
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
The Darwin term from the double commutator [O, [O, qΦ]]
Quantum Mechanics II wrote a δ-function into hydrogen's Hamiltonian because the 2S level needed one and Darwin's name came with it. This topic earns that term: one Pauli identity splits the double commutator, Gauss's law turns the Laplacian into a contact term, and the j-only fine structure then stands on derived operators alone.
UAQM-06.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
The spin-free half of a double commutator acts only where the electron sits on its source.
The key idea
The Darwin term is the spin-independent part of the Foldy-Wouthuysen correction −[O, [O, V]]/(8m²c⁴), equal to (ħ²/(8m²c²))∇²V; by Gauss's law it acts only where the electron overlaps the charges that produce its potential.
Example. For hydrogen's point proton ∇²V = (e²/ε₀)δ³(r), so only s states feel it: 1S rises by α⁴mc²/2 = 0.7245 meV (175.2 GHz) and 2S by 90.57 μeV (21.90 GHz), while every p level is untouched.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Topic 6.06 left one even operator unopened: −[O, [O, V]]/(8m²c⁴), the second-order trace that the first Foldy-Wouthuysen rotation leaves on the potential energy V = qΦ. Opening it takes one identity. The Dirac matrices obey αᵢαⱼ = δᵢⱼ + iεᵢⱼₖΣₖ; the antisymmetric half gives topic 6.07's spin-orbit operator, and the symmetric half, which carries no spin at all, reduces to (ħ²/(8m²c²))∇²V. That piece exists only because momentum and the field gradient fail to commute, so it is quantum through and through, and Gauss's law turns its ∇²V into the density of the charges that make the field: the Darwin term is felt only where the electron sits on its own sources. In hydrogen that is the proton alone, so the term is the contact operator (πħ²/(2m²c²))(e²/(4πε₀))δ³(r) that Quantum Mechanics II quoted, it lifts s states by α⁴mc²/(2n³), and with it the kinetic and spin-orbit corrections fold into energies that depend on n and j alone, every operator now derived. The model is an expansion in ħ/(mcL), L being the length over which the field changes, and a point nucleus has no such length. This order survives because ⟨δ³(r)⟩ is finite in an s state; the next order's operators are too singular, and the α⁶ energies need Unit 7's exact solution. Why the scale is ħ/mc, a position smeared over the reduced Compton wavelength, is Unit 8's picture.
1Where the double commutator comes from, and its size
Units are SI throughout, with Unit 5's metric signature (+, −, −, −) wherever four-vectors appear. Topic 6.06 split the Dirac Hamiltonian into βmc², an even potential energy V = qΦ and the odd O = cα⋅π, and removed O with the rotation e(iS), S = −iβO/(2mc²). Write T = iS = βO/(2mc²). The series eT H e(−T) = H + [T, H] + ½[T, [T, H]] + … acting on V gives at second order ½[T, [T, V]] = −(1/(8m²c⁴))[O, [O, V]], because β anticommutes with O and with the odd [O, V], and β² = 1; that line is quoted from 6.06. Count its size before computing it. O carries one power of cp, and each commutator with V trades a p for −iħ∇ acting on V, so the term is of order (ħ/mc)²∇²V, or V(ħ/(mcL))² for a potential that changes over a length L. In hydrogen L ≈ a₀ and ħ/(mca₀) = α = 7.30 × 10⁻³: the term is α² of the Coulomb energy, the same order as the kinetic correction −p⁴/(8m³c²).
2Opening [O, [O, V]] with the Pauli identity
Take static fields first. V commutes with A, so [O, V] = cα⋅[p, V] = −iħcα⋅∇V, and the second commutator is −iħc²[α⋅π, α⋅∇V] = −iħc² αᵢαⱼ(πᵢ∂ⱼV − ∂ᵢV πⱼ). The Dirac α's obey αᵢαⱼ = δᵢⱼ + iεᵢⱼₖΣₖ, with Σ the 4 × 4 spin matrix, and that identity splits the bracket in two. The symmetric part is [πᵢ, ∂ᵢV] = [pᵢ, ∂ᵢV] = −iħ∇²V, from which A has dropped out. The antisymmetric part is iΣ⋅(π × ∇V − ∇V × π). So [O, [O, V]] = −ħ²c²∇²V + ħc²Σ⋅(π × ∇V − ∇V × π), and multiplying by −1/(8m²c⁴) gives HD = (ħ²/(8m²c²))∇²V, derived, beside the spin term topic 6.07 reduced to S⋅L. The Darwin term is a commutator: it survives only because p and ∇V do not commute, which is why it carries ħ² and has no classical counterpart. A spinless Klein-Gordon particle, whose odd operator is quadratic in p rather than linear, gets no such term at this order (quoted), so the term belongs to the Dirac structure even though it contains no spin.
3Fields that change in time: the term is really ∇⋅E
If the fields depend on time, so does S, and topic 6.06 added −(iħ/(8m²c⁴))[O, Ȯ] beside the double commutator. With Ȯ = −qcα⋅∂A/∂t the two combine, because [O, V] + iħȮ = −iħcqα⋅(∇Φ + ∂A/∂t) = iħcqα⋅E. The whole second-order term is then −(1/(8m²c⁴))[O, iħcqα⋅E], and the same Pauli split gives HD = −(qħ²/(8m²c²))∇⋅E, derived, beside the spin-orbit term in its E × π form. Only the field appears, so the result is gauge invariant: a gauge that puts everything into A recovers the Darwin term from [O, Ȯ] alone. Gauss's law, ∇⋅E = ρ/ε₀, then says what the term measures: HD = −(qħ²/(8m²c²ε₀))ρ(r), the density of source charge at the particle's own position. Three checks follow. As c → ∞ the term vanishes as 1/c², leaving Schrödinger's equation. A free particle, or one in a radiation field in empty space, has ρ = 0 and no Darwin term at all. For an electron, q = −e, near positive charge ρ is positive and so is HD: the term pushes energies up wherever the electron overlaps the nucleus.
4A point nucleus: from ∇²V to the contact term
For a hydrogen-like ion V = −Ze²/(4πε₀r), and ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r) gives ∇²V = (Ze²/ε₀)δ³(r). So HD = (πħ²/(2m²c²))(Ze²/(4πε₀))δ³(r), derived: exactly the operator Quantum Mechanics II quoted. Dimensions: (ħ/mc)² = 1.491 × 10⁻²⁵ m² is an area, Ze²/(4πε₀) is in J m and δ³(r) in m⁻³, leaving joules. Its expectation value is the coefficient times |ψₙₗₘ(0)|², and Quantum Mechanics II's hydrogenic values, reused, give |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² = Z³/(πa₀³n³) and zero for l ≥ 1, since ψ grows as rˡ. With a₀ = ħ/(mcα) and e²/(4πε₀) = αħc, ΔED = Z⁴α⁴mc²/(2n³) for s states only, derived. In hydrogen 1S rises 0.7245 meV (175.2 GHz) and 2S 90.57 μeV (21.90 GHz); as a fraction of the binding energy the shift is Z²α²/n, 5.3 × 10⁻⁵ for 1S. A real proton spreads its charge over about 1 fm, but the shift integrates |ψ|² against the source density, and across R/a₀ ≈ 2 × 10⁻⁵ the 1s density is flat: the term sees the enclosed charge, not its shape.
5Assembling Eₙⱼ with every operator derived
Three operators of order (v/c)² now stand on derived ground: the kinetic correction −p⁴/(8m³c²) from O⁴ (topic 6.06), spin-orbit with the Thomas half built in (6.07), and the Darwin term. Quantum Mechanics II's expectation values, reused as first-order perturbation theory, give, in units of Eₙ²/(2mc²) with Eₙ = −Z²α²mc²/(2n²): kinetic −(4n/(l + ½) − 3); spin-orbit, for l ≥ 1, 2n[j(j + 1) − l(l + 1) − ¾]/(l(l + ½)(l + 1)); Darwin, for l = 0, +4n. For an s state, j = ½, the sum is −(8n − 3) + 4n = 3 − 4n, which is 3 − 4n/(j + ½). For l ≥ 1 kinetic and spin-orbit already combine to that form for both j = l ± ½. So Eₙⱼ − Eₙ = (Eₙ²/(2mc²))(3 − 4n/(j + ½)) for every state, derived. Hydrogen's n = 2 makes it concrete, with u = α⁴mc²/128 = 11.32 μeV: 2S₁/₂ is −13u + 8u = −5u, 2P₁/₂ is −(7/3)u − (8/3)u = −5u, and 2P₃/₂ is −(7/3)u + (4/3)u = −u. The Darwin term is precisely what lifts 2S₁/₂ onto 2P₁/₂.
6Measured checks, and where the expansion stops
The interval 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = 4u = α⁴mc²/32 = 10.95 GHz stands against a measured 10.969 GHz; the 0.18% remainder is the anomalous moment, +0.23% (topic 6.04), and nuclear recoil, −0.05%, while order α⁶ adds under 0.01%. The Darwin term's own test is the 2S level. Without it 2S₁/₂ would sit 8u = 21.90 GHz below 2P₁/₂; measured, it sits 1.0578 GHz above, the Lamb shift, quoted here and owed to the quantised field of Unit 13. So the measured 2S position confirms the derived contact term to 4.8% of its size, and the remainder is radiative. The expansion behind it runs in ħ/(mcL), and near a point nucleus the Coulomb field has no smallest L. At this order that costs nothing, because ⟨δ³(r)⟩ = |ψ(0)|² is finite, but the next order brings more derivatives of the singular potential, whose s-state expectation values diverge, so the α⁶ energies come from Unit 7's exact solution rather than from more terms. The picture of a position jittering over ħ/mc, which reproduces the coefficient, is Unit 8's.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Where the term is born
½[T, [T, V]] = −(1/(8m²c⁴)) [O, [O, V]], with T = βO/(2mc²)
The second-order term of the first Foldy-Wouthuysen rotation acting on V. It holds both the spin-orbit and the Darwin operators, which the Pauli identity separates.
O = cα⋅π the odd operator and V = qΦ the potential energy, both in J; m in kg, c in m s⁻¹. Quoted from topic 6.06.The Darwin operator
HD = −(1/(8m²c²)) Σᵢ [pᵢ, [pᵢ, V]] = (ħ²/(8m²c²)) ∇²V
The δᵢⱼ half of αᵢαⱼ = δᵢⱼ + iεᵢⱼₖΣₖ inside the double commutator; the εᵢⱼₖ half is topic 6.07's spin-orbit term. A commutator, so it carries ħ² and has no classical analogue.
ħ in J s, ∇²V in J m⁻²; (ħ/mc)² = 1.491 × 10⁻²⁵ m² for the electron. Spin-independent. Derived here.Gauss's-law form
HD = −(qħ²/(8m²c²ε₀)) ρ(r)
Zero wherever the particle's position holds no source charge, so zero for a free particle or in a radiation field. For an electron, q = −e near positive charge makes it repulsive.
q the charge (C), ρ the source-charge density (C m⁻³), ε₀ = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹. Derived here, for time-dependent fields too.Point nucleus: the contact term
HD = (πħ²/(2m²c²)) (Ze²/(4πε₀)) δ³(r)
From ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r). Hydrogen's coefficient is 5.404 × 10⁻⁵³ J m³; times |ψ₁₀₀(0)|² = 2.148 × 10³⁰ m⁻³ it gives 1.161 × 10⁻²² J.
δ³(r) in m⁻³; Ze²/(4πε₀) = Zαħc = 2.307 × 10⁻²⁸ Z J m. The operator Quantum Mechanics II quoted, here derived.Darwin shift of a hydrogen-like level
ΔED = Z⁴α⁴mc²/(2n³) for l = 0, and ΔED = 0 for l ≥ 1
Nonzero only where ψ reaches the nucleus, so for l = 0 alone, and it scales as Z⁴/n³ because |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² does. Hydrogen's 2S rises 21.90 GHz; He⁺ 1S rises 16 times hydrogen's 1S, 2.803 THz.
Uses Quantum Mechanics II's |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² = Z³/(πa₀³n³); α⁴mc² = 1.449 × 10⁻³ eV, or 350.4 GHz. Derived here.Fine structure, every operator derived
Eₙⱼ − Eₙ = (Eₙ²/(2mc²)) (3 − 4n/(j + ½))
Depends on n and j only, so 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide at −5α⁴mc²/128. Then 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = α⁴mc²/32 = 10.95 GHz, against 10.969 GHz measured.
Eₙ = −Z²α²mc²/(2n²), the Bohr energy; kinetic, spin-orbit (l ≥ 1) and Darwin (l = 0) expectation values summed. Derived here.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag w to 0 to switch the Darwin term off: nS₁/₂ drops 0.5 U below nP₁/₂, 21.90 GHz at n = 2. Return to w = 1, the coefficient the double commutator fixes, and S lands on P₁/₂ at every n; no other w does. Step n up to watch both stay locked.
Live results
- DARWIN LIFT OF nS, H
- 21.90 GHz
- nS₁/₂ − nP₁/₂, H
- 0.00 GHz
- nP₃/₂ − nP₁/₂, H
- 10.949 GHz
- nS₁/₂ SHIFT FROM Eₙ, H
- -13.69 GHz
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Darwin coefficient w, × ħ²/(8m²c²): 1.00; Principal quantum number n: 2
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
Because the final energies depend on j alone, it is tempting to say that s states are shifted by spin-orbit coupling, or that the Darwin term is merely spin-orbit's l = 0 case. The formula invites it: for j = l + ½ the spin-orbit shift is (Eₙ²/mc²) n/((l + ½)(l + 1)), which tends to 2n Eₙ²/mc², exactly the Darwin shift, as l → 0. Both readings are wrong. S⋅L annihilates every l = 0 state, so an s state's spin-orbit energy is exactly zero; the formula's l → 0 value multiplies ⟨S⋅L⟩ = 0 by a divergent ⟨1/r³⟩ and means nothing. The s-state shift comes from a different operator, the spin-free δᵢⱼ half of the double commutator, felt only at the nucleus. The l → 0 agreement is a property of the Coulomb potential and fails elsewhere: inside a uniformly charged sphere ∇²V is constant, so the Darwin term shifts every level equally while spin-orbit still splits p levels by j.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
In SI units, find the strength of hydrogen's Darwin contact operator, check its dimensions, and use it to obtain the 1s level's Darwin shift in joules, meV and GHz. Compare the shift with the 13.606 eV binding energy, then scale it to the 1s level of He⁺.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- For the electron V = −e²/(4πε₀r), and ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r) gives ∇²V = (e²/ε₀)δ³(r). So HD = Cδ³(r) with C = ħ²e²/(8m²c²ε₀) = (ħ/mc)²(e²/ε₀)/8.
- Numbers: (ħ/mc)² = (3.8616 × 10⁻¹³ m)² = 1.4912 × 10⁻²⁵ m² and e²/ε₀ = 2.8992 × 10⁻²⁷ J m, so C = 5.404 × 10⁻⁵³ J m³. Dimensions: m² × J m = J m³, and δ³(r) in m⁻³ leaves joules.
- Quantum Mechanics II's 1s density at the origin is |ψ₁₀₀(0)|² = 1/(πa₀³) = 2.1481 × 10³⁰ m⁻³, so ⟨HD⟩ = 5.404 × 10⁻⁵³ × 2.1481 × 10³⁰ = 1.1608 × 10⁻²² J = 0.7245 meV, or 175.2 GHz on dividing by h.
- As a fraction of the binding energy, 0.7245 meV/13.606 eV = 5.325 × 10⁻⁵, which is α², the Z²α²/n of the general result at Z = n = 1.
- For He⁺ the shift scales as Z⁴ = 16: 11.59 meV, or 2.803 THz. A 2p electron gets nothing in either ion, because its wavefunction vanishes at the nucleus.
Answer. C = 5.404 × 10⁻⁵³ J m³; hydrogen's 1s rises 1.161 × 10⁻²² J = 0.7245 meV (175.2 GHz), a fraction α² = 5.33 × 10⁻⁵ of its binding energy; He⁺ 1s rises 11.59 meV; p levels are not shifted.
MediumExample 2
Build hydrogen's n = 2 fine structure term by term from the three derived operators, using Quantum Mechanics II's expectation values. Show which levels coincide, compute the 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ interval in GHz, and use the measured 1.0578 GHz by which 2S₁/₂ lies above 2P₁/₂ to say how well the Darwin term is tested.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Work in u = E₂²/(2mc²) = α⁴mc²/128 = 11.32 μeV, which is 2.737 GHz.
- Kinetic term, −(4n/(l + ½) − 3)u: for 2S, −(16 − 3)u = −13u; for 2P, −(16/3 − 3)u = −(7/3)u.
- Spin-orbit, l = 1 only, 2n[j(j + 1) − l(l + 1) − ¾]u/(l(l + ½)(l + 1)) = (4/3)[j(j + 1) − 2.75]u: −(8/3)u for j = ½ and +(4/3)u for j = 3/2. Darwin, l = 0 only, 4n × u = +8u.
- Totals: 2S₁/₂ = −13u + 8u = −5u; 2P₁/₂ = −(7/3)u − (8/3)u = −5u; 2P₃/₂ = −(7/3)u + (4/3)u = −u. So 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide at −56.60 μeV (−13.69 GHz) and 2P₃/₂ sits at −11.32 μeV.
- 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = 4u = 45.28 μeV = 10.95 GHz, against 10.969 GHz measured; the 0.18% gap is the anomalous moment and recoil.
- Without the Darwin term 2S₁/₂ would lie 8u = 21.90 GHz below 2P₁/₂. Measured, it lies 1.0578 GHz above, which is 4.8% of the Darwin shift: the contact term is confirmed to that level, and the remainder is the radiative Lamb shift.
Answer. 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide at −5α⁴mc²/128 = −56.60 μeV; 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = 10.95 GHz against 10.969 GHz measured; the 21.90 GHz Darwin lift is confirmed to 4.8% by the measured 1.0578 GHz Lamb shift.
HardExample 3
Hydrogen's 2S hyperfine interval is measured as 177.5568 MHz. It comes from Quantum Mechanics II's Fermi contact operator, which samples the same |ψ(0)|² as the Darwin term. Without using any hydrogenic wavefunction, predict the 2S Darwin shift from it, take gₑ = 2.002319, gₚ = 5.585695 and mₚ/m = 1836.153, and compare with α⁴mc²/16.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Both operators are contact terms. HD = (ħ²e²/(8m²c²ε₀))δ³(r), and the Fermi operator (quoted) is (2μ₀/3)(gₑ gₚ μB μN/4)σₑ⋅σₚ δ³(r). In an s state ⟨δ³(r)⟩ = |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² for both, and σₑ⋅σₚ is +1 for F = 1 and −3 for F = 0, so ΔEHF = (2μ₀/3)gₑ gₚ μB μN|ψₙ₀₀(0)|².
- Divide: ΔED/ΔEHF = [ħ²e²/(8m²c²ε₀)]/[(2μ₀/3)gₑ gₚ μB μN]. With μB = eħ/(2m), μN = eħ/(2mₚ) and μ₀ε₀ = 1/c², every constant but the masses and g-factors cancels: ΔED/ΔEHF = 3mₚ/(4m gₑ gₚ).
- Check: the ratio is dimensionless and independent of n, since both shifts scale as |ψₙ₀₀(0)|². Numerically 3 × 1836.153/(4 × 2.002319 × 5.585695) = 5508.46/44.737 = 123.13.
- Prediction: ΔED(2S) = 123.13 × 177.5568 MHz = 21.862 GHz, using a measured contact density and no wavefunction.
- Compare: α⁴mc²/(16h) = 21.899 GHz assumes an infinitely heavy proton. The reduced mass scales |ψ(0)|² by (1 + m/mₚ)⁻³ = 0.99837, giving 21.863 GHz, which matches to 2 × 10⁻⁵, inside the 10⁻⁴-level QED and proton-structure corrections to the hyperfine interval (quoted).
- What this tests: the hyperfine interval measures the |ψ(0)|² that Quantum Mechanics II supplied, not the Darwin coefficient; the coefficient is tested by the 2S−2P₁/₂ near-degeneracy.
Answer. ΔED/ΔEHF = 3mₚ/(4m gₑ gₚ) = 123.13, so ΔED(2S) = 21.86 GHz (90.42 μeV), agreeing with (α⁴mc²/16)(1 + m/mₚ)⁻³ = 21.863 GHz to 2 parts in 10⁵.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Darwin term is the spin-independent part of the Foldy-Wouthuysen correction −[O, [O, V]]/(8m²c⁴), equal to (ħ²/(8m²c²))∇²V; by Gauss's law it acts only where the electron overlaps the charges that produce its potential.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.