Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Spin-orbit coupling with the Thomas factor built in

Quantum Mechanics II got the spin-orbit energy right by taking a rest-frame answer and cutting it in half on Thomas's authority. Here the Dirac equation hands you the operator with its coefficient already correct, and tells you which part of it is magnetism and which part is the geometry of an accelerating frame.

UAQM-06.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Spin-orbit coupling with the Thomas factor built inLeft, in units of (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L: the magnetic part g(1 − f) = 2.00, the Thomas part −1, and their sum κ = 1.000. Right: the hydrogen 2P levels that κ predicts, 2P₃/₂ above 2P₁/₂ when κ is positive, a doublet of 10.94 GHz beside the measured 10.969 GHz drawn dashed.+12.00−11.00magnetic g(1 − f) + Thomas −1 = κ2P₃/₂2P₁/₂2P levels, dashed = measured2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = 10.94 GHz
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

The half Quantum Mechanics II borrowed from Thomas comes out of the Dirac equation.

The key idea

Spin-orbit coupling is the order-(v/c)² energy (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L that a Dirac particle acquires in a static central electrostatic potential, with the Thomas half already part of the coefficient rather than applied to it.

Example. In hydrogen's 2p state the operator lifts 2P₃/₂ by 3.65 GHz and lowers 2P₁/₂ by 7.30 GHz, a doublet of 10.95 GHz, or 4.53 × 10⁻⁵ eV; the measured interval is 10.969 GHz.

The complete physical model and assumptions

The argument of this topic is that the spin-orbit operator is a consequence, not an assumption. Topic 6.06's Foldy-Wouthuysen reduction left one spin term at order (v/c)², written with the electric field; for a static central potential it becomes (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L with nothing chosen, and for hydrogen it is exactly the operator Quantum Mechanics II reached only by computing the rest-frame magnetic energy and halving it on Thomas's authority. Give the particle an anomalous moment and the same reduction returns the coefficient g − 1: a magnetic part proportional to g, which is the rest-frame calculation, and a g-independent −1, which therefore cannot be magnetic and is the precession of an accelerated frame. Experiment agrees: hydrogen's 2P doublet, measured at 10 969.0 MHz, is 10 943 MHz times g − 1 to 0.003%, while halving would leave it 13 MHz short. The model stops in three places. It assumes the binding is the time component of a four-vector, and a Lorentz-scalar potential, entering as a position-dependent mass, reverses the sign. It is leading order in (Zα)², so heavy ions need Unit 7's exact levels. And it cannot predict a: the anomaly is quoted from radiative corrections.

1From the field form to the central form

SI units throughout; where four-vectors appear the metric is (+, −, −, −). Topic 6.06 left one spin term at order (v/c)², −(qħ/(8m²c²)) σ⋅(E × π − π × E), quoted from there. Specialise in three steps. Static fields: ∇ × E = −∂B/∂t = 0, and since (π × E)ψ = −iħ(∇ × E)ψ − (E × π)ψ, the antisymmetric pair collapses to 2E × π. No magnetic field: π = p. Central potential energy V(r) = qΦ(r): qE = −∇V = −(1/r)(dV/dr) r. Then −(ħ/(4m²c²)) σ⋅(qE × p) = (ħ/(4m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) σ⋅(r × p) = (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, derived, with S = ħσ/2 and L = r × p. (1/r)(dV/dr) depends on r alone and commutes with every component of L, so the operator is Hermitian. Dimensions: J m⁻² × J² s² ÷ (kg² m² s⁻²) = J. Limit: as c → ∞ it vanishes, as a relativistic correction must.

2The Coulomb operator and the doublet it predicts

For hydrogen V = −e²/(4πε₀r), so (1/r)(dV/dr) = e²/(4πε₀r³) and HSO = (e²/(8πε₀))(1/(m²c²r³)) S⋅L, derived. For energies take Quantum Mechanics II's expectation values, quoted: ⟨1/r³⟩ = 1/(a₀³n³l(l + ½)(l + 1)) and ⟨S⋅L⟩ = (ħ²/2)[j(j + 1) − l(l + 1) − ¾]. For 2p, ⟨1/r³⟩ = 1/(24a₀³), and ⟨S⋅L⟩ is +ħ²/2 at j = 3/2 and −ħ² at j = 1/2, so 2P₃/₂ rises by mc²α⁴/96, which is h × 3.65 GHz, and 2P₁/₂ falls by mc²α⁴/48, h × 7.30 GHz; weighted by 2j + 1 the shifts cancel, 4 × 3.65 = 2 × 7.30. The doublet mc²α⁴/32 is h × 10 949 MHz, or h × 10 943 MHz with the reduced mass (quoted), against the measured 10 969.0 MHz. The kinetic correction depends only on n and l, and the Darwin term vanishes for l = 1, so this interval is the spin-orbit term alone: a clean test of its coefficient.

3What Quantum Mechanics II did, and why it needed a half

Quantum Mechanics II took another road. In the electron's instantaneous rest frame the nucleus moves, and its field transforms into B′ = −v × E/c²; with v = p/m and qE = −(1/r)(dV/dr) r, the moment μ = g(q/2m)S has energy −μ⋅B′ = (g/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, derived. At g = 2 that is exactly twice the Dirac operator, and QM-II halved it by quoting Thomas. The half is not cosmetic: unhalved, the operator predicts a 2P doublet of 21.9 GHz, double the measured 10.97 GHz. The Dirac reduction needed no halving because it never left the nucleus's frame; the 1/(2m²c²) came out of topic 6.06's generator and its double commutator. The rest-frame argument is not wrong, only incomplete: the rest frame of an accelerating electron is itself rotating relative to the lab, and the energy of that rotation must be added before the two roads can agree.

4Reading the coefficient as g − 1

Topic 6.04 carried Pauli's term through the same reduction and found the spin-orbit coefficient multiplied by 1 + 2a, derived there: the term's odd electric half, crossed with cα⋅p, adds 2a times topic 6.06's spin term. Since g = 2(1 + a), 1 + 2a is g − 1, and that rewriting is the point. The rest-frame count above gives a magnetic energy g/(2m²c²) for every g, so subtracting it from the Dirac result leaves −1/(2m²c²), a term with no g in it. It cannot be magnetic, because it survives when the moment is switched off. It is kinematic, the precession of the accelerating rest frame, which topic 6.09 derives from non-commuting boosts. Neither piece was inserted: the reduction produced their sum, and the dependence on the moment sorts them. Hydrogen agrees: (g − 1) × 10 943.32 MHz = 1.002 319 × 10 943.32 MHz = 10 968.70 MHz, against the measured 10 969.0 MHz. Limits: at g = 1 magnetism and Thomas cancel and the coupling vanishes; at g = 0 a spinning body with no moment still precesses, with coefficient −1.

5A scalar potential reverses the sign

All of this assumed V = qΦ, the time component of a four-vector. A Lorentz-scalar potential W(r), written W so that S stays the spin, enters as a position-dependent mass: H = cα⋅p + β(mc² + W) + V. Eliminate the small component as in topic 6.01: χ = [2mc² + E′ − V + W]⁻¹ cσ⋅p φ, with E′ = E − mc². Expanded once, the spin-dependent part is −(1/(4m²c²)) σ⋅p U σ⋅p with U = W − V, and σ⋅p U σ⋅p = Up² − iħ∇U⋅p + ħσ⋅(∇U × p) gives HSO = (1/(2m²c²))(1/r) d(V − W)/dr S⋅L, derived. The renormalisation topic 6.05 needed adds only spin-independent terms, so the coefficient stands. The bookkeeping agrees: a scalar field has no rest-frame magnetic field, but it accelerates the particle, so Thomas's −1 acts on V + W while g acts on V alone. Nuclear mean fields, a scalar near −400 MeV and a vector near +350 MeV, quoted, add in V − W, which is why nuclear p₃/₂ lies about 6 MeV below p₁/₂ in ¹⁶O while hydrogen's 2P₃/₂ lies above 2P₁/₂.

6Power counting and where the operator stops

The operator is order (v/c)² relative to the Bohr energies: hydrogen's 2P doublet over its n = 2 binding is (mc²α⁴/32)/(mc²α²/8) = α²/4 = 1.3 × 10⁻⁵. The reduction kept that order and nothing else, so it holds while Zα is small. For hydrogen-like uranium Zα = 0.67, and the leading-order doublet Z⁴mc²α⁴/32 = 3.24 keV falls 29% short of the 4.57 keV that Unit 7's exact Dirac levels give, quoted. For s states L annihilates the wavefunction, so the operator gives zero even though ⟨1/r³⟩ diverges; the s-state energy the n- and j-only formula needs comes from the Darwin term, topic 6.08. And the anomaly is quoted, never derived here: Schwinger's α/(2π) = 0.001 161 and the measured 0.001 159 652 come from the quantised field, which this operator does not contain. At hydrogen's precision the 0.34 MHz left after (g − 1) × 10 943.32 MHz is the size of the terms this order drops, α² × 10 943 MHz = 0.58 MHz.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Spin-orbit operator, static central potential

HSO = (1/(2m²c²)) (1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L

One operator for any central field, bare nucleus or screened core: only the slope of V enters, and (1/r)(dV/dr) commutes with L, so the product is Hermitian.

V(r): potential energy in J; r in m; m in kg; S, L in J s. Derived from topic 6.06's spin term with ∇ × E = 0.

Coulomb form, hydrogen-like ion

HSO = (Ze²/(8πε₀)) (1/(m²c²r³)) S⋅L

Exactly the operator Quantum Mechanics II reached by halving its rest-frame result; here the 2 in 1/(2m²c²) is the reduction's own.

V = −Ze²/(4πε₀r); e in C, ε₀ in F m⁻¹, Z = 1 for hydrogen. Derived, with no factor of ½ inserted anywhere.

Hydrogen's 2P doublet

E(2P₃/₂) − E(2P₁/₂) = μc²α⁴/32 = 4.526 × 10⁻⁵ eV

10 943 MHz against the measured 10 969.0 MHz: the leading-order operator is right to 0.23%, and the anomalous moment is that gap.

μ = 0.999 456 m, the reduced mass (quoted); uses QM-II's ⟨1/r³⟩ = 1/(24a₀³) and ⟨S⋅L⟩ = +ħ²/2 or −ħ².

Moment in the rest-frame field alone

−μ⋅B′ = (g/(2m²c²)) (1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, with B′ = −v × E/c²

At g = 2 this is twice the Dirac operator. Used unhalved it predicts a 21.9 GHz 2P doublet, double the measured one.

μ = g(q/2m)S in J T⁻¹; B′ in T, the field in the particle's instantaneous rest frame; v = p/m. Derived, as QM-II did.

Coefficient with an anomalous moment

HSO = ((g − 1)/(2m²c²)) (1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, g = 2(1 + a)

The part proportional to g is magnetic; the g-independent −1 is kinematic, Thomas precession, which topic 6.09 derives from boosts.

a: anomalous moment, measured 0.001 159 652 for the electron (quoted). The factor 1 + 2a = g − 1 is derived in topic 6.04.

Four-vector against Lorentz-scalar potential

HSO = (1/(2m²c²)) (1/r) d(V − W)/dr S⋅L

A scalar field makes no rest-frame magnetic field, only Thomas precession, so equal slopes give opposite spin-orbit: nuclear mean fields rely on it.

V: four-vector time component, as qΦ; W: Lorentz scalar, entering as β(mc² + W), a position-dependent mass. In J. Derived.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

2.00
0 to 2.5; steps of 0.05.
0.00
0 to 1; steps of 0.05.

Try this. Start at g = 2, f = 0, where the solid levels sit on the measured ones. Drop g to 1 and the doublet closes: magnetism and Thomas cancel. Then raise f and watch 2P₃/₂ cross below 2P₁/₂, the reversed sign a scalar potential gives.

Live results

MAGNETIC PART g(1 − f)
2.00
SPIN-ORBIT κ
1.000
2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂
10.94 GHz
WITHOUT THOMAS
21.89 GHz

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelLeft, in units of (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L: the magnetic part g(1 − f) = 2.00, the Thomas part −1, and their sum κ = 1.000. Right: the hydrogen 2P levels that κ predicts, 2P₃/₂ above 2P₁/₂ when κ is positive, a doublet of 10.94 GHz beside the measured 10.969 GHz drawn dashed.+12.00−11.00magnetic g(1 − f) + Thomas −1 = κ2P₃/₂2P₁/₂2P levels, dashed = measured2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ = 10.94 GHz
Left, in units of (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L: the magnetic part g(1 − f) = 2.00, the Thomas part −1, and their sum κ = 1.000. Right: the hydrogen 2P levels that κ predicts, 2P₃/₂ above 2P₁/₂ when κ is positive, a doublet of 10.94 GHz beside the measured 10.969 GHz drawn dashed.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Spin g-factor g: 2.00; Scalar share of binding f: 0.00

Baseline 2.00; choose 0 to 2.5, in steps of 0.05.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting summary of Quantum Mechanics II is that Thomas precession halves the spin-orbit energy, and students carry it forward as a rule: take the rest-frame magnetic energy and divide by 2, which for a general moment gives a coefficient g/2. That is wrong for every g except 2. Thomas precession is kinematic: the rotation of an accelerated rest frame depends on the acceleration, not on the moment, so it subtracts a fixed (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L whatever g is, and the reduction with Pauli's term returns g − 1. Halving and subtracting agree only at g = 2. Hydrogen tells them apart: with the measured g, g − 1 predicts a 2P doublet of 10 968.7 MHz and g/2 predicts 10 956.0 MHz, against 10 969.0 MHz measured. A body with no moment, g = 0, shows it starkly: halving says no coupling, while its frame still precesses.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

In Thomson's model of hydrogen the electron's potential energy inside a uniform sphere of positive charge e and radius R = a₀ = 52.9 pm is V(r) = −(e²/(8πε₀R))(3 − r²/R²), and Coulomb's outside it. Use the derived operator to find the largest spin-orbit splitting any l = 1 level can have, compare it with hydrogen's measured 2P doublet of 10.969 GHz, and decide whether any l = 1 level reaches it.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Sodium's D lines come from 3p → 3s, and its 3p doublet, measured, is 17.196 cm⁻¹. Treat the valence electron as moving in a central V(r) produced by the nucleus and the ten core electrons, with g = 2. Find ⟨(1/r)(dV/dr)⟩ for the 3p state and compare it with a hydrogen 3p electron's value.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Suppose a fraction f of the proton's attraction were a Lorentz scalar: V = −(1 − f)k/r and W = −fk/r with k = e²/(4πε₀), so V + W = −k/r and the Bohr levels are unchanged. With g = 2.002 319 and the measured 2P₃/₂ − 2P₁/₂ interval of 10 969.045 MHz (quoted), find the spin-orbit coefficient as a function of f, then f.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

An electron's measured g-factor is 2.00232. In a static central electrostatic potential its spin-orbit operator is written HSO = κ (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L. What is κ once Pauli's anomalous-moment term is carried through the Foldy-Wouthuysen reduction?
7

Review & continue

Spin-orbit coupling is the order-(v/c)² energy (1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L that a Dirac particle acquires in a static central electrostatic potential, with the Thomas half already part of the coefficient rather than applied to it.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.