Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Microcausality: [φ(x), φ†(y)] = 0 at spacelike separation

The amplitude for a scalar quantum to travel between two events does not vanish outside the light cone, which at first sight looks like the end of relativity. It is not: whether one measurement can disturb another is decided by the commutator, and it closes outside the cone only because the field carries antiparticles.

UAQM-09.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Microcausality: [φ(x), φ†(y)] = 0 at spacelike separationCommutator C = D(x) − wD(−x) of a scalar field whose antiparticle term has amplitude √w, here w = 1.00, against √|x²| in units of ħ/mc: spacelike left, future timelike right. Faint: Re D. Solid: Re C = 0.00 Re D. Dashed: Im C = 2.00 Im D, the arrow its −δ(x²) term. Values in units of m²/4π². The probe sits at 1.5 ħ/mc, 2.12 fm for a charged pion.C = [φ(x), φ†(0)]solid: Re C, dashed: Im Cfaint: Re D(x)scale m²/4π², tick at ħ/mcspacelike, x² < 0light conetimelike, x⁰ > 0probe: Re D 0.185, Re C 0.000, Im C 0.000
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

The amplitude leaks outside the light cone; the commutator does not.

The key idea

Microcausality is the requirement that every local observable commute with every other at spacelike separation, which for a scalar field means the field operators themselves commute there, so that nothing done at one event can change the statistics of measurements at an event outside its light cone.

Example. For the charged pion, ħ/mc = 1.414 fm. Two points 3.0 fm apart at equal times have vacuum amplitude D = 7.1 × 10⁻⁴ fm⁻², a quarter of the massless value 1/(4π²r²), yet [φ(x), φ†(y)] there is exactly zero.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Causality in a field theory is a statement about operators, not amplitudes. The complex Klein-Gordon field of topic 9.03 annihilates particles and creates antiparticles, so D(x − y) = ⟨0|φ(x)φ†(y)|0⟩ is the amplitude for a particle made at y to be absorbed at x. It is a Lorentz-invariant mode integral, and at equal times it equals mK₁(mr)/(4π²r), derived here: a tail that falls as e(−mr) over the Compton length ħ/mc, 1.41 fm for a charged pion, and never reaches zero. A relativistic quantum cannot be kept inside its light cone. What an action at y can do to a measurement at x is fixed instead by the commutator, and for this field [φ(x), φ†(y)] = D(x − y) − D(y − x), the particle's amplitude minus the antiparticle's amplitude for the reverse trip. Outside the light cone a proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation turns x − y into y − x, so the two terms are equal and cancel; inside, none can, and the difference, the Pauli-Jordan function, is nonzero. Every local observable built from φ and φ† then commutes with every other at spacelike separation. A field of positive frequencies alone would have commutator D itself, so relativity and locality together demand the antiparticle. The range ħ/mc shrinks to zero as c → ∞, which is why non-relativistic quantum mechanics never meets the leak, and the argument covers free fields only.

1The amplitude D: one quantum from y to x

Natural units ħ = c = 1 throughout, with ħc = 197.327 MeV fm turning masses into inverse lengths, and the metric (+, −, −, −), so x² = t² − r² is negative outside the light cone. Topic 9.03's field, quoted in one line and taken from its box of volume V to infinite volume (Σₖ → V∫ d³p/(2π)³, √V aₖ → aₚ, √V bₖ → bₚ), is φ(x) = ∫ d³p (aₚ e(−ip⋅x) + bₚ† e(ip⋅x)) / ((2π)³ √(2Eₚ)), with [aₚ, aq†] = [bₚ, bq†] = (2π)³ δ³(p − q). Acting on the vacuum, φ†(y) can only create a particle at y, because its b-term annihilates |0⟩, and φ(x) can only absorb it. So ⟨0|φ(x)φ†(y)|0⟩ = ∫ d³p e(−ip⋅(x−y)) / ((2π)³ 2Eₚ) ≡ D(x − y). Each piece is Lorentz invariant: p⋅(x − y) is a scalar, and d³p/2Eₚ = d⁴p δ(p² − m²) θ(p⁰), where θ(p⁰) survives because a proper orthochronous transformation never flips the sign of a timelike p⁰. D therefore depends only on (x − y)² and, inside the cone, on whether x is later or earlier than y.

2Evaluating D at equal times: a Compton-length tail

At equal times and separation r the angular integral gives D(0, r) = (1/(4π²r)) ∫₀^∞ p sin(pr) / Eₚ dp, which needs a convergence factor e(−εp). Extend the even integrand to the whole real line, replace sin(pr) by e(ipr)/i, which the symmetry allows, and close the contour in the upper half plane: the only obstruction is the branch cut of Eₚ = √(p² + m²) rising from p = im. Wrapping it with p = iρ gives D(0, r) = (1/(4π²r)) ∫ from m to ∞ of ρ e(−ρr) / √(ρ² − m²) dρ, every piece of which decays at least as e(−mr); a standard representation of K₁, quoted, makes this mK₁(mr)/(4π²r). Checks: the dimension is mass over length, mass² here; as m → 0, K₁(z) → 1/z returns the massless 1/(4π²r²); for mr ≫ 1 the endpoint ρ ≈ m dominates and gives √(πm/2) e(−mr)/(4π² r³⁄²). For the charged pion, measured at mc² = 139.570 MeV, ħ/mc = 1.414 fm, and at r = 3.0 fm the amplitude is 0.25 of its massless value: positive, real, and not zero.

3The commutator: the antiparticle's trip, subtracted

Now commute the fields instead of sandwiching them between vacua. The a-terms give [aₚ, aq†] = (2π)³ δ³(p − q) times e(−ip⋅x + iq⋅y), which integrates to D(x − y). The b-terms give [bₚ†, bq] = −(2π)³ δ³(p − q) times e(ip⋅x − iq⋅y), which integrates to −D(y − x). Cross terms vanish because a and b commute. So [φ(x), φ†(y)] = D(x − y) − D(y − x), a c-number with the same value in every state, while [φ(x), φ(y)] = 0 identically. Read it as two processes: a particle created at y and absorbed at x, minus an antiparticle created at x and absorbed at y. Since D(y − x) = D(x − y)*, the difference is 2i Im D(x − y) = iΔ(x − y), with Δ the real Pauli-Jordan function. One more check comes free: differentiating in x⁰ at equal times gives −i∫ d³p e(ip⋅r)/(2π)³ = −iδ³(r), half from each term: topic 9.03's canonical [φ(x), π(y)] = iδ³(x − y), read with the derivative on x rather than y.

4Why the terms cancel outside the cone and not inside

Take x − y spacelike, (t, r) along one axis with |t| < r. A boost at velocity t/r makes the events simultaneous at separation s = √(r² − t²); a rotation by π about a perpendicular axis turns (0, s) into (0, −s); the inverse boost then lands on (−t, −r). All three are proper and orthochronous, so D, which depends only on (x − y)² and the time order inside the cone, takes the same value at x − y and y − x, and the commutator vanishes. At equal times the step is immediate, since D(0, r) depends on |r| alone. Inside the cone x − y and y − x lie in the future and past halves, and no orthochronous transformation exchanges them. Continuing s → iλ gives, quoted, D = m[Y₁(mλ) + iJ₁(mλ)]/(8πλ) for x⁰ > 0, so Δ = mJ₁(mλ)/(4πλ) inside, with −δ(x²)/(2π) on the cone. It first vanishes at mλ = 3.832, at λ = 5.42 fm for the pion. As m → 0 only the δ survives: the massless commutator lives on the cone itself.

5Antiparticles are required, and local observables commute

The cancellation needs both terms, and the second exists only because φ contains b†. A field of positive frequencies alone, φ₊ = ∫ d³p aₚ e(−ip⋅x) / ((2π)³ √(2Eₚ)), has [φ₊(x), φ₊†(y)] = D(x − y), which for a pion-mass field 3.0 fm apart at equal times is 7.1 × 10⁻⁴ fm⁻², real and positive. Its time derivative at equal times is −(i/2)δ³(r), half the canonical value, and the antiparticle supplies the other half. No reshuffling of positive-frequency modes helps: such an amplitude is the boundary value of a function analytic in complex time, and, quoted, it cannot vanish across the spacelike region without vanishing everywhere. The real field of topic 9.02 makes the same subtraction with aₚ† playing both roles. Once the elementary commutators vanish, Leibniz's rule [AB, C] = A[B, C] + [A, C]B extends the result to every polynomial in φ, φ† and their derivatives at x against any at y: the charge density, the energy density, φ†φ. An operation exp(iεO(y)) then leaves every ⟨O′(x)⟩ at spacelike separation unchanged, to all orders in ε.

6A correlation with a measured range, and what comes next

D itself does not vanish, and it should not: it is a correlation of the vacuum across spacelike separation, the field cousin of an entangled pair, and like one it carries no signal. Its range is set by a measured mass. For charged pions it is ħ/mc = 1.41 fm, the length that sets the e(−r/1.41 fm) tail of charged-pion exchange between nucleons, quoted; the neutral pion, at 134.977 MeV, gives 1.46 fm. For an electron-mass field it is 386 fm, and across an atomic 0.1 nm the factor e(−mr) is e(−259) ≈ 3 × 10⁻¹¹³, which is why atomic physics never meets it; as c → ∞ the range ħ/mc goes to zero altogether. The same two terms will return: ⟨0|T φ(x)φ†(y)|0⟩ = θ(x⁰ − y⁰)D(x − y) + θ(y⁰ − x⁰)D(y − x), the Feynman propagator, is only named here, and its frame-dependent time ordering is harmless precisely because the two pieces agree at spacelike separation. Everything here assumes free fields quantised with commutators; topic 9.08 shows what anticommutators do to this cancellation.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Vacuum amplitude, derived

D(x − y) = ⟨0|φ(x)φ†(y)|0⟩ = ∫ d³p e(−ip⋅(x−y)) / ((2π)³ 2Eₚ)

Between vacua only the particle term survives: φ† makes the quantum at y and φ absorbs it at x. Invariant, because d³p/2Eₚ = d⁴p δ(p² − m²) θ(p⁰).

ħ = c = 1, metric (+, −, −, −); Eₚ = √(p² + m²); D has dimension mass², read as fm⁻² through ħc = 197.327 MeV fm.

Equal-time amplitude, derived

D(0, r) = m K₁(mr) / (4π² r)

Tends to 1/(4π²r²) as m → 0 and to √(πm/2) e(−mr) / (4π² r³⁄²) when mr ≫ 1: a tail about one Compton length long that never reaches zero.

r in fm; m = mc/ħ in fm⁻¹; K₁ is the modified Bessel function. At any spacelike interval, r becomes √(−x²).

The commutator, derived

[φ(x), φ†(y)] = D(x − y) − D(y − x) = iΔ(x − y)

The first term is a particle made at y and absorbed at x; the second, with its sign from [b†, b] = −[b, b†], an antiparticle made at x and absorbed at y.

Δ, the Pauli-Jordan function, is real: D(y − x) = D(x − y)*, so Δ = 2 Im D(x − y), in fm⁻².

Microcausality, derived

Δ(x − y) = 0 whenever (x − y)² < 0

A boost, a rotation by π and the inverse boost, all proper and orthochronous, carry any spacelike x − y to y − x, and D cannot tell the two apart.

(x − y)² = (x⁰ − y⁰)² − |x − y|²; negative means spacelike, outside each event's light cone.

Pauli-Jordan function inside the cone, quoted

Δ(x) = sgn(x⁰) [m J₁(mλ)/(4πλ) − δ(x²)/(2π)], λ = √(x²), x² ≥ 0

Nonzero inside the cone except on hyperboloids where J₁ vanishes, so causal contact switches the commutator on; at m = 0 only the δ on the cone survives.

J₁ is the Bessel function, first zero at mλ = 3.832. Obtained by continuing s → iλ in D; quoted, not derived here.

Initial data of the commutator, derived

Δ = 0 and ∂Δ/∂t = −δ³(r) on the surface t = 0

Klein-Gordon data confined to one point never spread faster than light, a property of the wave operator quoted here: microcausality by a second route.

Δ solves (∂² + m²)Δ = 0; δ³ in fm⁻³. The derivative is topic 9.03's equal-time [φ(x), π(y)] = iδ³(x − y).
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.00
0 to 1; steps of 0.05.
−1.5 ħ/mc
−4.9 to 4.9 ħ/mc; steps of 0.2.

Try this. At w = 1, the complex Klein-Gordon field, the solid curve lies on the axis and the dashed one is zero left of the cone, though the faint amplitude is not. Slide w to 0, positive frequencies only, and the solid curve rises to D outside the cone. Then carry the probe across the cone.

Live results

PROBE √|x²|, CHARGED PION
2.12 fm
PROBE √|x²|, ELECTRON MASS
579 fm
WEIGHT OF Re D IN Re C
0.00
WEIGHT OF Im D IN Im C
2.00

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelCommutator C = D(x) − wD(−x) of a scalar field whose antiparticle term has amplitude √w, here w = 1.00, against √|x²| in units of ħ/mc: spacelike left, future timelike right. Faint: Re D. Solid: Re C = 0.00 Re D. Dashed: Im C = 2.00 Im D, the arrow its −δ(x²) term. Values in units of m²/4π². The probe sits at 1.5 ħ/mc, 2.12 fm for a charged pion.C = [φ(x), φ†(0)]solid: Re C, dashed: Im Cfaint: Re D(x)scale m²/4π², tick at ħ/mcspacelike, x² < 0light conetimelike, x⁰ > 0probe: Re D 0.185, Re C 0.000, Im C 0.000
Commutator C = D(x) − wD(−x) of a scalar field whose antiparticle term has amplitude √w, here w = 1.00, against √|x²| in units of ħ/mc: spacelike left, future timelike right. Faint: Re D. Solid: Re C = 0.00 Re D. Dashed: Im C = 2.00 Im D, the arrow its −δ(x²) term. Values in units of m²/4π². The probe sits at 1.5 ħ/mc, 2.12 fm for a charged pion.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Antiparticle weight w: 1.00; Probe √|x²|, spacelike if negative: −1.5 ħ/mc

Baseline 1.00; choose 0 to 1, in steps of 0.05.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Because D(x − y) is nonzero outside the light cone, it is tempting to conclude that a scalar quantum can outrun light over a Compton length. But the amplitude does not limit signalling. φ is not even an observable: it is not Hermitian and it changes the charge. An experimenter at y can only apply some U = exp(iεO(y)) built from local observables, and that changes any ⟨O′(x)⟩ by iε⟨[O′(x), O(y)]⟩ to first order, and not at all, to every order, when the two commute. That commutator is built from D(x − y) − D(y − x), which vanishes outside the cone. The nonzero D is a correlation between the vacuum at x and at y, like that of an entangled pair: visible when records are compared later, useless for sending a message. The opposite error is as common: microcausality does not make spacelike correlations vanish, and 3.0 fm apart a pion-mass field keeps a quarter of the massless value.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

The charged pion's measured mass is 139.570 MeV/c². For a free pion-mass scalar field, find ħ/mc, then use the large-distance form of the equal-time amplitude to estimate D(0, 6.0 fm)/D(0, 3.0 fm). Check the estimate against the exact Bessel form and compare with a massless field.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Event y is at the origin and event x at ct = 1.0 fm, r = 2.0 fm along the x axis. Show that the separation is spacelike, find the boost that reverses its time order while keeping r, complete a proper orthochronous map of x − y onto y − x, and evaluate D(x − y) for a pion-mass field with ħ/mc = 1.414 fm.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

From the origin, event A lies at ct = 2.0 fm, r = 3.0 fm and event B at ct = 3.0 fm, r = 2.0 fm, so |x²| = 5.0 fm² for both. For a pion-mass field, ħ/mc = 1.414 fm, find [χ, χ†] for the positive-frequency field χ and [φ, φ†] for the complex field at each, using D = m[Y₁(mλ) + iJ₁(mλ)]/(8πλ), quoted, for future timelike λ. Where along r = 2.0 fm does [φ, φ†] first return to zero?

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A colleague drops the antiparticle term and uses χ(x) = ∫ d³p aₚ e(−ip⋅x) / ((2π)³ √(2Eₚ)), whose quanta all have positive energy. For the pion mass, ħ/mc = 1.414 fm, what is [χ(x), χ†(y)] at equal times with |x − y| = 2.0 fm?
7

Review & continue

Microcausality is the requirement that every local observable commute with every other at spacelike separation, which for a scalar field means the field operators themselves commute there, so that nothing done at one event can change the statistics of measurements at an event outside its light cone.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.