
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Why naive elimination fails at order (v/c)²
Push the elimination of χ one order further and the algebra hands you an operator that is not Hermitian, with a Darwin term twice too large. Read that as a diagnosis, not a slip: the energies are already right, the wavefunction is not normalised, and the cure shows what a proper reduction must do.
UAQM-06.05 · Lesson 5 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
The upper spinor is not the whole electron: at order (v/c)² its norm leaks into χ.
The key idea
Naive elimination solves the Dirac equation's lower row for χ to order (v/c)² and keeps the upper spinor φ as the wavefunction; it fails because φ is not normalised, which surfaces as a non-Hermitian term in φ's Hamiltonian.
Example. In hydrogen's 2s state the naive Laplacian term raises the level by 43.8 GHz and the non-Hermitian term lowers it by 21.9 GHz, leaving the correct 21.9 GHz Darwin shift. Delete the second term and 2S₁/₂ sits 21.9 GHz too high, about 21 times the measured 1.058 GHz Lamb shift.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Topic 6.01 closed the Dirac equation on the upper spinor φ by setting χ ≈ (σ⋅p/2mc)φ, enough for g = 2 but silent at relative order (v/c)², where fine structure lives. Reaching that order means keeping the energy in the small component, χ = (1/2mc)[1 − (E′ − V)/2mc²]σ⋅pφ, then trading E′ − V for p²/2m so that φ obeys an ordinary eigenvalue equation. The trade yields the kinetic correction −p⁴/8m³c² and the spin-orbit operator with its Thomas half in place, but also a Laplacian term with twice the Darwin coefficient and a term (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p that is not Hermitian. Neither is an algebra slip. The levels are right at this order, because in every bound state the gradient term has a real expectation value that cancels the surplus Laplacian. What is wrong is the wavefunction: the Dirac equation conserves ∫(φ†φ + χ†χ) d³r ≈ ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩, so φ loses norm to χ whenever the potential accelerates the electron, and an operator on φ alone can record that only by failing to be Hermitian. Rescaling to Φ = (1 + p²/8m²c²)φ restores a conserved norm, and the similarity transformation it induces cancels the gradient term and halves the Laplacian one without moving a level. The patch stops there: at order (v/c)⁴ the norm operator gains potential- and spin-dependent pieces, with time-dependent fields E′ is not a number, and nothing in the procedure guarantees Hermiticity.
1Keep the energy in the small component
Units are SI; where four-vectors appear the metric is (+, −, −, −). Take A = 0 and a static potential energy V(r), so p = −iħ∇. Quoted from topic 6.01 in one line: in a stationary state with E = mc² + E′ the Dirac rows are (E′ − V)φ = cσ⋅pχ and (2mc² + E′ − V)χ = cσ⋅pφ, both exact. Topic 6.01 set the bracket to 2mc², which captures g = 2 and nothing of relative order (v/c)², where hydrogen's measured 10.97 GHz 2P₃/₂ to 2P₁/₂ interval sits. Expand the inverse one step further: χ = (1/2mc)[1 − (E′ − V)/2mc²]σ⋅pφ, the bracket an operator standing between the two σ⋅p because V(r) does not commute with p. Substituting into the upper row gives, derived, (E′ − V)φ = (p²/2m)φ − (1/4m²c²)σ⋅p(E′ − V)σ⋅pφ. The eigenvalue E′ now sits inside the operator as well: an energy-dependent effective Hamiltonian, Hermitian for each real E′, but not yet an ordinary eigenvalue problem.
2Trade E′ for p²/2m, and Hermiticity goes
To reach an ordinary eigenvalue equation, remove E′ from the correction with the lowest-order relation (E′ − V)φ = (p²/2m)φ. First move E′ − V past σ⋅p: (E′ − V)σ⋅p = σ⋅p(E′ − V) + [σ⋅p, V], with [σ⋅p, V] = −iħσ⋅∇V. Then σ⋅p(E′ − V)σ⋅pφ = (p⁴/2m)φ − iħ(σ⋅p)(σ⋅∇V)φ. The identity (σ⋅a)(σ⋅b) = a⋅b + iσ⋅(a × b) survives only with the order kept, because p differentiates ∇V: (σ⋅p)(σ⋅∇V)φ = [−iħ∇²V + ∇V⋅p − iσ⋅(∇V × p)]φ. Collecting, derived: Hₙ = p²/2m + V − p⁴/8m³c² + (ħ/4m²c²)σ⋅(∇V × p) + (ħ²/4m²c²)∇²V + (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p. The first correction is the next term of √(p²c² + m²c⁴); for central V the second is (1/2m²c²)(1/r)(dV/dr)S⋅L, Thomas half included. The last two are the trouble: (∇V⋅p)† = p⋅∇V = ∇V⋅p − iħ∇²V, so Hₙ − Hₙ† = (iħ/4m²c²)(∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V), nonzero wherever a force acts.
3The levels come out right anyway
A non-Hermitian operator invites the fear of complex energies, so test it. In any bound eigenstate |b⟩ of H₀ = p²/2m + V, ⟨b|[p², H₀]|b⟩ = 0, and [p², H₀] = [p², V] = −ħ²∇²V − 2iħ∇V⋅p, so ⟨b|iħ∇V⋅p|b⟩ = −½ħ²⟨b|∇²V|b⟩: real, derived. First-order perturbation theory, quoted from Quantum Mechanics II, still applies because H₀ is Hermitian, and the two suspect terms give (ħ²/4m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩ − (ħ²/8m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩ = (ħ²/8m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩, one Darwin energy. For hydrogen ∇²V = 4πke²δ³(r), and with Quantum Mechanics II's |ψ₂₀₀(0)|² = 1/8πa₀³ the Laplacian term gives mc²α⁴/8 = 43.8 GHz on 2s and the gradient term −21.9 GHz, a sum of 21.9 GHz; for ℓ ≥ 1 both vanish. So Hₙ reproduces the n- and j-only Eₙⱼ, with 2S₁/₂ level with 2P₁/₂, which experiment separates by only 1057.8 MHz. Diagonalising the one-dimensional Dirac equation in a harmonic well, in a basis that keeps V far below 2mc² (an electrostatic well binds a Dirac electron only quasi-stably), confirms it numerically: agreement to order c⁻⁴, and a miss of one Darwin shift if the gradient term is dropped.
4What the gradient term is bookkeeping for
The Dirac equation conserves ∫ψ†ψ d³r = ∫(φ†φ + χ†χ) d³r. With χ ≈ σ⋅pφ/2mc and (σ⋅p)² = p², the second integral is ⟨φ|p²|φ⟩/4m²c², so the conserved norm written with φ is ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩, derived. Let Hₙ drive time evolution, legitimate for static V because every superposition of its stationary states obeys iħ∂φ/∂t = Hₙφ. Then d⟨φ|φ⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨φ|Hₙ† − Hₙ|φ⟩ = (1/4m²c²)⟨∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V⟩, while Ehrenfest's theorem gives d⟨p²⟩/dt = −⟨∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V⟩, the quantum form of d(p²)/dt = 2p⋅F. Their combination ⟨φ|φ⟩ + ⟨p²⟩/4m²c² is constant: Hₙ conserves the Dirac norm, not ⟨φ|φ⟩. As the potential speeds the electron up, probability passes into χ, and an operator on φ alone can record that only by being non-Hermitian. The rule is general: eliminating part of a Hilbert space leaves an energy-dependent Heff(E′), Hermitian at each E′, whose solutions are orthogonal only with the weight 1 − ∂Heff/∂E′, here 1 + p²/4m²c².
5Rescale φ, and a similarity transformation repairs it
Define Φ = Ωφ with Ω = 1 + p²/8m²c², Hermitian, so that ⟨Φ|Φ⟩ = ⟨φ|Ω²|φ⟩ = ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩ to this order: Φ carries the whole conserved density, so its Hamiltonian must be Hermitian. From Hₙφ = E′φ follows ΩHₙΩ⁻¹Φ = E′Φ, so H = ΩHₙΩ⁻¹ = Hₙ + [p², Hₙ]/8m²c², and at this order only [p², V] = −ħ²∇²V − 2iħ∇V⋅p survives, derived from p = −iħ∇. The commutator cancels (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p exactly and cuts (ħ²/4m²c²)∇²V to (ħ²/8m²c²)∇²V, giving the Hermitian H = p²/2m + V − p⁴/8m³c² + (ħ/4m²c²)σ⋅(∇V × p) + (ħ²/8m²c²)∇²V, derived. Similar operators share eigenvalues, so not one level moves. Checks: ħ²∇²V/m²c² has units (J s)²(J m⁻²)/(kg m s⁻¹)² = J; with V = 0, H = p²/2m − p⁴/8m³c², the expansion of √(p²c² + m²c⁴) − mc²; and for hydrogen the last term is (πħ²ke²/2m²c²)δ³(r), 21.9 GHz on 2s.
6A patch for one order, not a method
The repair worked because the weight was 1 + p²/4m²c², whose square root could be read off. One order higher it is 1 + p²/4m²c² − σ⋅p(E′ − V)σ⋅p/4m³c⁴, containing V and spin: Ω must then be assembled from non-commuting operators, E′ removed again, and Hermiticity checked by hand. With time-dependent fields the procedure fails before it starts, since E′ becomes iħ∂/∂t and there is no number to trade. Even symmetrising, ½(Hₙ + Hₙ†), which happens to return H here because Hₙ − H ≈ −[p²/8m²c², H₀] is purely anti-Hermitian, is an accident of first order. The stakes are lopsided: in hydrogen's 2s state Ω − 1 averages α²/32 = 1.7 × 10⁻⁶, yet it rearranges operator terms at the 22 GHz scale, because a relative change of order (v/c)² in the wavefunction is the same order as fine structure. What is wanted is a change of representation that is unitary by construction, conserving ψ†ψ at every order and valid for time-dependent fields. That is the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation of the next topic, which returns exactly this H.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Small component to next order
χ = (1/2mc)[1 − (E′ − V)/2mc²] σ⋅p φ, E′ = E − mc²
Keeps the relative (v/c)² piece 6.01 dropped, the order of fine structure. The bracket is an operator: V(r) does not commute with σ⋅p.
E′ and the potential energy V(r) in J; p = −iħ∇ in kg m s⁻¹; σ dimensionless. Static V, A = 0. Topic 6.01's exact lower row, expanded once more.Naive Hamiltonian once E′ is removed
Hₙ = p²/2m + V − p⁴/8m³c² + (ħ/4m²c²)σ⋅(∇V × p) + (ħ²/4m²c²)∇²V + (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p
The kinetic and spin-orbit terms are already right. The Laplacian carries twice the Darwin coefficient, and the last term is not Hermitian.
Derived by trading (E′ − V)φ for (p²/2m)φ. Every correction is an energy in J, of order (v/c)² times p²/2m.Its anti-Hermitian part
Hₙ − Hₙ† = (iħ/4m²c²)(∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V)
It makes d⟨φ|φ⟩/dt = (1/4m²c²)⟨∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V⟩ = −(1/4m²c²) d⟨p²⟩/dt: φ loses norm as the electron speeds up.
From (∇V⋅p)† = p⋅∇V = ∇V⋅p − iħ∇²V; ∇V is minus the force, in J m⁻¹. It vanishes for a free particle.The conserved norm, written with φ
∫(φ†φ + χ†χ) d³r = ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩
φ is normalised with weight 1 + p²/4m²c², not 1. That, not the algebra, is why no operator on φ alone can be Hermitian here.
To order (v/c)², from χ ≈ σ⋅pφ/2mc and (σ⋅p)² = p². The weight is 1 − ∂Heff/∂E′ of the energy-dependent Heff.Rescaled two-component spinor
Φ = Ωφ, Ω = 1 + p²/8m²c²
Φ carries the whole conserved density. In hydrogen's 2s state ⟨Ω⟩ − 1 is only α²/32 = 1.7 × 10⁻⁶, yet Ω reshapes terms at the 22 GHz scale.
Ω is dimensionless and Hermitian; ⟨Φ|Φ⟩ = ⟨φ|Ω²|φ⟩ = ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩ to this order.Hermitian Hamiltonian for Φ
H = p²/2m + V − p⁴/8m³c² + (ħ/4m²c²)σ⋅(∇V × p) + (ħ²/8m²c²)∇²V
The commutator cancels the gradient term exactly and halves the Laplacian to the Darwin value. A similarity transformation, so no level moves.
H = ΩHₙΩ⁻¹ = Hₙ + [p², V]/8m²c², with [p², V] = −ħ²∇²V − 2iħ∇V⋅p. Energies in J.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. At κ = 0 bare φ loses T/2mc² of the norm and the i∇V⋅p bar dips below zero. At κ = 1 the loss is gone to first order (the 1.9% excess at 100 keV is order (v/c)⁴), that bar vanishes, and the sum never moves. Set keep to 0 at κ = 0: the sum doubles.
Live results
- NORM OF Φ AT T
- 0.9475
- LAPLACIAN TERM, 2s
- 43.8 GHz
- i∇V⋅p TERM, 2s
- -21.9 GHz
- 2s SHIFT, SUM
- 21.9 GHz
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Rescaling strength κ in Ω: 0.00; Kinetic energy gained T: 60 keV; Keep the i∇V⋅p term (1 yes, 0 no): 1
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The term (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p looks like an algebra slip, or a sign that hydrogen's levels have turned complex, and the tempting fix is to delete it and keep the rest. Both readings are wrong. Its expectation value in every bound eigenstate of H₀ is real, −(ħ²/8m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩, because ⟨b|[p², H₀]|b⟩ = 0, and it cancels half of the naive (ħ²/4m²c²)∇²V. Delete it and the Darwin term doubles: hydrogen's 2S₁/₂ rises 21.9 GHz above 2P₁/₂, about 21 times the measured 1.058 GHz Lamb shift that actually separates them. Nor are the eigenvalues complex, since Hₙ is similar to a Hermitian operator. What the term records is that ⟨φ|φ⟩ is not conserved, correctly, because φ is not the whole electron. The repair changes the wavefunction, Φ = (1 + p²/8m²c²)φ, not the list of terms.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A model electron is bound in an isotropic harmonic potential V = ½mω²r² with ħω = 10.0 eV. In every bound eigenstate, find the energy contributed by the naive Laplacian term (ħ²/4m²c²)∇²V and by the non-Hermitian term (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p, and show that their sum is the Darwin shift.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- ∇V = mω²r, so ∇²V = 3mω², the same everywhere. The Laplacian term is (ħ²/4m²c²)(3mω²) = 3(ħω)²/4mc² = 3 × (10.0 eV)²/(4 × 5.110 × 10⁵ eV) = 1.47 × 10⁻⁴ eV in every state.
- The other term is (iħmω²/4m²c²) r⋅p. In a bound stationary state d⟨r²⟩/dt = ⟨r⋅p + p⋅r⟩/m = 0, and summing [xᵢ, pᵢ] = iħ over three axes gives r⋅p − p⋅r = 3iħ, so ⟨r⋅p⟩ = 3iħ/2 in every eigenstate.
- Its expectation value is therefore (iħmω²/4m²c²)(3iħ/2) = −3(ħω)²/8mc² = −7.34 × 10⁻⁵ eV: real, and exactly minus half the Laplacian term.
- Sum: +7.34 × 10⁻⁵ eV = (ħ²/8m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩, the Darwin shift, identical for every level. Checks: (ħω)²/mc² is an energy; it vanishes as c → ∞; and it is 4.9 × 10⁻⁶ of the 15.0 eV ground energy, below ⟨p²⟩/m²c² = 2.9 × 10⁻⁵, as an order-(v/c)² correction should be.
Answer. Laplacian term +1.47 × 10⁻⁴ eV, non-Hermitian term −7.34 × 10⁻⁵ eV, sum +7.34 × 10⁻⁵ eV (73.4 μeV) in every level: one Darwin shift, 3(ħω)²/8mc².
MediumExample 2
For hydrogen with an infinitely heavy proton, V = −ke²/r, evaluate the naive non-Hermitian term (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p in any S state ψ(r) by a radial integral, compare it with the naive Laplacian term, and give both for 2s in GHz, taking |ψ₂₀₀(0)|² = 1/8πa₀³ from Quantum Mechanics II.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- ∇V = (ke²/r²)r̂ and p = −iħ∇, so on a function of r alone (iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p = (ħ²ke²/4m²c²)(1/r²)∂/∂r.
- For a real S state, ⟨(1/r²)∂/∂r⟩ = ∫4πr²(1/r²)ψψ′ dr = 4π∫ψψ′ dr = 2π[ψ²] from 0 to ∞ = −2π|ψ(0)|². The term's expectation value is −(πħ²ke²/2m²c²)|ψ(0)|²: real.
- Laplacian term: ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r) gives ∇²V = 4πke²δ³(r), so (ħ²/4m²c²)⟨∇²V⟩ = (πħ²ke²/m²c²)|ψ(0)|², twice as large and opposite in sign. Their sum, (πħ²ke²/2m²c²)|ψ(0)|², is the Darwin energy.
- For 2s, ke² = αħc and a₀ = ħ/αmc turn the Darwin energy into mc²α⁴/16. With mc²α⁴/h = 2R∞cα² = 350.4 GHz: Laplacian term +43.8 GHz, gradient term −21.9 GHz, sum +21.9 GHz.
- Checks: (J s)²(J m)/(kg m s⁻¹)² × m⁻³ = J; for ℓ ≥ 1 the radial function vanishes at r = 0, so both terms are zero and only S levels move; and the measured 1057.8 MHz 2S₁/₂ to 2P₁/₂ splitting is 21 times smaller than the error that dropping the gradient term would cause.
Answer. ⟨(iħ/4m²c²)∇V⋅p⟩ = −(πħ²ke²/2m²c²)|ψ(0)|², real: −21.9 GHz in 2s against +43.8 GHz from the Laplacian term, leaving the 21.9 GHz Darwin shift.
HardExample 3
An electron wavepacket starts essentially at rest, with φ normalised to 1 and χ negligible, and a static potential accelerates it through 20.0 kV into a field-free region. Evolving φ with the naive Hₙ, (a) show that ⟨φ|φ⟩ + ⟨p²⟩/4m²c² is conserved, (b) find ⟨φ|φ⟩ at 20.0 keV, (c) compare with the exact Dirac share of the density in the upper components, and (d) say what the rescaled Φ does. Use 2mc² = 1022.0 keV.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Only the anti-Hermitian part changes a norm: d⟨φ|φ⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨φ|Hₙ† − Hₙ|φ⟩ = (1/4m²c²)⟨∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V⟩.
- Ehrenfest with H₀: d⟨p²⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨[V, p²]⟩ = −⟨∇V⋅p + p⋅∇V⟩, using [p², V] = −ħ²∇²V − 2iħ∇V⋅p. Adding, d/dt[⟨φ|φ⟩ + ⟨p²⟩/4m²c²] = 0: Hₙ conserves the Dirac norm.
- Integrate as ⟨p²⟩ grows from about 0 to 2mT: ⟨φ|φ⟩ = 1 − T/2mc² = 1 − 20.0/1022.0 = 0.98043, so 1.96% of the probability has passed into χ.
- Exact, from 6.01's quoted free ratio |χ|/|φ| = cp/(E + mc²): |χ|²/|φ|² = (E − mc²)/(E + mc²) = T/(T + 2mc²), so the upper share is (T + 2mc²)/(2T + 2mc²) = 1042.0/1062.0 = 0.98117. The naive value is low by 7.4 × 10⁻⁴, close to 2(T/2mc²)² = 7.7 × 10⁻⁴: an order-(v/c)⁴ error, beyond the order kept.
- Φ = (1 + p²/8m²c²)φ has ⟨Φ|Φ⟩ = ⟨φ|1 + p²/4m²c²|φ⟩, which step 2 holds at 1 throughout, so its Hamiltonian ΩHₙΩ⁻¹ is Hermitian. Checks: T/2mc² is dimensionless and vanishes as c → ∞, and at v = 0.272c, (v/c)²/4 = 0.018 is close to the 1.96% leak.
Answer. ⟨φ|φ⟩ falls to 0.9804, a 1.96% leak into χ, against the exact 0.9812; Φ keeps norm 1, so its Hamiltonian is Hermitian. The 7 × 10⁻⁴ residual is order (v/c)⁴.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Naive elimination solves the Dirac equation's lower row for χ to order (v/c)² and keeps the upper spinor φ as the wavefunction; it fails because φ is not normalised, which surfaces as a non-Hermitian term in φ's Hamiltonian.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.