
Physics I course sequence · Problem studio
Momentum problem studio
Momentum problems are rarely lost in the algebra. They are lost at the boundary: the wrong system, a conservation law carried across a stage where it fails, or one unknown too many. These problems drill the decisions that come before the equations and the checks that come after them.
UPI-08.08 · Lesson 8 of 8 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Choose the system and the stage before you choose the law
The key idea
Solving an interaction problem in stages means applying momentum conservation only over intervals in which the chosen system receives negligible external impulse, and energy conservation only over intervals in which no energy leaves unaccounted.
Example. A 30 g dart at 12.0 m s⁻¹ sticks in a 0.270 kg block hanging on a cord. Momentum across the brief impact gives (0.030 × 12.0)/0.300 = 1.20 m s⁻¹; energy across the swing then gives a rise of 1.20²/(2 × 9.81) = 7.3 cm.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Every interaction problem in this unit is a story cut into stages, and the physics lies in choosing the cuts. Impulse–momentum, Δp⃗ = ∫F⃗ₑₓₜ dt, holds for any system over any interval; conservation is the special case in which the external impulse over that interval is small against the momenta that change. That makes it a claim about a system and a duration, not about an event: a 5 ms impact on a rough floor passes the test, and the skid that follows fails it. Energy answers to a different test. Internal forces cancel in the momentum sum because each pair acts for the same time, but not necessarily in the energy sum, because the two contact points can move different distances while material crushes. So the working model is momentum across the impact, energy — with any friction work — across the motion either side of it, and the centre of mass as the ledger showing that only ½μuᵣₑₗ² of the kinetic energy is ever at risk. It stops working when a contact is long or rigidly constrained (a hinge, a wall, a tyre gripping the road), when mass crosses the boundary, and when the equations run out: a 1D collision needs one closure beyond momentum, a 2D one needs a measured angle or speed, and without it the honest answer is a range.
1Draw the boundary, then time the external impulse
Momentum is conserved for a system over an interval, never for an event in general. Choose the system so the large forces are internal, then estimate the external impulse over the interval you mean to use. Two carts of total mass 2.0 kg carrying 3.0 kg m s⁻¹ across a floor with μₖ = 0.30 feel at most 0.30 × 2.0 × 9.81 = 5.9 N of friction. Over a 12 ms contact that is 0.071 N s, 2.4% of their momentum, so conservation across the contact is sound; over the 0.50 s skid afterwards the same force delivers 2.9 N s, nearly all of it. Brevity only defeats forces that stay finite. When a 5.0 kg sandbag falling at 4.0 m s⁻¹ lands in a 20 kg cart rolling at 2.0 m s⁻¹, the track's normal force spikes as hard as the landing, so vertical momentum is not conserved. No horizontal force spikes, so horizontal momentum is: (20)(2.0) = (25)V gives V = 1.6 m s⁻¹.
2Cut the story wherever the governing law changes
Before writing an equation, list the stages and what each conserves. A stage ends whenever a force switches on or off: contact begins, a spring lets go, a surface turns rough. Two gliders of 0.50 kg and 0.25 kg are pushed apart from rest by a spring storing 0.75 J. Stage 1, the release, conserves momentum and mechanical energy: 0.50v₁ = 0.25v₂ and 0.25v₁² + 0.125v₂² = 0.75 give 1.0 and 2.0 m s⁻¹. Stage 2, the lighter glider coupling to a 0.75 kg glider, conserves momentum only: (0.25)(2.0) = (1.00)V, so V = 0.50 m s⁻¹ and the kinetic energy drops from 0.50 J to 0.125 J. Stage 3, the pair coasting up a ramp, conserves energy only: h = V²/2g = 1.3 cm. Carry energy straight through stage 2 and you predict 5.1 cm, four times too high — the factor (m + M)/m that the coupling threw away.
3Count the unknowns before you pick the closure
A one-dimensional collision has two unknown final velocities and momentum supplies one equation, so something else must close it: the bodies stick (e = 0), the collision is elastic (e = 1), e is measured, or one final velocity is. Prefer the restitution equation to the energy equation even when the collision is elastic, because energy is quadratic and brings a spurious root. For a 2.0 kg cart at 3.0 m s⁻¹ striking a 1.0 kg cart at rest elastically, 6.0 = 2.0v₁ + 1.0v₂ with v₂ − v₁ = 3.0 gives v₁ = 1.0 m s⁻¹ and v₂ = 4.0 m s⁻¹ in two lines; the energy route also returns v₁ = 3.0, v₂ = 0, the carts passing through each other untouched. In two dimensions the count is four unknown components against two momentum equations and at most one energy equation. One measured angle or speed is still missing, and without it the correct answer is a family of collisions.
4Split the kinetic energy at the centre of mass
Write each velocity as vcm plus a velocity relative to the centre of mass. The cross terms vanish because the relative momenta sum to zero, leaving K = ½Mvcm² + ½μuᵣₑₗ², with M the total mass and μ = m₁m₂/M. Internal forces cannot change vcm, so the first term is untouchable; a collision acts only on the second, turning uᵣₑₗ into −e uᵣₑₗ and removing ½μ(1 − e²)uᵣₑₗ². The payoff is that damage tracks closing speed. A 1200 kg car at 15 m s⁻¹ runs into the back of an 1800 kg car doing 10 m s⁻¹ and the bumpers lock: μ = 720 kg and uᵣₑₗ = 5.0 m s⁻¹, so 9.0 kJ is dissipated out of 225 kJ carried. The same pair meeting at 5.0 m s⁻¹ with the front car parked loses the same 9.0 kJ, but out of only 15 kJ.
5Measure both displacements from the ground
When a system starts at rest and no external horizontal force acts, its centre of mass stays where it began however the parts rearrange, so m₁Δx₁ + m₂Δx₂ = 0 with both displacements measured from the ground. The trap is the distance you are given, which is almost always relative. A 75 kg angler walks 5.0 m from stern to bow of a 175 kg boat on still water. Her displacement relative to the boat is Δx₁ − Δx₂ = 5.0 m; combining the two equations gives Δx₂ = −(75)(5.0)/250 = −1.5 m and Δx₁ = +3.5 m. Check: 75 × 3.5 = 262.5 = 175 × 1.5. Enter 5.0 m as her ground displacement instead and the boat moves 2.1 m, which would have her walk 7.1 m along a 5.0 m deck. The same trap sits in every launcher problem: a projectile's speed relative to the gun must be converted to the ground frame before it enters the momentum sum.
6Finish with the checks momentum cannot make for you
A result that conserves momentum can still be impossible, so every collision answer gets two more tests and a limit. Is the final kinetic energy no larger than the initial, unless a spring or explosive released energy? Is the body that was behind still no faster than the one ahead? A 1.5 kg cart at 4.0 m s⁻¹ hits a 0.50 kg cart at rest, carrying 6.0 kg m s⁻¹ and 12 J. The claim v₁ = −1.0 m s⁻¹, v₂ = 15 m s⁻¹ conserves momentum and makes 57 J out of 12. The claim v₁ = 3.5 m s⁻¹, v₂ = 1.5 m s⁻¹ conserves momentum and loses energy plausibly, but drives the rear cart through the front one. The allowed outcomes run from 3.0 m s⁻¹ each (stuck) to 2.0 and 6.0 m s⁻¹ (elastic). Then test a limit: a very heavy target must return v₁ = −e u₁, and equal masses in an elastic collision must swap velocities.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
External impulse decides conservation
Δp⃗sys = ∫ F⃗ₑₓₜ dt
Conserve momentum only over an interval where this integral is small against the momenta that change: brief contacts usually pass, hinges and walls never do.
p in kg m s⁻¹ = N s, Fₑₓₜ in N, t in s. Internal forces cancel in pairs and never appear.Restitution closes a 1D collision
v₂ − v₁ = −e (u₂ − u₁)
The one equation momentum cannot supply, and it is linear: e = 1 elastic, e = 0 stuck together, with no spurious root to discard.
u before, v after, in m s⁻¹ along the line of impact; e is dimensionless, 0 ≤ e ≤ 1The only kinetic energy a collision can remove
Kₗₒₛₜ = ½ μ (1 − e²) uᵣₑₗ², μ = m₁m₂/(m₁ + m₂)
½Mvcm² survives every internal collision. Only motion relative to the centre of mass is at risk, so the loss follows closing speed, not speed over the ground.
μ is the reduced mass in kg, uᵣₑₗ the closing speed along the line of centres in m s⁻¹, K in JRecoil from rest
m₁v⃗₁ + m₂v⃗₂ = 0 ⇒ K₁/K₂ = m₂/m₁
Equal and opposite momenta, unequal energies: the lighter body carries the larger share of whatever energy the push or explosion released.
velocities in the ground frame, m s⁻¹; masses in kgAn isolated centre of mass at rest stays put
m₁Δx₁ + m₂Δx₂ = 0
Trades velocities you never know for positions you can see: a stride d along a floating boat moves the boat back by m₁d/(m₁ + m₂).
Δx in m, measured from the ground, never from the other bodyElastic, equal masses, target at rest
u⃗₁ = v⃗₁ + v⃗₂ and u₁² = v₁² + v₂² ⇒ v⃗₁ ⋅ v⃗₂ = 0
Square the momentum equation and subtract the energy equation: the pucks leave at 90° unless the hit is head-on. A measured angle under 90° proves energy was lost.
two smooth pucks of equal mass; speeds in m s⁻¹Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag v₂: momentum always closes the polygon, but past the outer ring the kinetic energy lost turns negative, and inside the inner ring puck 1 would pass through puck 2. Then set m₂ = 0.30 kg, the direction to 60° and v₂ = 1.00 m s⁻¹: the tip lands on the outer ring and the after-arrows meet at 90°.
Live results
- PUCK 1 SPEED v₁
- 1.23 m s⁻¹
- PUCK 1 ANGLE ABOVE +x
- 34.1 °
- RESTITUTION e
- 0.83
- KINETIC ENERGY LOST
- 0.050 J
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Direction of puck 2 below +x: 35 °; Speed of puck 2 after, v₂: 1.80 m s⁻¹; Mass of puck 2, m₂: 0.20 kg
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The commonest studio error is carrying one conservation law through the whole story: setting the dart's kinetic energy equal to the block's final potential energy, or conserving momentum through the swing. During the impact, dart and block push on each other with equal and opposite forces for exactly the same time, so their impulses cancel and momentum survives. Their works do not cancel, because work is force times the displacement of its own point of application, and while the dart burrows in, its tip travels further than the wood it pushes; the difference becomes heat and crushed fibre. During the swing the opposite holds: cord tension and gravity act for a large fraction of a second, their impulse is anything but small, and momentum falls to zero at the top while mechanical energy is conserved. Each law is exact over its own stage and wrong across the next.
Problem-solving studio
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
A 58 kg skater stands at rest on smooth ice holding a 3.0 kg medicine ball. She pushes it horizontally forward; a sensor in the ball records a force that rises steadily from zero to 260 N and falls steadily back to zero, the whole push lasting 0.12 s. Find the ball's speed as it leaves her hands, her recoil velocity, and the kinetic energy her muscles supplied.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- The ball's momentum change is the area under its force–time graph, a triangle: J = ½(260 N)(0.12 s) = 15.6 N s forward. From rest, the ball leaves at v = J/m = 15.6/3.0 = 5.2 m s⁻¹.
- Take skater + ball as the system. The push is internal, smooth ice exerts no horizontal force, and weight and the normal force cancel, so the system's horizontal momentum keeps its starting value: zero.
- So MV + mv = 0, and V = −(15.6 N s)/(58 kg) = −0.269 m s⁻¹. Newton's third law says the same thing directly: she receives the impulse she gives, reversed.
- Kinetic energy: ½(3.0)(5.2)² = 40.6 J for the ball and (15.6)²/(2 × 58) = 2.10 J for the skater, 42.7 J in all. The momenta are equal in size but the energies split as 58 : 3.0, so 95% of her work went into the ball.
Answer. Ball 5.2 m s⁻¹ forward; skater 0.27 m s⁻¹ backward; about 43 J of kinetic energy supplied, 95% of it to the ball.
MediumExample 2
On a level bench where μₖ = 0.300 for both blocks, a 0.400 kg block arrives at 2.50 m s⁻¹ and strikes a 0.600 kg block at rest. The contact lasts about 4 ms. Afterwards the 0.600 kg block skids 0.435 m to rest. Find the 0.400 kg block's velocity just after impact, the coefficient of restitution and the kinetic energy lost in the collision, and justify treating momentum as conserved.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Isolation first. During the contact, friction on the pair is at most μₖ(m₁ + m₂)g = 0.300 × 1.000 × 9.81 = 2.94 N, an impulse of 2.94 × 0.004 = 0.012 N s. That is about 1% of the 1.000 kg m s⁻¹ the pair carries, so momentum is conserved across the impact — and not across the skid, where friction removes all of it.
- Skid stage, work–energy with friction: ½m₂v₂² = μₖ m₂ g d, so v₂ = √(2μₖ g d) = √(2 × 0.300 × 9.81 × 0.435) = 1.600 m s⁻¹. The mass cancels.
- Impact stage, momentum: (0.400)(2.50) = 0.400v₁ + (0.600)(1.600), so 1.000 = 0.400v₁ + 0.960 and v₁ = +0.100 m s⁻¹, still forward and slower than the block ahead, as it must be.
- Restitution: e = (v₂ − v₁)/(u₁ − u₂) = (1.600 − 0.100)/(2.50 − 0) = 0.600.
- Energy audit: ½(0.400)(2.50)² = 1.250 J before; ½(0.400)(0.100)² + ½(0.600)(1.600)² = 0.002 + 0.768 = 0.770 J after; 0.480 J lost. Through the centre of mass: μ = 0.240 kg gives ½μ(1 − e²)uᵣₑₗ² = 0.120 × 0.640 × 6.25 = 0.480 J, while ½Mvcm² = 0.500 J was never available to lose.
Answer. v₁ = +0.100 m s⁻¹ (still forward); e = 0.600; 0.480 J lost, 38.4% of the incoming kinetic energy.
HardExample 3
On a level air table, puck 1 (0.300 kg) glides at 2.00 m s⁻¹ along +x and strikes puck 2 (0.200 kg) at rest. A photo shows puck 2 leaving at 1.80 m s⁻¹, 35.0° below the +x axis; puck 1 is out of frame. Find puck 1's velocity, decide whether the collision is elastic, find e along the line of centres, and say whether puck 2's direction alone would have fixed the collision.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- x-momentum: (0.300)(2.00) = 0.300v₁ₓ + (0.200)(1.80 cos 35.0°), so 0.600 = 0.300v₁ₓ + 0.2949 and v₁ₓ = 1.017 m s⁻¹.
- y-momentum: 0 = 0.300v₁ᵧ − (0.200)(1.80 sin 35.0°) = 0.300v₁ᵧ − 0.2065, so v₁ᵧ = +0.688 m s⁻¹. Puck 1 leaves at √(1.017² + 0.688²) = 1.228 m s⁻¹, at tan⁻¹(0.688/1.017) = 34.1° above the +x axis.
- Energy audit: ½(0.300)(2.00)² = 0.600 J before; ½(0.300)(1.228)² + ½(0.200)(1.80)² = 0.226 + 0.324 = 0.550 J after. 0.050 J, 8.3%, has gone: inelastic, and possible, because the kinetic energy did not grow.
- Smooth pucks push only along the line of centres, and puck 2 started at rest, so its 35.0° path is that line. Along it, puck 1 approaches at 2.00 cos 35.0° = 1.6383 m s⁻¹ and leaves at 1.0170 cos 35.0° − 0.6883 sin 35.0° = 0.4383 m s⁻¹, so e = (1.80 − 0.4383)/1.6383 = 0.831. Across it, puck 1's component is 1.147 m s⁻¹ before and after, as it must be.
- Direction alone leaves three unknowns for two momentum equations. Along the line of centres, v₂ = (1 + e)m₁u₁cos 35.0°/(m₁ + m₂) = (1 + e)(0.983 m s⁻¹), and every e from 0 to 1 respects both momentum and energy, so any v₂ from 0.983 to 1.97 m s⁻¹ fits. The photo's speed picks e = 0.831 out of that family.
Answer. Puck 1: 1.23 m s⁻¹ at 34.1° above +x. Inelastic, 0.050 J (8.3%) lost; e = 0.831. Direction alone is not enough: any v₂ from 0.983 to 1.97 m s⁻¹ fits, so a speed or a second angle is needed.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Solving an interaction problem in stages means applying momentum conservation only over intervals in which the chosen system receives negligible external impulse, and energy conservation only over intervals in which no energy leaves unaccounted.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.
Optional supporting lessons
These chapter resources can help with earlier ideas; they are not additional required Physics I completion tasks.