
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Photons and the photoelectric effect
One photon hands one electron exactly hf, and the electron pays φ to get out. Everything you can measure, from the threshold and the stopping potential to a straight line whose slope is h/e, follows from that one accounting rule, and so does the short list of conditions under which it quietly stops being true.
UPIII-09.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. This modern-physics material is an introductory survey, not a complete course in relativity, quantum, atomic, nuclear or particle physics. Your university determines the required depth and assessment. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
One photon, one electron, one energy budget.
The key idea
The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons from a surface by light, in which each electron absorbs a single photon and leaves with at most Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ, however intense the light.
Example. Light of 400 nm carries hf = 1240 eV nm ÷ 400 nm = 3.10 eV; on a cathode with φ = 2.30 eV it frees electrons with Kₘₐₓ = 0.80 eV, halted by a retarding 0.80 V whether the beam carries 1 mW or 1 W.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Einstein's claim of 1905 went further than Planck's: not only is energy exchanged with matter in steps, the light itself travels as quanta of hf, each absorbed whole by a single electron or not at all. That one rule accounts for the photoelectric effect. An electron at the Fermi level needs the work function φ to escape, so the fastest electron leaves with Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ, a straight line in f with the universal slope h and no dependence on intensity. Below f₀ = φ/h nothing leaves however bright the lamp; above it electrons appear at once, since no energy has to accumulate; and intensity decides only how many photons, and so how many electrons, there are. A retarding voltage that just halts the current turns Kₘₐₓ into eVₛ, so Vₛ plotted against f is a line of slope h/e for every metal: Planck's constant from a voltmeter and a monochromator. The model rests on two idealisations. It assumes a sharp Fermi edge, true only at T = 0; at room temperature the edge is smeared over a few kB T and the threshold becomes a Boltzmann tail. And it assumes one photon per electron, which holds for lamps but fails when a pulsed laser packs photons so densely that two reach one electron within a single excitation lifetime; then Kₘₐₓ = nhf − φ and the current grows as intensity to the nth power. Einstein's line is the cold, dim limit of that fuller picture.
1Light arrives in lumps of hf, sized for a work function
Treat a beam of frequency f as a stream of quanta each carrying E = hf, and let an electron absorb one whole or none. With hc = 1240 eV nm, a 500 nm photon carries 2.48 eV and a 250 nm photon 4.96 eV. Work functions, the least energy that lifts an electron from the Fermi level to rest outside the surface, run from 2.1 eV for caesium to about 5.6 eV for platinum, so visible light can just free a caesium electron while platinum needs ultraviolet below 1240/5.6 = 221 nm. A classical wave gets three things wrong in kind. Its energy is spread over the wavefront, so an electron's share should grow with intensity; nothing in it makes one frequency a cliff; and the energy has to accumulate. At 1.0 μW m⁻², an atom intercepting 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁹ m² collects 1.0 × 10⁻²⁵ W and needs 3.7 × 10⁶ s, about 43 days, to gather 2.30 eV. Experiment finds electrons within nanoseconds, with energies independent of intensity, and essentially none below a threshold frequency.
2Einstein's equation is energy conservation for one absorption
One photon, one electron. If the electron starts at the Fermi level, the highest occupied state at T = 0, it spends φ reaching the vacuum level and keeps the rest: Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ. That is the largest kinetic energy, not the typical one. Electrons that start deeper in the band, or lose energy in collisions on the way out, emerge with anything from zero to Kₘₐₓ, so the equation fixes the upper edge of a distribution. Setting Kₘₐₓ = 0 gives the threshold f₀ = φ/h, or λ₀ = hc/φ. For φ = 2.10 eV the threshold is 590 nm, and 420 nm light frees electrons of up to 2.952 − 2.10 = 0.85 eV, moving at √(2Kₘₐₓ/mₑ) = 5.5 × 10⁵ m s⁻¹. Check the mechanics used on the electron: Kₘₐₓ/(mₑc²) = 0.85 eV ÷ 511 keV = 1.7 × 10⁻⁶, and (γ − 1)mₑc² exceeds ½mₑv² by a fraction ¾(v/c)² ≈ 2.5 × 10⁻⁶. Newtonian kinetic energy is safe here and stays safe until hf reaches tens of keV, where Kₘₐₓ/(mₑc²) climbs to a few per cent.
3The stopping potential turns the edge into a straight line
Kₘₐₓ is measured by stopping it. Make the collector negative by V and only electrons with K > eV arrive; the current vanishes at Vₛ, where eVₛ = Kₘₐₓ. Then Vₛ = (h/e)f − φ/e: a line in f whose slope, 4.136 × 10⁻¹⁵ V s, contains nothing about the metal, and whose intercept contains nothing else. Measure Vₛ at several frequencies, fit by least squares, and h = e × slope; the slope's standard error, s/√(Σ(fᵢ − f̄)²) with s the residual scatter on N − 2 degrees of freedom, carries straight into h. Do not force the fit through the origin. The line crosses zero at f₀, and below f₀ there is no current at all, so its negative branch is extrapolation, not data. Read the intercept with care too. Emitter and collector are joined by a wire and share a Fermi level, so the energy an electron needs to land is set by the collector's surface: eVₛ = hf − φcollector. The slope is untouched, which is why h is what this experiment measures cleanly.
4Intensity buys electrons, and the grain shows when it is low
A beam of power P delivers P/(hf) photons per second, and each frees an electron that escapes with probability η, the quantum efficiency: about 10⁻⁴ for bare copper, above 0.2 for the alkali-antimonide cathode of a photomultiplier. So the saturation current is I = ηeP/(hf). Double P and I doubles, while Vₛ does not move by a millivolt, because hf has not changed. Since every photon is an independent trial, the number of photoelectrons in a time t is Poisson-distributed, with mean n̄ = ηPt/(hf) and spread √n̄. That is where the classical picture returns. A 2.6 μA current delivers 1.6 × 10⁷ electrons per microsecond, fluctuating by 0.025%: a smooth current, as a continuous wave would give. Attenuate it by 10⁶ and the same microsecond holds about 16 ± 4 electrons. The grain is plain, and only the mean rate still behaves like a wave's intensity. Correspondence works through large numbers: the photon picture reproduces every classical result that depends on the average energy flux alone.
5Finite temperature turns the threshold into a Boltzmann tail
The sharp threshold assumes a sharp Fermi edge, which is a T = 0 statement. At temperature T the occupation of states near the edge falls off over a few kB T, with kB T = 0.0259 eV at 300 K, so a few electrons already sit above it and a photon slightly short of φ can still free them. Fowler's analysis gives the yield per absorbed photon two limits: Y ∝ (hf − φ)² a few kB T above threshold, and Y ∝ exp(−(φ − hf)/kB T) well below it, the Boltzmann factor for an electron that far up the tail. Ten kB T short, 0.26 eV below φ, the yield is down by about e⁻¹⁰ ≈ 5 × 10⁻⁵ on its threshold value: small, yet a photomultiplier counts it. Near 2.5 eV a smear of 4kB T ≈ 0.10 eV is 1240 × 0.10/2.5² ≈ 20 nm of wavelength, so a threshold read off a room-temperature current plot is soft by that much. The Vₛ line fares better: its foot is rounded over a few kB T/e, but the slope, fitted well above threshold, is untouched. Read h from the slope, never from where the current seems to vanish.
6Where one photon per electron fails: multiphoton absorption
Einstein's rule is a low-intensity statement. A photon too weak to free an electron alone can still lift it into a short-lived intermediate state; if a second photon reaches that electron within the lifetime τ, of order 10⁻¹⁵ s, it takes both and leaves with Kₘₐₓ = 2hf − φ. The ratio of two-photon to one-photon events is roughly σΦτ, with σ ≈ 10⁻¹⁹ m² an atomic cross-section and Φ = I/(hf) the photon flux. For 2.0 eV photons in sunlight's 10³ W m⁻², Φ = 3 × 10²¹ m⁻² s⁻¹ and σΦτ ≈ 3 × 10⁻¹³: invisible. A focused nanosecond laser at 10¹² W m⁻² gives 3 × 10⁻⁴, negligible beside one-photon emission but the whole signal once hf < φ has closed that channel, and near 10¹⁵ W m⁻² the two compete. The signatures are clean: the n-photon current grows as Iⁿ, so a log–log plot of current against intensity has slope n, and its Vₛ line has slope nh/e. Towards 10²⁰ W m⁻² the laser's field rivals the 5 × 10¹¹ V m⁻¹ that binds an atomic electron, and counting photons stops being the useful picture.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Photon energy
E = hf = hc/λ
Turns a wavelength into what one absorption delivers: 400 nm gives 3.10 eV and 700 nm 1.77 eV, the same scale as the work functions of metals.
h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J s; f in Hz, λ in m, E in J; in eV use hc = 1240 eV nmEinstein's photoelectric equation
Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ
Energy conservation for one photon absorbed by one electron from the Fermi level. Deeper electrons leave slower, so it fixes an edge, not an average.
Kₘₐₓ largest electron kinetic energy, φ work function, both in J or eV; Kₘₐₓ = 0 gives f₀ = φ/hStopping-potential line
Vₛ = (h/e) f − φ/e
The slope is universal and the intercept is the metal. Fit Vₛ against f and h = e × slope, with the slope's standard error carried into h.
Vₛ in V, f in Hz; slope h/e = 4.136 × 10⁻¹⁵ V s; e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ CSaturation photocurrent
I = ηePλ/(hc)
Power sets the photon rate P/(hf), so it scales the current and leaves Vₛ alone; at fixed power a longer λ means more, weaker photons.
P beam power in W, η electrons freed per incident photon (dimensionless), I in AThermal tail below threshold
Y ∝ exp(−(φ − hf)/(kB T)), for φ − hf ≫ kB T
A Boltzmann factor for electrons already above the Fermi edge: at room temperature the threshold is a slope about 0.1 eV wide, not a step.
Y electrons per absorbed photon; kB = 1.381 × 10⁻²³ J K⁻¹, so kB T = 0.0259 eV at 300 Kn-photon emission edge
Kₘₐₓ = nhf − φ
Where one photon per electron fails. The n-photon current grows as intensity to the nth power, and its Vₛ line has slope nh/e.
n photons absorbed within one excitation lifetime, about 10⁻¹⁵ s; seen from about 10¹² W m⁻² upwardsInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag P from 1.0 to 2.0 mW: the bar doubles and the marker stays put, because power buys photons, not energy per photon. Then lengthen λ past λ₀ = {1239.84/φ|0} nm: the marker drops below the axis and the bar vanishes at any power. Change φ and the line slides without tilting.
Live results
- PHOTON ENERGY hf
- 3.10 eV
- STOPPING POTENTIAL Vₛ
- 0.80 V
- THRESHOLD λ₀ = hc/φ
- 539 nm
- SATURATION CURRENT (η = 1%)
- 3.23 μA
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Work function φ: 2.3 eV; Wavelength λ: 400 nm; Beam power P: 1.0 mW
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
First-year students read Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ as the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, as if every electron left with the same energy and a brighter beam ought to raise it. Neither is right. The equation is the budget of the best-placed electron, the one starting at the Fermi level; the others begin deeper or lose energy on the way out, so the emitted energies fill the whole range from zero to Kₘₐₓ, and the stopping potential measures the edge of that distribution, not its mean. That spread is also why the retarding current dwindles steadily to zero as V approaches Vₛ rather than dropping off a step. Intensity cannot move the edge, because it changes how many photons arrive and not how much each one carries: I doubles, Vₛ stays. And the edge is sharp only at T = 0; at room temperature it is softened over a few kB T, so a faint tail of current persists about 0.1 V beyond Vₛ instead of ending at a clean point.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A phototube whose emitter and collector are the same metal gives a stopping potential of 1.10 V under the 365 nm mercury line. Find the work function and threshold wavelength, predict the stopping potential under the 436 nm line, and check that Newtonian kinetic energy is adequate for the fastest electrons.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Photon energy with hc = 1239.8 eV nm: hf = 1239.8/365 = 3.397 eV. The fastest electrons have Kₘₐₓ = eVₛ = 1.10 eV.
- Einstein's equation rearranged: φ = hf − Kₘₐₓ = 3.397 − 1.10 = 2.297 eV. The threshold is where Kₘₐₓ reaches zero: λ₀ = hc/φ = 1239.8/2.297 = 540 nm, in the green.
- At 436 nm, hf = 1239.8/436 = 2.844 eV. The work function belongs to the metal and carries over, so Vₛ = (2.844 − 2.297) V = 0.55 V.
- Fastest electron at 365 nm: Kₘₐₓ = 1.10 × 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 1.762 × 10⁻¹⁹ J, so v = √(2Kₘₐₓ/mₑ) = √(2 × 1.762 × 10⁻¹⁹ / 9.109 × 10⁻³¹) = 6.22 × 10⁵ m s⁻¹, and v/c = 2.1 × 10⁻³.
- The relativistic kinetic energy exceeds ½mₑv² by a fraction ¾(v/c)² ≈ 3 × 10⁻⁶, far below the precision of a 1.10 V reading: the classical formula is the right limit here.
Answer. φ = 2.30 eV; λ₀ = 540 nm; Vₛ = 0.55 V at 436 nm; vₘₐₓ = 6.2 × 10⁵ m s⁻¹, so Newtonian kinetic energy is ample.
MediumExample 2
A phototube with emitter and collector of the same metal gives stopping potentials of 1.41 V at 350 nm, 0.95 V at 400 nm, 0.63 V at 450 nm and 0.33 V at 500 nm. Fit Vₛ against f by least squares, extract h with its standard error, the work function and the threshold wavelength, and compare h with the accepted 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J s.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Convert with f = c/λ, in PHz (10¹⁵ Hz): 0.8565, 0.7495, 0.6662 and 0.5996 PHz. Means: f̄ = 0.7180 PHz and V̄ = 0.830 V.
- Deviations: Δf = +0.1386, +0.0315, −0.0517, −0.1184 PHz and ΔV = +0.58, +0.12, −0.20, −0.50 V. Sums: Sff = Σ Δf² = 0.03689 PHz² and SfV = Σ Δf ΔV = 0.1537 PHz V.
- Slope = SfV/Sff = 4.166 V PHz⁻¹ = 4.166 × 10⁻¹⁵ V s; intercept = V̄ − slope × f̄ = 0.830 − 4.166 × 0.7180 = −2.161 V. The residuals, +0.003, −0.011, +0.016 and −0.007 V, show no curvature, so a line is the right model.
- Residual scatter on N − 2 = 2 degrees of freedom: s = 0.0146 V, so the slope's standard error is s/√Sff = 0.076 × 10⁻¹⁵ V s, or 1.8%.
- h = e × slope = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ × 4.166 × 10⁻¹⁵ = 6.68 × 10⁻³⁴ J s, with u(h) = 0.12 × 10⁻³⁴ J s: 0.7% above the accepted value and well inside one standard error of it.
- φ = −e × intercept = 2.16 eV; the line reaches zero at f₀ = 2.161/4.166 = 0.519 PHz, so λ₀ = c/f₀ = 578 nm, in the yellow.
Answer. h = (6.68 ± 0.12) × 10⁻³⁴ J s, consistent with 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J s; φ = 2.16 eV; λ₀ = 578 nm.
HardExample 3
A cathode with φ = 2.50 eV (collector of the same metal) at 300 K is lit by 800 nm pulses of fixed length and repetition rate. At peak intensity 1.5 × 10¹³ W m⁻² the average photocurrent is 0.36 nA; at 6.0 × 10¹³ W m⁻² it is 5.6 nA. Decide whether thermal one-photon emission can explain the current, find the order of the process, the stopping potential, and the current at 3.0 × 10¹³ W m⁻².
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- One photon: hf = 1239.8/800 = 1.550 eV, which is 0.950 eV short of φ = 2.50 eV, so one-photon emission is closed at T = 0.
- The thermal tail could in principle make up the deficit: kB T = 0.02585 eV at 300 K, (φ − hf)/kB T = 0.950/0.02585 = 36.8, and e(−36.8) ≈ 1 × 10⁻¹⁶. That route is negligible, so the electrons must absorb more than one photon each.
- At fixed pulse shape the average current scales as (peak intensity)ⁿ, so n = ln(5.6/0.36) ÷ ln(6.0/1.5) = 2.744/1.386 = 1.98. The process is two-photon: 2hf = 3.100 eV clears φ where hf could not.
- Kₘₐₓ = 2hf − φ = 3.100 − 2.50 = 0.60 eV, so Vₛ = 0.60 V. Retuning the laser would move Vₛ along a line of slope 2h/e = 8.27 × 10⁻¹⁵ V s, twice Einstein's. A faint tail out to 3hf − φ = 2.15 eV would be the weaker three-photon channel.
- At 3.0 × 10¹³ W m⁻²: I = 0.36 nA × (3.0/1.5)² = 1.44 nA, and scaling down from the upper point, 5.6 nA × (3.0/6.0)² = 1.40 nA. The two agree, so I ≈ 1.4 nA.
Answer. Thermal one-photon emission is suppressed by about 10⁻¹⁶; the process is two-photon (n = 1.98 ≈ 2); Vₛ = 0.60 V; I ≈ 1.4 nA at 3.0 × 10¹³ W m⁻².
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons from a surface by light, in which each electron absorbs a single photon and leaves with at most Kₘₐₓ = hf − φ, however intense the light.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics III completion tasks.