
Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Reduced dynamics and the Kraus representation
Every open system in this unit starts here. Let a system and its environment evolve under one unitary, discard the environment, and ask what rule is left for the system alone. The answer is a sum of Kraus operators: not unique, able to destroy purity, obeying no Schrödinger equation, and bound to stay positive on half an entangled pair.
UAQM-14.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Optional unit · institution-dependent. Units 14 and 15 are the course’s optional extension into open systems and quantum gases. Unit 14 builds on radiation and decay; Unit 15 builds on second quantisation. Keep the fifteen-unit numbering and follow your institution’s required syllabus. Optional work is not a required completion gate.
Build the model
Trace out the environment and one unitary becomes a sum of Kraus operators.
The key idea
The Kraus representation writes the evolution of a system that shares a unitary with an environment as ρ → Σₖ Kₖ ρ Kₖ†, a sum of operators acting on the system alone whose only constraint is Σₖ Kₖ†Kₖ = 1.
Example. An excited atom trading its energy with an empty cavity mode for gt = π/4 has K₀ = |g⟩⟨g| + 0.707|e⟩⟨e| and K₁ = −0.707i|g⟩⟨e|. Its excited population falls to 0.50 and its purity to 0.50, the least a qubit can have.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A system never evolves alone, but a system and its environment together do. Start them uncorrelated, as ρS ⊗ ρE, let one unitary act, and the partial trace leaves the system a linear map Λ(ρ) = Σ KρK†, whose Kraus operators are partial matrix elements of U between environment states and whose completeness, Σ K†K = 1, is unitarity seen from one side. The environment survives only in which operators appear. Three consequences follow. The reduced state can lose purity, which no equation iħ dρ/dt = [H, ρ] permits, and in a small environment the excitation the system gave away comes back, so the maps for successive times do not compose. The Kraus set is not unique: tracing E in a different basis mixes the operators by a unitary and leaves the map unchanged. And the map is completely positive, a stronger demand than sending states to states, as the transpose shows: applied to half of a singlet, it leaves the pair with a probability of −½. Stinespring's theorem, quoted, closes the circle: every such map has a unitary dilation. The model stops where its premise does. If S and E are correlated before t = 0 there may be no map from ρS(0) to ρS(t) at all, and turning the exact map into a differential equation needs the Born, Markov and secular approximations, which this topic has not yet made.
1From a joint unitary to Kraus operators
Units are SI with ħ explicit; nothing here is relativistic, so no metric signature enters (the course uses (+, −, −, −) where four-vectors appear). Start S and E uncorrelated, ρS ⊗ ρE, with ρE = Σⱼ pⱼ|eⱼ⟩⟨eⱼ| in its eigenbasis, and let one unitary U act on both. Quantum Mechanics II's partial trace, TrE X = Σₖ ⟨eₖ|X|eₖ⟩, gives ρS(t) = Σⱼₖ pⱼ ⟨eₖ|U|eⱼ⟩ ρS ⟨eⱼ|U†|eₖ⟩. Each ⟨eₖ|U|eⱼ⟩ is a partial matrix element, an operator on S alone, so ρS(t) = Σⱼₖ Kⱼₖ ρS Kⱼₖ† with Kⱼₖ = √pⱼ ⟨eₖ|U|eⱼ⟩, derived. Unitarity supplies the one constraint: Σⱼₖ Kⱼₖ†Kⱼₖ = Σⱼ pⱼ ⟨eⱼ|U†(Σₖ|eₖ⟩⟨eₖ|)U|eⱼ⟩ = 1S, so the trace survives for every input. Checks: each K is dimensionless, as an amplitude must be; with no coupling, U = US ⊗ UE, the sum collapses to US ρS US†, the closed-system limit; and a pure environment gives dE operators, a mixed one up to dE × rank ρE.
2A dilation you can solve: one excitation, two qubits
Let an atom S with levels |e⟩, |g⟩ trade its excitation with a two-level environment E through H = ħg(σ₊τ₋ + σ₋τ₊), in the interaction picture on resonance, with τ₊, τ₋ the ladder operators of E, g in s⁻¹ and θ = gt a dimensionless angle. |gg⟩ and |ee⟩ do not move; on the pair |eg⟩, |ge⟩, H is ħg times a swap, so U = cos θ − i sin θ × swap there. With E in |g⟩, K₀ = ⟨g|U|g⟩ = |g⟩⟨g| + cos θ|e⟩⟨e| and K₁ = ⟨e|U|g⟩ = −i sin θ σ₋, complete because cos²θ + sin²θ = 1. They give Pₑ → cos²θ Pₑ and ρeg → cos θ ρeg. If E starts excited with probability p, K₀ and K₁ take a factor √(1 − p) and two more, √p(cos θ|g⟩⟨g| + |e⟩⟨e|) and −i√p sin θ σ₊, join them, adding p sin²θ to Pₑ. This is not a toy: a circular Rydberg atom crossing a cavity whose mode holds no photon is this model, with the mode's |0⟩ and |1⟩ as E. Brune and co-workers (1996) measured Ω₀/2π = 47 kHz, so g = Ω₀/2 = 1.48 × 10⁵ s⁻¹ and the swap completes at 10.6 μs, about 20 times shorter than the 220 μs photon lifetime (both quoted).
3Purity falls, so no von Neumann equation can hold
Any equation iħ dρ/dt = [Heff, ρ] with Heff Hermitian keeps the purity: d Tr ρ²/dt = 2 Tr(ρ dρ/dt) = −(2i/ħ) Tr(ρHeffρ − ρρHeff) = 0, by the cyclic property of the trace. The reduced state does not. For S pure at Bloch polar angle α, measured from |e⟩, and E excited with probability p, the populations and coherence above give Tr ρS² = ½[1 + (cos²θ cos α + (2p − 1) sin²θ)² + cos²θ sin²α], derived. An excited atom and E in |g⟩ give ½(1 + cos²2θ): 1 at θ = 0, then ½ at θ = π/4, where the pair (|eg⟩ − i|ge⟩)/√2 is maximally entangled and the atom alone maximally mixed, then 1 again at π/2, with the excitation wholly in E. For the Rydberg atom the minimum falls at 5.3 μs. Purity coming back is not itself memory, since decay into a large reservoir also ends in the pure |g⟩; composition is the test: Λ(π/4) applied twice leaves Pₑ = cos⁴(π/4) = ¼ where Λ(π/2) leaves 0, because the second application hands the atom a fresh environment while the real one still holds half the excitation. Topic 14.03 recovers a composition law only where the environment forgets fast.
4One map, many Kraus sets
Nothing forced the basis |eₖ⟩ used in the trace. Trace instead over |fₗ⟩ = Σₖ |eₖ⟩Wₖₗ with W unitary, and for a pure environment the new operators are Lₗ = Σₖ W*ₖₗ Kₖ. Then Σₗ Lₗ ρ Lₗ† = Σₖₖ' (Σₗ W*ₖₗ Wₖ'ₗ) Kₖ ρ Kₖ'† = Σₖ Kₖ ρ Kₖ†, because the rows of a unitary are orthonormal. Kraus sets related by a unitary therefore give one map, derived; the converse, that any two sets for the same map are so related once the shorter is padded with zero operators, is quoted. Random π phase kicks, ρ → ½ρ + ½σzρσz, have K₀ = 1/√2 and K₁ = σz/√2; the Hadamard W turns them into (1 ± σz)/2, which are |e⟩⟨e| and |g⟩⟨g|, an energy measurement whose result nobody reads. Kick and unread measurement are one channel. The number of operators depends on the dilation, but a d-level system never needs more than d² (quoted), so the four of the exchange model, for p strictly between 0 and 1, are already as many as any qubit channel requires.
5Positive is not enough: the transpose and half a singlet
A map is positive if it sends every density matrix to one, and completely positive if 1A ⊗ Λ does so for every partner A it leaves alone. Physics demands the second, because S may be entangled with a distant qubit, and acting on S must still leave the pair in a state. Every Kraus map qualifies, derived in a line: (1 ⊗ K)σ(1 ⊗ K)† is positive whenever σ is, and a sum of positive operators is positive. Now take the transpose T: ρ → ρᵀ in the basis |e⟩, |g⟩. It is positive and keeps the trace, since ρᵀ has the eigenvalues of ρ; on the Bloch ball it is the reflection y → −y, which no rotation produces. Apply it to the second qubit of |Ψ⁻⟩ = (|eg⟩ − |ge⟩)/√2. Partial transposition, |ab⟩⟨cd| → |ad⟩⟨cb|, moves the coherences −½|eg⟩⟨ge| and −½|ge⟩⟨eg| to −½|ee⟩⟨gg| and −½|gg⟩⟨ee|, and the result has eigenvalues ½, ½, ½ and −½, shown. The −½ belongs to (|ee⟩ + |gg⟩)/√2: a probability of −½. Transposing ρ is complex conjugation, what an antiunitary does: a symmetry of a whole closed system, like time reversal, never a process on a part.
6What is quoted, and why the start must be a product
Stinespring's theorem runs the derivation backwards and is quoted: every completely positive, trace-preserving map on a d-level system is the reduced dynamics of some unitary acting on S and a pure environment of at most d² levels. Its first step can be checked. Given Kraus operators Kₖ, the map V|ψ⟩ = Σₖ Kₖ|ψ⟩ ⊗ |k⟩ obeys V†V = Σₖ Kₖ†Kₖ = 1, so V is an isometry; extending it to a unitary is the part we quote. Operator sums, completely positive trace-preserving maps and unitary dilations are therefore one class. The derivation needed a product state at t = 0 and fails without one. Put S and E in (|gg⟩ + |ee⟩)/√2 and apply a CNOT with E as control: the pair ends in |g⟩ ⊗ (|g⟩ + |e⟩)/√2, so S is pure. Start instead from the product of two maximally mixed qubits, with the same ρS = 1/2, half the identity: the CNOT leaves ρS = 1/2. One initial ρS, two final ones, so no map ρS(0) → ρS(t) exists. That is why topic 14.03 starts the atom and the field as a product.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Kraus operators of a dilation (derived)
Λ(ρS) = Σⱼₖ Kⱼₖ ρS Kⱼₖ†, with Kⱼₖ = √pⱼ ⟨eₖ|U|eⱼ⟩
The partial trace of U(ρS ⊗ ρE)U† taken in E's eigenbasis. With no coupling, U = US ⊗ UE, it collapses to US ρS US†.
ρE = Σⱼ pⱼ|eⱼ⟩⟨eⱼ|; ⟨eₖ|U|eⱼ⟩ is an operator on S alone; K and ρ are dimensionlessCompleteness, the trace condition (derived)
Σⱼₖ Kⱼₖ† Kⱼₖ = 1S
Equivalent to Tr Λ(ρ) = Tr ρ for every ρ. A set whose Σ K†K falls short of 1 loses probability: it describes one branch of a measured environment, not the whole evolution.
from U†U = 1 and Σⱼ pⱼ = 1; one dilation gives at most dE × rank ρE operatorsUnitary freedom of the Kraus set
Lₗ = Σₖ W*ₖₗ Kₖ, W unitary, gives Σₗ Lₗ ρ Lₗ† = Σₖ Kₖ ρ Kₖ†
Derived for a change of trace basis; the converse, that any two Kraus sets of one map are so related, is quoted. A Kraus operator is not a uniquely defined event.
W rotates the environment basis used in the trace; pad the shorter set with zero operatorsExchange model: excited population (derived)
Pₑ(t) = cos²(gt) Pₑ(0) + p sin²(gt)
The excitation is shared, not destroyed: at gt = π/2 the atom inherits E's population. The measured Ω₀/2π = 47 kHz of a Rydberg atom in a cavity puts that swap at 10.6 μs.
g in s⁻¹, t in s, gt in rad; p = probability that the environment qubit starts excitedExchange model: purity of the reduced state (derived)
Tr ρS² = ½[1 + (cos²θ cos α + (2p − 1) sin²θ)² + cos²θ sin²α]
For α = 0, p = 0 it falls to ½ at θ = π/4 and returns to 1 at π/2. A von Neumann equation, which fixes Tr ρ², can do neither.
θ = gt; α = initial Bloch polar angle of S, measured from |e⟩; ½ ≤ Tr ρ² ≤ 1 for a qubitThe transpose on half a singlet (shown)
(1 ⊗ T)|Ψ⁻⟩⟨Ψ⁻| has eigenvalues ½, ½, ½ and −½
T sends every qubit state to a state, yet no dilation produces it: positive is not completely positive.
T: ρ → ρᵀ in the basis |e⟩, |g⟩; |Ψ⁻⟩ = (|eg⟩ − |ge⟩)/√2; the −½ belongs to (|ee⟩ + |gg⟩)/√2Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Start with the qubit excited and E in its ground state: purity falls to 0.5 at gt = 45°, where the pair is maximally entangled, and climbs back to 1 at 90°, where the excitation has fully swapped. Now raise p to 0.5: at 90° the qubit inherits E's mixedness and its purity is 0.5.
Live results
- PURITY Tr ρS²
- 0.500
- EXCITED POPULATION Pₑ
- 0.500
- COHERENCE |ρeg|
- 0.000
- ENVIRONMENT-FLIP WEIGHT
- 0.500
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Initial Bloch angle α of S: 0 °; Excitation probability p of E: 0.00; Coupling angle gt: 45 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
It is tempting to read each Kraus operator as an event that happened to the system. For the atom and the empty cavity, K₁ = −i sin θ σ₋ reads as 'the atom emitted into the mode' and K₀ as 'it did not', so that the atom must really be in one branch or the other and we merely do not know which. The operator sum does not support that reading. The same map is produced exactly by (K₀ ± K₁)/√2, each of which mixes emission and no emission in one term, and both sets are partial traces of one U taken in different bases of the mode. Which set describes outcomes depends on what is later measured on the environment: count photons and K₀, K₁ are the branches; measure the field in the basis (|0⟩ ± |1⟩)/√2 and the other pair is. If nothing is measured, an initially excited atom and the mode stay in the entangled cos θ|e,0⟩ − i sin θ|g,1⟩, and Λ fixes only the atom's averaged statistics.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A circular Rydberg atom crosses a cavity whose resonant mode holds no photon; take the measured Ω₀/2π = 47 kHz, so H = ħg(σ₊a + σ₋a†) with g = Ω₀/2. The atom enters in (|e⟩ + |g⟩)/√2 and interacts for 4.0 μs. Treat the mode as the environment, derive the Kraus operators, check completeness, and find the atom's Pₑ, |ρeg| and purity.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Coupling angle: g = π × 47 × 10³ s⁻¹ = 1.477 × 10⁵ s⁻¹, so θ = gt = 1.477 × 10⁵ s⁻¹ × 4.0 × 10⁻⁶ s = 0.591 rad, dimensionless as an angle must be. cos θ = 0.831 and sin θ = 0.557.
- |g,0⟩ does not move, and |e,0⟩ → cos θ|e,0⟩ − i sin θ|g,1⟩. The mode starts pure in |0⟩, so K₀ = ⟨0|U|0⟩ = |g⟩⟨g| + 0.831|e⟩⟨e| and K₁ = ⟨1|U|0⟩ = −0.557i|g⟩⟨e|; no higher photon number is ever reached.
- Completeness: K₀†K₀ + K₁†K₁ = |g⟩⟨g| + (0.690 + 0.310)|e⟩⟨e| = 1.
- The initial ρ has every element equal to ½. Then Pₑ = 0.690 × 0.5 = 0.345, Pg = 0.655 and ρeg = 0.831 × 0.5 = 0.415.
- Purity: Pₑ² + Pg² + 2|ρeg|² = 0.119 + 0.429 + 0.345 = 0.893, below 1, so the atom is now entangled with the mode. Limit: as t → 0, K₀ → 1, K₁ → 0 and the purity returns to 1.
Answer. K₀ = |g⟩⟨g| + 0.831|e⟩⟨e| and K₁ = −0.557i|g⟩⟨e|, with Σ K†K = 1; Pₑ = 0.345, |ρeg| = 0.415 and Tr ρ² = 0.893.
MediumExample 2
In the two-qubit exchange model, E starts excited with probability p = 0.20 and the atom in |e⟩. Write the four Kraus operators at θ = gt = 60° and check completeness, then find Pₑ and Tr ρS². A student builds θ = 60° by applying the θ = 30° map twice: compare, and say what the second application gets wrong.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Label Kⱼₖ by the initial j and final k state of E; cos 60° = 0.500 and sin 60° = 0.866. Kgg = 0.894(|g⟩⟨g| + 0.500|e⟩⟨e|), Kge = −0.775i σ₋, Kₑₑ = 0.447(0.500|g⟩⟨g| + |e⟩⟨e|) and Keg = −0.387i σ₊, using √0.80 = 0.894 and √0.20 = 0.447.
- Completeness, element by element: on |g⟩, 0.80 + 0.20 × 0.25 + 0.20 × 0.75 = 1; on |e⟩, 0.80 × 0.25 + 0.80 × 0.75 + 0.20 = 1.
- Pₑ = cos²θ × 1 + p sin²θ = 0.250 + 0.150 = 0.400. No coherence is created, so Tr ρS² = 0.400² + 0.600² = 0.520: purity lost under a joint unitary, which no Heff acting on S could do.
- Twice θ = 30°, with cos² = 0.75 and sin² = 0.25: after one step Pₑ = 0.750 + 0.050 = 0.800; after two, 0.75 × 0.800 + 0.050 = 0.650, with purity 0.650² + 0.350² = 0.545.
- At θ = 30° the real E is excited with probability 0.25 × 1 + 0.75 × 0.20 = 0.40 and correlated with the atom. The second application discards it and supplies a fresh E at 0.20, so the composed map overshoots Pₑ by 0.25: Λ(60°) ≠ Λ(30°)Λ(30°), because the environment remembers.
Answer. Four Kraus operators with Σ K†K = 1; at θ = 60°, Pₑ = 0.400 and Tr ρS² = 0.520, against 0.650 and 0.545 from composing two 30° maps.
HardExample 3
For real λ, let Λλ(ρ) = λρᵀ + (1 − λ)(Tr ρ)1/2, with 1 the identity, act on a qubit. Find the λ for which Λλ is positive and the λ for which it is completely positive, find Kraus operators at the upper boundary and a dilation that produces them, and say what λ = ½ does to half of a singlet.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- On the Bloch ball: σₓᵀ = σₓ, σzᵀ = σz and σyᵀ = −σy, so T sends (x, y, z) to (x, −y, z), and the second term sends every Bloch vector to 0. Hence Λλ maps r to λ(x, −y, z), of length |λ|r, which stays in the ball for every state exactly when −1 ≤ λ ≤ 1. That is the positive range.
- On half a singlet, (1 ⊗ T) gives eigenvalues ½ three times and −½ once, and the second term gives (1 − λ)/4 times the identity, which shares those eigenvectors. So (1 ⊗ Λλ)|Ψ⁻⟩⟨Ψ⁻| has eigenvalues λ/2 + (1 − λ)/4 = (1 + λ)/4, three times, and −λ/2 + (1 − λ)/4 = (1 − 3λ)/4. Complete positivity needs both non-negative: −1 ≤ λ ≤ 1/3.
- At λ = ½ the eigenvalues are 0.375, three times, and −0.125. A map that halves every Bloch vector and reflects its y component, harmless on one qubit, assigns the pair a probability of −1/8: positive, not completely positive.
- At λ = 1/3 try K = 1/√3, σₓ/√3, σz/√3. Then Σ K†K = (1 + 1 + 1)/3 = 1, and (ρ + σₓρσₓ + σzρσz)/3 sends (x, y, z) to ((x + x − x), (y − y − y), (z − z + z))/3 = (x, −y, z)/3, which is Λ at λ = 1/3.
- λ = −1 gives (−x, y, −z), the rotation ρ → σyρσy, and every λ between −1 and 1/3 is a mixture of these two completely positive maps, so the singlet bound is also sufficient. A dilation: an environment qutrit in (|0⟩⟨0| + |1⟩⟨1| + |2⟩⟨2|)/3 and U = 1 ⊗ |0⟩⟨0| + σₓ ⊗ |1⟩⟨1| + σz ⊗ |2⟩⟨2| give Kⱼₖ = δⱼₖ Pⱼ/√3, with P₀, P₁, P₂ = 1, σₓ, σz, exactly this set.
Answer. Positive for −1 ≤ λ ≤ 1; completely positive only for −1 ≤ λ ≤ 1/3. At λ = 1/3 the Kraus operators are 1/√3, σₓ/√3 and σz/√3; at λ = ½ half a singlet acquires the eigenvalue −0.125.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Kraus representation writes the evolution of a system that shares a unitary with an environment as ρ → Σₖ Kₖ ρ Kₖ†, a sum of operators acting on the system alone whose only constraint is Σₖ Kₖ†Kₖ = 1.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.