
Physics II course sequence · Interactive lesson
Forces from Charge Distributions
A dozen point charges you can add up one at a time. A charged rod you cannot, because there are no separate charges left to name. This topic turns superposition into an integral you can actually do: pick the element, write the distance and the direction in one variable, let symmetry cancel what it can, and check the answer against a point charge.
UPII-01.06 · Lesson 6 of 8 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Superposition becomes an integral once the charges stop being countable.
The key idea
A continuous charge distribution replaces a countable set of charges by a charge density, so that superposition over charges becomes an integral of Coulomb's law over charge elements dq.
Example. A 24 cm rod carrying 8.0 nC uniformly has λ = 8.0 nC ÷ 0.24 m = 33 nC m⁻¹, so a 2.0 mm slice of it is a charge element dq = λ dl = 6.7 × 10⁻¹¹ C — about 4 × 10⁸ elementary charges, and still a point from a centimetre away.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Matter is made of countable charges, but a charged rod carries tens of billions of them, spaced far more finely than any distance you will measure, so we stop counting and smear. A density — charge per unit length, per unit area or per unit volume, whichever the shape calls for — says how much charge sits in each slice of the object, and a slice small enough to be treated as a point carries a charge element dq. Coulomb's law applies to dq exactly as it does to a point charge, and superposition, which is linear and exact rather than an approximation, says the total force is the sum of those contributions; in the limit that sum is an integral. What makes the integral physics rather than calculus is everything that happens before you integrate: choosing the element, writing the separation r and the direction of r̂ in terms of one source coordinate that runs over the object while the test charge stays put, and letting symmetry kill the components that cancel in pairs. And the smooth density is a model of the matter, not the matter itself: it is trustworthy only at distances well above the spacing of the real charges, and only while the source is rigid enough that the test charge cannot rearrange it.
1Why smearing countable charges is legitimate
A 24 cm rod holding 8.0 nC carries 8.0 × 10⁻⁹ C ÷ 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C = 5.0 × 10¹⁰ elementary charges. Spread along the rod, their mean spacing is about 5 × 10⁻¹² m. Probe the rod from a millimetre away and that staircase of lumps is indistinguishable from a smooth ramp, so we describe the object by a density instead: λ = dq/dl in C m⁻¹ for a wire, σ = dq/dA in C m⁻² for a sheet, ρ = dq/dV in C m⁻³ for a solid. Which one you use is set by the shape of the object, not by the problem. A density need not be uniform: λ(x) = λ₀ x/L is a rod whose charge grows towards one end, and only a uniform density may be pulled outside the integral as a constant.
2Set up the element before you set up the answer
The whole method is five lines, in this order. Choose one coordinate that labels position on the source — x along a rod, angle φ around a ring, radius s on a disc. Write the element in it: dq = λ dx, or dq = σ (2πs ds) for an annulus of a disc. Write the separation r from that element to the test charge as a function of that same coordinate. Write the direction of dF, which lies along the line from dq to q. Only then choose limits, which come from the geometry of the source. The commonest setup error is to treat r as a single fixed number, the distance to the rod. The test charge's position is what stays constant through the integration; r does not.
3Let symmetry cancel a component before you integrate
A ring of radius a and charge Q, with q on the axis at distance z, is the clean case. Every element lies the same distance r = √(z² + a²) away, and each dF tilts towards the ring by the same angle. Pair each element with the one diametrically opposite: their off-axis components are equal and opposite, so the whole perpendicular part cancels exactly. What survives is dF cos θ with cos θ = z/r, and because r and cos θ are the same for every element, both leave the integral and ∫dq = Q is all that remains: F = k q Q z/(z² + a²)³⁄². With a = 5.0 cm, Q = 30 nC, q = 2.0 nC and z = 12 cm this gives 29.5 μN, only 79% of the 37.5 μN you would get by lumping Q at the centre, because every element pulls at an angle.
4When the geometry factor varies, do the integral
Move the test charge onto a rod's own axis and the direction is constant but the distance is not. With the origin at q, the rod runs from x = d to x = d + L, each element contributes k q λ dx/x², and integrating dx/x² from x = d to x = d + L gives F = k q λ (1/d − 1/(d + L)) = k q Q/(d(d + L)) once λ = Q/L is used. Because the geometric mean √(d(d + L)) never exceeds the arithmetic mean d + L/2, the rod always exerts more force than the same charge parked at its midpoint would. Put the charge on the perpendicular bisector instead and both distance and angle vary: F = 2 k q λ ∫₀(L/2) z dx/(x² + z²)³⁄², which the substitution x = z tan θ turns into a cosine integral, giving F = k q λ L/(z √(z² + L²/4)).
5Every continuous result must collapse to one you know
An integral is not finished until its limits are checked. Let d ≫ L in the rod result and d(d + L) → d², so F → k q Q/d²: far away, any bounded distribution looks like its total charge at a point. Let z ≫ a in the ring result and (z² + a²)³⁄² → z³, giving the same law. Now go the other way on the bisector result. Let z ≪ L, so √(z² + L²/4) → L/2 and F → 2 k q λ/z, an inverse-first-power law. That does not contradict Coulomb's law. Only the stretch of line lying within roughly z of the foot of the perpendicular contributes appreciably, so halving z brings each of those elements four times closer while halving how much of the line still counts, and 4 × ½ = 2. Dimensions confirm the result: [k q λ] = N m, so k q λ/z is a force.
6Where the smooth model stops
Three failures are worth naming. The 2 k q λ/r line law diverges as r → 0, which is the idealisation admitting that it has no thickness; a real rod of radius R keeps the force finite, because at r < R the charge no longer sits all at one small distance. The density itself fails once r drops below the spacing of the actual charges, about 5 × 10⁻¹² m for the rod above, where the smooth ramp turns back into a staircase. And a fixed λ, σ or ρ assumes the source cannot respond. That holds for charge sprayed onto an insulator; on a conductor the approaching test charge redistributes the very charge you integrated over, and the problem stops being a single integral.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Charge element from a density
dq = λ dl = σ dA = ρ dV
Turns a geometric slice of the object into the charge that slice carries.
λ in C m⁻¹ for a line, σ in C m⁻² for a surface, ρ in C m⁻³ for a volume; each may vary with positionSuperposition as an integral
F = (q/4πε₀) ∫ (r̂/r²) dq
Exact rather than approximate: forces from different elements add independently.
r is the distance in m from element dq to the test charge q, r̂ the unit vector from dq to q, and 1/4πε₀ = 8.99 × 10⁹ N m² C⁻²One component, after symmetry
Fₓ = k q ∫ (cos θ/r²) dq
Replaces three scalar integrals by one, and is why most of these integrals are doable at all.
θ is the angle between r̂ and the x axis; the perpendicular parts cancel in diametrically opposite pairsUniform rod, test charge on its axis
F = k q Q/(d (d + L))
The effective separation is the geometric mean √(d(d + L)), not the distance to the middle.
L is the rod length in m, d the gap in m from the test charge to the near end, Q the rod's total charge in CUniform ring, test charge on its axis
F = k q Q z/(z² + a²)³⁄²
Zero at the centre, largest at z = a/√2, and k q Q/z² once z far exceeds a.
a is the ring radius in m, z the distance in m from the ring's centre along the axis, Q the ring's charge in CLong straight line of charge
F = q λ/(2πε₀ r) = 2 k q λ/r
An inverse-first-power law, showing that the 1/r² of Coulomb's law belongs to the point, not to the force.
λ in C m⁻¹, r the perpendicular distance in m; valid while r is far smaller than the line's lengthInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set the gap to 2 cm and sweep: the first fifth of a 20 cm rod already delivers 73% of the total force. Push the gap to 20 cm and that same fifth gives only 33% — every element now contributes alike, which is the rod turning into a point charge.
Live results
- FORCE SO FAR
- 21.4 μN
- WHOLE ROD
- 28.8 μN
- FRACTION OF FORCE
- 0.74
- LUMPED AT CENTRE
- 17.6 μN
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Gap to the near end: 6 cm; Rod length: 20 cm; Fraction of rod included: 0.40
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting shortcut is to put the whole distribution at its geometric centre and use Coulomb's law once. It fails because 1/r² is convex in r: the near elements gain more than the far ones lose. For a uniform rod of length L with the test charge a distance d = L beyond its near end, the integral gives k q Q/(2L²) while the centre shortcut gives k q Q/(2.25 L²) — 11% low. Worse, the error does not even keep a fixed sign. For a ring of radius a with the test charge at z = 2.4a on the axis, lumping the charge at the centre overestimates the force by 27%, because every element pulls at an angle and only the axial component survives. A spherically symmetric ball of charge is the one shape you may replace by a point at its centre, and only for points outside it.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A thin glass rod 45 cm long carries 12 nC spread uniformly along it. A point charge q = 3.0 nC sits on the rod's axis, 15 cm beyond one end. Find the linear charge density, and the force on q.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- λ = Q/L = 12 nC ÷ 0.45 m = 26.7 nC m⁻¹, so a slice dx of the rod carries dq = λ dx.
- Put the origin at the test charge with the axis pointing towards the rod. The rod then occupies x = 0.15 m to x = 0.60 m, an element at x lies a distance x away, and every dF points the same way along the axis, so no components are needed.
- F = k q λ ∫ dx/x² from 0.15 m to 0.60 m = k q λ (1/0.15 − 1/0.60) = k q λ × 5.00 m⁻¹.
- k q λ = 8.99 × 10⁹ × 3.0 × 10⁻⁹ × 2.667 × 10⁻⁸ = 7.19 × 10⁻⁷ N m, so F = 7.19 × 10⁻⁷ × 5.00 = 3.60 × 10⁻⁶ N.
- Check it against the trap: lumping the rod at its centre, 0.375 m away, gives 2.30 μN, which is 36% low. The near end is weighted far more heavily than the far end.
Answer. λ = 27 nC m⁻¹ and F = 3.6 × 10⁻⁶ N (3.6 μN), along the axis and directed away from the rod when both charges carry the same sign.
MediumExample 2
A thin ring of radius 8.0 cm carries −24 nC spread uniformly. A point charge q = +5.0 nC sits on the ring's axis, 6.0 cm from the centre. Find the force on q, then find where on the axis that force would be largest.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Every element of the ring lies the same distance r = √(z² + a²) from q, and opposite elements cancel each other's perpendicular pull, so only the axial component survives.
- That component carries the factor cos θ = z/r, the same for every element, so it comes outside the integral: F = k q (z/r³) ∫dq = k q Q z/(z² + a²)³⁄².
- z² + a² = 0.060² + 0.080² = 0.0100 m², so (z² + a²)³⁄² = 1.00 × 10⁻³ m³.
- k |q| |Q| = 8.99 × 10⁹ × 5.0 × 10⁻⁹ × 24 × 10⁻⁹ = 1.079 × 10⁻⁶ N m², so F = (1.079 × 10⁻⁶ N m²)(0.060 m)/(1.00 × 10⁻³ m³) = 6.47 × 10⁻⁵ N, attractive.
- For the maximum, differentiate: d/dz [z (z² + a²)(−3/2)] = (z² + a²)(−5/2) (a² − 2z²), which vanishes at z = a/√2 = 5.66 cm.
- There F = 6.49 × 10⁻⁵ N, only 0.2% above the value at 6.0 cm — the peak is broad, and 6.0 cm already sits just beyond it.
Answer. F = 6.5 × 10⁻⁵ N (65 μN), pulling q towards the ring. The axial force peaks at z = a/√2 = 5.7 cm, where it reaches 6.49 × 10⁻⁵ N.
HardExample 3
A 20 cm rod lies along the x axis from x = 0 to x = 0.20 m, carrying a density that grows linearly from zero at its near end: λ(x) = λ₀ x/L with λ₀ = 60 nC m⁻¹. A point charge q = 4.0 nC sits on the axis at x = −0.10 m. Find the force on q, and compare it with what a uniform rod of the same total charge would exert.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Total charge: Q = ∫₀L λ₀ x/L dx = λ₀ L/2 = 6.0 nC. Because λ varies, it cannot be pulled out of the force integral.
- An element at x lies a distance x + d from q, with d = 0.10 m, and every dF is axial, so F = k q (λ₀/L) ∫₀L x dx/(x + d)².
- Substitute u = x + d, so x = u − d and the integrand becomes 1/u − d/u². Integrating from u = d to u = L + d gives ln((L + d)/d) + d/(L + d) − 1.
- Numerically: ln(0.30/0.10) = 1.0986, plus 0.10/0.30 = 0.3333, minus 1, leaves 0.4319, a pure number.
- k q λ₀/L = 8.99 × 10⁹ × 4.0 × 10⁻⁹ × (60 × 10⁻⁹ ÷ 0.20) = 1.079 × 10⁻⁵ N, so F = 1.079 × 10⁻⁵ × 0.4319 = 4.66 × 10⁻⁶ N.
- A uniform rod of the same 6.0 nC would give k q Q/(d(d + L)) = 7.19 × 10⁻⁶ N, 54% more, because it puts charge near the test charge instead of at the far end. Far-field check: for d ≫ L the bracket tends to L²/(2d²), so F tends to k q Q/d².
Answer. F = 4.7 × 10⁻⁶ N (4.7 μN) along the axis, away from the rod for like charges — only 65% of the 7.2 μN a uniform rod carrying the same 6.0 nC would exert.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
A continuous charge distribution replaces a countable set of charges by a charge density, so that superposition over charges becomes an integral of Coulomb's law over charge elements dq.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics II completion tasks.