should shed pairs. It does not, because the window only says a pair is allowed by energy. Making one needs a sea electron to tunnel the forbidden stretch d = 2mc²/(eE), with probability exp(−πEc/E), and Klein's sharp step hides this by rising in zero distance. Spread 5 MV over 2.5 m and E = 2 × 10⁶ V m⁻¹, so Ec/E = 6.6 × 10¹¹ and the exponent is about 2 × 10¹². The converse error is as common: a field above Ec is not enough either. A nucleus exceeds Ec over hundreds of femtometres yet makes no pairs, because that field fills a region smaller than ħ/mc, too small to hold a level below −mc². Pairs need both an open window and a field not far below Ec across it.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A uniform electric field of 2.0 × 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹ acts in vacuum. Find E/Ec, the length over which it raises an electron's potential energy by 2mc², in pm and in units of ħ/mc, and the Sauter factor exp(−πEc/E). Check the factor against that length.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Ec = m²c³/(eħ) = 1.323 × 10¹⁸ V m⁻¹, so E/Ec = 2.0 × 10¹⁷ / 1.323 × 10¹⁸ = 0.151, and Ec/E = 6.62.
- The forbidden stretch is d = 2mc²/(eE): 2 × 5.110 × 10⁵ V divided by 2.0 × 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹ is 5.11 × 10⁻¹² m = 5.11 pm. With ħ/mc = 0.3862 pm that is 13.2 ħ/mc, which is 2Ec/E as it must be.
- Sauter's exponent is πEc/E = π × 6.616 = 20.8, so the factor is exp(−20.8) = 9.4 × 10⁻¹⁰.
- Check: (π/2)d/(ħ/mc) = 1.571 × 13.23 = 20.8, the same exponent read from the length. It is dimensionless, and doubling the field would halve it, raising the factor to 3.1 × 10⁻⁵.
Answer. E = 0.151Ec; the 2mc² rise takes 5.11 pm, or 13.2 ħ/mc; the Sauter factor is exp(−20.8) ≈ 9.4 × 10⁻¹⁰.
MediumExample 2
An electron of total energy 1.5mc² meets a sharp step of height V₀ = 4.0mc². Using topic 8.02's R and T with a positive transmitted momentum, give the hole-theory account of that stationary state: electrons out to the left and positrons out to the right per unit incident flux, each pair member's kinetic energy and speed, a pair's total energy, and the vacuum's own pair rate. Then spread the step linearly over 1.0 pm and find the Sauter factor.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Window: mc² ≤ 1.5mc² ≤ V₀ − mc² = 3.0mc², so the energy lies inside it. Near side: pc = √(1.5² − 1) mc² = 1.118mc². Far side: E − V₀ = −2.5mc², so qc = √(2.5² − 1) mc² = 2.291mc².
- Quoted from topic 8.02: r = (q/p)(E + mc²)/(E − V₀ + mc²) = (2.291/1.118)(2.5/−1.5) = −3.416, so R = ((1 − r)/(1 + r))² = 3.341 and T = 4r/(1 + r)² = −2.341, with R + T = 1.000.
- Hole reading of this stationary state: R − 1 = −T = 2.34, so per unit incident flux 3.34 electrons go left, 1 reflected and 2.34 from pairs, and 2.34 positrons go right; charge out, −3.34e + 2.34e = −e, equals charge in. The 2.34 is set by choosing q positive, not caused by the incident electron: the sea alone passes Tg = 4|r|/(1 + |r|)² = 0.70 of its electrons, 0.70/(2πħ) pairs per second per unit energy per spin.
- Each pair electron has E = 1.5mc², kinetic 0.5mc² = 255 keV, speed pc²/E = 0.745c, moving left. Its hole has rest plus kinetic energy V₀ − E = 2.5mc², of which 1.5mc² = 766 keV is kinetic, speed qc²/(V₀ − E) = 0.917c, moving right. A pair's total energy is E + (−E) = 0: the static step pays nothing.
- Ramp: E/Ec = (V₀/mc²)(ħ/mc)/w = 4 × 0.3862/1.0 = 1.545, so πEc/E = 2.03 and the Sauter factor is exp(−2.03) = 0.13. A step a hundredth of an atom wide still passes pairs; over 1.0 nm the exponent would be 2.0 × 10³.
Answer. Per unit incident flux the stationary state sends 3.34 electrons left (0.5mc² kinetic each) and 2.34 positrons right (1.5mc² each) at no energy cost; the vacuum alone makes 0.70/(2πħ) pairs per unit time, energy and spin; over 1.0 pm, Sauter's factor is 0.13.
HardExample 3
A design study for a laser focus claims a peak field of 1.0 × 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹ held over a volume of (1.0 μm)³ for 5.0 fs. Treating that field as uniform and constant, use Schwinger's quoted rate to estimate the number of pairs. Then find the field at which the expected number falls to one, the effect of a 10% shortfall in field, and the intensity required compared with today's record of about 10²³ W cm⁻².
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- E/Ec = 1.0 × 10¹⁷ / 1.323 × 10¹⁸ = 0.0756, so the exponent is πEc/E = 41.57 and exp(−41.57) = 8.8 × 10⁻¹⁹.
- Prefactor: eE = 1.602 × 10⁻² N, so (eE)² = 2.567 × 10⁻⁴ N², and 4π³ħ²c = 124.0 × 1.112 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s² × 2.998 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ = 4.135 × 10⁻⁵⁸ J² s m. Their ratio is 6.21 × 10⁵³ m⁻³ s⁻¹; N² over J² s m is indeed m⁻³ s⁻¹.
- Γ = 6.21 × 10⁵³ × 8.8 × 10⁻¹⁹ = 5.5 × 10³⁵ m⁻³ s⁻¹, and N = ΓVt = 5.5 × 10³⁵ × 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁸ m³ × 5.0 × 10⁻¹⁵ s ≈ 2.7 × 10³ pairs.
- One pair needs πEc/E = ln[(eE)²Vt/(4π³ħ²c)]. Iterating: at 8.458 × 10¹⁶ V m⁻¹ the prefactor is 4.44 × 10⁵³ m⁻³ s⁻¹, the right side is ln(2.22 × 10²¹) = 49.15, and πEc/E = 49.15, so N = 1 there, at 0.064Ec.
- Shortfall: at 0.90 × 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹ the exponent rises to 46.2 and N falls to about 22, a factor of 125 for a 10% loss of field. The exponential, not the E² prefactor, decides.
- Intensity: I = ε₀cE²/2 = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² × 2.998 × 10⁸ × (1.0 × 10¹⁷)² / 2 = 1.3 × 10³¹ W m⁻² = 1.3 × 10²⁷ W cm⁻², about 10⁴ times the record. At 10²³ W cm⁻² the peak field is 8.7 × 10¹⁴ V m⁻¹ and the exponent 4.8 × 10³.
Answer. About 3 × 10³ pairs; the yield falls to one near 8.5 × 10¹⁶ V m⁻¹ (0.064Ec); a 10% field shortfall cuts it 125-fold; and 10¹⁷ V m⁻¹ needs 1.3 × 10²⁷ W cm⁻², 10⁴ times today's record.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Klein pair production is the vacuum beside a steep potential releasing electron-positron pairs at no energy cost, possible only where empty electron states lie level with the filled negative-energy sea, and suppressed in a uniform field E by exp(−πEc/E).
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.