Skip to main content

Physics II course sequence · Interactive lesson

Electric Field from Potential

Potential stores one number per point; the field needs three. This lesson runs the map backwards — differentiate V to recover E, read a field straight off the slope of a V–x graph, and use the curvature of V to say whether a charge left at an equilibrium will stay there.

UPII-04.06 · Lesson 6 of 8 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Electric Field from PotentialA cubic potential V(x) = (V₀/2)[(x/L)³ − 3x/L] with L = 0.20 m, drawn above a field row. At the probe the graph sits at V = -170 V, its tangent has slope dV/dx = -1890 V m⁻¹, and the arrow below carries E_x = 1890 V m⁻¹ — the same size, the opposite sign, and zero at the two flat points x = ±0.20 m.V(x) = (V₀/2)[(x/L)³ − 3x/L]L = 0.20 m V₀ = 300 Varrow below: Eₓ on the same x scaleVxx = 0.08 m V = −170 VEₓ = −dV/dx = 1890 V m⁻¹
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

The field is the downhill slope of the potential, never its value.

The key idea

The electric field is the negative spatial rate of change of the potential: each component of E is minus the derivative of V along that coordinate, so E points down the steepest slope of V.

Example. Two parallel plates 4.0 mm apart differ by 12.0 V, and V falls linearly between them, so E = 12.0 V ÷ 4.0 × 10⁻³ m = 3.0 × 10³ V m⁻¹, directed from the high-potential plate to the low one.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Potential was built by integrating the field along a path: VB − VA = −∫E⋅ds. That integral can be run backwards. Shrink the step until it is infinitesimal and the statement becomes dV = −Eₛ ds, so the component of E in any direction is minus the rate at which V changes in that direction: Eₛ = −dV/ds. One scalar function of position therefore carries a whole vector field, and three partial derivatives recover its three components. The geometry follows at once. Along an equipotential dV = 0, so E has no component there and must cross it at right angles; the steepest descent of V is the direction E points; and the more tightly equal-voltage contours crowd together, the larger the field. The payoff is that potentials superpose as plain numbers, so the honest route to a complicated field is to add V from every charge and differentiate once at the end. Where it stops: the derivative is local, so the ratio −ΔV/Δx equals the field only where the V–x graph is straight; the value of V at a point says nothing about the field there; and what you recover is the electrostatic field alone — once a magnetic field changes with time, an induced field appears that no single-valued V can produce.

1Run the potential integral backwards

Potential came from the field by integration: VB − VA = −∫E⋅ds, taken along any path joining the two points. Differentiation undoes it. Move a short distance ds in a chosen direction ŝ; the change in potential is dV = −E⋅ds = −Eₛ ds, where Eₛ is the component of E along ŝ. Divide by ds and Eₛ = −dV/ds. No new physics has entered — it is the same statement read in the other direction, and it is exact rather than approximate, because ds is a differential. The units agree: V m⁻¹ = J C⁻¹ m⁻¹ = N C⁻¹, the unit the field has carried since Coulomb's law. A field of 1 V m⁻¹ means the potential drops by one volt for every metre you advance along the field.

2Read the field off the slope of a V–x graph

On a graph of V against x the field component is minus the gradient at that point, so what you read is a slope, never a height. Suppose V falls steadily from 60 V at x = 0.10 m to 20 V at x = 0.30 m. The slope is (20 − 60) V ÷ (0.30 − 0.10) m = −200 V m⁻¹, so Eₓ = +200 V m⁻¹: the field points toward +x, which is downhill in potential. Three habits follow. A flat stretch means zero field however high V sits there. A steeper stretch means a stronger field. And the sign takes care of itself — a descending graph gives a positive Eₓ, an ascending one a negative Eₓ — so the field always runs from high potential to low, which is exactly the way a positive charge is pushed.

3Three partial derivatives give three components

In two or three dimensions the rule runs once per axis: Eₓ = −∂V/∂x, Ey = −∂V/∂y and Ez = −∂V/∂z, each derivative taken with the other coordinates held fixed. Written compactly, E = −∇V. Take the saddle-shaped map V(x, y) = A x y with A = 250 V m⁻². Then Eₓ = −A y and Ey = −A x, and at the point (0.020 m, 0.040 m) these give Eₓ = −250 × 0.040 = −10.0 V m⁻¹ and Ey = −250 × 0.020 = −5.0 V m⁻¹, a field of magnitude √(10.0² + 5.0²) = 11.2 V m⁻¹ aimed back into the third quadrant. Notice what the arithmetic exposes: Eₓ depends on y. A field component need not vary only with its own coordinate.

4Equipotentials fix the direction, their spacing the size

Step along an equipotential and V does not change, so dV = 0 and Eₛ = 0 in that direction: the field has no component along an equipotential and must cross it at right angles. Step perpendicular to it instead and you take the fastest change V can offer, which is why E points along the steepest descent with magnitude |dV/dn|, the derivative along that normal. That turns a contour map into a field map by eye. If equipotentials are drawn every 5.0 V and two neighbours lie 2.5 mm apart, the field between them is about 5.0 V ÷ 2.5 × 10⁻³ m = 2.0 × 10³ V m⁻¹, directed from the higher-voltage contour to the lower. Crowded contours mean a strong field, widely spaced ones a weak field, and parallel evenly spaced contours a uniform field.

5Add scalars first, differentiate once at the end

This is why the detour through potential pays. Adding fields means adding vectors, component by component, for every charge present; adding potentials means adding numbers. So the efficient route to a complicated field is to sum V over all the charges and then differentiate the single answer. Far out along the axis of a dipole of moment p the two potentials almost cancel, leaving V = kp/z². One differentiation gives Ez = −dV/dz = 2kp/z³, the inverse-cube fall-off, with no Coulomb vectors resolved at all. For a water molecule, p = 6.2 × 10⁻³⁰ C m, so at z = 1.0 nm this is V = 56 mV and Ez = 1.1 × 10⁸ V m⁻¹. The same move checks familiar results: V = kq/r differentiates to Eᵣ = kq/r², and anywhere V is constant every derivative vanishes, so E = 0.

6Slope locates equilibrium, curvature decides stability

A charge q sitting in the potential has energy U(x) = qV(x) and feels Fₓ = qEₓ = −q dV/dx. Equilibrium needs Fₓ = 0, so dV/dx = 0 — a flat point on the V–x graph, whatever value V happens to take there. Stability is settled by the next derivative: the point is stable when q d²V/dx² > 0. A positive charge is therefore trapped by a minimum of V and thrown off a maximum, while a negative charge is trapped by a maximum. Put +4.0 nC at x = −5.0 cm and another at x = +5.0 cm. Midway V = 2kQ/a = 1.44 kV, and along the line the curvature is 4kQ/a³ = 1.15 × 10⁶ V m⁻², positive, so a positive test charge nudged along x is pushed back. Nudge it sideways and it runs away: the midpoint is a valley along the axis and a ridge across it.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Field from a one-dimensional potential

Eₓ = −dV/dx

The field component is minus the slope of the V–x graph, read point by point.

Eₓ in V m⁻¹ (= N C⁻¹), V in volts, x in metres

All three components at once

E = −∇V = −(∂V/∂x) x̂ − (∂V/∂y) ŷ − (∂V/∂z) ẑ

One scalar function stores the whole vector field: differentiate it once per axis.

each partial derivative holds the other two coordinates fixed; E in V m⁻¹, V in volts, coordinates in metres

Component along any chosen direction

Eₛ = −dV/ds

Zero along an equipotential and largest down the steepest descent, which fixes the direction of E.

s is arc length in metres along the chosen direction ŝ; dV/ds in V m⁻¹

Radial fields

Eᵣ = −dV/dr

V = kq/r returns Eᵣ = kq/r², the inverse-square law recovered in one differentiation.

r in metres from the centre or axis of symmetry; Eᵣ in V m⁻¹

Uniform-field shortcut

Eₓ = −ΔV/Δx

The ratio replaces the derivative exactly when the slope is constant, as between parallel plates.

only where the V–x graph is straight; ΔV in volts across a gap Δx in metres

Stability of a charge at an equilibrium

q d²V/dx² > 0 → stable

A positive charge is trapped by a minimum of V, a negative charge by a maximum.

evaluated where dV/dx = 0; d²V/dx² in V m⁻², q in coulombs
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.08 m
−0.24 to 0.24 m; steps of 0.04.
300 V
150 to 500 V; steps of 50.

Try this. Drag the probe to x = +0.20 m and watch the arrow vanish: the field is zero where V is flat, not where V is zero. Then raise V₀ — every arrow grows while the two zeros stay exactly where they were.

Live results

POTENTIAL V(x)
-170 V
SLOPE dV/dx
-1890 V m⁻¹
FIELD Eₓ = −dV/dx
1890 V m⁻¹
CURVATURE d²V/dx²
9000 V m⁻²

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics II modelA cubic potential V(x) = (V₀/2)[(x/L)³ − 3x/L] with L = 0.20 m, drawn above a field row. At the probe the graph sits at V = -170 V, its tangent has slope dV/dx = -1890 V m⁻¹, and the arrow below carries E_x = 1890 V m⁻¹ — the same size, the opposite sign, and zero at the two flat points x = ±0.20 m.V(x) = (V₀/2)[(x/L)³ − 3x/L]L = 0.20 m V₀ = 300 Varrow below: Eₓ on the same x scaleVxx = 0.08 m V = −170 VEₓ = −dV/dx = 1890 V m⁻¹
A cubic potential V(x) = (V₀/2)[(x/L)³ − 3x/L] with L = 0.20 m, drawn above a field row. At the probe the graph sits at V = −170 V, its tangent has slope dV/dx = −1890 V m⁻¹, and the arrow below carries Eₓ = 1890 V m⁻¹ — the same size, the opposite sign, and zero at the two flat points x = ±0.20 m.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Probe position x: 0.08 m; Potential scale V₀: 300 V

Baseline 0.08; choose −0.24 to 0.24, in steps of 0.04.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest error is reading the field off the value of V instead of its slope. The two are independent. Midway between two equal and opposite charges V = 0 while E is large and points straight from the positive charge to the negative one; deep inside a charged conductor in electrostatic equilibrium V may sit at several kilovolts while E is exactly zero, because V is constant there and a constant has zero derivative. The second error is the same mistake in disguise: using E = ΔV/d everywhere. That ratio equals the derivative only where the V–x graph is straight, as it is between parallel plates. On the axis of a dipole V = kp/z², so the ratio V/z gives kp/z³ while the true field is Ez = −dV/dz = 2kp/z³ — wrong by a factor of two, and the gap widens the more the graph bends. Differentiate; do not divide.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A probe maps the potential along the x-axis of a laboratory cell. V rises linearly from 0 V at x = 0 to 60 V at x = 0.40 m, holds at 60 V from x = 0.40 m to x = 0.60 m, then falls linearly back to 0 V at x = 0.90 m. Find the x-component of the electric field in each of the three regions.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A field-mapping program stores the potential in one corner of a chamber as V(x, y, z) = A x² y − B z, with A = 40.0 V m⁻³, B = 15.0 V m⁻¹ and coordinates in metres. Find the three components of E at the point (0.30, 0.50, 0.20) m, the magnitude of the field there, and the direction in which the potential climbs fastest.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A bead of mass 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ kg carrying +2.0 nC slides without friction on an insulating rail along the x-axis, where electrodes hold the potential at V(x) = αx³ − βx with α = 2.50 × 10³ V m⁻³ and β = 300 V m⁻¹. Locate the equilibrium points, classify them for this bead, and describe the motion after it is released from rest at x = 0.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Along the x-axis the potential rises linearly from 0 V at x = 0 to 80 V at x = 0.20 m, and then holds at 80 V all the way out to x = 0.50 m. What is the x-component of the electric field at x = 0.10 m and at x = 0.35 m?
7

Review & continue

The electric field is the negative spatial rate of change of the potential: each component of E is minus the derivative of V along that coordinate, so E points down the steepest slope of V.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Optional supporting lessons

These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics II completion tasks.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.